I agree. I'd prefer NOT to partition, just for that very noise factor. On
addition, often an inquiry spans several topic areas; posting and working
through the parallel replies would just be too much--I only have so much
time during the day.
Steve Holak
Senior Software Architect
Brokerage Concepts IS Dept.
610-491-4879
email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Peter Foreman
<peter_foreman@YAH To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
OO.COM> cc:
Sent by: The Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Administrative
Announcement - Please Read
DOTNET list will
be retired 7/1/02
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]
VELOP.COM>
06/01/2002 10:59
AM
Please respond to
The DOTNET list
will be retired
7/1/02
--- Bill Schmidt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thomas,
>
> Your suggestion about DOTNET-DATA seems like a good one, and I would
> support it. However, this shows the folly of partitioning the list, at
all.
Too right. There I was trying to tell the difference between DOTNET and
ADVANCED-DOTNET, then
this comes along.
This list has typically attracted the type of person that is interested in
all of .Net, even if
just out of interest. That's the way I'd prefer it to stay, since it has
the side effect of
filtering most basic questions, due to the technical level of participants.
> actually do). Most likely, you will be tempted to post your question to
> more than one list. The net effect will be confusion and/or increased
> total list traffic.
This is what typically happens. Very annoying. :-(
Peter
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Yahoo! - Official partner of 2002 FIFA World Cup
http://fifaworldcup.yahoo.com
You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubscribe from DOTNET, or
subscribe to other DevelopMentor lists at http://discuss.develop.com.
