Hi all,
Using dovecot-1.2.6, I use dovecot with an LDAP backend for user
authentication. In general this works ok, but I have some issues
with this...
In LDAP, I have users like this:
dn:cn=user1,ou=users,dc=kapott,dc=org
dn:cn=user2,ou=users,dc=kapott,dc=org
etc.
When authenticating
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Markus Beyer wrote:
I was wondering if it is possible to put a dovecot managed maildir under
a vcs like system, for example git or bzr. I'd like to have a seamless
history of all mail going in and out of my mailboxes, so a vcs
Stefan Palme schrieb:
Hi all,
Using dovecot-1.2.6, I use dovecot with an LDAP backend for user
authentication. In general this works ok, but I have some issues
with this...
In LDAP, I have users like this:
dn:cn=user1,ou=users,dc=kapott,dc=org
dn:cn=user2,ou=users,dc=kapott,dc=org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Joachim Boltz wrote:
This is a important for me because sometimes users are lazy. They think
oh, still 10% left, no reason to delete mail while in the meantime
large messages are already bounced, while some small ones arrive in
On 02/18/2010 09:45 AM, Oliver Eales wrote:
Isn't it possible to just give the each allowed IMAP Users a attribute
like imap=1 ?
Yes, it would. But this would also require me to use PASSWORD LOOKUP
(e.g. with a filter like '((objectclass=person)(imap=1))'), but I
do not want to use password
Em 18/2/2010 06:19, Stefan Palme escreveu:
In LDAP, I have users like this:
dn:cn=user1,ou=users,dc=kapott,dc=org
dn:cn=user2,ou=users,dc=kapott,dc=org
etc.
(...)
My problem: not ALL users from the LDAP system should be allowed to
use the IMAP server. Currently, I have defined an
Hi,
I have, in one customer, a web server running on a Verisign-signed
certificate SSL certificate. Everything works fine, IE and Firefox
connects on https without asking anything, which usually happens on
self-signed certificates. I'm trying to use that certificate on dovecot,
but
Torsdag 18 februar 2010 14:47:03 skrev Leonardo Rodrigues :
Hi,
I have, in one customer, a web server running on a Verisign-signed
certificate SSL certificate. Everything works fine, IE and Firefox
connects on https without asking anything, which usually happens on
self-signed
and another interesting information . Thunderbird claims the
certificate is not valid, but Windows Mail accepts it without any
warnings and works just fine. I've tested on a new machine just to make
sure i havent previously accepted it on that machine/Windows Mail.
another minor
On 2010-02-18 3:51 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
On Sun, 14 Feb 2010, Joachim Boltz wrote:
This is a important for me because sometimes users are lazy. They think
oh, still 10% left, no reason to delete mail while in the meantime
large messages are already bounced, while some small ones arrive
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Arne K. Haaje wrote:
I'm using the same certificate for dovecot and https. My settings in
dovecot.conf are;
ssl_cert_file = /etc/ssl/certs/hostname.pem
ssl_key_file = /etc/ssl/private/hostname.key
This part from the user
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:05 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
Personally I think the best way would be, if the user isn't over quota
at the time of a message delivery, deliver that message, *regardless* of
whether or not it puts the user over quota.
Wonder if there's anyone who wouldn't want this
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 15:26 +0100, Andre Hübner wrote:
my user_query:
user_query = SELECT home, uid, gid, concat('*:storage=', quota_bytes,'M')
AS quota_rule FROM mail_users WHERE login = '%u'
Do you really want quota_bytes number of megabytes? If not, change
the ,'M' part to ,'B'.
On 18 February 2010 16:20, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
Wonder if there's anyone who wouldn't want this behavior? One exception
could be that if mail is larger than the user's entire quota limit, it
wouldn't be accepted. And this would happen only for deliver/lmtp, not
imap append
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:19 +0100, Stefan Palme wrote:
base=ou=groups,dc=kapott.org
filter=((cn=dovecot)(member=cn=%u,ou=users,dc=kapott,dc=org))
result_attribute=member
After finding a DN this way (via attribute member), I want to use
auth_bind to use this DN for password
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 16:29 +0200, Warren Baker wrote:
I am not sure how much work it would involve but I would prefer to
have a config option to either disable or enable the behaviour.
