Hi, Satendra:
I've applied this patch to my branch mediatek-drm-next-4.18,
and I've added below modification in this patch to prevent build error,
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/Kconfig
b/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/Kconfig
index 294de45..119ec0a 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/mediatek/Kconfig
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104888
Robin Kauffman changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |WORKSFORME
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105684
--- Comment #17 from jian-h...@endlessm.com ---
Created attachment 139117
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=139117=edit
dmesg of loading amdgpu module - tested in 4.17-rc2
I have tried Linux kernel 4.17-rc2 and load amdgpu
On 16 February 2018 at 23:28, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
>
> Gerd Hoffmann (4):
> qxl: remove qxl_io_log()
> qxl: move qxl_send_monitors_config()
> qxl: hook monitors_config updates into crtc, not encoder.
> qxl: drop dummy functions
Reviewed-by: Dave Airlie
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105425
--- Comment #53 from MirceaKitsune ---
(In reply to iive from comment #52)
Ah... I do indeed have apitrace 7.1-3.89. I don't know if a newer version
exists on https://software.opensuse.org which is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105425
--- Comment #52 from i...@yahoo.com ---
(In reply to MirceaKitsune from comment #51)
> Created attachment 139103 [details]
> Output of: systemctl | grep running
>
> (In reply to iive from comment #50)
>
> I've preformed many more tests during
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:45 PM, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Sandeep Panda (2018-04-19 10:56:06)
>> Document the bindings used for the sn65dsi86 DSI to eDP bridge.
>>
>> Changes in v1:
>> - Rephrase the dt-binding descriptions to be more inline with existing
>>bindings
On 04/25/2018 05:09 PM, Paulo Zanoni wrote:
Add the PCI IDs and the basic code to enable ICL. This is the current
PCI ID list in our documentation.
Kernel commit: d55cb4fa2cf0 ("drm/i915/icl: Add the ICL PCI IDs")
v2: Michel provided a fix to IS_9XX that was broken by rebase bot.
v3: Fix
Add the PCI IDs and the basic code to enable ICL. This is the current
PCI ID list in our documentation.
Kernel commit: d55cb4fa2cf0 ("drm/i915/icl: Add the ICL PCI IDs")
v2: Michel provided a fix to IS_9XX that was broken by rebase bot.
v3: Fix double definition of PCI IDs, update IDs according
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105284
--- Comment #7 from Jon ---
(In reply to Harry Wentland from comment #6)
> Marking resolved as no longer an issue on recent mainline.
Which commit fixes this? I merged in agd5f/drm-fixes-4.17 into linus master:
Merge:
Hi Christian,
I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on drm/drm-next]
[also build test ERROR on v4.17-rc2 next-20180424]
[if your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, please drop us a note to help
improve the system]
url:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 6:04 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 09:55:32AM -0400, Sean Paul wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 20, 2018 at 01:50:01PM +0200, Emil Lundmark wrote:
>> > This fixes a NULL pointer dereference that can happen if the UDL
>> > driver is unloaded
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106225
Francisco Pina Martins changed:
What|Removed |Added
Attachment #139081|0 |1
Hi Rob,
On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 20:11:23 EEST Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 04:17:25PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 15:20:04 EEST Philippe CORNU wrote:
> >> On 04/25/2018 11:01 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday, 25 April 2018
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 5:33 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:04:29PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> > Coordinating the backport of a trivial helper in the arm tree is not
>> > the end of the world. Really, this cowboy attitude is a good reason
>> >
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106159
--- Comment #13 from Alex Deucher ---
Try the patches from this branch:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/log/?h=drm-fixes-4.17
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199425
--- Comment #1 from Johannes Hirte (johannes.hi...@datenkhaos.de) ---
(gdb) list *(drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_flip_done+0x247)
0x82043447 is in drm_atomic_helper_wait_for_flip_done
(drivers/gpu/drm/drm_atomic_helper.c:1381).
1376
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106159
--- Comment #12 from Joel Sass ---
Created attachment 139112
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=139112=edit
The modified file causing the problem in my comment.
Looks like there's some missing
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106159
--- Comment #11 from Joel Sass ---
It appears that the patch I manually created isn't working out so hot. During
compiling, I'm seeing this error for amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104082
ojab changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||o...@ojab.ru
--- Comment #44 from
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104082
--- Comment #43 from ojab ---
Same here on ryzen 2400g + asus a320m-k w/ iommu disabled, vanilla kernel
4.16.4.
