Re: [DPP-Devel] IntelliJProjectImpl

2016-09-22 Thread Zieris, Franz
OK, so to summarize my impressions of your reactions to my proposal to trim the Core concepts to a minimum: There are quite a few difficulties along the way, but I did not notice any fundamental concerns on the topic. But before we get all too busy starting with just another big rework activity

Re: [DPP-Devel] IntelliJProjectImpl

2016-09-21 Thread Michaela Borzechowski
<srossb...@arcor.de> > Cc: dpp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net > Betreff: Re: [DPP-Devel] IntelliJProjectImpl > > > maybe we had to think about that before we actually start building stuff > > for theses interfaces, mainly the new HTML interface. > > Some thought

Re: [DPP-Devel] IntelliJProjectImpl

2016-09-20 Thread Matthias Bohnstedt
ieris, Franz" <franz.zie...@fu-berlin.de> Datum: 20.09.2016 18:53 (GMT+01:00) An: Stefan Rossbach <srossb...@arcor.de> Cc: dpp-devel@lists.sourceforge.net Betreff: Re: [DPP-Devel] IntelliJProjectImpl > maybe we had to think about that before we actually start bui

Re: [DPP-Devel] IntelliJProjectImpl

2016-09-20 Thread Stefan Rossbach
Well, about 700 errors so for when removing the IProject interface 8-) I think the hardest part is the SPath stuff, as we have to ensure, that a path is now transmitted as an absolute path. I will present a (of course broken) patch set next week. On 20.09.2016 18:53, Zieris, Franz wrote: >>

Re: [DPP-Devel] IntelliJProjectImpl

2016-09-20 Thread Zieris, Franz
> maybe we had to think about that before we actually start building stuff > for theses interfaces, mainly the new HTML interface. Some thoughts take their time, and sometimes you need to hit a wall at full speed to see more clearly. > As for the core internals, removing the "project" stuff is

Re: [DPP-Devel] IntelliJProjectImpl

2016-09-20 Thread Stefan Rossbach
Hi Franz, maybe we had to think about that before we actually start building stuff for theses interfaces, mainly the new HTML interface. As for the core internals, removing the "project" stuff is not that hard. If you remove projects you will end up with partial sharing. What is left is to

Re: [DPP-Devel] IntelliJProjectImpl

2016-09-20 Thread Zieris, Franz
Hi there, Michaela started by asking: > In IntelliJ and Eclipse a "Project" is a different thing. > A project in Eclipse is like a module in IntelliJ. Yes, "like" is the correct verb. But not "equal" and that's causing some trouble. > Now there is the class IntelliJProjectImpl, and I was

Re: [DPP-Devel] IntelliJProjectImpl

2016-09-20 Thread Etienne Girard
Hi Michaela, IMHO this class should represent a project. Only sharing a module is not a Real choice as far as i know, and it's a pain when trying to work with Saros/I. Regards, Etienne Le 20 sept. 2016 15:57, "Michaela Borzechowski" a écrit : > Hey all, > > In

Re: [DPP-Devel] IntelliJProjectImpl

2016-09-20 Thread Stefan Rossbach
Hi Michaela, IWorkspaceRoot represents an IntelliJ project. Maybe you should do a little refactor in the ShareWithUserAction class to make it clear that you are using modules and projects in IntelliJ but when you have to access the core, you have to "convert" an IntelliJ module to a core