It's not about how much work adding that setting is. It's that I don't
think there should be settings for
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:05 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
Personally I think the best way would be, if the user isn't over quota
at the time of a message delivery, deliver that message, *regardless* of
whether or not it puts the user over quota.
Wonder if there's anyone who wouldn't want
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 08:46 -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
namespace private {
separator = /
prefix = mail/
Things would probably be simpler if you used prefix= here.
location = mbox:~/mail:INBOX=/var/mail/%u
So you've mboxes..
namespace private {
separator = /
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Sven Eulberg wrote:
Over quota is over quota...
Perhaps it's better to drop a line in the user's inbox e.g. 'mail from
m...@address.com rejected because there was not enough space in your inbox...'
or something else.
So both
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 17:55 +0100, Werner wrote:
2010-02-17 17:52:21 deliver(wer...@example.com): Error: Corrupted transaction
log file /mailhome/wernertest/dovecot.index.log seq 24: Invalid
transaction log size (67988 vs 68080): /mailhome/wernertest/dovecot.index.log
(sync_offset=67988)
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 15:57 +0100, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
But I'd like the deliver a message if user is under quota and the message
is smaller than quota.
The current behavior? Is that what you really meant?
Or an option deliver may exceed the quota by X, sort of like the
quota_rules for
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 11:31 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
The last three entries exist in the Courier IMAP file, but NOT the Courier
POP file. The resulting dovecot-uidlist format is different, but to be
honest, I haven't been able to find the exact specification for the format
of the
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 15:18 -0200, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
but i havent found, in all the sources, where the
QUOTA_EXCEEDED_MESSAGE is feeded by something from dovecot.conf or
anywhere else.
plugin {
quota_exceeded_message = stuff
}
I guess I should put that somewhere..
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 07:41 -0500, Jonathan Siegle wrote:
Running revision 9492:3efdbaab2960(Mon Nov 23) on AIX 5.3. I run dovecot out
of inetd. Every once in a while I get the following error:
Dovecot is already running with PID 2592842 (read from
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 08:16 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
With 1.0.15 my configuration I a single dovecot-auth process, which is what I
want now. Since upgrading to 1.2.10 I have two such processes:
root 16992 16990 0 Feb15 ?00:00:00 dovecot-auth
root 16997 16990 0 Feb15 ?
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 13:34 +0100, Lazy wrote:
lda is executed as
exec /var/qmail/bin/preline -f /usr/local/dovecot/libexec/dovecot/deliver -s
..
+ /* if DTLINE (qmail Delivered-To: header) is not null use it
as a destination address */
+ if (destaddr == NULL) {
+
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 14:00 +0300, Неворотин Вадим wrote:
allow_nets check failed: Remote IP not known
Problem is clear: smtpd don't send client IP to dovecot authentication
socket.
Yep. The only way you can get Postfix to send IP to Dovecot is by
patching Postfix sources.
But I need to
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 10:46 +0500, CoolAtt NNA wrote:
from the wiki of Lazy Expunge:
The plugin is configured by defining namespaces where the mails are
moved. You can decide if you want the namespaces to be visible to
clients, or if you want to show them only via some special webmail
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 15:15 -0800, Brandon Davidson wrote:
rip=67.223.67.45, pid=12881: Timeout while waiting for lock for
transaction log file /home6/pellerin/.imapidx/.INBOX/dovecot.index.log
That's fcntl lock I guess. You could always try lock_method=dotlock..
signature.asc
Description:
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 13:04 -0200, maximatt wrote:
in dovecot.conf, i set the user mail:
mail_uid= 72940
mail_gid= 72941
but when i try to start dovecot i have the following error:
# sbin/dovecot
Error: Error in configuration file /etc/dovecot/etc/dovecot.conf line
Well, I've asked this question in Postfix mail list and after discussion as
I understand Postfix 2.7 send all necessary client information to Dovecot
socket. But I haven't try this solution yet.