I'm not sure if it's another issue since it happens on driver loading and
backtrace looks like:
[Wed Apr 25 20:18:50
Hi Maxime,
Il 25/04/2018 20:40, Maxime Ripard ha scritto:
Hi Giulio,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:31:44PM +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
LiNova1 is not a board with various headers to connect other peripherals
such display, pcap etc.
It's an HMI that I would consider the same as a Tablet, because
On 25/04/18 02:25, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:25:44PM +0300, Jyri Sarha wrote:
>> On 24/04/18 20:06, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 07:04:16PM +0300, Jyri Sarha wrote:
On 24/04/18 13:14, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-04-24
On Wednesday, April 25, 2018 1:43 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> For the same reasons we've added dri-devel for all fbdev patches: Most
> of the actively developed drivers using this infrastructure are in
> drivers/gpu/. It just makes sense to cross-post patches and keep
> aligned. And total
On Wednesday, April 25, 2018 1:43 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> The backlight power state handling is supremely confusing. We have:
> - props.power, using FB_BLANK_* defines
> - props.fb_blank, using the same, but deprecated int favour of
> props.state
> - props.state, using the BL_CORE_*
Hi Dave,
Here's the latest from -misc-fixes. Of note, no nasty backmerges as per the
thread on dim-tools. We have one regression fix, and two stable fixes, and a
couple of regular fixes for your consideration.
drm-misc-fixes-2018-04-25:
sun41: Fix regression for TBSA711 tablet (Ondrej)
qxl: 2
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=54060
Öyvind Saether changed:
What|Removed |Added
Resolution|--- |FIXED
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:55 PM, Rob Clark wrote:
> Hi Dave,
>
> A few fixes for 4.17.. thanks to Sean for helping pull together some
> of the display related fixes while I was off in compute-land.
>
> The following changes since commit
Hi Dave,
A few fixes for 4.17.. thanks to Sean for helping pull together some
of the display related fixes while I was off in compute-land.
The following changes since commit a10beabba213924d876f2d10ca9351aeab93f58a:
Merge branch 'drm-next-4.17' of
git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux
Hi Giulio,
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:31:44PM +0200, Giulio Benetti wrote:
> LiNova1 is not a board with various headers to connect other peripherals
> such display, pcap etc.
> It's an HMI that I would consider the same as a Tablet, because it has a
> plastic enclosure also.
>
> So I would like
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 10:44 AM, Alex Deucher wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:24:36AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>>> > It has a non-coherent transaction mode (which the chipset can opt to
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 2:41 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 02:24:36AM -0400, Alex Deucher wrote:
>> > It has a non-coherent transaction mode (which the chipset can opt to
>> > not implement and still flush), to make sure the AGP horror show
>> >
Nothing in the entire tree ever sets this, which means this is dead
code. Remove it.
Cc: Lee Jones
Cc: Daniel Thompson
Cc: Jingoo Han
Acked-by: Daniel Thompson
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
For the same reasons we've added dri-devel for all fbdev patches: Most
of the actively developed drivers using this infrastructure are in
drivers/gpu/. It just makes sense to cross-post patches and keep
aligned. And total activity in the backlight subsystem is miniscule
compared to drm overall.
Leaking driver internal tracking into the already massively confusing
backlight power tracking is really confusing.
Stop that by allocating a tiny driver private data structure instead.
Cc: Lee Jones
Cc: Daniel Thompson
Cc: Jingoo Han
Now that the 3 drivers using this are cleaned up we can also remove
this final bit of confusion of leaking driver internals into the
backlight power interface.
The backlight power interface itself is still a massive mess.
Cc: Lee Jones
Cc: Daniel Thompson
Leaking driver internal tracking into the already massively confusing
backlight power tracking is really confusing.
Luckily we have already a drvdata structure, so fixing this is really
easy.
Cc: Lee Jones
Cc: Daniel Thompson
Cc: Jingoo Han
The backlight power state handling is supremely confusing. We have:
- props.power, using FB_BLANK_* defines
- props.fb_blank, using the same, but deprecated int favour of
props.state
- props.state, using the BL_CORE_* defines
- and finally a bunch of backlight drivers treat brightness == 0 as
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 08:34:55AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:07:07AM +0300, Oleksandr Andrushchenko wrote:
> > On 04/24/2018 11:35 PM, Dongwon Kim wrote:
> > > Had a meeting with Daniel and talked about bringing out generic
> > > part of hyper-dmabuf to the
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 04:17:25PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 15:20:04 EEST Philippe CORNU wrote:
> > On 04/25/2018 11:01 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 10:53:13 EEST Philippe Cornu wrote:
> > >> Add optional power
Hi Dave,
A few fixes for 4.17:
- Fix a hang on CZ boards with EDC enabled
- Fix hangs related to DP MST handling
- Fix a deadlock in irq handling in DC
The following changes since commit 221bda4b5f1abfd74159d7bf3703affa62468030:
Merge branch 'drm-next-4.17' of
On 04/25/2018 11:29 AM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Another issue is changing wait_event_killable to wait_event_timeout where I need
to understand
what TO value is acceptable for all the drivers using the scheduler, or maybe it
should come as a property
of drm_sched_entity.
