I only allow explicit service traffic through. IMAPS, SMTPS, etc. If
doveadm is communicating via the IMAP(S) ports then all I can do via
firewall is block countries. Which of course I can but I'm asking about any
additional hardening for Dovecot itself.
--
Daniel
On May 13, 2023 6:25:06 PM
It appears when I set vsz_limit=0 it works without crashing. So the
problem appears when setting an explicit maximum.
--
Daniel
On 12/7/2021 9:57:29 PM, "Aki Tuomi" wrote:
On 7 December 2021 23.10.50 UTC, Daniel Miller wrote:
On 12/7/2021 12:29:49 PM, "Daniel Miller&quo
On 12/7/2021 12:29:49 PM, "Daniel Miller" wrote:
service replicator {
vsz_limit = 2G
}
Aki
Tried that - got another one.
I just tried setting
service replicator {
vcsz_limit = 5G
}
and I still get:
Dec 7 15:08:25 bubba dovecot: replicator: Panic: data stack: Out of
m
I just noticed, that when checking "doveconf -a" - all vsz_limit
settings that are not explicitly given have a value of:
18446744073709551615 B
I have this on two servers, one with an implicit default_vsz_limit=256M,
the other with an explicit default_vsz_limit=2G.
Is this correct?
--
service replicator {
vsz_limit = 2G
}
Aki
Tried that - got another one.
[New LWP 14072]
Core was generated by `dovecot/replicator'.
Program terminated with signal SIGABRT, Aborted.
---Type to continue, or q to quit---
#0 __GI_raise (sig=sig@entry=6) at
Use
gdb /path/to/replicator /path/to/core
bt full
Aki
root@bubba:/var/core# gdb /usr/lib/dovecot/replicator
/var/core/11199.replicator
GNU gdb (Ubuntu 8.1.1-0ubuntu1) 8.1.1
Copyright (C) 2018 Free Software Foundation, Inc.
License GPLv3+: GNU GPL version 3 or later
-- Original Message --
Hi!
Can you instead submit gdb bt full output and doveconf -n?
Aki
Certainly - but I need to know how. The problem is during TCP
replication.
Here is dovecot -n:
# 2.3.17.1 (476cd46418): /etc/dovecot/dovecot.conf
# Pigeonhole version 0.5.17.1 (a1a0b892)
#
I've run dovecot-sysreport -o and generated a file - but it's a
few gigs in size. Am I generating the core dump incorrectly? Should I do
something different?
--
Daniel
Another update.
I dug deeper into the mailboxes - and found the "subscriptions" and
actual mailboxes weren't correct in all cases. I guess when I shifted to
the explicit INBOX/ namespace not all the existing boxes migrated
correctly. So...after manually correcting all the "subscription"
mailbox GUID f4338038839caa613a1a0500b88bfabe for mailboxes INBOX/Sent
Messages and INBOX/Sent - giving a new GUID
bcf4f82702a4aa616c079db5accb to INBOX/Sent
--
Daniel
-- Original Message --
From: "Daniel Miller"
To: "Daniel Miller" ; dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: 12/3/2021 3:13:55 PM
Subje
ent and
Sent Messages-temp-1 - giving a new GUID
60ad190102a4aa6182210500b88bfabe to Sent
--
Daniel
-- Original Message --
From: "Daniel Miller"
To: "Daniel Miller" ; dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: 12/3/2021 2:42:12 PM
Subject: Re[2]: Replication
nc I suppose is reasonable. A
second...maybe? But I'm getting nervous I'm about to start seeing the
endless temp folders again.
--
Daniel
-- Original Message --
From: "Daniel Miller"
To: "Daniel Miller" ; dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: 12/3/2021 2:39:25 PM
Subject: Re: Repl
ation is allowed at a time.
Am I correct, and whether or not I am - how can I correct these errors?
Do I dare try going back to just "-N"?
--
Daniel
-- Original Message --
From: "Daniel Miller"
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: 12/3/2021 2:16:28 PM
Subject: Replication weirdne
+1.
I *was* using the repo's packages for Ubuntu - but when I wanted to try
fts-flatcurve I needed something to compile against. I'd rather do so
against the repo sources if possible.