2010/2/18 Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 14:00 +0300, Неворотин Вадим wrote:
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 17:05 +0100, Frank Bonnet wrote:
deliver(): Error: file_dotlock_create(/var/mail/)
failed: Permission denied (euid=3003() egid=3010(smig) missing
+w perm: /var/mail) (set mail_privileged_group=mail)
Doea this means I have to chmod 777 the
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 15:57 +0100, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
But I'd like the deliver a message if user is under quota and the message
is smaller than quota.
The current behavior? Is that what you really
Oh. I actually checked v2.7 code before replying, but I was stupidly
searching only for a full rip word, while the code had \trip :)
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 18:41 +0300, Неворотин Вадим wrote:
Well, I've asked this question in Postfix mail list and after discussion as
I understand Postfix 2.7
Hi,
I'm a long term dovecot user, packager and believer, but on the other
side of the wire I've been a mutt user for longer than I can think.
Which modern email client under Linux is working best with dovecot? I
just did a grep on User-Agent:/X-Mailer: on my dovecot archive (which
goes back to
On 2010-02-18 9:57 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
But I'd like the deliver a message if user is under quota and the
message is smaller than quota.
Or an option deliver may exceed the quota by X, sort of like the
quota_rules for Trash, but for the service. Possible not all scenarios
can tweak a
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 17:45 +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
Which modern email client under Linux is working best with dovecot? I
just did a grep on User-Agent:/X-Mailer: on my dovecot archive (which
goes back to 2004) and found that the top ten are:
28% Thunderbird
25% Evolution
9% Apple Mail
On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 12:31 +0100, Rampage wrote:
i applied the modifications to the dovecot.conf file as you suggested
but now i'm experiencing duplicated folders.
namespace private {
separator = /
prefix = INBOX/
inbox = yes
hidden = yes
list=no here.
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Thu, 18 Feb 2010, Charles Marcus wrote:
But in the modern age, just delivering mail until the quota is exceeded
then rejecting seems to be the simplest thing to do, and imo should be
the default...
You change the quota from a (hard) limit to a
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 21:25:46 -0600
Von: Eric Rostetter rostet...@mail.utexas.edu
An: dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] GlusterFs - Any new progress reports?
Quoting Ed W li...@wildgooses.com:
Anyone had success using some other
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 14:54 +0100, Laurent Moineau wrote:
I've read carefully the wiki page Upgrading Dovecot v1.1 to v1.2 and a
few messages concerning mail_location parameter but I still don't know
what to change in my configuration in order to keep it working after the
upgrade.
Nothing?
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 12:34 +0500, CoolAtt NNA wrote:
Hi,
I tried the plugin but it is not working.
Why not?
I added the following in dovecot.conf then restarted dovecot.
Please guide me to the correct configuration.
##
namespace private {
...
dovecot -n
On Wed, 2010-02-10 at 14:19 -0200, Alex Baule wrote:
example, I have the header:
X-ThereisMy: yes
How can I get this value inside a plugin ?
There is something like getHeaderVar(X-ThereisMy) ?
If you haven't found out yet, one of these should help:
/* Get value for single header field,
Em 18/02/2010 13:10, Timo Sirainen escreveu:
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 15:18 -0200, Leonardo Rodrigues wrote:
but i havent found, in all the sources, where the
QUOTA_EXCEEDED_MESSAGE is feeded by something from dovecot.conf or
anywhere else.
plugin {
quota_exceeded_message =
On Mon, 2010-02-08 at 13:08 +0100, Matthijs Kooijman wrote:
This makes somewhat sense, since my virtual namespace is a subdir of my
default namespace:
mail_location = Maildir:~/Mail:LAYOUT=fs
..
namespace private {
location = virtual:~/Mail/virtual:LAYOUT=fs
}
Now, should
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Wed, 2010-02-17 at 11:31 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
The last three entries exist in the Courier IMAP file, but NOT the Courier
POP file. The resulting dovecot-uidlist format is different, but to be
honest, I haven't been able to find the exact specification for
On Sun, 2010-02-07 at 15:10 +0100, Josephus wrote:
Hi,
I'm having trouble implementing the virtual pop3 inbox solution in
Dovecot 1.2.x. As the following wiki page describes
(http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Virtual) one should only set the
inbox=yes flag for the virtual namespace
Yes.
