https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42972
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar 2012-03-21 21:43:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=72671)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=72671)
Xorg log 3.3.0
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42972
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar 2012-03-21 21:42:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=72670)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=72670)
Xorg log 3.2.11
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42972
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar 2012-03-21 21:41:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=72669)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=72669)
dmesg 3.3.0
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42972
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar 2012-03-21 21:41:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=72668)
--> (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=72668)
dmesg 3.2.11
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42972
Summary: Missing EDID through NV11 (nouveau) driver causes
suboptimal modeline
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 3.3.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42876
--- Comment #4 from Sergio 2012-03-21 20:07:05 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
> No problem with parameter acpi=off noapic
It worked for me in Fedora 16 with 3.2.10-2 kernel but, don't support for dual
screen configuration and GNOME 3 only
From: Jerome Glisse
For 6xx+. Required for mesa to use htile support for HiZ/HiS.
Userspace will check radeon version 2.14 with is bumped either
by tiling patch or stream out patch. This patch only add support
for htile relocation which should be enough for any userspace
to
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43278
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Nieder 2012-03-21
10:49:34 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #18)
> Today I am using kernel 3.2.0-2-amd64 .
> The problem still exists in exactly the same way - the first hibernate
> always works perfectly fine - the
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:31 PM, InKi Dae wrote:
> Hi Linus,
>
> now mainline has a duplicated patch set for exynos drm driver so
> please revert the patch below from mainline before merging with
> drm-next to avoid conflict.
> subject: drm exynos: use drm_fb_helper_set_par directly
> commit id:
From: Rob Clark
Minor error path clean-up.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_dmm_tiler.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_dmm_tiler.c
b/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_dmm_tiler.c
index
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:21:28AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
> <#part sign=pgpmime>
> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:53:54 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Keith, is there a chance that this bug can be fixed by i915 team?
>
> Yes, I'm working on figuring out how to actually reproduce
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:25 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:46:14AM -0700, Rebecca Schultz Zavin wrote:
>> I want to make sure I understand how this would work. ?I've been planning
>> on making cache maintenance implicit, and most of the corresponding
>> userspace
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka
wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:21:28AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
>> <#part sign=pgpmime>
>> On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:53:54 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka > redhat.com> wrote:
>>
>> > Keith, is there a chance that this bug can be fixed by i915
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45018
--- Comment #42 from Alexandre Demers
2012-03-21 07:35:36 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #41)
> Are you still getting any messages like the following in your dmesg with the
> latest mesa from git?
>
> radeon :01:00.0: offset 0x20 is in
A udelay value of 20 leads to an I2C bus running at only 25 kbps. I2C
devices can typically operate faster than this, 50 kbps should be fine
for all devices (and compliant devices can always stretch the clock if
needed.)
FWIW, the vast majority of framebuffer drivers set udelay to 10
already. So
A udelay value of 20 leads to an I2C bus running at only 25 kbps. I2C
devices can typically operate faster than this, 50 kbps should be fine
for all devices (and compliant devices can always stretch the clock if
needed.)
FWIW, the vast majority of framebuffer drivers set udelay to 10
already. So
Hi Keith,
On Sunday 29 January 2012 02:34:05 am Keith Packard wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:08:58 +0100, Jean Delvare
> wrote:
> > The VESA specification suggests a 2.2 ms timeout on DDC channels.
> > Use exactly that (as the i915 driver does) instead of hard-coding a
> > jiffy count.
>
> The
From: Rob Clark
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
tests/modetest/modetest.c | 36
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/modetest/modetest.c b/tests/modetest/modetest.c
index 36bdfff..819724a 100644
---
From: Rob Clark
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
tests/modetest/modetest.c | 151 ++---
1 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/modetest/modetest.c b/tests/modetest/modetest.c
index 2936de0..36bdfff 100644
---
From: Rob Clark
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
tests/modetest/modetest.c | 166 ++---
1 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/modetest/modetest.c b/tests/modetest/modetest.c
index 1e4ec91..2936de0 100644
---
From: Rob Clark
This adds libdrm_omap helper layer (as used by xf86-video-omap,
omapdrmtest, etc).
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark
---
Makefile.am |6 +-
configure.ac | 12 ++
omap/Makefile.am | 22
omap/libdrm_omap.pc.in| 11 ++
On 20.03.2012 22:17, alexdeucher at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Alex Deucher
>
> This patch set adds support for SI (Southern Islands discrete
> GPUs) and TN (Trinity APU). The patches are available here
> as well:
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/si_tn/
> New ucode for SI (TAHITI, PITCAIRN,
? ??2012-03-20 ? 23:03 +0100?Pali Roh?r ???
