On 6 Feb 2012, at 16:34, Dinh Le wrote:
On Mon, 6 Feb 2012, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 6.2.2012, at 22.45, Michael M Slusarz wrote:
The subject, because it contains quotes, can't be expressed in a
quoted string so it is instead sent in a literal string.
Small correction: Quotes can be
On 9 May 2012, at 9:05, Markus Fritz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 09.05.2012 14:32, schrieb Ken Stevenson:
I got only this keys. Can you explain me what exactly you mean with
adding chains?
And I wonder why this error only occurs in Thunderbird, not in
openssl.
On 9 May 2012, at 9:51, Markus Fritz wrote:
Am 09.05.2012 15:42, schrieb Bill Cole:
On 9 May 2012, at 9:05, Markus Fritz wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Am 09.05.2012 14:32, schrieb Ken Stevenson:
I got only this keys. Can you explain me what exactly you mean
A spammer claiming to be 'Tim Saarela tim.saar...@dovecot.fi' is
sending out a pitch for Enterprise Level Support for Dovecot. The
address of mine which he hit is only ever used for this mailing list, so
it is clear that whatever the mechanism, this list is being harvested
for commercial
On 17 May 2012, at 10:56, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-05-17 10:20 AM, dovecot-20120...@billmail.scconsult.com wrote:
On 17 May 2012, at 9:46, Charles Marcus wrote:
Tim is working closely with Timo, and I'm sure got Timo's permission
to send that email to list subscribers.
I subscribed to
On 17 May 2012, at 10:20, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On 17.5.2012, at 16.46, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 2012-05-17 9:38 AM, Bill Cole
dovecot-20110...@billmail.scconsult.com wrote:
A spammer claiming to be 'Tim Saarela tim.saar...@dovecot.fi' is
sending out a pitch for Enterprise Level Support
is for.
That specific case is a very good thing. Procmail is not a good piece
of software to rely on and offer to users as their filtering tool.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 1:13 PM +0200 4/2/07, Frank Doege wrote:
thanks steffen, this will work for me till we have a plugin :-)
What do you see as the benefit of a Dovecot plugin over a
free-standing sending gadget?
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to understand how much simpler it is now
to run basically functional and non-abusive NTP than it was even 5
years ago. The work put into making pool.ntp.org usable has
essentially eliminated the need to think much about NTP for most
sites.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL
the specific log files that
syslog is using. The implication of what you are seeing is that the
breakage is between dovecot and syslogd, and that restarting dovecot
fixes it.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
that
starts dovecot on boot up?
Absolutely. Probably by putting the Dovecot startup after the NTP startup.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:37 AM -0700 6/11/07, Jeremy Gillick wrote:
I have Dovecot setup with Postfix and can't seem to connect to to the SMTP
server (port 25) unless I'm on the server itself (telnet localhost 25).
Absolutely, certainly, without the slightest doubt NOT a Dovecot problem.
--
Bill Cole
, but
there are likely to be people here who can help.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, that Date header is improperly formatted. Whatever
generated that message is broken, and it is not really a bug for mail
clients (i.e. TBird) to choke on parsing it, although presenting
ANYTHING as a Date when the Date header can easily be detected as
improper is arguably a bug.
--
Bill Cole
?
~/Maildir/cur
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 1:55 PM +0100 9/17/07, Timothy Murphy imposed structure on a
stream of electrons, yielding:
On Mon 17 Sep 2007, Bill Cole wrote:
At 2:45 AM +0100 9/17/07, Timothy Murphy wrote:
I'd be really grateful if someone running a dovecot IMAP (or IMAPS) server
could tell me exactly how
At 2:10 AM +0100 9/18/07, Timothy Murphy imposed structure on a
stream of electrons, yielding:
On Tue 18 Sep 2007, Bill Cole wrote:
A concrete example of an actual mail setup
and how this is seen by an IMAP client
would have been much more useful, in my view.