It would not surprise
Daniel Vetter writes:
> Bunch of ideas from Eric and me on what we could do to make gem gpu
> rendering drivers a notch simpler to type.
>
> Cc: Eric Anholt
> Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
> diff --git
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=199493
--- Comment #1 from har...@gmx.de ---
Created attachment 275577
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=275577=edit
related part of dmesg, with amdgpu.dc=1
there are some warnings followed by callstacks in dmesg, maybe this is
On 2018-04-25 05:21 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 02:58:10PM -0400, Felix Kuehling wrote:
>> Reviewed-by: Felix Kuehling
>>
>> We could probably add a sanity check for n_devices to avoid user mode
>> causing excessive memory allocations in the kernel.
Hi all,
The patch works: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
I switch 4K@60 and 4K@30 monitors some times, monitors show correct output.
Thanks for your help.
What are the steps to close the issue in freedesktop? Append the patch by Ville
Syrjälä, then I close it?
Antony
2018-04-25 3:36 GMT+08:00
Fixes: 14da3ed8dd08c581 ("devicetree/bindings: display: Document common
panel properties")
Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/panel-common.txt | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 01:54:39AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> [discussion about this patch, which should have been cced to the iommu
> and linux-arm-kernel lists, but wasn't:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg173630.html]
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:41:51AM +0200, Thierry
Hi!
On 16/04/18 16:49, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> I have implemented a WSEGL plugin library for Imagination's PVR driver
> for SGX, which allows using SGX via DRI3. In other words, it is one
> piece in the puzzle of using SGX with X11.
>
> The project is not production quality, as I
On 2018-04-24 19:06, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 07:04:16PM +0300, Jyri Sarha wrote:
>> On 24/04/18 13:14, Peter Rosin wrote:
>>> On 2018-04-24 10:08, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 08:58:42AM +0200, Peter Rosin wrote:
> On 2018-04-23
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:10:51PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding
>
> The ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU Kconfig option has side-effects that drivers can
> not opt into but have to explicitly opt out of. This can lead to subtle
> bugs that are difficult to track down
Andrey Grodzovsky writes:
> On 04/25/2018 03:14 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 05:37:08PM -0400, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
>>>
>>> On 04/24/2018 05:21 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Andrey Grodzovsky writes:
>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106193
--- Comment #8 from Harry Wentland ---
Hi Joel,
does the patch fix the issue?
Thanks for your bug report and testing.
Harry
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:04:29PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > Coordinating the backport of a trivial helper in the arm tree is not
> > the end of the world. Really, this cowboy attitude is a good reason
> > why graphics folks have such a bad rep. You keep poking into random
> > kernel
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104412
Harry Wentland changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:10:47PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding
>
> Depending on the kernel configuration, early ARM architecture setup code
> may have attached the GPU to a DMA/IOMMU mapping that transparently uses
> the IOMMU to back the DMA API.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105425
--- Comment #51 from MirceaKitsune ---
Created attachment 139103
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=139103=edit
Output of: systemctl | grep running
(In reply to iive from comment #50)
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106193
--- Comment #6 from Joel Sass ---
Harry,
as I had mentioned here https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106159 I
had to manually apply the patches you'd given me, so I'm including the diff
here as well. This has both
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106193
--- Comment #7 from Joel Sass ---
Created attachment 139102
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=139102=edit
amdgpu_dm.c patch I had to manually apply
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106159
--- Comment #10 from Joel Sass ---
Created attachment 139101
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=139101=edit
amdgpu_dm_mst_types.c patch I had to manually apply
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106159
--- Comment #9 from Joel Sass ---
Created attachment 139100
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=139100=edit
amdgpu_dm.c patch I had to manually apply
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106159
--- Comment #8 from Joel Sass ---
Alright! First, I appreciate the help with this.
I decided to just roll with what I was being given and roll the kernel after
applying the patches you'd recommended. I downloaded the
> +void arch_iommu_detach_device(struct device *dev)
> +{
> +#ifdef CONFIG_ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU
> + struct dma_iommu_mapping *mapping = to_dma_iommu_mapping(dev);
> + const struct dma_map_ops *dma_ops;
> +
> + if (!mapping)
> + return;
> +
> +
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 12:10:48PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> From: Thierry Reding
>
> The dma_iommu_detach_device() API can be used by drivers to forcibly
> detach a device from an IOMMU that architecture code might have attached
> to. This is useful for drivers that
The series seems to miss a cover letter.