Is there a correct way to tell the client we don't want, and don't
support Keywords via a configuration option? If there's no
configuration option, would I override allow_new_keywords to just
return FALSE?
Thanks,
Tony
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Steve stev...@gmx.net wrote:
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Wed, 17 Feb 2010 20:15:30 +0100
Von: alex handle alex.han...@gmail.com
An: Dovecot Mailing List dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] GlusterFs - Any new progress reports?
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:26 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
Well, with v1.1+ it's possible to preserve both POP3 and IMAP UIDs (each
line is IMAP uid PPOP3 UIDL :filename). I guess the script doesn't
merge IMAP and POP3 messages well enough. Feel free to fix the script ;)
Yes, unless you're
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:33 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
Is there a correct way to tell the client we don't want, and don't
support Keywords via a configuration option?
Why?
If there's no
configuration option, would I override allow_new_keywords to just
return FALSE?
Yes.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Things would probably be simpler if you used prefix= here.
The reason I used a prefix is for the way things show up in
Thunderbird and Outlook. Without the prefix, it all falls under the
same tree as their INBOX. By adding the prefix, they get an extra
level called
Quoting Timo Sirainen, who wrote on Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 05:26:54PM +0200 ..
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 19:13 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
- On my new system I have dovecot v 1.2.8 which refuses to handle these
dot-seperated files. I get the somewhat familiar
Mailbox doesn't allow
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:26 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
Well, with v1.1+ it's possible to preserve both POP3 and IMAP UIDs (each
line is IMAP uid PPOP3 UIDL :filename). I guess the script doesn't
merge IMAP and POP3 messages well enough. Feel free to fix the script ;)
Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:33 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
Is there a correct way to tell the client we don't want, and don't
support Keywords via a configuration option?
Why?
Nothing to do with Dovecot...but we have other ancillary systems in play
that don't
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:52 -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Things would probably be simpler if you used prefix= here.
The reason I used a prefix is for the way things show up in
Thunderbird and Outlook. Without the prefix, it all falls under the
same tree as
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:26 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
Here's a question though. If the dovecot-uidlist file is deleted (for
whatever reason), it gets rebuilt by Dovecot. But, how does it get
rebuilt? It does not appear to generate uids based on the date of
messages...I believe
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:36:36 -0800
Von: Brandon Lamb brandonl...@gmail.com
An: Dovecot Mailing List dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] GlusterFs - Any new progress reports?
On Wed, Feb 17, 2010 at 11:55 AM, Steve stev...@gmx.net wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 12:02 -0500, Tony Rutherford wrote:
If there's no
configuration option, would I override allow_new_keywords to just
return FALSE?
Yes.
Thanks.
It's mainly about telling clients that they aren't supported. I'm not
sure if the current code actually
Timo Sirainen wrote:
location = mbox:~/Mail-Archives
(the :LAYOUT=fs is unnecessary, because it's the default with mboxes
anyway.)
Made the above change as you suggested. That turned my namespaces into:
namespace private {
separator = /
prefix = mail/
location =
Attached updated patch that actualy uses bind_dn, as pointed out by
Edgar Fuß.
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 16:38 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:19 +0100, Stefan Palme wrote:
base=ou=groups,dc=kapott.org
filter=((cn=dovecot)(member=cn=%u,ou=users,dc=kapott,dc=org))
On Sat, 2010-01-30 at 23:06 +0100, spamv...@googlemail.com wrote:
userdb:
driver: passwd
userdb:
driver: ldap
args: /etc/dovecot-ldap.conf
Note the extra userdb passwd. I'd guess you don't want that.
Does the sieve plugin use the home_dir returned from the ldap ?