Aside from creating the top
At 12:42 AM -0400 9/18/07, Benjamin R. Haskell imposed structure on
a stream of electrons, yielding:
On Tue, 18 Sep 2007, Bill Cole wrote:
At 2:10 AM +0100 9/18/07, Timothy Murphy imposed structure on a
stream of electrons, yielding:
I cannot see the Family folder from my IMAPS client
with a
Maildir mailstore through the filesystem and with an IMAP server that
is accessing the same mailstore.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 4:18 PM +0100 9/21/07, Timothy Murphy wrote:
On Fri 21 Sep 2007, Bill Cole wrote:
It's a very bad idea for a mail client running on the same host as an
IMAP server to try to access the same mailstore via the filesystem.
I don't know what you mean by the same mailstore.
KMail on my
client:
path: /var/run/dovecot/auth-client
mode: 432
master:
path: /var/run/dovecot/auth-master
mode: 432
Thanks!
Rich
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, it looks like it still relies on SGI's FAM, an abandoned
project that doesn't really work well anywhere but Irix and Linux.
Dovecot has avoided that at the cost of having to understand each
system's unique approach to that issue.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, an abandoned
project that doesn't really work well anywhere but Irix and Linux.
Dovecot has avoided that at the cost of having to understand each
system's unique approach to that issue.
Thanks for the insight.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
significantly, I think such a feature as you
describe would have to be used with great
caution. I certainly don't want to find that some
spammer has created a bazillion new IMAP folders
by sending to random tags.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bill Cole and Rich Winkel and
following up on this, it seems that the new 1.1b wants you to give
the Deliver app specific setuid permission via:
cd /path/to/where/dovecot's/deliver/is
sudo chmod u+s deliver
Then things worked as before. There was no need to give the group
's' permission nor
-sql.conf
userdb:
driver: passwd
userdb:
driver: static
args: args = uid=5000 gid=5000 home=/home/vmail/%d/%n allow_all_users=yes
This looks like you may have a typo in dovecot.conf. Maybe an extra 'args = '
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ChatterEmail running on my Treo with 5
open connections to my Dovecot server, one for each of 5 folders.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Eudora, Outlook) work in ways that are Very Bad when they disagree on
the final destination of probable spam.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
of its
contents.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, you should be looking
for support to RedHat, not to the user community or developer of the
real Dovecot.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in sending mail. It
never comes anywhere near the mail queue.
It does sound about par for the course for Verio support though. Spot on.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to delete them. Mail queues are handled by mail transport
agents, aka MTA's like Sendmail or Postfix.
Thanks,
Darren
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
RESPONSE TAG: 8483057671202
On 12/7/2007 at 10:49 PM Bill Cole wrote:
At 11:56 AM -0600 12/7/07, Darren McLaughlin wrote
is that -l surrounds library with lib and .a and
searches several directories.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
cron.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
with some systems defaulting to 32. Some systems are held to 32 as an
absolute limit.
Some programs deal with that limit by truncating the list of groups
provided to setgroups() but that can be a tricky business.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
(or some related OS) and have mis-read the
man page where that quoted text exists, but explicitly DOES NOT
describe setgroups().
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
on this list might lead one to believe. The Dovecot LDA does
not provide enough of a compelling feature set to overpower the
inertia of sticking with the standard delivery agent(s). That's not
specific to Sendmail.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simone Caruso wrote, On 6/27/11 4:34 PM:
I have to manage 2 different domains, with 1 ssl certificate each, but I don't
know how to configure them.
I tried this example:
Different certificates per IP and protocol
http://wiki2.dovecot.org/SSL/DovecotConfiguration
but I got this error:
doveconf:
Carlos Mennens wrote, On 11/10/11 2:17 PM:
I asked a user today to make sure his incoming and outgoing email was
using TLS. He told me it wasn't possible because my Dovecot / Postfix
daemons were only listening on TCP 25 143 according to a port scan
he did. He told me the only way I could
Andreas Cieslak wrote, On 11/13/11 9:48 AM:
Hi List,
i am trying to restore mails from an backup-archive which was made with
rsnapshot.
