Hi,
The correction doesn't call the closing method for:
sink.anchor( ... );
IMHO, we need to add also:
sink.anchor_();
Cheers,
Vincent
Author: brett
Date: Thu Mar 9 18:47:31 2006
New Revision: 384684
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewcvs?rev=384684view=rev
Log:
[MNG-2099] fix anchor
+1
Vincent
2006/7/20, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I Was wondering what folks thought of deprecating the src/site/*/ in
favour of, say, src/site/docs which contains all the docs.
Instead of processing by directory name, we'd need to detect each file's
type (by extension, and possibly
Hmm, it seems to work for me. I will review it.
Thanks,
Vincent
2006/7/28, Trygve Laugstøl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Vincent Siveton wrote:
2006/7/28, Trygve Laugstøl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Author: vsiveton
Date: Fri Jul 28 10:55:37 2006
New Revision: 426618
URL
[snip]
I like these, they are separators between logical parts of the method.
It is not a Maven standard style thus I removed it. Is it for Doxia?
If yes, we need a developping guide.
They are very much a standard part of the Maven code, we (at least I)
use it all the time.
I will
[sorry for the delay]
Hi Minto,
mm it seems a bug.
Feel free to open an issue about that and better, provide a patch!
Thanks
Vincent
2006/10/27, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Postbus 2287
1000 CG Amsterdam
Telefoon 0900 8844
Fax 020 5594466
.
Amsterdam-Amstelland
Hi
Hi Lukas,
We need also to update the APT format docu for \f in Doxia site.
Moreover, we have 2 docs which describe the apt format: one in maven
and one in doxia. WDYT to remove the doc from the maven site and to
add an Apache rule to go to the doxia one?
Cheers,
Vincent
2007/7/12, [EMAIL
by the way) to see how he's done it.
Trygve, if you want to contribute some code (in one way or the other) let me
know, I'm sure we can help each other, we seem to have the same goal!
Thanks,
Math
On 7/26/07, Trygve Laugstøl [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lukas Theussl wrote:
Vincent
is only talking about the really general stuff here.
Exactly.
Cheers,
Vincent
Thanks guys!
Cheers,
Brett
On 30/07/2007, at 7:06 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi,
As you know, Doxia modules need to be more consistents. Dennis pointed
the EOL problem today.
I recently added
2007/8/22, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Jason van Zyl wrote:
On 21 Aug 07, at 6:05 PM 21 Aug 07, Brett Porter wrote:
To date, I have always been in favour of one trunk, and one version.
I understand the need for a clear separate and for Doxia to be useful
without the site
2007/8/31, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi again,
2007/8/31, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Is there a non-SNAPSHOT release of these taglets in sight soon?
no idea so I will comment them.
Good. Is their purpose to generate javadoc for the plexus
Hi,
Doxia is near to be released and I would like to promote doxia-book
and doxia-maven-plugin. They will be moved to doxia/doxia/trunk/
Please vote [+1,0,-1], vote is open for 72 hrs.
Thanks,
Vincent
+1
Vincent
2007/10/29, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
Due to a couple of issues we need to release doxia-1.0-alpha-10, before
we can start using it in the plugins. This time I will release doxia and
doxia-sitetools separately, so that we don't confuse Continuum this
time. A vote
Yes, go ahead in the sandbox
Vincent
2008/1/8, Brett Porter [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
It sounds fine - though there's also the sandbox if you wanted
somewhere out of the way to work on it?
On 08/01/2008, at 5:30 PM, Vincent Massol wrote:
Hello,
I'd like to commit the first version of the
Hi Catalin,
2008/1/22, Catalin Kormos [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi there,
I tried this question on the maven users lists first, but got no answer
there yet, sorry for the possible double post, but this list actually seems
more appropriate now.
What i'm after is the possibility to customize the
Hi Benjamin,
2008/4/12, Benjamin Bentmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
According to the APT Reference [0] and the output delivered by the Maven
Site Plugin 2.0-beta-6, the construct
{{{foo}baa}}
denotes an internal link to the anchor foo in the current document. I
believe this kind of
Hi,
[SNIP]
Your plan sounds good for me.
Here's what I'd like to do:
- Release a last 1.0-alpha of Doxia, from the alpha branch
- Update the Site plugin to use that released alpha of Doxia
- Release maven-doxia-tools 1.0 and use that in the Site plugin
- Release Site plugin
Hi Lukas,
2008/5/13, Lukas Theussl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I am not sure I understand correctly the implications of MNG-3402 [1] wrt
the beta-1 release plan. Is the following correct?
- in order for the site plugin to use doxia-beta-1, we need to resolve
MNG-3402
AFAIK yes
- MNG-3402 can
+1
Thanks Dennis!
