Hi Terry,
> > /dev/urandom can be quite slow for large amounts.
>
> OK. I'll try the second drive with zeros.
No, I'd stick to /dev/urandom if you don't want to do that cat(1) method
since it's slow, but probably not as slow as writing over USB 2.0 to
spinning rust. Who knows, perhaps the
On Sunday, 18 February 2018 11:16:04 GMT Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> dd(1) is quick. It read(2)s a block of bytes and write(2)s that block.
> The kernel does the transfer of bytes from the device to dd's memory and
> vica versa. If you don't choose a block size then it might be quite
> small,
>
>
Hi Terry,
> I think that it's more likely to be the interface. The drive is a
> Seagate ST31000523AS, which has a SATA speed of 6 GB/s, a Transfer
> Speed of 600 MB/s and a Sustained Data Rate of 125 MB/s.
I'd expect read to be different to write? And if they only give one
figure then it's the
Hi Terry,
> The above link also suggests that dd is the longest method.
dd(1) is quick. It read(2)s a block of bytes and write(2)s that block.
The kernel does the transfer of bytes from the device to dd's memory and
vica versa. If you don't choose a block size then it might be quite
small,
Try Again.
This seems to happen when people cc me as well as sending the response to the
list. My mail client helpfully suppresses the original and only sends me the
duplicate, which I then reply to
On Sunday, 18 February 2018 09:49:55 GMT PeterMerchant via dorset wrote:
> I have an idle
On Sunday, 18 February 2018 08:48:00 GMT Hamish MB wrote:
> You could well be being limited by your disks speed then. 100GB per hours is
> pretty fast for a HDD. Can you connect two at once to speed it up?
I think that it's more likely to be the interface. The drive is a Seagate
ST31000523AS,
On 18/02/18 08:48, Hamish MB wrote:
You could well be being limited by your disks speed then. 100GB per hours is
pretty fast for a HDD. Can you connect two at once to speed it up?
Hamish
On 18 Feb 2018, at 08:45, Terry Coles
> wrote:
On
You could well be being limited by your disks speed then. 100GB per hours is
pretty fast for a HDD. Can you connect two at once to speed it up?
Hamish
On 18 Feb 2018, at 08:45, Terry Coles
> wrote:
On Sunday, 18 February 2018 07:59:30 GMT
On Sunday, 18 February 2018 07:59:30 GMT Terry Coles wrote:
> It seems to be pretty quick having reached 22 GB done in around 40 minutes.
Of course, if I was any good at basic arithmetic, I would have known that this
is no quicker than shred. It just passed 100 GB after about an hour; 1000 GB
On Saturday, 17 February 2018 23:56:31 GMT Ralph Corderoy wrote:
> The NAS offered a `reformat'? How long did it take?
It's part of the build process. The NAS offers Raid 0, Raid 1, etc and as part
of the process
formats the drives. It seems to be a special format in D-Link boxes, because
On Saturday, 17 February 2018 19:22:05 GMT Hamish MB wrote:
> For modern drives a single pass with zeros is usually just fine. You can use
> dd if=/dev/zero of=/Dev/sdxy
> You could copy from /Dev/urandom for a quicker random number pass too.
Hamish,
I did find some information that told me
Hi Terry,
> I have reformatted the drives in-situ
The NAS offered a `reformat'? How long did it take?
> My PC is in the bedroom, so I'd rather not run it overnight.
Kill it off then start from scratch tomorrow morning, assuming ten hours
for a disk?
> I suspect that part of the problem is
For modern drives a single pass with zeros is usually just fine. You can use dd
if=/dev/zero of=/Dev/sdxy
You could copy from /Dev/urandom for a quicker random number pass too.
Hamish
On 17 Feb 2018, at 18:38, Keith Edmunds
> wrote:
On Sat, 17
On Saturday, 17 February 2018 18:36:34 GMT Keith Edmunds wrote:
> On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 18:31:53 +, d-...@hadrian-way.co.uk said:
> > I'd be happier if there was no chance of data recovery.
>
> Then destroy the drives.
I want to sell them with the NAS Box.
I do know about hammers :-)
--
On Sat, 17 Feb 2018 18:31:53 +, d-...@hadrian-way.co.uk said:
> I'd be happier if there was no chance of data recovery.
Then destroy the drives.
--
"Laughter is the best medicine, though it tends not to work in the case
of impotence" - Jo Brand
--
Next meeting: Bournemouth, Tuesday,
On Saturday, 17 February 2018 17:56:45 GMT Keith Edmunds wrote:
> Shred is slow. No one will trivially read the ex-data following a
> reformat. I suppose if the drive used to hold your plans for world
> domination, a few more hours of shred is a small price to pay. However,
> if the drive only
Shred is slow. No one will trivially read the ex-data following a
reformat. I suppose if the drive used to hold your plans for world
domination, a few more hours of shred is a small price to pay. However,
if the drive only held data of interest to you and you don't want the PC
running overnight,
Hi,
I am retiring my old D-Link Sharecenter NAS with a view to flogging it on eBay.
Clearly, I
want to ensure the data has been completely scrubbed off the two 1TB drives.
I have reformatted the drives in-situ, but felt that I should do more than
that, so I've
removed the drives and am
18 matches
Mail list logo