Yes, but
Quoting Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
- Add redundancy to the storage using DRDB (I believe a successful
strategy with Dovecot is pairs of servers, replicated to each other -
run each at 50% capacity and if one dies the other picks up the slack)
DRDB is alright for a couple of
If anybody is interested, which they are probably not,
here is an improved and more rigorous version of mkcert.sh
#! /bin/sh
#*#
#|
#| file : /root/apps/share/sh/create_dovecot_certificate
#|
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Well, clients can become confused a bit too easily. Try talking IMAP
protocol directly: http://wiki.dovecot.org/TestInstallation
After logging in, the important commands to try would be:
a LIST *
b LSUB *
c SELECT mail-Archive/something-that-actually-exists
d SUBSCRIBE
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:06 -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
Thunderbird will see exactly what I have subscribed to, stuff in
mail/ and stuff in mail-Archives/.
Outlook will *not* see mail/, at all. And it *will* see
*everything* that's in mail-Archives/, whether I'm subscribed to
Hi,
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:36 -0200, Marcio Merlone wrote:
I use LDAP on PAM, and dovecot uses PAM as auth method, ...
Thanks for the tip. This way (dovecot - PAM - LDAP (with a
dedicated ldap-configuration for the dovecot PAM service))
works for me.
Regards
-stefan-
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 16:38 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
How about if it worked like:
pass_attrs = member=bind_dn, ...
pass_filter = ..
Have already solved it via PAM. But will nevertheless try this solution
too. But this has to wait until weekend :-)
Thanks for support!
-stefan-
Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Deleting and recreating the Outlook account might be the easiest fix
Ok, that solved the seeing everything problem. But Outlook still
won't see the user's 'mail/' folder with mailboxes in it. Could that
be because I don't have a
Spoke too fast. I can't move mailboxes across namespaces. Is that
a limitation? For example, if I have a mailbox in 'mail/' that I want
to move into 'mail-Archives/' I get an error saying:
The current command did not succeed. The mail server responded:
Can't rename mailbox to
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 11:40 -0700, Ashley M. Kirchner wrote:
Spoke too fast. I can't move mailboxes across namespaces. Is that
a limitation? For example, if I have a mailbox in 'mail/' that I want
to move into 'mail-Archives/' I get an error saying:
The current command did not
Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/18/2010 9:17 AM:
On Tue, 2010-02-16 at 08:16 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
With 1.0.15 my configuration I a single dovecot-auth process, which is what I
want now. Since upgrading to 1.2.10 I have two such processes:
root 16992 16990 0 Feb15 ?00:00:00
On 18 February 2010 16:41, Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi wrote:
It's not about how much work adding that setting is. It's that I don't
think there should be settings for stuff that (almost) everyone sets
only one way. Useless extra settings cause bugs and bloat, both to code
and documentation.
Timo Sirainen wrote:
Yeah, Dovecot v1.2 doesn't like this. v2.0 allows it though.
In that case, Timo you have solved all of my configuration problems
today. With Dovecot 2.0 still in beta, I'll just sit back and wait.
Thank you very much for all your help today!
My next task?
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 12:47 -0600, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Are you using passwd/pam combination? The second process is auth
worker, which does blocking passdb/userdb lookups. The v1.0 behavior
was causing bugs.
Yep:
auth default:
worker_max_count: 1
process_size: 16
passdb:
On 2010-02-18 11:09 AM, Steffen Kaiser wrote:
Actually, I once had a system where the request was we do not send over
quota notices, all mails have to arrive. Hence, deliver should have no
quota - well, a very high quota actually -, but a quite strick IMAP quota.
So simply leaving everything
Quoting Wilko Bulte, who wrote on Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 05:53:10PM +0100 ..
Quoting Timo Sirainen, who wrote on Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 05:26:54PM +0200 ..
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 19:13 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
- On my new system I have dovecot v 1.2.8 which refuses to handle
these
Quoting Wilko Bulte, who wrote on Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 08:14:55PM +0100 ..
Quoting Wilko Bulte, who wrote on Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 05:53:10PM +0100 ..
Quoting Timo Sirainen, who wrote on Thu, Feb 18, 2010 at 05:26:54PM +0200 ..
