On Sun, Mar 11, 2018 at 10:52 PM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 09-03-18, 09:03, Jordan Crouse wrote:
>> I don't think we are understanding each other. The GMU is a separate
>> microcontroller. It is given a magic number (actually a combination of magic
>> numbers) that it then uses to directly interac
On 09-03-18, 10:42, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 09:18:41AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > BTW, it's qcom,corner and not qcom-corner right?
>
> http://git.linaro.org/people/viresh.kumar/mylinux.git/commit/?h=opp/genpd/qcom&id=7586600b3bf3f8e79ce9198922fad7d4aa5b3f8d
>
> +
On 09-03-18, 09:03, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> I don't think we are understanding each other. The GMU is a separate
> microcontroller. It is given a magic number (actually a combination of magic
> numbers) that it then uses to directly interact with the other hardware to
> make
> the vote. The only re
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 09:18:41AM -0800, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> (I wrote an email that seems to have been lost)
>
> Quoting Jordan Crouse (2018-03-09 08:03:55)
> > On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 09:13:32AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > > On 08-03-18, 13:14, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > > > It seems to me th
(I wrote an email that seems to have been lost)
Quoting Jordan Crouse (2018-03-09 08:03:55)
> On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 09:13:32AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 08-03-18, 13:14, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > > It seems to me that performance_state has a direct relationship with genpd
> > > which is g
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 09:13:32AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 08-03-18, 13:14, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > It seems to me that performance_state has a direct relationship with genpd
> > which is good for CPU votes but in this case, we're just passing along raw
> > data
> > to an independent micr
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 03:49:00PM +0530, Rajendra Nayak wrote:
> Hey Jordan/Viresh,
>
> On 03/09/2018 09:13 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> > On 08-03-18, 13:14, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> >> It seems to me that performance_state has a direct relationship with genpd
> >> which is good for CPU votes but in
Hey Jordan/Viresh,
On 03/09/2018 09:13 AM, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 08-03-18, 13:14, Jordan Crouse wrote:
>> It seems to me that performance_state has a direct relationship with genpd
>> which is good for CPU votes but in this case, we're just passing along raw
>> data
>> to an independent microc
On 08-03-18, 13:14, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> It seems to me that performance_state has a direct relationship with genpd
> which is good for CPU votes but in this case, we're just passing along raw
> data
> to an independent microcontroller. The 'qcom,arc-level' is used to construct
> the actual valu
On Wed, Mar 07, 2018 at 10:36:24AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 06-03-18, 08:37, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > I'll try to explain but I might need Stephen or some of the other folks to
> > jump
> > in and save me.
>
> Maybe you should start using his kernel.org address then ? :)
>
> > On sdm845 t
On 06-03-18, 08:37, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> I'll try to explain but I might need Stephen or some of the other folks to
> jump
> in and save me.
Maybe you should start using his kernel.org address then ? :)
> On sdm845 there are shared power resources controlled by the RPMh which is
> programed by
On Tue, Mar 06, 2018 at 09:56:56AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 05-03-18, 08:28, Jordan Crouse wrote:
> > I'm glad you brought this up - I was trying to find a place in the
> > documentation
> > to put it, but since target specific nodes would be a new trick for OPP I
> > didn't
> > quite know
12 matches
Mail list logo