--
Daniel
-- Original Message --
From: "Shawn Heisey"
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: 12/3/2021
First, I have to say this. After configuring everything correctly - and
that means *everything* correctly - Dovecot replication Just Works. I'm
not sure how (yes I do - Timo & Co. Magic) - but it does. Real-time new
sync is near instantaneous.
Now the problem. Or the background for the
On 9/15/2020 10:07 AM, Matej Tyc wrote:
On 14. 09. 20 22:46, Daniel Miller wrote:
On 9/14/2020 1:19 PM, Matej Tyc wrote:
...
When learning about how ACL work in e.g.
[...] so I can't use
it to reverse-engineer the correct syntax.
The global ACLs are...global. They apply to all matching
On 9/14/2020 1:19 PM, Matej Tyc wrote:
Hello,
I am relatively new to the world of MTAs and MDAs, and I try to set up
shared mailboxes.
So far I have somehow succeeded - I have defined a shared namespace and
I have managed to create per-mailbox ACL files thanks to the doveadm
command.
This may (and probably does) come under the heading of "really dumb
ideas", but...
Before I develop this further I need to ask - is it possible to have a
"primary" mail_location using single-dbox with an alternate storage
using multi-dbox? This is *not* the same as different storages for
2020 at 5:16 PM Aki Tuomi
wrote:
> >
> > > On 11/05/2020 12:12 Joe Wong wrote:
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > On Sun, May 10, 2020 at 3:54 PM Sami Ketola
wrote:
> > > >
> >
Dovecot either already had support or there were plans to implement
it.
---
Daniel
-- Original Message --
From: "Teemu Huovila"
To: dovecot@dovecot.org
Sent: 5/8/2020 5:49:34 AM
Subject: Re: Support for MULTISEARCH
On 6.5.2020 3.57, Daniel Miller wrote:
Does Dovecot present
Does Dovecot presently support the MULTISEARCH command, or are there
plans to do so?
---
Daniel
-- Original Message --
[...]
To start, the following features are likely to be removed in next few releases
of Dovecot.
[...]
- mailbox alias plugin
Like autocreate, autosubscribe, and expire - Is there a built-in feature
that makes this plugin obsolete?
---
Daniel
Try this:
namespace inbox {
hidden = no
inbox = yes
list = yes
mailbox Drafts {
auto = no
special_use = \Drafts
}
mailbox Junk {
auto = no
special_use = \Junk
}
mailbox Sent {
auto = no
special_use = \Sent
}
mailbox "Sent Messages" {
auto = no
Any thoughts on this?
---
Daniel
-- Original Message --
From: "Daniel Miller"
To: "Dovecot Mailing List"
Sent: 2/12/2020 6:16:05 PM
Subject: Shared Mailboxes with Multiple Domains
Trying to track down a problem I've been dealing with for a while. Everyth
Trying to track down a problem I've been dealing with for a while.
Everything else works fine - the problem is with shared mailboxes.
My present, and desired, prefix for the shared namespace is:
prefix = INBOX/shared/%%d/%%n/
Some mail clients, particularly Thunderbird and Android's
Is it possible to setup the following:
1. Primary mailserver with SMTP solutions and Dovecot.
2. Primary server will store recent mails.
3. Secondary server for archival storage and Solr.
So I'm not looking for a distributed cluster - simply a splitting of
designated functions. Clients would
And I should have seen that from your first post but output from
"doveconf" is definitive.
--
Daniel
On 1/23/2020 6:57 PM, Daniel Miller wrote:
Keeping in mind I'm 0% Dovecot certified and 100% certifiable...
I'm guessing you have your namespace definition separate from your
s
Keeping in mind I'm 0% Dovecot certified and 100% certifiable...
I'm guessing you have your namespace definition separate from your
special-use mailbox declarations. Possibly in 10-mail.conf and
15-mailboxes.conf? Not that it matters.
First sugggestion - that first namespace definition.
Interesting.
While I don't use mbox (dbox or maildir) I wouldn't think that would
matter. Your namespace layout looks nearly the same as my own. But to
verify what's going on - post the output of "doveconf namespace".
