Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (---

--- Ted Neward <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Be careful with that DF comment--Chris is already diving into Rotor to > figure out how to do it :-) Of course now it's been publically announced he'll not be able to give up without losing face. Peter __

Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (---

ward http://www.clrgeeks.com/tneward - Original Message - From: "Peter Foreman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 2:50 PM Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (--- > --- Kunle Odutola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > B

[DOTNET] DARN: Fw: Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (---

> To: "dotnet discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 9:50 PM Subject: Re: Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (--- > You have an interesting communication style. I recognized your > characterization of the way Tim makes observations about articles. If you > can&

Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (---

e Obasanjo" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 7:38 PM Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (--- > > -Original Message- > > From: Jim McWilliams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 9:55 AM >

Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (---

> -Original Message- > From: Jim McWilliams [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Monday, May 13, 2002 9:55 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (--- > > > Sam, you're worried about the uninformed rant of a > pseudo-techno co

Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (---

sulting [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -Original Message- > From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of > Brad Wilson > Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 6:48 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (--- > > > Mark A. Gregory wrote: >

Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (---

--- Kunle Odutola <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Both Dare and yourself are smart guys. His rant certainly does not > constitute an attack on yourself. He expresse a disatisfaction the the tone > of your rant in his rant -- nothing more. He did put him in the category of "elitist programmers with w

Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (---

> Well, now I am apparently the subject of an attack > about my rant > Its > .html> The Runtime Stupid , which is mean spirited, calls me "an > elitist programmer wi

Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (---

Earth To Sam! Hello? You're concerned about criticism from someone who refused this offer: "You're going to come back home with us and have some fun."? Geesh, I had a similar experience once and it's one of my fonder memories! :-) Zane You can read messages from the DOTNET archive, unsubsc

Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (---

05852/ http://www.project-inspiration.com/sgentile/ScienceFiction.htm -Original Message- From: dotnet discussion [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Steve Johnson Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 8:19 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (--- > Well, now I am ap

Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (---

> Well, now I am apparently the subject of an attack... Are you so insecure with yourself that for anyone to disagree with you or dislike you sends you into a fit? Seems like you do a good job to me and that plenty of people here think so. The text in the link was the opinion of someone who dis

Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (---

Sam Gentile wrote: > Well, now I am apparently the subject of an attack about my rant [...] Well, my gut feeling is to ignore these kinds of things. It was a personal attack combined with ego gratification ("here's how _I_ would've handled it"). From an objective standpoint, he sure looks like a

Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (---

Mark A. Gregory wrote: > The link you give to the attack is "not found", > maybe it has been pulled? http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/5/12/03311/9485 (Haven't read it yet, just figured out the right link) Brad -- Read my web log at http://www.quality.nu/dotnetguy/ You can read messages fro

Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (---

The link you give to the attack is "not found", maybe it has been pulled? Mark -Original Message- From: Sam Gentile [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Sunday, 12 May 2002 3:52 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [DOTNET] Attacked again (--- Well, now I am apparently the sub

Re: [DOTNET] Attacked again (---

Sam, with all do respect, you should toughen up. you are doing a damn good job, everybody knows that, let it go and focus on what you're best at. cheers, Allan >Well, now I am apparently the subject of an attack > about my rant >Its >

[DOTNET] [OT] RE: [DOTNET] Attacked again (---

2002 12:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [DOTNET] Attacked again (--- Well, now I am apparently the subject of an attack <http://www.kuro5hin.org/story/2002/5/12/03311/9485%22> about my rant Its <http://radio.weblogs.com/0105852/stories/2002/04/21/itsTheRuntimeStupid elitist programme

[DOTNET] Attacked again (---

Well, now I am apparently the subject of an attack about my rant Its The Runtime Stupid , which is mean spirited, calls me "an elitist programmer with a web log