Re: User-configurable time-based mail deletion in specific folders

> Am 25.02.2024 um 16:58 schrieb William Edwards via dovecot > : > >> >> Op 25 feb 2024 om 16:51 heeft Steven Varco het >> volgende geschreven: >> >>  >>>> Am 25.02.2024 um 09:38 schrieb Rupert Gallagher via dovecot >>>

Re: User-configurable time-based mail deletion in specific folders

one thing only, but doing this good. Steven > > > Original Message ---- > On Feb 21, 2024, 23:25, Steven Varco < dovecot@bbs.varco.ch> wrote: > >> Am 21.02.2024 um 21:25 schrieb Peter Reinhold : > > Hi > I have been > wondering about i

Re: User-configurable time-based mail deletion in specific folders

> Am 21.02.2024 um 21:25 schrieb Peter Reinhold : > > Hi > I have been wondering about if Dovecot has a feature that would allow users to > setup a rule for a given folder, that mails older than X days should be > deleted? > Or is > this something that would need to be done by an external

Re: submission_add_received_header option?

Hi Ellie > Am 02.02.2024 um 23:02 schrieb Ellie McNeill : > > Sorry, I seem to have missed that. I hope this isn't a silly question, but > I'm wondering what the difference between 'regular' Dovecot and the 'CE'/3.0 > edition is? I can't seem to find much information on this. Why are there >

Re: Please do not remove replication

Although I’m also a very happy dovecot replication user, I don’t think this decision will be reverted, sadly. However, despite of messing with NFS, I will try setting up a three-node GlusterFS Cluster to give redundant storage to dovecote as mail store and hope it performs well enough… Has

Re: [EXT] Replication going away?

Does anyone already have a dovecot (CE with Maildir) setup running using shared storage (i.ex. GlusterFS) underneath? This will be my current „migration plan“ to dovecot nmot supporting replication anymore: 2 x Loadblancers (accross two sites) with keepalived and haproxy 3x GlusterFS nodes 3x

Re: Replication going away?

> While I understand it takes effort to maintain the replication plugin, this > is especially problematic for small active/active high-availability > deployments. > I guess there are lots of servers that use replication for just 50 or 100 > mailboxes. Cloudstorage (like S3) would be overkill

Re: Replication going away?

> However, I understand some had a better experience with it. I am curious > if someone will fork dovecot and restore the beloved feature. With all the recent actions going on, clearly targeting in getting more paying „pro“ customers (and nothing else!) the dovecot project will walk on thin ice

Re: el9 rpms

Sad, had planed to migrate my dovecot cluster (2x director 2x IMAP from 2.2.36 (CentOS 7) to 2.4 (AlmaLinux 9, when 2.4 is released). So, does anyone already built a STABLE(!) alternative for director? @Aki: Is dovecot IMAP 2.4 expected to still work with dovecot director 2.2 (or 2.3)? In this

Re: What is the current state of High Availability Dovecot ?

What do you mean bei „High Availability Dovecot“? Dovecot HA using director and poolmon is working very well since quite some time now. I recently just migrated a single instance dovecot to a HA setup using 2x Dovecot Director and 2x Dovecot IMAP servers. Obviously High Availability setups are

Re: macOS ManageSieve client?

>> How do people use this from their macOS clients? For this, the ManageSieve >> protocol exists and this is implemented by dovecot-sieve, but other than >> installing roundcube and offering a web-based mail client that also supports >> ManageSieve, is there another way? A ManageSieve client

Re: noob maildir question

Hi Mik > I would like to ask if it is an acceptable practice to manage messages in the > maildir as a file (move them from one folder to another) while dovecot is in > stop state thinking that it will be rebuild to the next imap user login Maildir is actually designed to do so, as the storage

Re: Stop used or not

> Am 20.01.2022 um 19:13 schrieb mau...@gmx.ch: > > Sieve scripts running fine, but please what would mean the “Stop”, if I have > multiple Policy that will run true, I need one stop to finish this per > section? > > if header :is ["from","bcc","to"] [“Email-Address-one”,

Re: Dovecot Director: Preferred backend server

secs, hash=1561836376) Do see what I’m missing out here? Using dovecot 2.2.36 (1f10bfa63) on both the directror and IMAP backend. thanks, Steven -- https://steven.varco.ch/ > Am 30.08.2021 um 19:20 schrieb Aki Tuomi : > > >> On 30/08/2021 19:09 Steven Varco wrote: >

