Re: [DOTNET] Last! (NOT)

2002-07-02 Thread Steve Holak
You guys are going to get kicked off this retired, nonfunctional list if you keep up posting non-messages to the !list Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mathieu Rachlin

Re: [DOTNET] .NET Zero Deployment

2002-06-24 Thread Steve Holak
security zone if you load from the Internet or an Intranet than one launched from the user's PC directly, so be sure to address any permissions issues that might arise. I'm not sure about the browser requirements, but I would guess that IE might be favored over the "downlevel" choices

Re: [DOTNET] WAY OT: Humorous Don Box story...

2002-06-12 Thread Steve Holak
Yeah, but Don usually initiates the stuff. Do you think that mere association with the man brought on all the bad karma? Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Ted <[EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [DOTNET] Problem with Service and File System Watcher

2002-06-12 Thread Steve Holak
earch the archives--I think it's around 16K, so be aware if you're not cleaning up. HTH Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Don Davis cc:

Re: [DOTNET] Casting to a Type from an Enum

2002-06-06 Thread Steve Holak
like varTypedObject=(Type.GetType(stringlabelingthetype)) varObject That was the sort of syntax I was looking for originally in the email. Thanks for taking a look, I appreciate your time (and everyone else's on the list). Sorry about the confusion, but it was at the end of a long day. Steve Holak Senio

Re: [DOTNET] Casting to a Type from an Enum

2002-06-06 Thread Steve Holak
king at it, though. Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Block, Jeffrey A." To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMA

[DOTNET] Casting to a Type from an Enum

2002-06-05 Thread Steve Holak
defined by the string. MyVar=(Type.GetType(whatsthetype)) foo; //do something else . . . } It obviously isn't right; What am I missing? I feel dumb for asking, but it's the end of the day and I'm not leaving until I figure out how to do this. TIA Steve Holak Senior Soft

Re: [DOTNET] Newsgroups (was Re: [DOTNET] Administrative Announcement - Please Read)

2002-06-05 Thread Steve Holak
I agree; I have a similar problem here with newgroups and the firewall, and I have no say in the administration end of things--I prefer the email list. Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Brad Wilson

Re: [DOTNET] Administrative Announcement - Reasoning

2002-06-04 Thread Steve Holak
h time now getting into his tub--there's hard evidence for this: how long has it been , in fact, since he's been wheeled onstage to give a lecture in a tub? Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [DOTNET] .Net Compact Framework Query

2002-06-03 Thread Steve Holak
Post the code fragment from the switch statement and we'll have a look, but I suspect also that you simply missed a break; Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Renu S

Re: [DOTNET] Administrative Announcement - Please Read

2002-06-03 Thread Steve Holak
stuff that doesn't really fit the "Web" category alone, but does sort of fall there if you pigeonhole it very tightly. I do believe that you might increase traffic by splitting the list, and decrease its value as you increase the associated noise by the dilution. I urge DM to reco

Re: [DOTNET] Administrative Announcement - Please Read

2002-06-03 Thread Steve Holak
I agree. I'd prefer NOT to partition, just for that very noise factor. On addition, often an inquiry spans several topic areas; posting and working through the parallel replies would just be too much--I only have so much time during the day. Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brok

Re: [DOTNET] Sending doc as an attachment through mail

2002-05-29 Thread Steve Holak
re the app has the appropriate permissions to get to the file. Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Renu Sharma cc: Sent by: dotnet

Re: [DOTNET] Catch 22... (Recordset to Dataset issue...)

2002-05-23 Thread Steve Holak
rshal.ReleaseComObject(cc); return ds; } Hope that helps Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] franklin gray cc: Sent by: dotne

Re: [DOTNET] Get hold of HTTP Application which created an object

2002-05-22 Thread Steve Holak
Much better solution. Thanks. Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fritz Onion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >

Re: [DOTNET] Get hold of HTTP Application which created an object

2002-05-22 Thread Steve Holak
, this seems cleaner. I'd be curious to see others' solutions. Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL

Re: [DOTNET] Object serialization to string representation

2002-05-22 Thread Steve Holak
I visited that site; seems well-organized. Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Christoph cc: Sent by: dotnet Subject: Re:

Re: [DOTNET] Object serialization to string representation

2002-05-21 Thread Steve Holak
IIRC, there is a requirement for a default parameterless public contructor on the serializable class, in order for the Soap Formatter to serialize it, but I may be incorrect. I haven't looked at Treenode; and have you tried :base()? (or the VB analog?) Steve Holak Senior Software Arch

Re: [DOTNET] Object serialization to string representation

2002-05-21 Thread Steve Holak
ementing some of the Serialization.Formatters definitions. More info in :ms-help://MS.VSCC/MS.MSDNVS/cpref/html/frlrfSystemRuntimeSerializationFormattersSoapSoapFormatterClassTopic.htm in the Framework documentation Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 emai

Re: [DOTNET] Object serialization to string representation

2002-05-21 Thread Steve Holak
nvolved? I originally started down that way. thanks Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Jeff Key <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [DOTNET] Object serialization to string representation

2002-05-21 Thread Steve Holak
lized=GetObjectFromDatabaseFunction(some identifier); return (MyObjectType) Serialization.SoapDeserialize(serialized); } Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Brent

[DOTNET] Object serialization to string representation

2002-05-20 Thread Steve Holak
m); sr.BaseStream.Seek(0, SeekOrigin.Begin); //test always shows "" string test=sr.ReadToEnd(); stream.Close(); TIA Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can

