https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35051
--- Comment #7 from Brian Paterni 2011-03-11 17:59:30
PST ---
(In reply to comment #1)
> The "Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ..." line in
> the log looks suspicious, although it's unclear to me if it's related to the
> cause of the crash.
I
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 11:46 AM, Thomas Renninger wrote:
> Why is there need for another tool?
> ---
>
> CPU power consumption vs performance tuning is not about
> CPU frequency switching anymore for quite some time.
> Deep sleep states, traditional dynamic
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35045
--- Comment #2 from Kevin DeKorte 2011-03-11 15:39:30
PST ---
Created an attachment (id=44375)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=44375)
Screen shot of crash on display
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35045
--- Comment #1 from Kevin DeKorte 2011-03-11 15:37:01
PST ---
Similar crash in gnome using git versions of D-R-T, drm, mesa and DDX as of
3/11/2011. Screen shot attached.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30922
Summary: [radeon] Noisy fan with Radeon R600 and Toshiba
Satellite L500-164
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.38-rc8 (at least since 2.6.35)
Platform: All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35226
Summary: [regression] build failure in git/master:
r600_dri.so.tmp: undefined reference to
`_mesa_rgba_logicop_enabled'
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: x86
Hi,
cpupowerutils is based on the well known cpufrequtils project.
Where do I find it?
---
A git repository is hosted on gitorious:
git://gitorious.org/cpupowerutils/cpupowerutils.git
Be careful, it's not the default, but the cpupowerutils branch!
You can also directly download
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
Marek Ol??k changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|
On Fri, Mar 11, 2011 at 02:08:46AM +0100, Indan Zupancic wrote:
> On Thu, March 10, 2011 14:31, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Am Do, 10.03.2011, 11:36 schrieb Indan Zupancic:
> >> Which versions fix this, just for reference?
> >
> > git master branch of libdrm and xf86-video-intel newer than
On Fri, March 11, 2011 08:26, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> At Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:23:08 +0100 (CET),
> Indan Zupancic wrote:
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> Some nitpicks below. I know you're just restoring the original code,
>> but if we improve it we can as well do it now.
>
> Well, Linus already merged my patch
On Fri, March 11, 2011 09:07, Chris Wilson wrote:
>> Nothing guarantees that those calls will be balanced, so having
>> backlight_enabled makes no sense, as the real state can change
>> without the panel code noticing. So keep things as stateless as
>> possible.
>
> The problem is wider than
On Fri, March 11, 2011 08:23, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> [Removed stable-kernel from Cc]
>
> At Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:35:45 +0100 (CET),
> Indan Zupancic wrote:
>>
>> drm/i915: Fix DPMS and suspend interaction for intel_panel.c
>>
>> When suspending intel_panel_disable_backlight() is never called,
>> but
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:35:45 +0100 (CET)
"Indan Zupancic" wrote:
> drm/i915: Fix DPMS and suspend interaction for intel_panel.c
>
> When suspending intel_panel_disable_backlight() is never called,
> but intel_panel_enable_backlight() is called at resume. With the
> effect that if the brightness
On 10 March 2011 19:57, wrote:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25709
>
> Marek Ol??k changed:
>
> ? ? ? ? ? What ? ?|Removed ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? |Added
>
> ? ? ? ? ? ? Status|NEW ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ?
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33648
--- Comment #5 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-03-11 08:50:41 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=44363)
--> (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=44363)
Lightsmark with upper part of the screen corrupt
RV570 here, and Lightsmark seems to be
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #25 from Sven Arvidsson 2011-03-11 08:47:47 PST ---
(In reply to comment #23)
> Created an attachment (id=44333)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=44333
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=32945=44333
At Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:23:08 +0100 (CET),
Indan Zupancic wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Some nitpicks below. I know you're just restoring the original code,
> but if we improve it we can as well do it now.
Well, Linus already merged my patch quickly. So, we can improve the
readability as an additional
[Removed stable-kernel from Cc]
At Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:35:45 +0100 (CET),
Indan Zupancic wrote:
>
> drm/i915: Fix DPMS and suspend interaction for intel_panel.c
>
> When suspending intel_panel_disable_backlight() is never called,
> but intel_panel_enable_backlight() is called at resume. With
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:35:45 +0100 (CET), "Indan Zupancic"
wrote:
> drm/i915: Fix DPMS and suspend interaction for intel_panel.c
>
> When suspending intel_panel_disable_backlight() is never called,
> but intel_panel_enable_backlight() is called at resume. With the
> effect that if the
Hi Linus,
Fixes an oops caused by the intersection of two new features being empty.
The following changes since commit 9179746652faf0aba07b8b7f770dcf29892a24c6:
Merge branch 'media_fixes' of
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mchehab/linux-2.6 (2011-03-10
13:22:10 -0800)
are
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34137
--- Comment #2 from Chi-Thanh Christopher Nguyen
2011-03-11 04:26:36 PST ---
Yes, thank you. With the patch the problem is fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35183
--- Comment #2 from Dave Airlie 2011-03-11
03:14:56 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=44345)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=44345
Review: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/review?bug=35183=44345
initial minimal patch to fix
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35183
--- Comment #1 from Dave Airlie 2011-03-11
03:10:42 PST ---
I've debugged this and I'm hoping I have a fix, hopefully I can get a cleaned
up patch in 5mins - tomorrow. (this is mainly to stop anyone else getting into
this)
--
Configure
drm/i915: Fix DPMS and suspend interaction for intel_panel.c
When suspending intel_panel_disable_backlight() is never called,
but intel_panel_enable_backlight() is called at resume. With the
effect that if the brightness was ever changed after screen
blanking, the wrong brightness gets restored
On Thu, March 10, 2011 20:36, Keith Packard wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Mar 2011 14:02:12 +0100, Takashi Iwai wrote:
>> +val &= ~1;
>
> The reason for this is that some ancient platforms wire this bit to
> be "go to max backlight", or at least that's why this was in the 2D
> driver
Hi,
Some nitpicks below. I know you're just restoring the original code,
but if we improve it we can as well do it now.