> >
> > Another doubt is the latest statement in _BCM, it emit a BEVT event:
> >
> > Signal (\_SB.BEVT)
> >
> > Only HKFR(HotkeyFunctionResponse) method is waiting this event, it
> > should related to how the HP implement brightness function key on
>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43278
--- Comment #18 from Rolf 2012-03-21 05:01:34 PDT ---
On 20.03.2012 19:47, bugzilla-daemon at freedesktop.org wrote:
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43278
>
> --- Comment #17 from Jonathan Nieder 2012-03-20
> 11:47:35 PDT ---
>
Hi Keith,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Sunday 29 January 2012 02:26:25 am Keith Packard wrote:
> On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:07:09 +0100, Jean Delvare
> wrote:
> > A udelay value of 20 leads to an I2C bus running at only 25 kbps.
> > I2C devices can typically operate faster than this, 50 kbps should
Hi, Dave.
as you pointed out, we have removed g2d driver from this patch set and
rebased virtual display driver. for g2d driver, we will consolidate the
security issue you pointed out for next time.
Please pull from
git://git.infradead.org/users/kmpark/linux-samsung exynos-drm-next
this
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Rob Clark wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Daniel Vetter
> wrote:
>> Let's have some competition here for dma_buf mmap support ;-)
>>
>> Compared to Rob Clarke's RFC I've ditched the prepare/finish hooks
>> and corresponding ioctls on the dma_buf file.
Hi Dave,
> -Original Message-
> From: Dave Airlie [mailto:airlied at gmail.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2012 6:49 PM
> To: Inki Dae
> Cc: airlied at linux.ie; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org;
> kyungmin.park at samsung.com; sw0312.kim at samsung.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 00/14]
Hi Linus,
This is the main drm pull request, I'm probably going to send two more
smaller ones, will explain below.
This contains a patch that is also in the fbdev tree, but it should be the
same patch, it added an API for hot unplugging framebuffer devices, and I
need that API for a new
backing storage to userspace. Note that the
> > + * mapping needs to be coherent - if the exporter doesn't directly
> > + * support this, it needs to fake coherency by shooting down any
> ptes
> > + * when transitioning away from the cpu domain.
> > */
> > struct dma_buf_ops {
> >int (*attach)(struct dma_buf *, struct device *,
> > @@ -92,6 +96,8 @@ struct dma_buf_ops {
> >void (*kunmap_atomic)(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long, void *);
> >void *(*kmap)(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long);
> >void (*kunmap)(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long, void *);
> > +
> > + int (*mmap)(struct dma_buf *, struct vm_area_struct *vma);
> > };
> >
> > /**
> > @@ -167,6 +173,9 @@ void *dma_buf_kmap_atomic(struct dma_buf *, unsigned
> long);
> > void dma_buf_kunmap_atomic(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long, void *);
> > void *dma_buf_kmap(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long);
> > void dma_buf_kunmap(struct dma_buf *, unsigned long, void *);
> > +
> > +int dma_buf_mmap(struct dma_buf *, struct vm_area_struct *,
> > +unsigned long);
> > #else
> >
> > static inline struct dma_buf_attachment *dma_buf_attach(struct dma_buf
> *dmabuf,
> > @@ -247,6 +256,13 @@ static inline void dma_buf_kunmap(struct dma_buf *,
> unsigned long,
> > void *)
> > {
> > }
> > +
> > +static inline int dma_buf_mmap(struct dma_buf *,
> > + struct vm_area_struct *vma,
> > + unsigned long pgoff)
> > +{
> > + return -ENODEV;
> > +}
> > #endif /* CONFIG_DMA_SHARED_BUFFER */
> >
> > #endif /* __DMA_BUF_H__ */
> > --
> > 1.7.7.5
> >
> > ___
> > dri-devel mailing list
> > dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> > http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
>
> ___
> Linaro-mm-sig mailing list
> Linaro-mm-sig at lists.linaro.org
> http://lists.linaro.org/mailman/listinfo/linaro-mm-sig
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20120321/a6ad5451/attachment-0001.htm>
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Daniel Vetter
wrote:
> Let's have some competition here for dma_buf mmap support ;-)
>
> Compared to Rob Clarke's RFC I've ditched the prepare/finish hooks
> and corresponding ioctls on the dma_buf file. The major reason for
> that is that many people seem to be
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47606
--- Comment #1 from Michel D?nzer 2012-03-21 03:08:21
PDT ---
Please attach dmesg output.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47606
Michel D?nzer changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|xorg-driver-ati at lists.x.org |dri-devel at
lists.freedesktop
> > > }
> > > > }
> > >
> out:
> > > > ttm->caching_state = c_state;
> > > >
> > > > return 0;
>
> Is the problem with calling page change twice making the machine slow?