Possibly just reviewing that output may tell you enough - otherwise
share
On 11/13/2019 11:59 PM, Thomas Güttler via dovecot wrote:
Am 13.11.19 um 17:21 schrieb Ralph Seichter via dovecot:
* Thomas Güttler via dovecot:
AFAIK you can't sent a link/URL to a mail on a shared folder to a friend.
Like "Hi bob, she loves me. See this message from here https:/./"
There is some ambiguity in the setting names, however:
In the "upper" authentication config file (possibly
conf.d/auth-sql.conf.ext) you define which "internal" driver the
authentication system will use. These are...more of a top-level engine
selection if you will - perhaps not what you'd
I've been hunting some ghost mailboxes - and I *think* I found the source.
I use the complete email address as the username, and store such in a
database. The storage structure is location=/var/mail/%d/%n. Not unusual
I think.
So all I *should* see from "ls /var/mail" would be a list of
The current documentation makes mention of a "special" subscription
namespace. The example given:
namespace subscriptions {
subscriptions = yes
prefix = ""
list = no
hidden = yes
}
namespace inbox {
inbox = yes
location =
subscriptions = no
[...]
results in a startup error as
In conf.d/10-logging.conf, set:
auth_debug_passwords = yes
mail_debug = yes
verbose_ssl = yes
You might try setting them one-by-one as having all three will give a
ton of info, and auth_debug_passwords will expose all passwords used
while set, but those settings should show you what the
On 10/9/2019 6:58 PM, @lbutlr via dovecot wrote:
On Oct 9, 2019, at 5:23 PM, @lbutlr wrote:
Postfix logs "Client host rejected: Access denied” but as I said, other
accounts can submit and there’s nothing special in the submission service in
master.cf.
submission inet n - n
Not defending Thunderbird - but I don't understand your "taking hours to
load my Dovecot IMAP". I suppose if you have sync enabled then the first
time you connect to a large mailstore there would be an initial
download. But...I always disable sync immediately upon setting up
accounts in
On 9/19/2019 6:28 AM, Fabian via dovecot wrote:
Thanks for your response! No we are not limiting Soli’s memory usage. After your tip, we've
also upgraded the memory to 32GB. But the behavior remains the same. I have also already
considered that Dovecot may index the UID incorrectly. But if I
again via thunderbird. I am comparing write tests to different backends.
-Original Message-
From: Daniel Miller [mailto:dmil...@amfes.com]
Sent: dinsdag 17 september 2019 22:06
To: Marc Roos; dovecot
Subject: Re: Imaptest stall
On 9/17/2019 12:58 AM, Marc Roos via dovecot wrote:
I have
On 9/17/2019 12:58 AM, Marc Roos via dovecot wrote:
I have been testing with imaptest and getting 'stalls', I tried even
building from source and static. Even running it on the same host.
Anyone knows what I could doing wrong?
[@~]# ./imaptest - append=100,0 logout=0 host=192.168.10.44
Given an existing default namespace:
namespace inbox {
type = private
separator = /
prefix =
location = sdbox:/var/mail/%d/%n/sdbox
inbox = yes
hidden = no
list = yes
subscriptions = yes
}
And mailboxes like:
INBOX
INBOX/Archives
INBOX/Archives/2018
if I then define a new
On 9/13/2019 1:21 AM, Fabian via dovecot wrote:
Hi,
we are trying to add full text search functionality with Solr to our Doveoct
setup. Our Versions:
OS: Debian 9
Tried versions:
- Dovecot 2.2.7 with Solr 3.6
- Dovecot 2.3.4 with Solr 8.2
(2.2.7 from offical Debian repository, 2.3.4 from
It's quite likely I'm doing it wrong, but...
Given a valid mailbox...
doveadm mailbox list -u realmb
returns "realmb"
doveadm mailbox list -u real*
returns "realmb"
Seems reasonable. Now, with a non-existent mailbox...
doveadm mailbox list -u bogus
returns "bogus"
Is the following "legal" for Dovecot? And...is this separation
recommended or a bad idea? Particularly I'm asking about the "archives"
namespace - I haven't actually implemented this yet and I'm checking
before I break something.