Vincent
2008/5/11, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
This vote is to release doxia-1.0-alpha-11, which will be followed by
another vote for doxia-sitetools-1.0-alpha-11.
The Release Notes show only 1 issue solved, but there are a few other minor
changes as well:
Hi Lukas,
2008/5/13, Lukas Theussl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Another doubt about faq id's: in m1 an id had to be a valid HTML id, in m2
fml files I see frequently things like [1]
faq id=What is a Mojo
which is internally converted to a name=What_is_a_Mojo. I think the faq
id should be valid
+1
Vincent
2008/5/13, Lukas Theussl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I'd like to fix http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DOXIA-208
in beta-1 still to avoid possible breaking changes later on. I am a bit
confused about APT though as we seem to have a lot of different standards
floating around in our own
+1
Thanks Dennis!
Vincent
2008/5/15, Dennis Lundberg [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
This vote is to release doxia-sitetools-1.0-alpha-11.
The Release Notes show only 1 issue solved, but there are a few other
minor changes as well:
Hi Abhijit,
I recommend you to provide a patch under the trunk and not under alpha
tag. The trunk is Doxia beta-1.
Thanks,
Vincent
2008/5/23, Abhijit Bagri [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
I am Abhijit and work in a platform team at Yahoo! We recently moved
documentation of our project from our
Hi Lukas,
Since the code in AptUtils#isExternalLink() ==
DoxiaUtils#isExternalLink(), I suggest to remove the first one.
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/5/23, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Author: ltheussl
Date: Fri May 23 04:38:39 2008
New Revision: 659507
URL:
Hi Lukas,
I forgot to commit the Plexus component file. Done in r698133.
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/9/22 Lukas Theussl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Vincent,
Is there any special reason for this 'innocent' change? I am concerned about
backward compatibility (yes, really! ;) ). As illustrated by the
Hi,
2008/11/7 Hervé BOUTEMY [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi folks,
For the next 1.0-beta-1 version, 2 methods have been added to SinkFactory
interface to improve encoding support:
- Sink createSink( File outputDir, String outputName, String encoding )
- Sink createSink( Writer writer )
See [1] for
Hi Benjamin
2008/11/7 Benjamin Bentmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
[SNIP]
It might however be convenient to create an AbstractTextSinkFactory from
which all/most text-based sinks could inherit. For instance,
XhtmlSinkFactory and XdocSinkFactory look pretty much the same. In more
detail, how about
, maybe it will more easy to have directly String in input/output
instead of stream.
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/11/7 Vincent Siveton [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi,
2008/11/7 Hervé BOUTEMY [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi folks,
For the next 1.0-beta-1 version, 2 methods have been added to SinkFactory
interface
2008/11/7 Benjamin Bentmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Then I think Sink createSink( Writer writer ) should be removed.
I prefer deprecated for backward compatibility issue.
The source code says @since 1.0-beta-1, i.e. this method was never part of
a released Doxia version
Hi guys,
IMHO Doxia 1.0-beta-1 could be release soon, ideally for xmas!
So, do you think we are missing issues?
Any other comments?
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/12/8 Paul Spencer [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Dec 8, 2008, at 7:17 AM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
2008/12/8 Lukas Theussl [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I just noticed that the fml module now takes ~5min to build instead of a
few
Same for xdoc module.
secs for all other modules. There are some svn
to relative doc path, ie from
doxia-module-fml using ../../../plugins/maven-ant-plugin/src/site
This approach has pros/cons like svn co.
WDYT?
Vincent
-Lukas
Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi guys,
IMHO Doxia 1.0-beta-1 could be release soon, ideally for xmas!
So, do you think we are missing issues
Hi Benjamin,
Right and I fixed it in r724309.
Thanks!
Vincent
2008/12/6 Benjamin Bentmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Hi Vincent,
Author: vsiveton
Date: Sat Dec 6 06:41:44 2008
New Revision: 723989
URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=723989view=rev
Log:
DOXIA-265: Add an EntityResolver in
Hi Benjamin and Paul,
According your comments, I created a new module doxia-test-docs which
includes svn copy on several documents. I also updated tests to fetch
these changes.
Any comments are welcome!
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/12/8 Benjamin Bentmann [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Vincent Siveton wrote
PM, Vincent Siveton wrote:
Hi Benjamin and Paul,
According your comments, I created a new module doxia-test-docs which
includes svn copy on several documents. I also updated tests to fetch
these changes.
Any comments are welcome!
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/12/8 Benjamin Bentmann [EMAIL
?
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/12/13 Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com:
Hi Dennis,
2008/12/12 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org:
Hi Vincent
Can we have a quit poll about version numbering. We have had discussions
about this in the past and I'd like to come to a conclusion now that the
release
Hi Dennis,
2008/12/12 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org:
Hi Vincent
Can we have a quit poll about version numbering. We have had discussions
about this in the past and I'd like to come to a conclusion now that the
release is getting closer.
