, 2004 12:28 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3 - VAULT
Any ideas here from Vault users? I thought I remembered someone talking
about this a while ago but I could not find it in google...
-Original Message-
From: Bryan D. Andrews
Sent: Tuesday
- this install works on another box. Guess I have to roll
back again. :(
-Original Message-
From: Bryan D. Andrews
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 1:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3
I can send you a config file but pretty much any changes
on another box. Guess I have to roll
back again. :(
-Original Message-
From: Bryan D. Andrews
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 1:39 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3
I can send you a config file but pretty much any changes this happens
know of any
special kind of config I'll need to do.
thanks
Paul
- Original Message -
From: Bryan D. Andrews [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 13, 2004 7:27 PM
Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3
OK while it helped on my test box - it sure
!
-Original Message-
From: Paul Welter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, November 15, 2004 1:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta 3
Hi,
I have not tested vault because I didn't have access to a vault
repository.
I see that I can get a free
Sorry, forgot to attach the file.
Eric J. Smith
-Original Message-
From: Eric J. Smith [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 15, 2004 11:42 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'; 'draconet-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta
I'd like
PROTECTED] [mailto:draconet-users-
[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Erv Walter
Sent: Friday, September 10, 2004 2:46 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; draconet-
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [Draconet-users] Issues with 1.6 beta
The first problem is caused by an off by one error in the log parser
Hello all,
I've observed both of the issues Eric mentioned, and would like to
mention a third one: The BuildTime value is always NaN. Has anyone else
observed this?
Jeremy
---
This SF.Net email is sponsored by: YOU BE THE JUDGE. Be one of 170