10-mail.conf
# Primary private namespace
# Using sdbox for
On 7/9/2019 6:17 AM, Jérôme Bardot via dovecot wrote:
Hello,
This is my first email here.
I want to understand well how dovecot is integrate with ldap in a
postfix/dovecot/ldap setup.
I use a debian server.
Perfectly!
More specifically what dovecot need in ldap to work.
I saw we can use
wrote:
Hi
Are you using the latest git version ?
WHich part exactly of your logs relates to "virtual folders do not work" ?
On 2019-06-05 13:08, Daniel Miller via dovecot wrote:
Logs:
Jun 5 06:02:25 bubba dovecot:
imap(dmil...@amfes.com)<25877>: Opening DB (RO)
/var/mail/amfe
comparator-i;ascii-numeric relational regex imap4flags
copy include variables body enotify environment mailbox date index ihave
duplicate mime foreverypart extracttext
namespace inbox {
hidden = no
inbox = yes
list = yes
location =
mailbox "Deleted Messages" {
auto = no
For my primary namespace this is working fine - thanks to the developers!
It also appears to work great for shared folders as well.
But my virtual folders aren't returning results - at least not to the
client. The logs show FTS Xapian opening several DB files and getting
results - but nothing
On 5/5/2019 10:50 PM, MRob via dovecot wrote:>
Thank you for helping but-
Again, Dovecot terminology here, mailbox means 'folder' not the whole
account
Dynamic-
https://www.mail-archive.com/dovecot@dovecot.org/msg71091.html
Ahh...I understand what you want now. Yes it would be nice - no
On 5/3/2019 11:22 AM, MRob via dovecot wrote:> That is not dynamically
generated and it isn't limited to just one
mailbox (dovecot terminology here is confusing, normally a mailbox is a
mail account (user), but in this context "mailbox" I guess mean "folder"
which is how I am using it, as it is
On 5/3/2019 11:18 AM, MRob via dovecot wrote:>
Thank you, but question is about the example mailbox settings in
15-mailboxes.conf
I found I can put those mailbox definitions in the new virtual
namespace, still not sure if they would work if I kept them in the inbox
namespace, maybe the
On 5/2/2019 12:47 PM, MRob via dovecot wrote:
hi, I spent time learning about virtual mailboxes. Is there some way to
create dynamic virtual mailboxes? I mean, when I look at a mailbox, I
want to see only unread messages or flagged messages in that mailbox.
contents of
On 4/30/2019 11:13 PM, MRob via dovecot wrote:
The examples in 15-mailboxes.conf
# If you have a virtual "All messages" mailbox:
#mailbox virtual/All {
# special_use = \All
# comment = All my messages
#}
# If you have a virtual "Flagged" mailbox:
#mailbox virtual/Flagged {
On April 23, 2019 10:54:38 PM luckydog xf wrote:
Is it worthwile to use dbox? seeing from
http://www.linuxmail.info/mbox-maildir-mail-storage-formats/ it may cause
file lock and easy to corrupt.
As with everything - it depends. You're asking me so these are *my*
opinions - and I do not claim
On 4/23/2019 1:53 AM, luckydog xf via dovecot wrote:
Hi, I use sis to deduplicate attachments, here is my `doveconf -n`
[...]
mail_location = maildir:/var/mail/%n/Maildir
[...]
SIS is a function of dbox. You're using Maildir.
--
Daniel
On 1/29/2019 9:15 AM, Tomasz Nowak wrote:
Hello,
I'm trying to experiment with Dovecot and Solr server.
I have >30k email addresses that I want to index to speed up searching
and save IOPS on mail servers.
For now - I'm doing some experiments and I'm testing how it is
working. I'm thinking
On 1/25/2019 1:33 PM, ash-dove...@comtek.co.uk wrote:
We will be deploying a replacement Dovecot server soon, and we are
planning to use maildir for the primary storage, but with an archive
namespace using mdbox (or perhaps sdbox), and SIS.
Our backup servers and (luke)warm spare server
On 1/5/2019 9:58 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
Thanks Daniel...
So, as one who has no experience of the benefit of either...