>
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://lists.freedesktop.org/archives/dri-devel/attachments/20120321/9f991ca4/attachment.htm>
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Jean Delvare wrote:
> A udelay value of 20 leads to an I2C bus running at only 25 kbps. I2C
> devices can typically operate faster than this, 50 kbps should be fine
> for all devices (and compliant devices can always stretch the clock if
> needed.)
>
> FWIW, the
On Saturday 04 February 2012 20:19:16 Joey Lee wrote:
> Add Cc. to dri mail
>
> Hi Pali,
>
> ? ??2012-02-03 ? 16:24 +0100?Pali Roh?r ???
>
> > On Friday 20 January 2012 17:55:57 Pali Roh?r wrote:
> > > On Friday 20 January 2012 11:28:59 joeyli wrote:
> > > > ? ??2012-01-20 ? 11:12 +0800?joeyli
On Saturday 04 February 2012 20:19:16 Joey Lee wrote:
Add Cc. to dri mail
Hi Pali,
於 五,2012-02-03 於 16:24 +0100,Pali Rohár 提到:
On Friday 20 January 2012 17:55:57 Pali Rohár wrote:
On Friday 20 January 2012 11:28:59 joeyli wrote:
於 五,2012-01-20 於 11:12 +0800,joeyli 提到:
Hi
於 二,2012-03-20 於 23:03 +0100,Pali Rohár 提到:
Another doubt is the latest statement in _BCM, it emit a BEVT event:
Signal (\_SB.BEVT)
Only HKFR(HotkeyFunctionResponse) method is waiting this event, it
should related to how the HP implement brightness function key on
Windows
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47606
Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|xorg-driver-...@lists.x.org
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=47606
--- Comment #1 from Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net 2012-03-21 03:08:21 PDT
---
Please attach dmesg output.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail because: ---
You
Hi Linus,
This is the main drm pull request, I'm probably going to send two more
smaller ones, will explain below.
This contains a patch that is also in the fbdev tree, but it should be the
same patch, it added an API for hot unplugging framebuffer devices, and I
need that API for a new
On 20.03.2012 22:17, alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Alex Deucheralexander.deuc...@amd.com
This patch set adds support for SI (Southern Islands discrete
GPUs) and TN (Trinity APU). The patches are available here
as well:
http://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/si_tn/
New ucode for SI (TAHITI,
Hi Keith,
Sorry for the late reply.
On Sunday 29 January 2012 02:26:25 am Keith Packard wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:07:09 +0100, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de
wrote:
A udelay value of 20 leads to an I2C bus running at only 25 kbps.
I2C devices can typically operate faster than this, 50
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43278
--- Comment #18 from Rolf hu...@online.de 2012-03-21 05:01:34 PDT ---
On 20.03.2012 19:47, bugzilla-dae...@freedesktop.org wrote:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43278
--- Comment #17 from Jonathan Niederjrnie...@gmail.com
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 9:30 AM, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de wrote:
A udelay value of 20 leads to an I2C bus running at only 25 kbps. I2C
devices can typically operate faster than this, 50 kbps should be fine
for all devices (and compliant devices can always stretch the clock if
needed.)
Hi Keith,
On Sunday 29 January 2012 02:34:05 am Keith Packard wrote:
On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:08:58 +0100, Jean Delvare jdelv...@suse.de
wrote:
The VESA specification suggests a 2.2 ms timeout on DDC channels.
Use exactly that (as the i915 driver does) instead of hard-coding a
jiffy count.
A udelay value of 20 leads to an I2C bus running at only 25 kbps. I2C
devices can typically operate faster than this, 50 kbps should be fine
for all devices (and compliant devices can always stretch the clock if
needed.)
FWIW, the vast majority of framebuffer drivers set udelay to 10
already. So
A udelay value of 20 leads to an I2C bus running at only 25 kbps. I2C
devices can typically operate faster than this, 50 kbps should be fine
for all devices (and compliant devices can always stretch the clock if
needed.)