The proposal that was made earlier was this:
Hi guys,
I proposed to remove officially org.codehaus.doxia.sink.Sink for the
1.0 (DOXIA-146).
WDYT?
Vincent
Sorry, I did a mistake due the new versioning :)
I speak to remove it in doxia 1.1 for Maven 2.1.x (with Doxia 1.1.x).
Vincent
2008/12/14 Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com:
Hi guys,
I proposed to remove officially org.codehaus.doxia.sink.Sink for the
1.0 (DOXIA-146).
WDYT
2008/12/14 Benjamin Bentmann benjamin.bentm...@udo.edu:
Vincent Siveton wrote:
I proposed to remove officially org.codehaus.doxia.sink.Sink for the
1.0 (DOXIA-146).
WDYT?
This interface is still referenced by MavenReport from the
maven-reporting-api. Hence it seems removing it would
Hi Brett,
2008/12/14 Brett Porter br...@apache.org:
You will need to at least introduce the overloaded method into 2.0.x and
deprecate the old one... but again this might cause problems for anyone
using the interface and not the AbstractMavenReport.
We have already a coupling pb between
for 2.1.0 now, instead of
2.0.11?
I have updated the wiki - and have pushed the upgrade to beta-1 out to
2.1.0-M3 so that we can push out another milestone in the mean time.
Cheers,
Brett
2008/12/16 Vincent Siveton vincent.sive...@gmail.com
Hi Dennis,
I renamed branches, did an external
Hi Paul,
It is related to MNG-3402
You need to build Maven with beta-1 (ie to update maven-reporting-api)
and uses maven-project-info-reports-plugin-doxia-beta-1
maven-site-plugin-doxia-beta-1 from the plugins branches.
Cheers,
Vincent
2008/11/24, Paul Spencer pau...@apache.org:
I just
Hi Jason,
2009/1/29 Jason van Zyl ja...@maven.org:
Howdy,
I've been looking at reporting in Maven 3.x and I've been following the work
that Vincent Massol has been doing over at XWiki where he has made some
attempts at melding Doxia, the XWiki rendering engine, and WikiModel. You
can see
-- Forwarded message --
From: Vincent Siveton vsive...@apache.org
Date: 2009/3/7
Subject: [ANN] Maven Doxia 1.1 Released
To: annou...@maven.apache.org, us...@maven.apache.org
The Maven team is pleased to announce the release of the Maven Doxia,
Doxia Sitetools, version 1.1
Hi
2009/3/8 Hervé BOUTEMY herve.bout...@free.fr:
I worked on the overview schema: see the new version attached to this mail.
Please comment if you think other changes are needed before I commit it and
update everyhting (the .png and imagemap).
+1 go for it
I have one question though: if I
Go ahead.
Cheers,
Vincent
2009/4/3 Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org:
Hi,
Is there any reason why we have this setting in the doxia parent pom:
plugin
artifactIdmaven-surefire-plugin/artifactId
configuration
forkModenever/forkMode
Hi Lukas,
2009/5/4 Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org:
Vincent,
I'm trying to understand some of the issues we have with entities in the
XmlParser. Is there a special reason why entities are emitted as rawText and
not text?
The text used by XhtmlBaseParser#handleEntity() could contain
Hi Dennis,
2009/8/2 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org:
These are logically not necessary, but are put in there for performance
reasons. Only if the logger is in debug mode (in this case) will the 3
String objects it uses actually be created by the JVM. Otherwise no
objects will be created,
Hi Lukas,
2009/8/19 Lukas Theussl ltheu...@apache.org:
IIUC, according to the xdoc schema it is perfectly legal to specify a
title in both properties and head, so throwing an Exception is not the
right solution IMO. I would prefer one of the following two alternatives:
Yes both are legal, but
Should be but I dont think we have a test case for this.
Could you create an issue so I could have a glance?
Cheers,
Vincent
2010/7/13 nsowatsk nsowa...@cisco.com:
Hi
I am trying to get a TOC in the pages generated from .confluence files, like
the one I get from the %{toc} macro in .apt
Hi
This plugin works and was used by Maven site itself
http://maven.apache.org/linkcheck.html
So I think it could be released
Cheers,
Vincent
2010/7/27 Dennis Lundberg denn...@apache.org:
Hi
I'm looking at releasing a first version of maven-linkcheck-plugin, to
get some mileage on it and
Improve the FmlParser class
---
Key: DOXIA-52
URL: http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/DOXIA-52
Project: doxia
Type: Improvement
Components: Core
Versions: 1.0-alpha-8
Reporter: Vincent Siveton
Attachments: FmlParser.diff
52 matches
Mail list logo