How does this compare with Squat? Meaning, Is it exponentially faster?
Twice as fast?
It's been many years since I last had a Squat setup - but that's my memory.
--
Daniel
On 1/3/2019 10:56 AM, Tanstaafl wrote:
On 12/21/2018, 11:19:42 AM, Daniel Miller via dovecot
wrote:
There is a *huge* difference between a functional Solr setup & squat
Interesting. Care to elaborate?
This is one of those things that has to be experienced to be
understood. When you
On 1/1/2019 3:49 PM, Joan Moreau via dovecot wrote:
Hi
Solr is a standard package in ArchLinux. ("pacman -S solr") . the
systemd installation script is included (and it is launching
/opt/solr/bin/solr.in.sh)
Instance : sudo -u solr /opt/solr/bin/solr create -c dovecot -> this
creates a
On 1/2/2019 12:59 AM, M. Balridge wrote:
So, without rancour or antipathy, I ask the entire list: has ANYONE gotten a
Dovecot/solr-fts-plugin setup to work that provides as a BASELINE, all of the
following functionality:
1) The ability to search for a string within any of the structured fields
t is launching
/opt/solr/bin/solr.in.sh)
Instance : sudo -u solr /opt/solr/bin/solr create -c dovecot -> this
creates a separate folder with default solrconfig.xml, schema.xml, etc..
I made a symlink of the data folder to a second drive (ext4) much bigger
On 2018-12-31 14:09, Daniel Mil
On 12/29/2018 4:49 PM, Joan Moreau wrote:
Also :
- Java is 10.0.2
Same as me.
- If i delete schema.xml but create only managed-schema, the solr
refuses to start with a java error "schema.xml missing"
Ok...so we need to do some more digging.
How did you install Solr? (I downloaded a
On 12/29/2018 4:46 PM, Joan Moreau wrote:
Hi Daniel,
I am on Archlinux. Anyway, I adapted the scripts.
2 questions:
1 - It looks like we are not on the same version . I am on 7.5.0.
Which version are you running ?
Solr 7.5.0.
2 - Your conf shows that you let managed-schema but deleted
On 12/26/2018 1:32 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 26 December 2018 at 11:26 Daniel Miller via dovecot
wrote:
Ubuntu 18.04, AMD Opteron, Dovecot Version 2.3.3, local file storage. I
believe it's one of my users checking mail remotely via mobile - don't
remember if it's an iPhone or Android.
I
Ubuntu 18.04, AMD Opteron, Dovecot Version 2.3.3, local file storage. I
believe it's one of my users checking mail remotely via mobile - don't
remember if it's an iPhone or Android.
gdb backtrace:
Reading symbols from /usr/local/libexec/dovecot/imap...done.
[New LWP 13852]
[Thread debugging
the right results to the end user) setup ?
(3) If there iare no tangible reason, what about maintaining fts_squat
, which did the job nicely for years and no complains about.
On 2018-12-16 08:51, Daniel Miller via dovecot wrote:
Joan,
I understand and sympathize with your frustration - tryin
I tried SIS a couple years ago - I was very excited with the resulting
decrease in storage requirements but the undiagnosed intermittent issues
became too significant to ignore so I switched away. Recently I was
thinking about it again.
The primary issue with SIS seemed to be links would be
I found an error in my log today...
Dec 17 12:03:30 bubba dovecot:
imap(us...@amfes.com)<23017>: Error: fts_solr:
received invalid uid '0'
Dec 17 12:04:44 bubba dovecot:
imap(us...@amfes.com)<25004>: Fatal: master:
service(imap): child 25004 killed with signal 11 (core dumps disabled -
Don't know if this was corrected in 2.3.4 (haven't upgraded yet but
didn't see it in the notes) - but in 2.3.3 I see this in my log:
imap-login: Error: Diffie-Hellman key exchange requested, but no DH
parameters provided. Set ssh_dh=
So...either there's an undocumented feature of
As a LetsEncrypt user myself, I have:
ssl_cert = So nothing further should be required. You say Dovecot fails to start -
have you tried simply executing "dovecot -F"?
Daniel
On 12/16/2018 6:19 AM, C. Andrews Lavarre wrote:
Phil hi.