On Mon, 2010-02-15 at 19:13 +0100, Wilko Bulte wrote:
- On
Quoting Steve stev...@gmx.net:
My interest is more in bootstrapping a more highly available system
from lower quality (commodity) components than very high end use
GFS+DRBD should fit the bill... You need several nics and cables,
but they are dirt cheap... Just 2 machines with the same
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:51:33 -0600
Von: Eric Rostetter rostet...@mail.utexas.edu
An: dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] GlusterFs - Any new progress reports?
Quoting Steve stev...@gmx.net:
My interest is more in bootstrapping a more
Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/18/2010 12:54 PM:
Hmm. You could try setting auth_worker_max_request_count=1 to see if
that gets rid of the processes after they've handled the request.
Restarting IMAP/POP3 mail server: dovecotError: Error in configuration file
/etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf line 1:
Quoting Steve stev...@gmx.net:
I have already installed GFS on a cluster in the past, but never on DRBD.
Me too (I did in on a real physical SAN before).
Hmm... when I started with GlusterFS I thought that using more then
two nodes is something that I will never need.
GlusterFS is
Quoting Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/18/2010 12:54 PM:
Hmm. You could try setting auth_worker_max_request_count=1 to see if
that gets rid of the processes after they've handled the request.
Restarting IMAP/POP3 mail server: dovecotError: Error in
Dare I ask...(as it's not exactly clear from the Gluster docs)
If I take 5 storage servers to house my /mail can my cluster of 5 front
end dovecot servers all mount/read/write to /mail.
The reason I ask is the docs seem to suggest I should be doing 5
servers, having 5 partitions, one for each
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 16:20 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-18 at 09:05 -0500, Charles Marcus wrote:
Personally I think the best way would be, if the user isn't over quota
at the time of a message delivery, deliver that message, *regardless* of
whether or not it puts the user
Eric Rostetter put forth on 2/18/2010 3:21 PM:
Quoting Stan Hoeppner s...@hardwarefreak.com:
Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/18/2010 12:54 PM:
Hmm. You could try setting auth_worker_max_request_count=1 to see if
that gets rid of the processes after they've handled the request.
Restarting
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Thu, 18 Feb 2010 21:32:46 +
Von: John Lyons j...@support.nsnoc.com
An: Dovecot Mailing List dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] GlusterFs - Any new progress reports?
Dare I ask...(as it's not exactly clear from the Gluster docs)
If
On 18.2.2010, at 21.31, Wilko Bulte wrote:
Mutt 1.5.20 (2009-06-14) does NOT work with first.initial.last mboxes
raw logging gives me:
Oa0003 CAPABILITY
a0004 LIST
a0005 STATUS mail/postponed (MESSAGES)
a0006 SELECT INBOX
a0007 FETCH 1:41 (UID FLAGS INTERNALDATE RFC822.SIZE
On 18.2.2010, at 23.08, Stan Hoeppner wrote:
Timo Sirainen put forth on 2/18/2010 12:54 PM:
Hmm. You could try setting auth_worker_max_request_count=1 to see if
that gets rid of the processes after they've handled the request.
Restarting IMAP/POP3 mail server: dovecotError: Error in
On 19.2.2010, at 0.37, Steve wrote:
You can do that. But with GlusterFS and Dovecot you don't need to. You can
mount read/write the same GlusterFS share on all the mail servers. Dovecot
will usually add the hostname of the delivering system into the maildir file
name. As long as the
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 03:02:48 +0200
Von: Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi
An: Dovecot Mailing List dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] GlusterFs - Any new progress reports?
On 19.2.2010, at 0.37, Steve wrote:
You can do that. But with GlusterFS
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 03:12 +0100, Steve wrote:
This has the same problems as with NFS (assuming the servers aren't only
delivering mails, without updating index files). http://wiki.dovecot.org/NFS
Except that NFS is not so flexible as GlusterFS. In GlusterFS I can
replicate, stripe,
Original-Nachricht
Datum: Fri, 19 Feb 2010 04:37:04 +0200
Von: Timo Sirainen t...@iki.fi
An: dovecot@dovecot.org
Betreff: Re: [Dovecot] GlusterFs - Any new progress reports?
On Fri, 2010-02-19 at 03:12 +0100, Steve wrote:
This has the same problems as with NFS (assuming
93 matches
Mail list logo
