Hi,
You can interop to CAPICOM. It supports RC4 as one of the
encryption algorithms (see CAPICOM_ENCRYPTION_ALGORITHM_RC4).
-Valery.
-Original Message-
From: Wareham, Matt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, May 02, 2002 9:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [DOTNET] C#
Hi,
To use it from IE (and other URLMoniker consumers) you have to
implement your own Pluggable Protocol Handler. You can find a couple of
C++ (VC6) samples how to implement your PPH on my webpage
http://home.online.no/~valery. Tim Tabor also has PPH sample on his
website, which you can ch
orking/pluggable/overview/appendi
x_a.asp
Titled: Registering an Application to a URL Protocol
In most cases this is enough :-)
Regards
Thomas Tomiczek
THONA Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-----
From: Valery Pryamikov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Freitag, 10.
A Consulting Ltd.
(Microsoft MVP C#/.NET)
-Original Message-----
From: Valery Pryamikov [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Freitag, 10. Mai 2002 09:55
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] custom URL protocol handler
Thomas,
IE clickable and pluggable protocol handlers are rather different
Hi Simon,
Primary difference here is stack allocated vs heap allocated storage
location for managed pointer.
Stack allocated storage location of managed pointer has known lifetime
which is bound to the stack frame. When managed pointer stored in stack
allocated storage location it should be consid
Hi,
Searching list archives [1] for:
VB and C and language and ( difference or better )
Gives a list of 506 articles with most of them related to subj. Tons of
pro and cons for each particular language could be found there. And now
the question:
Is there someone who would take a challenge to go
Hi,
I just had a really quick look at the search results (ie. I used only
about 5 minutest to quickly browse through results - first check subject
line and then open the letter) and the first 50 matches page shown
several letters with subj. "Re: Getting ready for .NET -- best language
to use today
Hi,
Here you can find a list of problems that were corrected in IE 5.01:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q244655
and here is the description of SP 1:
http://support.microsoft.com/default.aspx?scid=kb;en-us;Q261268
As you can see from these kb articles, there were a lot
Henk,
Here are some problems:
1. Execution of the code in the same thread doesn't necessary means the
execution on the same processor.
2. Dotnet memory model guarantees that reads and writes from the same
processor to the *same memory location* would never cross each other,
but no guarantees about
lease.
fNeedInit = false;
}
Note: second if checks internal fNeedInitInt variable and fNeedInit is
updated outside of lock region.
(of course we consider that bNeedInit/fNeedInit/fNeedInitInt are not
volatile).
-Valery.
-Original Message-
From: Valery Pryamikov
Sent: Monday, Apr
ed. That's the rule I was
referring to.
So, what can we learn from this: never post code from the top of your
head
and then respond to emails without rereading what you posted ;-);-).
-- Henkk
- Original Message -
From: "Valery Pryamikov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: &
;-)
- Original Message -
From: "Valery Pryamikov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:29 PM
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] lock - how expensive is it to call?
> Your latest code should work, of course, but using second lock would
be
> quite an e
ssage -
From: "Valery Pryamikov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, April 29, 2002 2:34 PM
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] lock - how expensive is it to call?
> You right here:-).
>
> -Original Message-
> From: Henk de Koning [mailto:[EMAIL PROTE
gle2() {}
public MySingle2 Instance{ get{return theInstance;} }
}
On Mon, 29 Apr 2002 14:29:46 +0200, Valery Pryamikov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Your latest code should work, of course, but using second lock would be
>quite an expensive addition... And you only need a me
11:35:42 +0200, Valery Pryamikov
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes, it's safe to initialize singleton from the static constructor,
>which is properly protected by framework. Check list archives for more
>details and/or 9.5.3 of PartitionIIMetadata.doc.
>
>In short: static c
Btw: about memory consumption.
AFAIK current implementation adds 8 bytes for each object - RTTI/vptr
(or whatever you want to call it) and SyncBlockIndex. It's guaranteed
that RTTI/vptr will be always naturally aligned, to avoid split access.
It is also obvious that whenever GC allocates an object
that for each allocated object, sooner or later GC
should put a reference/handler to this object in one or another internal
list...
-Valery.
-Original Message-----
From: Valery Pryamikov
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 12:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] lock - how expensive
r Memory Mapped
Files in the current version of DOTNET.
-Valery.
-Original Message-
From: Peter Laan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 1:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] lock - how expensive is it to call?
inline
From: "Valery Pryamiko
How about using Image.FromHBitmap method?
If I recall it correctly IPicture has Handle property (get_Handle).
-Valery.
-Original Message-
From: Alex Yakhnin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, April 30, 2002 1:09 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [DOTNET] How-to convert StdPic
19 matches
Mail list logo