Thank you for explaining what the symbol does... so it is
="true"/>
On 2018-12-15 20:54, Joan Moreau wrote:
Daniel,
I have done that so any times (deleteing the data folders, recreating
the instance, restarting etc...)
But this is really not the issue
The issue is
1 - fts_solr reports errors in the log file (this is a pure
On 12/10/2018 10:02 PM, Joan Moreau wrote:
Additionally, here the errors I get in logs:
Dovecot:
Dec 09 09:21:09 imap(j...@grosjo.net)<3349>: Error:
fts_solr: received invalid uid '0'
Dec 09 09:21:10 imap(j...@grosjo.net)<3349>: Error:
fts_solr: received invalid uid '0'
or
11 03:36:03
teAll="1"/>
maxGramSize="15" />
protected="protwords.txt"/>
ignoreCase="true" synonyms="synonyms.txt"/>
ignoreCase="true"/>
generateWordParts="1" generateNumberParts="1" splitOnCaseChange="1"
splitO
On 12/4/2018 10:40 AM, Joan Moreau via dovecot wrote:
In the Wiki, ( https://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/FTS/Solr ), it would
nice to stipulate to the reader to type the command :
sudo -u solr /opt/solr/bin/solr create -c dovecot # to create the
dovecot instance
before updating the
I have a small but critical server that supports our group. As a single
server - it's obviously a single-point-of-failure for lots of things.
As I just experienced...again. It was a lot more fun building systems
from components when I was younger...
Previously 3rd-party hosted solutions
I'm trying to have my server maintain it's FTS indexes reasonably
current at all times. From prior threads, and based on my namespace
configuration, I have the following hourly cronjob:
doveadm index -A -q '*'
doveadm index -A -q 'shared/*'
doveadm index -A -q 'virtual/*'
This seems to work
The attached is the Dovecot schema I am now using for Solr 7.5.0 - no
"deprecated" warnings!
--
Daniel
managed-schema
Description: Binary data
On 2018-09-26 10:14, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 26 September 2018 at 18:42 Daniel Miller wrote:
As the subject says. This may be a bit open-ended - but it would
really
help troubleshooting some obscure folder issues.
In my case, I happen to have both some "real" folders and also som
While trying to identify possible causes of wrong mail folder creation I
did something...bad.
Normally, I would recognize that deleting a mail folder would naturally
delete all the contained mails. However...somehow my imaginative self
decided that deleting a virtual folder via IMAP would
As the subject says. This may be a bit open-ended - but it would really
help troubleshooting some obscure folder issues.
In my case, I happen to have both some "real" folders and also some
"virtual" folders that respond to IMAP LIST commands with the
"\NoSelect" flag - and I don't know why.
Are variables such as %d and %n available to doveadm when executed from
the command line? Either when explicitly declaring the user via -u or
when using all users with -A?
--
Daniel
ttps://wiki2.dovecot.org/Migration/MailFormat
---
Aki Tuomi
Dovecot oy
Original message
From: Daniel Miller
Date: 02/09/2018 04:14 (GMT+02:00)
To: Dovecot Mailing List
Subject: online conversion using replication?
With a single server - and no intent to have a second server on
Having relocated my virtual folders to a new namespace - I'm having some
subscription challenges. I'm able to reach them via telnet without
issue - and some clients have better luck than others. Some folders
have no problems at all - some seem different.
In trying to identify what might be
With a single server - and no intent to have a second server online at
this time - is it possible to use the replication service to keep a
"live" backup? Or otherwise perform a storage format conversion?
I'm presently using sdbox - and considering going back to mdbox though
without SIS. My
Will the following command:
doveadm index -A '*'
Ensure all Dovecot indexes are current (including virtual mailboxes) and
also update FTS? Other than the time/resources needed to parse all
users/mailboxes - is there a reason not to schedule this to run on a
regular (hourly?) basis?
My
On 8/14/2018 10:41 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 14.08.2018 21:23, Daniel Miller wrote:
On 8/14/2018 12:55 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 13.08.2018 19:51, Daniel Miller wrote:
When doing a filesystem backup of an moderate sdbox mailstore (300GB)
- are there any files that can be safely excluded from
I've been re-thinking my backup strategy - I wanted to see what input
others have. At this time - I'm using sdbox as the primary storage
format and running on a single server.