Re: [DOTNET] Deployment of a windows service

2002-05-09 Thread Steve Holak
r service, now's the time to grab onto the process containing your service, and step through the code looking for problems. This article covers each of these steps in some detail." Here's the link to the full article: http://msdn.microsoft.com/msdnmag/issues/01/12/NETServ/NETServ

Re: [DOTNET] Postback

2002-05-03 Thread Steve Holak
Check the ViewState property . . . Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] "Joseph J. Sarna Jr." To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EM

Re: [DOTNET] DropDownList binding

2002-05-03 Thread Steve Holak
="pub_name"; DropDownList1.DataBind(); Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Kirk Jackson cc: Sent by: dotnetSubj

Re: [DOTNET] why IE 5.01

2002-04-29 Thread Steve Holak
development process for our people by only targeting one platform. Your business, business mode,l and client base will drive the rules, not the technology choices. Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Reggie

Re: [DOTNET] ADO interop

2002-04-26 Thread Steve Holak
Thanks. I created an installer msi pack and it worked just fine. --thanks for your time. Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Adam Nathan cc

[DOTNET] ADO interop

2002-04-25 Thread Steve Holak
s have an assembly folder. Any ideas, or am I missing something basic? Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.

Re: [DOTNET] Checking Existance and Creating SqlServer Objects

2002-04-25 Thread Steve Holak
Reminds me of an old T-Shirt from Calc class with the text of a solved problem coming down to "1=0", and the moral of the story was, "Don't Drink and Derive." Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [DOTNET] Storing ADO.NET Connection String Parameters

2002-04-23 Thread Steve Holak
The config file is the natural place. Search the docs for AppSettings. Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Daniel Morgan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]To: [EMAIL PROTEC

Re: [DOTNET] How do you bind a DataGrid HyperLinkColumn to more than one field ?

2002-04-23 Thread Steve Holak
. Excuse the analogy. Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Linda Wienholt cc: Sent by: dotnetSubject: Re: [DOTNET] How do

Re: [DOTNET] WinForms UI editing.... actually VS editing questions... BUGS?

2002-04-19 Thread Steve Holak
Also, in an ASP.NET project after running in debug, the properties windox on the page designer won't open; you have to close the IDE and re-open the project. It's annoying. Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL

Re: [DOTNET] Serviced Components and New()

2002-04-18 Thread Steve Holak
IIRC, the Init functions evolved from VB classes not supporting parameterized constructors. Of course, if you're not talking .NET, then VB6 will not allow parameterized constructors. Which . . . reading through the thread, you probably are, so ignore everything . . . Steve Holak Senio

Re: [DOTNET] Why upgrade to .NET

2002-04-16 Thread Steve Holak
The current issue of .NET Magazine is focused on migration issues and decisions, you could mine or forward a good deal of the information for your explanation. Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [DOTNET] Windows .NET Framework, Japanese version

2002-04-15 Thread Steve Holak
Yeah, I've been picking up new languages lately too--it seems like just yesterday I was learning C# , and VB.NET, and . . . Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fumiaki Yoshi

Re: [DOTNET] Weird debug occurrence... Managed debug fails after unmanaged debug???

2002-04-12 Thread Steve Holak
Hey, not too strange; there was one guy on this list that smoked his hardware with some C# code that spawned too many threads, or so the legend goes . . . Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Andrew

Re: [DOTNET] Disable generation of code behind in IDE

2002-04-12 Thread Steve Holak
Touche' Good one. I think we're about to be kicked to Advocacy, though . . . Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Chris Anderson cc:

Re: [DOTNET] Disable generation of code behind in IDE

2002-04-12 Thread Steve Holak
lear separation of responsibiliy in software is still a higher-level power to answer to. Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Richard Birkby cc:

Re: [DOTNET] Sharing ASP intrinsic objects across ASP and ASP.Net

2002-04-12 Thread Steve Holak
ASP.NET app use the instance, if the proper libraries were referenced for COM inteop? Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Srinivasa Sivakumar To: [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [DOTNET] Tying in XSL generated controls tie to .NET framework

2002-04-12 Thread Steve Holak
s, and their funtionality and events, but you'd have some work ahead, and I've never gone down the road of using Reflection for web pages in ASP.NET. Just a suggestion to get the creative juices flowing. Maybe a few on the list with time on their hands could generate a few ideas or de

Re: [DOTNET] Com to DotNet

2002-04-12 Thread Steve Holak
Either way, you have simple and quick solution. Generating a CCW (COM callable wrapper) from .NET would be the recommended technically correct solution however, and we've begun migrating all our original iplementaions, which were rolled out for the Beta releases of .NET. Steve Holak

Re: [DOTNET] ObjectSpaces

2002-04-11 Thread Steve Holak
The msi generates a message "The PDC version of the .NET Framework is required to install ObjectSpaces" and it aborts. Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL

Re: [DOTNET] Ask a Language Designer

2002-04-11 Thread Steve Holak
Eric, Actually, I was wondering about the "with" feature; it seems similar *in spirit * to the "foreach" (although the interface implemented would not be anywhere similar). Can you answer that? It seems like it would be a very common question. Steve Holak Senio

Re: [DOTNET] ObjectSpaces

2002-04-11 Thread Steve Holak
Newsgroup: microsoft.public.objectspaces Steve Holak Senior Software Architect Brokerage Concepts IS Dept. 610-491-4879 email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Peter Foreman cc: Sent by: dotnet Subject: [DOTNET