Also I really think this patch original patch shouldn't be in the proper
series.
___
dri-devel mailing list
dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/dri-devel
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 11:25:11AM +0100, Russell King - ARM Linux wrote:
> > config ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU
> > - bool
> > + def_bool y
> > select ARM_HAS_SG_CHAIN
> > select NEED_SG_DMA_LENGTH
>
> This doesn't work - as has recently been discussed with hch, we can't
> globally enable
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=106193
--- Comment #5 from Harry Wentland ---
I recommend using drm-next-4.18-wip from Alex's tree:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux/?h=amd-staging-drm-next
git clone git://people.freedesktop.org/~agd5f/linux
cd linux
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103277
--- Comment #24 from Harry Wentland ---
Thanks for testing Jerry's patches. We tried reproducing this issue many times
but never thought to try MST.
Those two patches are going into 4.17 and 4.18.
--
You are receiving
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 9:16 PM, wrote:
> On 2018-04-24 20:13, Rob Herring wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 18, 2018 at 05:50:02PM +0530, Sandeep Panda wrote:
>>>
>>> The Innolux TV123WAM is a 12.3" eDP display panel
>>> with 2160x1440 resolution.
>>
>>
>> Why don't you just
On 04/25, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> > On 04/24, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> >>
> >> wait_event_killabel doesn't check for fatal_signal_pending before calling
> >> schedule, so definitely has a nice race there.
> >
> > This is
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 07:03:14PM +0800, Antony Chen wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The patch works: drivers/gpu/drm/drm_edid.c
> I switch 4K@60 and 4K@30 monitors some times, monitors show correct output.
> Thanks for your help.
>
> What are the steps to close the issue in freedesktop? Append the patch
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 09:36:29PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 05:26:30PM +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 04:18:37PM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 04:02:50PM +0300, Ville Syrjala wrote:
> > > > From: Ville Syrjälä
Hi Vaishali,
On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 16:42:59 EEST Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 15:10:36 EEST Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
> >> As specified in drm_drv.c, drm_dev_unref is a compatibility alias
> >> for
On 04/24/2018 05:40 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 05:02:40PM -0400, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
On 04/24/2018 03:44 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 05:46:52PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Adding the dri-devel list, since this is driver independent code.
On
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 01:27:20PM +0100, Emil Velikov wrote:
> On 24 April 2018 at 20:14, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:30 PM, Emil Velikov
> > wrote:
> >> On 13 April 2018 at 11:00, Daniel Vetter
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 7:02 PM, Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
> Hi Vaishali,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 15:10:36 EEST Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
>> As specified in drm_drv.c, drm_dev_unref is a compatibility alias
>> for drm_dev_put and
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 3:22 PM, Oleg Nesterov wrote:
> On 04/24, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>
>> wait_event_killabel doesn't check for fatal_signal_pending before calling
>> schedule, so definitely has a nice race there.
>
> This is fine. See the signal_pending_state() check in
Hi Vaishali,
Thank you for the patch.
On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 15:10:36 EEST Vaishali Thakkar wrote:
> As specified in drm_drv.c, drm_dev_unref is a compatibility alias
> for drm_dev_put and shouldn't be used in new code. So, use
> drm_dev_put instead.
This looks good to me. However, how
On 04/24, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>
> wait_event_killabel doesn't check for fatal_signal_pending before calling
> schedule, so definitely has a nice race there.
This is fine. See the signal_pending_state() check in __schedule().
And this doesn't differ from wait_event_interruptible(), it too
Hi, Robin,
Thanks for the patch. It was some time since I put together that code,
but I remember hitting something similar to
https://www.linuxquestions.org/questions/linux-kernel-70/%27nents%27-argument-of-dma_unmap_sg-4175621964/
Even if it's clear from the documentation that orig_nents
Hi Philippe,
On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 15:20:04 EEST Philippe CORNU wrote:
> On 04/25/2018 11:01 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 10:53:13 EEST Philippe Cornu wrote:
> >> Add optional power supplies using the description found in
> >> "SiI9022A/SiI9024A HDMI
On 04/25/2018 03:14 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 05:37:08PM -0400, Andrey Grodzovsky wrote:
On 04/24/2018 05:21 PM, Eric W. Biederman wrote:
Andrey Grodzovsky writes:
On 04/24/2018 03:44 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at
On 25 April 2018 at 01:29, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:31 AM, Ezequiel Garcia
> wrote:
>> Hi Doug, Sean:
>>
>> I would like to move this forward.