All the mails in the archive look similar like the following:
-rw--- 2 1014 1015 3308 8. Aug 13:42
1312803768.V809I266a00aM505178.server:2,ST
At 8:33 PM -0700 1/8/08, Andrew Falanga wrote:
On Jan 8, 2008 7:31 AM, Bill Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At 6:52 AM -0500 1/8/08, Charles Marcus wrote:
Andrew Falanga, on 1/7/2008 11:18 PM, said the following:
What must be done to make sendmail do its thing for deliver?
I don't think
deleting it.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
homepage.
-
Never miss a thing. Make Yahoo your homepage.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
the various Dovecot binaries in
subdirectories of src (e.g. src/suth/dovecot-auth) Those can be
examined with ldd. If all is well, you can install with:
make install
That will install the binaries where they need to be.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
MTA. Your references to alias and transport hashes makes me
suspect that it is Postfix.
Dovecot has nothing to do with sending mail.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, and doesn't
really indicate a Dovecot flaw. A mailstore server like Dovecot makes
more complex demands for proper behavior from a filesystem than an
MTA like Postfix.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
running an unexpected
version of something on a system where alternative implementations
may lurk behind unexpected PATH's.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
be useful in those circumstances.
Interested to know if there is anything that can be improved.
As a general issue, I doubt it.
However:
Dovecot 1.0.9
XFS Filesystem
Maildir Directories
XFS historically has had very poor delete performance unless specially tuned.
--
Bill Cole
At 6:32 PM -0800 1/29/08, Asheesh Laroia imposed structure on a
stream of electrons, yielding:
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Bill Cole wrote:
For Dovecot, the mailbox index also has to be updated for each
deletion, and while that in itself is not terribly expensive per
message, it has to be done one
filtering delivered
mail
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
for APOP because nothing else that claims
to be secure in the modern world would ever use such a database.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
That should make mtime quite static for an individual file, and it
looks to me like Dovecot even makes an effort to preserve the
delivery time of a message by replicating the mtime from the original
file to the new one when copying a message between subfolders.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 12:21 AM -0500 2/13/08, Benjamin R. Haskell imposed structure on a stream
of electrons, yielding:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Rody wrote:
Op woensdag 13 februari 2008 00:43, schreef Bill Cole:
Yes, but you may also care that ctime is reset when a client has
Dovecot move a message from one subfolder
At 7:55 AM +0200 2/13/08, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Feb 13, 2008, at 7:21 AM, Benjamin R. Haskell wrote:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Rody wrote:
Op woensdag 13 februari 2008 00:43, schreef Bill Cole:
Yes, but you may also care that ctime is reset when a client has
Dovecot move a message from one
At 12:25 AM -0500 2/14/08, Benjamin R. Haskell imposed structure on
a stream of electrons, yielding:
On Wed, 13 Feb 2008, Bill Cole wrote:
[...]
Maildir DOES NOT require a timestamp in the filename, it's just common.
DJB's Maildir spec isn't RFC-esque (so it's not a MUST, in that
sense
At 12:27 PM +0100 2/14/08, Edgar Fuß wrote:
Am 13.02.2008 um 14:56 schrieb Bill Cole:
Not on all filesystems. Note what HFS+ (MacOS) does:
~ $ ls -lc foo
-rwxr-xr-x 1 wkc wkc 332 Jan 29 03:32 foo
~ $ mkdir foodir
~ $ mv foo foodir
~ $ ls -lc foodir/foo
-rwxr-xr-x 1 wkc wkc 332 Jan 29 03
At 11:53 PM +0100 2/13/08, mouss imposed structure on a stream of
electrons, yielding:
Bill Cole wrote:
[...]
Not on all filesystems. Note what HFS+ (MacOS) does:
~ $ ls -lc foo
-rwxr-xr-x 1 wkc wkc 332 Jan 29 03:32 foo
~ $ mkdir foodir
~ $ mv foo foodir
~ $ ls -lc foodir/foo
-rwxr-xr
mandatory
lock system in the OS and good gatekeeping on the
creation and deletion of mboxes, but that's not a
combination that multi-platform software can
count on...