Re: Dovecot Director: Preferred backend server

HAProxy is fundamentally different as it operates on connections only, which is not what you usually want on IMAP Servers. Instead you want to route all connections from the same USER to the same server and for this you must have a layer-7 proxy like dovecot director. The implication with

Dovecot Director: Preferred backend server

Hi All I have a dovecot cluster with directror and two IMAP Servers behind. Since they are in geographical different locations I would like to have users to go to a specific IMAP backend server (if both are up) and only switch to the other if one goes down (failover). As to my current

Re: Major upgrade of mail server

Hi Shawn I recently did a similar upgrade project of a dovecot-postfix-amavis Mailserver from CentOS 6 to CentOS 7. What I did was first creating a new test-server with the new OS. Than I copied all the maildirs from the productive server to the testing server, so I could simulate the upgrade

Re: dsync replication fails with No space left on device / Out of memory

> Am 07.07.2021 um 10:34 schrieb @lbutlr : > > On 2021 Jul 05, at 02:00, Steven Varco wrote: >> I then increased the filesystem size and all the problems suddenly vanished. > > How large was your tmp before and after the change, out of curiosity? Before it was 128 M

Re: dsync replication fails with No space left on device / Out of memory

ee issue is something different. Increasing memory parameters > doesn't help- the sync only crashes later. > > Here, everything seems to be synced fine nevertheless. > > > > Am 02.07.21 um 02:56 schrieb Harlan Stenn: >> Inodes? df -i >> >> On 7/1/2021 5:07 PM, S

dsync replication fails with No space left on device / Out of memory

Hi All Since I configured dsync replication I get strange errors in the maillog on my two mail dovecot nodes: PRIMARY: Jul 2 01:21:42 mx01.example.com dovecot: doveadm: Error: read(mx02.example.com) failed: read(size=3148) failed: Connection reset by peer (last sent=mail, last recv=mail

Re: failed: Cached message size smaller than expected

Am 21.04.2021 um 19:31 schrieb Michael Grant : > We don't really fix issues with mbox files anymore, other than read issues.. Our focus is enabling people to move to other formats, such as maildir. I would strongly recommend you to consider using maildir instead of mbox. >

Re: dovecot director and keepalived

e mentioned that in the beginning… ;) thanks, Steven -- https://steven.varco.ch/ > Am 16.03.2021 um 13:39 schrieb Sebastiaan Hoogeveen > : > > Hi Steven, > > On 14/03/2021, 17:53, "dovecot on behalf of Steven Varco" > wrote: > >> Now I’m hitting the

Re: Mass Stripping Attachments by Directory, Age, Size

I would like such a feature too, but instead of deleting the atatchment files, I would like to „detach“ the files and save them into a sperate directory, which could be on a different storage like a share in the users home directory or even S3 and then replace the attachment in the Mail with a

Re: dovecot director and keepalived

6:52 μ.μ., Steven Varco wrote: > >> Hi All >> >> I’m trying to establish a dovecot HA setup with two loadbalancers, running >> keepalived for sharing a virtual public IP. >> On the same machines I’m running a dovecot director which proxies the >> requ

dovecot director and keepalived

Hi All I’m trying to establish a dovecot HA setup with two loadbalancers, running keepalived for sharing a virtual public IP. On the same machines I’m running a dovecot director which proxies the requests to two underlying mail servers (on seperate machines). Now I’m hitting the issue with the

Re: Monitoring Dovecot Replication

Hi Andrea It would be great if oyu could post that here, as I (and possibly others) would also be interested. :) thanks, Steven -- https://steven.varco.ch/ > Am 12.02.2021 um 15:12 schrieb Andrea Gabellini > : > > Hello, > > I wrote a little script for Check_MK (MRPE mode). > > If you

Re: Where is dovemon

ieb Scott Q. : > > You can write something similar and I think others did already if you Google > for it. Shouldn't take you more than 1-2h to write something in Perl: > connect to backend, no login, remove from director > > > On Saturday, 16/01/2021 at 22:37 Steven Var

Re: Where is dovemon

Hi Christian This confused me as well. I later found out, that „Dovemon“ is an exlcusive part of the dovecot „pro" Package (the paid docecot). This is why you cannot find it. best regards, Steven -- https://steven.varco.ch/ > Am 13.01.2021 um 12:30 schrieb li...@mlserv.org: > > Hello, > >

Combine director and HAProxy for loadbalancig and failover

Hi All I’m trying to achive an active/active cluster with dovecot-director and HAProxy, as the director does not do health checks (loadblancing only) and I want both, loadblancing AND failover, where the latter is far more important to me (loadblancing I would just use as an addon and for