>>
>> On 26 February 2018 at 15:23, Doug Anderson
On 24 April 2018 at 20:14, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 7:30 PM, Emil Velikov
> wrote:
>> On 13 April 2018 at 11:00, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> This tries to align with the X.org communities's
Hi Laurent & Rob :-)
On 04/25/2018 11:01 AM, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Philippe,
>
> Thank you for the patch.
>
> On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 10:53:13 EEST Philippe Cornu wrote:
>> Add optional power supplies using the description found in
>> "SiI9022A/SiI9024A HDMI Transmitter Data Sheet
As specified in drm_drv.c, drm_dev_unref is a compatibility alias
for drm_dev_put and shouldn't be used in new code. So, use
drm_dev_put instead.
Signed-off-by: Vaishali Thakkar
---
drivers/gpu/drm/rcar-du/rcar_du_drv.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 1:26 PM, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:17:22AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 07:12:47PM +0100, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
>> > malidp_pm_suspend_late checks if the runtime status is not suspended
>> > and if so,
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:17:22AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2018 at 07:12:47PM +0100, Ayan Kumar Halder wrote:
> > malidp_pm_suspend_late checks if the runtime status is not suspended
> > and if so, invokes malidp_runtime_pm_suspend which disables the
> > display engine/core
Bunch of ideas from Eric and me on what we could do to make gem gpu
rendering drivers a notch simpler to type.
Cc: Eric Anholt
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter
---
Documentation/gpu/todo.rst | 18 ++
1 file changed, 18 insertions(+)
diff
On Monday, April 23, 2018 05:11:14 PM Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 23/04/18 16:56, Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz wrote:
>
> > Ideally we should be able to build both drivers in the same kernel
> > (especially as modules).
> >
> > I was hoping that it could be fixed easily but then I discovered
> >
On Monday, April 23, 2018 10:55:57 AM Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Em Mon, 23 Apr 2018 14:47:28 +0200
> Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz escreveu:
>
> > On Friday, April 20, 2018 01:42:51 PM Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> > > Add stubs for omapfb_dss.h, in the case it is
Hi Tomi,
On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 13:10:43 EEST Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> On 25/04/18 13:02, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 12:33:53 EEST Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
> >> On 25/04/18 12:03, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> >>> Could we trim down omapfb to remove support for the
On 25/04/18 12:43, Merlijn Wajer wrote:
> Hi!
>
> On 16/04/18 16:49, Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> I have implemented a WSEGL plugin library for Imagination's PVR driver
>> for SGX, which allows using SGX via DRI3. In other words, it is one
>> piece in the puzzle of using SGX with X11.
From: Thierry Reding
The ARM_DMA_USE_IOMMU Kconfig option has side-effects that drivers can
not opt into but have to explicitly opt out of. This can lead to subtle
bugs that are difficult to track down and not immediately obvious to be
related to this Kconfig option.
To
On 25/04/18 13:02, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> Hi Tomi,
>
> On Wednesday, 25 April 2018 12:33:53 EEST Tomi Valkeinen wrote:
>> On 25/04/18 12:03, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
>>> Could we trim down omapfb to remove support for the devices supported by
>>> omapdrm ?
>>
>> I was thinking about just that.
From: Thierry Reding
Depending on the kernel configuration, early ARM architecture setup code
may have attached the GPU to a DMA/IOMMU mapping that transparently uses
the IOMMU to back the DMA API. Tegra requires special handling for IOMMU
backed buffers (a special bit in the
From: Thierry Reding
The dma_iommu_detach_device() API can be used by drivers to forcibly
detach a device from an IOMMU that architecture code might have attached
to. This is useful for drivers that need explicit control over the IOMMU
using the IOMMU API directly.
From: Thierry Reding
Implement this function to enable drivers from detaching from any IOMMU
domains that architecture code might have attached them to so that they
can take exclusive control of the IOMMU via the IOMMU API.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
From: Thierry Reding
Use the new dma_iommu_detach_device() function to replace the open-coded
equivalent.
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding
---
.../drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/tegra.c| 19 ++-
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 17
On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 01:54:39AM -0700, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> [discussion about this patch, which should have been cced to the iommu
> and linux-arm-kernel lists, but wasn't:
> https://www.spinics.net/lists/dri-devel/msg173630.html]
>
> On Wed, Apr 25, 2018 at 09:41:51AM +0200, Thierry
1 - 100 of 209 matches
Mail list logo