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
, but
the right approach would be to decompose the response structurally
into name/value pairs rather than look for specific names in a
particular order.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
... Some MUA's and MDA's
can be configured to de-dupe mailboxes based on Message-ID, but doing
so is not always safe or desirable and Dovecot has no such facility.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
:
driver: passwd
socket:
type: listen
client:
path: /var/spool/postfix/private/dovecot-auth
mode: 432
user: postfix
group: postfix
master:
I'd be thankful for any help. Thanks
Anne
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
.
Referring back to those docs, it seems that this is the part that I'm missing
(cyrus instructions follow):
You need to stop looking at Cyrus docs. Cyrus docs are irrelevant to Dovecot.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 4:54 PM + 3/23/08, Anne Wilson wrote:
On Sunday 23 March 2008 15:24, Bill Cole wrote:
It is safe to assume that there are no clairvoyant's on this list, so
you probably need to provide a bit more specific information about
your difficulties to get useful suggestions. Unstated details
clients seeing that
will have to resynch their mappings of messages to UID triple.
The only solution to Dovecot making that sort of error is for Dovecot
to be fixed. The release announcements for later 1.0rc* versions seem
to describe such fixes.
--
Bill Cole
...
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
an unstable/test OS
distribution, it would also not be particularly shocking if something
on that system had a memory leak that is the real root cause.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PAM module, the allow_nets extra
authentication field, or a custom checkpassword script. You also
*might* be able to build a SQL query string using the %r variable and
some sort of conditional logic so that authentication from 'bad' IP's
fails.
--
Bill Cole
writing a simple web app entirely in shell.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 9:32 PM +0100 4/12/08, Douglas Willcocks wrote:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 14:23:58 -0400, Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 2:07 PM +0100 4/12/08, Douglas Willcocks imposed structure on a
stream of electrons, yielding:
On Sat, 12 Apr 2008 07:52:01 +0200, Patrick Ben Koetter
[EMAIL
sets them and
sets the bit count in the context structure to 512 (i.e. 64 bytes)
Maybe that provides a helpful clue...
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 11:57 AM +0100 4/13/08, Douglas Willcocks imposed structure on a
stream of electrons, yielding:
On Sun, 13 Apr 2008 01:39:44 -0400, Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
At 9:32 PM +0100 4/12/08, Douglas Willcocks imposed structure on a
stream of electrons, yielding:
[...]
I've read
describe is probably not the best approach unless user antagonism is
one of your goals. You would probably be better off making a user's
deletion into a server-side hiding/archiving. The Lazy Expunge
plugin can do that. http://wiki.dovecot.org/Plugins/Lazyexpunge
--
Bill Cole
-imap mbox format and not the Maildir format
for keeping email, because a year ago I migrated away from wu-imap
to dovecot.
That eliminates the Lazy Expunge option...
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 9:36 AM -0500 4/14/08, Adam Williams wrote:
Bill Cole wrote:
Presumably you're users are all using IMAP, since the question
doesn't really make sense for POP users, whose view of mail is
entirely local to their machines, not the server.
I'd argue that having the sort of in-your-face
Postfix's recipient_bcc_maps you may not
need to back up the live user-facing mailboxes at all, because you
can have an archive mailbox for each user instead of the big shared
dump you get with always_bcc.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 10:57 AM +0200 4/17/08, Chris Laif wrote:
On 4/13/08, Bill Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
In fact, look here:
http://www.scconsult.com/bill/crampass.pl
It does have a dependency issue, in that it requires Digest::Perl::MD5.
There's a little mistake in this script. Line 54 should
. The commercial operation trying to market it went
bankrupt, but the author managed to reclaim Mulberry and it is now
open source.
http://www.mulberrymail.com/
I think one reason Mulberry may seem counterintuitive is that it
exposes behavior of IMAP that is counterintuitive.
