Hello,
My phone:
Android ics 4.1.2 on galaxy nexus.
And yes, stock mean the default client that come with the os in IMAP mode.
I already know about that configuration parameter, but it will display two time
namespace in postlogin capabilities, and so I like much more to adjust the
source code
Alessio Cecchi wrote:
> Daniel Parthey wrote:
> > Davide wrote:
> >>my question is what is benefit implementing LMTP service replacing
> >>LDA i have dovecot 2.1.8 with vpopmail+qmail and about 500 users
> >>now i'm using LDA and i'm interested on LMTP service.
> >with LMTP...
> >* you don't need t
On 6.11.2012, at 17.26, Ed W wrote:
> On 05/11/2012 23:22, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>> On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 23:40 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
>>> Anyway, looks like Dovecot can't link OpenSSL to imap/pop3 processes
>>> without wasting a ton of memory. In v2.2 I already moved imapc/pop3c
>>> backend c
At 4PM +0100 on 6/11/12 you (Stephan Bosch) wrote:
> Op 11/6/2012 1:43 PM, Ben Morrow schreef:
> > You want 'ereject', RFC 5429, but Pigeonhole currently only implements
> > it as a synonym for reject. I'm not sure if this is within-spec or not:
> > this paragraph
> >
> > The "ereject" actio
Op 11/6/2012 1:43 PM, Ben Morrow schreef:
You want 'ereject', RFC 5429, but Pigeonhole currently only implements
it as a synonym for reject. I'm not sure if this is within-spec or not:
this paragraph
The "ereject" action MUST NOT be available in environments that do
not support protoco
On 05/11/2012 23:22, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Mon, 2012-11-05 at 23:40 +0200, Timo Sirainen wrote:
Anyway, looks like Dovecot can't link OpenSSL to imap/pop3 processes
without wasting a ton of memory. In v2.2 I already moved imapc/pop3c
backend code to plugins to avoid this. Looks like similar ug
Hi,
>> Another solution would be to write some kind of milter/policy-service with a
>> web-interface, where people can reject mails directly on the postfix side.
>> But this is a lot of work.
>
> Use a web interface that requires auth. But I'd not use a milter/policy
> service--too complicated
On 6.11.2012, at 14.17, Timo Sirainen wrote:
> It would be possible to keep a separate expunge log which could remember the
> expunges longer. But that would be yet another different index file for
> Dovecot, which annoyingly complicates everything. And currently since it
> sounds like the only
Quoting Timo Sirainen :
On 6.11.2012, at 3.49, Michael J Rubinsky wrote:
That would require infinitely storing the modseq of when each message
was expunged. Not very nice. Also the RFC talks a lot about this
situation. The SELECT command has two optional parameters to optimize
it.
The RFC *
Quoting Robert Schetterer :
Am 06.11.2012 13:17, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
the only problem is activesync implementation using it
Hi, Michael,
as i am going to implement horde 5 active sync server in near Future
with dovecot , i followed this in high interest
I know horde active sync server is
Am 06.11.2012 13:17, schrieb Timo Sirainen:
> the only problem is activesync implementation using it
Hi, Michael,
as i am going to implement horde 5 active sync server in near Future
with dovecot , i followed this in high interest
I know horde active sync server is different to z-push
so sorry my
On 11/6/2012 2:29 AM, Christian Rößner wrote:
> Another solution would be to write some kind of milter/policy-service with a
> web-interface, where people can reject mails directly on the postfix side.
> But this is a lot of work.
Use a web interface that requires auth. But I'd not use a milte
At 8AM +0100 on 6/11/12 you (Christian Rößner) wrote:
>
> is there a sieve option that can reject a mail directly without
> creating a new mail and sending that out? I know about
>
> reject "Reject message goes here";
>
> but I am looking for a mechanism that can reject Mail.
You want 'erejec
Thank you, Thomas.
I think, i will install a newer version..
Am 06.11.2012 13:27, schrieb Thomas Leuxner:
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:51:47PM +0100, Andreas Thomsen wrote:
any idea, whats the problem?
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/2010-October/000179.html
Yes. It simply wasn't impl
On Tue, Nov 06, 2012 at 12:51:47PM +0100, Andreas Thomsen wrote:
> any idea, whats the problem?
http://www.dovecot.org/list/dovecot-news/2010-October/000179.html
Yes. It simply wasn't implemented in 2.0.4 which is ages old btw.
Regards
Thomas
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
On 6.11.2012, at 3.49, Michael J Rubinsky wrote:
>> That would require infinitely storing the modseq of when each message
>> was expunged. Not very nice. Also the RFC talks a lot about this
>> situation. The SELECT command has two optional parameters to optimize
>> it.
>
> The RFC *does* indicate
Hello,
we are running dovecot 2.0.4 on openSuse 11.2.
mailboxes are in mdbox-format on local filesystem.
we had a powerfailure resulting in many corrupted files and i had to
restore some mailboxes.
as descibed in wiki, i tried :
doveadm import -u mdbox:/path/to/backup//mdbox
INBOX all
or
d
Hello,
I'm running dovecot 2.1.9 and I'm trying to configure shared folders.
So, as described at http://wiki2.dovecot.org/SharedMailboxes/Shared I
have configured a namespace like this:
namespace {
type = shared
separator = /
prefix = shared/%%u/
location = ma
May be, that solution of yout problem is mailfromd
http://puszcza.gnu.org.ua/software/mailfromd/
Dne 6.11.2012 08:59, Christian Rößner napsal:
Hi,
is there a sieve option that can reject a mail directly without
creating a new mail and sending that out? I know about
reject "Reject message goes
Hello,
I've been asked to have a look at a misbehaving mail server of some
colleagues today where almost all logins where failing or excessively
delayed, while the LDAP database itself was pretty fast.
They run Dovecot 1.2.11 (yes, I know, stoneage) against an LDAP server
run by a 3rd party, auth
Am 06.11.2012 10:09, schrieb Steffen Kaiser:
> Another solution would be to write some kind of milter/policy-service
> with a web-interface, where people can reject mails directly on the
> postfix side. But this is a lot of work.
it existed in horde 3 ingo, no idea for horde 5 stable
https://gith
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, 6 Nov 2012, Christian Rößner wrote:
but I am looking for a mechanism that can reject Mail. Postfix can
use reject_unverified_recipient to connect to LMTP and ask if a mail
would successfully be enqueued and will return the status gotten from
Am 06.11.2012 07:08, schrieb Ben Morrow:
> At 6AM +0100 on 6/11/12 you (Massimiliano Cianelli) wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> My setup:
>> Dovecot 2 latest, installed to replace courrier IMAP, and off course
>> configured with the dot separator and all folder under INBOX.*.
>>
>> The problem:
>> My phone w
Hi,
>> but I am looking for a mechanism that can reject Mail. Postfix can
>> use reject_unverified_recipient to connect to LMTP and ask if a mail
>> would successfully be enqueued and will return the status gotten from
>> the LMTP server if not. Chances are high that the mechanism would
>> work, t
On 11/6/12 8:59 AM, Christian Rößner wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a sieve option that can reject a mail directly without
> creating a new mail and sending that out? I know about
>
> reject "Reject message goes here";
>
> but I am looking for a mechanism that can reject Mail. Postfix can
> use rejec
Hi,
is there a sieve option that can reject a mail directly without creating a new
mail and sending that out? I know about
reject "Reject message goes here";
but I am looking for a mechanism that can reject Mail. Postfix can use
reject_unverified_recipient to connect to LMTP and ask if a mail
26 matches
Mail list logo