On Thu, March 10, 2011 14:02, Takashi Iwai wrote:
> This reverts commit 951f3512dba5bd44cda3e5ee22b4b522e4bb09fb
>
> drm/i915: Do not handle backlight combination mode
On Thu, March 10, 2011 14:31, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> Am Do, 10.03.2011, 11:36 schrieb Indan Zupancic:
>> Which versions fix this, just for reference?
>
> git master branch of libdrm and xf86-video-intel newer than 2011-02-22.
Thank you. If there will be no new releases of those packages within
a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32688
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Pedretti 2011-03-11 00:29:49
PST ---
I have a similar problem with sauerbraten on my RV530, with both r300 and
r300g, see also bug #25710.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25710
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Pedretti 2011-03-11 00:24:13
PST ---
Note that the same problem also affects r300g but I think this is already
reported as bug #32688.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=25710
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Pedretti fabio@libero.it 2011-03-11 00:24:13
PST ---
Note that the same problem also affects r300g but I think this is already
reported as bug #32688.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32688
--- Comment #3 from Fabio Pedretti fabio@libero.it 2011-03-11 00:29:49
PST ---
I have a similar problem with sauerbraten on my RV530, with both r300 and
r300g, see also bug #25710.
--
Configure bugmail:
On Fri, March 11, 2011 08:23, Takashi Iwai wrote:
[Removed stable-kernel from Cc]
At Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:35:45 +0100 (CET),
Indan Zupancic wrote:
drm/i915: Fix DPMS and suspend interaction for intel_panel.c
When suspending intel_panel_disable_backlight() is never called,
but
On Fri, March 11, 2011 09:07, Chris Wilson wrote:
Nothing guarantees that those calls will be balanced, so having
backlight_enabled makes no sense, as the real state can change
without the panel code noticing. So keep things as stateless as
possible.
The problem is wider than described since
On Fri, March 11, 2011 08:26, Takashi Iwai wrote:
At Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:23:08 +0100 (CET),
Indan Zupancic wrote:
Hi,
Some nitpicks below. I know you're just restoring the original code,
but if we improve it we can as well do it now.
Well, Linus already merged my patch quickly. So, we
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35183
--- Comment #1 from Dave Airlie airl...@freedesktop.org 2011-03-11 03:10:42
PST ---
I've debugged this and I'm hoping I have a fix, hopefully I can get a cleaned
up patch in 5mins - tomorrow. (this is mainly to stop anyone else getting into
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=34137
--- Comment #2 from Chi-Thanh Christopher Nguyen chith...@gentoo.org
2011-03-11 04:26:36 PST ---
Yes, thank you. With the patch the problem is fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=30922
Summary: [radeon] Noisy fan with Radeon R600 and Toshiba
Satellite L500-164
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 2.6.38-rc8 (at least since 2.6.35)
Platform: All
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
--- Comment #25 from Sven Arvidsson s...@whiz.se 2011-03-11 08:47:47 PST ---
(In reply to comment #23)
Created an attachment (id=44333)
View: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=44333
Review:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=33648
--- Comment #5 from Sven Arvidsson s...@whiz.se 2011-03-11 08:50:41 PST ---
Created an attachment (id=44363)
-- (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=44363)
Lightsmark with upper part of the screen corrupt
RV570 here, and Lightsmark
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:35:45 +0100 (CET)
Indan Zupancic in...@nul.nu wrote:
drm/i915: Fix DPMS and suspend interaction for intel_panel.c
When suspending intel_panel_disable_backlight() is never called,
but intel_panel_enable_backlight() is called at resume. With the
effect that if the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=32945
Marek Olšák mar...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35226
Summary: [regression] build failure in git/master:
r600_dri.so.tmp: undefined reference to
`_mesa_rgba_logicop_enabled'
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform: x86
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35045
--- Comment #1 from Kevin DeKorte kdeko...@yahoo.com 2011-03-11 15:37:01 PST
---
Similar crash in gnome using git versions of D-R-T, drm, mesa and DDX as of
3/11/2011. Screen shot attached.
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35045
--- Comment #2 from Kevin DeKorte kdeko...@yahoo.com 2011-03-11 15:39:30 PST
---
Created an attachment (id=44375)
-- (https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=44375)
Screen shot of crash on display
--
Configure bugmail:
On Fri, March 11, 2011 18:27, Jesse Barnes wrote:
On Fri, 11 Mar 2011 02:35:45 +0100 (CET)
Indan Zupancic in...@nul.nu wrote:
drm/i915: Fix DPMS and suspend interaction for intel_panel.c
When suspending intel_panel_disable_backlight() is never called,
but intel_panel_enable_backlight() is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=35051
--- Comment #7 from Brian Paterni bpate...@gmail.com 2011-03-11 17:59:30 PST
---
(In reply to comment #1)
The Inconsistency detected by ld.so: ... line in
the log looks suspicious, although it's unclear to me if it's related to the
cause of
46 matches
Mail list logo