--
Bill Cole
At 10:28 AM -0500 4/14/08, Adam Williams imposed structure on a
stream of electrons, yielding:
Bill Cole wrote:
Um, really?
I've had a little experience with SOx, HIPAA, GLBA, and Federal
E-Discovery compliance projects, and I've never heard that SOx
applied at all to state agencies
style.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
At 5:54 PM +0200 5/7/08, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Bill Cole:
[in regards to making TBird and Dovecot work like GMail]
Dovecot isn't really a player in that question, which is really about how
to make TBird do what you want it to do with messages and present
them in a particular
to a mailbox.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
will be in /Library/LaunchDaemons and should be named
dovecot.plist, org.dovecot.plist, or (strictly matching the Apple
naming convention and looking goofy) org.dovecot.dovecot.plist.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
be found in
/opt/SunStudioExpress/bin:/usr/sbin:/usr/bin:/usr/xpg4/bin
Thanks,
-a
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
in a network or resource environment that
prevents you from fixing the core problem, you can adapt to the
breakage yourself.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
is
intentionally designed to block on 'ntpdate' running successfully.
You are likely to be better off with a system that is obviously not
working than one which started and then was subjected to a backwards
clock change, which can harm more than Dovecot.
--
Bill Cole
At 3:58 PM +0200 5/13/08, AndraÏ 'ruskie' Levstik wrote:
On 15:48:42 2008-05-13 Bill Cole [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
At 11:31 AM +0400 5/13/08, Eugene wrote:
Hi Timo,
From: Timo Sirainen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I suggest that Dovecot simply terminate the current connections
(causing the client
.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
to something else from
login_user setting.
Your config shows that you set login_user to 'vmail' which is the
user you are using for your virtual users. That is wrong.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
someting during reboot, the server
would just sit there in single-user prompt, waiting for (expensive)
console operations.
Which is actually the right choice in some circumstances.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
system-wide is a sounder approach than making
one daemon adapt to what should be a very rare event.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
particularly want to make
sure that your client system is not trying to use NFS over TCP across
a network that interferes with it or to a server that doesn't support
it properly. (for definitions of properly that are based in the
behavior of Solaris 10 as a client...)
--
Bill Cole
is unwise. VMware software is what provides your virtual
system with a clock.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
,
there is very little risk in removing the dovecot-uidlist. There's
unlikely to be any point in ever removing the dovecot-keywords file,
since it tends to only have a handful of entries anyway and there's
no harm in keeping the ones not actually in use by current messages.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL
At 1:17 AM +0300 6/13/08, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 11:10 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
[...]
However, I DO clobber the dovecot-uidlist in .Trash as part of my
monthly housekeeping because it tends to get very large
All the expunged messages get removed from it the next time
At 5:08 AM +0300 6/13/08, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 19:28 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
At 1:17 AM +0300 6/13/08, Timo Sirainen wrote:
On Thu, 2008-06-12 at 11:10 -0400, Bill Cole wrote:
[...]
However, I DO clobber the dovecot-uidlist in .Trash as part of my
monthly
. There's a strong chance that you won't really
be sacrificing anything that you actually use.
--
Bill Cole
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Tue, Sep 09, 2008 at 06:59:10AM -0400, Charles Marcus wrote:
On 9/9/2008, Alan Premselaar ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Ahh, no, sorry I must have overlooked that part. I'm just using
standard self-signed certificates on the server side.
Then if this is a 3G iPhone,
Harondel J. Sibble wrote:
On 27 Sep 2008 at 13:22, mouss wrote:
if you have a commercial cert, you don't need a self signed cert. self
signed certs are for people who don't want to get a cert signed by a 3d
party (commercial or other). For email, you generally don't need a
commercial
Harondel J. Sibble wrote:
On 29 Sep 2008 at 10:43, Bill Cole wrote:
Right. You need to keep track of what client certs you trust, so you really
should be *at least* the immediate issuer (signer) of the client certs. The
only reasons you would want your signing cert for those client certs
1 - 100 of 114 matches
Mail list logo