FWIW, the vast majority of framebuffer drivers set udelay to 10
already. So
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45018
--- Comment #42 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com 2012-03-21
07:35:36 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #41)
Are you still getting any messages like the following in your dmesg with the
latest mesa from git?
radeon :01:00.0:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 3:14 PM, Stanislaw Gruszka sgrus...@redhat.com wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:21:28AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
#part sign=pgpmime
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:53:54 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka sgrus...@redhat.com
wrote:
Keith, is there a chance that this bug can be
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
Let's have some competition here for dma_buf mmap support ;-)
Compared to Rob Clarke's RFC I've ditched the prepare/finish hooks
and corresponding ioctls on the dma_buf file. The major reason for
that is that many
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 5:31 PM, InKi Dae daei...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi Linus,
now mainline has a duplicated patch set for exynos drm driver so
please revert the patch below from mainline before merging with
drm-next to avoid conflict.
subject: drm exynos: use drm_fb_helper_set_par directly
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43278
--- Comment #19 from Jonathan Nieder jrnie...@gmail.com 2012-03-21 10:49:34
PDT ---
(In reply to comment #18)
Today I am using kernel 3.2.0-2-amd64 .
The problem still exists in exactly the same way - the first hibernate
always works
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
This adds libdrm_omap helper layer (as used by xf86-video-omap,
omapdrmtest, etc).
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
Makefile.am |6 +-
configure.ac | 12 ++
omap/Makefile.am | 22
omap/libdrm_omap.pc.in|
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
tests/modetest/modetest.c | 166 ++---
1 files changed, 157 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/modetest/modetest.c b/tests/modetest/modetest.c
index 1e4ec91..2936de0
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
tests/modetest/modetest.c | 151 ++---
1 files changed, 142 insertions(+), 9 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/modetest/modetest.c b/tests/modetest/modetest.c
index 2936de0..36bdfff
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
tests/modetest/modetest.c | 36
1 files changed, 36 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tests/modetest/modetest.c b/tests/modetest/modetest.c
index 36bdfff..819724a 100644
---
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42876
--- Comment #4 from Sergio sergiomart...@gmail.com 2012-03-21 20:07:05 ---
(In reply to comment #3)
No problem with parameter acpi=off noapic
It worked for me in Fedora 16 with 3.2.10-2 kernel but, don't support for dual
screen
From: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
Minor error path clean-up.
Signed-off-by: Rob Clark r...@ti.com
---
drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_dmm_tiler.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/omapdrm/omap_dmm_tiler.c
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42972
Summary: Missing EDID through NV11 (nouveau) driver causes
suboptimal modeline
Product: Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 3.3.0
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42972
--- Comment #1 from Petr Pisar petr.pi...@atlas.cz 2012-03-21 21:41:24 ---
Created an attachment (id=72668)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=72668)
dmesg 3.2.11
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42972
--- Comment #2 from Petr Pisar petr.pi...@atlas.cz 2012-03-21 21:41:52 ---
Created an attachment (id=72669)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=72669)
dmesg 3.3.0
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42972
--- Comment #3 from Petr Pisar petr.pi...@atlas.cz 2012-03-21 21:42:35 ---
Created an attachment (id=72670)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=72670)
Xorg log 3.2.11
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42972
--- Comment #4 from Petr Pisar petr.pi...@atlas.cz 2012-03-21 21:43:03 ---
Created an attachment (id=72671)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=72671)
Xorg log 3.3.0
--
Configure bugmail:
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:46:14AM -0700, Rebecca Schultz Zavin wrote:
I want to make sure I understand how this would work. I've been planning
on making cache maintenance implicit, and most of the corresponding
userspace components I've seen for android expect to do implicit cache
From: Jerome Glisse jgli...@redhat.com
For 6xx+. Required for mesa to use htile support for HiZ/HiS.
Userspace will check radeon version 2.14 with is bumped either
by tiling patch or stream out patch. This patch only add support
for htile relocation which should be enough for any userspace
to
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 03:44:38PM -0700, Rebecca Schultz Zavin wrote:
Couldn't this just as easily be handled by not having those mappings
be mapped cached or write combine to userspace? They'd be coherent,
just slow. I'm not sure we can actually say that all these cpu access
are necessary
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 10:21:28AM -0700, Keith Packard wrote:
#part sign=pgpmime
On Mon, 19 Mar 2012 15:53:54 +0100, Stanislaw Gruszka sgrus...@redhat.com
wrote:
Keith, is there a chance that this bug can be fixed by i915 team?
Yes, I'm working on figuring out how to actually reproduce
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch
wrote:
Let's have some competition here for dma_buf mmap support ;-)
Compared to Rob Clarke's RFC I've ditched the prepare/finish hooks
and
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:45 AM, Rob Clark rob.cl...@linaro.org wrote:
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 3:53 PM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
Let's have some competition here for dma_buf mmap support ;-)
Compared to Rob Clarke's RFC I've ditched the prepare/finish hooks
and
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=45018
--- Comment #43 from Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com 2012-03-21
21:11:41 PDT ---
Created attachment 58846
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=58846
Different error message
Running RenderFeatTest.bin64 with
71 matches
Mail list logo