Previously, all my backups were simple filesystem backups. Either
inotify-based or cron-based. The whole mail
On 8/14/2018 12:55 AM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On 13.08.2018 19:51, Daniel Miller wrote:
When doing a filesystem backup of an moderate sdbox mailstore (300GB)
- are there any files that can be safely excluded from the backup?
Like *.log or *.backup? Or are they all "vital" for recovery?
I
When doing a filesystem backup of an moderate sdbox mailstore (300GB) -
are there any files that can be safely excluded from the backup? Like
*.log or *.backup? Or are they all "vital" for recovery?
I'm already excluding the sdbox/virtual folders as it looks like they
get created and
I get about a half dozen rejection messages from various servers when I
post to this list. Is there something I need to configure differently in my
DMARC record to be better compliant?
Daniel
On 1/14/2018 6:18 PM, Stephan Bosch wrote:
Op 1/12/2018 om 8:18 PM schreef Daniel Miller:
Sorry if this seems elementary - but a question on
implementation/usage/purpose of this. My understanding is at this
time the SMTP proxy server is only that - it does not implement any
further
Sorry if this seems elementary - but a question on
implementation/usage/purpose of this. My understanding is at this time
the SMTP proxy server is only that - it does not implement any further
functionality. So its availability now is purely for testing purposes.
Is that accurate?
I
And remove that "postfix reload" command - Postfix doesn't require
explicit reloading. It'll pickup the changed cert automagically.
Daniel
On 9/12/2017 9:26 AM, Daniel Miller wrote:
What's wrong with using a certbot "post-hook" script such as:
#!/bin/bash
echo "
What's wrong with using a certbot "post-hook" script such as:
#!/bin/bash
echo "Letsencrypt renewal hook running..."
echo "RENEWED_DOMAINS=$RENEWED_DOMAINS"
echo "RENEWED_LINEAGE=$RENEWED_LINEAGE"
if grep --quiet "your.email.domain" <<< "$RENEWED_DOMAINS"; then
/usr/local/sbin/dovecot
On 8/4/2017 12:48 PM, Daniel Miller wrote:
On 8/3/2017 6:11 AM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
On 02.08.2017 23:35, Daniel Miller wrote:
Is there explicit documentation available for the (probably trivial)
configuration needed for Dovecot and Wforce? I'm probably missing
something that should
On 8/3/2017 6:11 AM, Teemu Huovila wrote:
On 02.08.2017 23:35, Daniel Miller wrote:
Is there explicit documentation available for the (probably trivial)
configuration needed for Dovecot and Wforce? I'm probably missing something
that should be perfectly obvious...
Wforce appears to start
Is there explicit documentation available for the (probably trivial)
configuration needed for Dovecot and Wforce? I'm probably missing
something that should be perfectly obvious...
Wforce appears to start without errors. I added a file to dovecot's conf.d:
95-policy.conf:
On 6/30/2017 12:05 PM, Aki Tuomi wrote:
On June 30, 2017 at 9:49 PM Daniel Miller <dmil...@amfes.com> wrote:
I've made a preliminary auth policy server in Perl - and it sort of
works (mostly) - but I've got some questions on "proper" implementation.
Hi!
First of all, which
I've made a preliminary auth policy server in Perl - and it sort of
works (mostly) - but I've got some questions on "proper" implementation.
It appears the communication is HTTP based - is the intent to talk to a
"proper" webserver, or is a simple dedicated daemon appropriate (which
is what I
On 6/27/2017 1:33 AM, Daniel Miller wrote:
On 6/27/2017 12:42 AM, Fabian Schmidt wrote:
Am 26.06.17 schrieb Daniel Miller:
On 2017-06-23 15:09, Marcus Rueckert wrote:
On Fri, 23 Jun 2017 11:38:28 -0700
Daniel Miller <dmil...@amfes.com> wrote:
While auditing my logs after an a
1 - 100 of 137 matches
Mail list logo
