On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> I have compared next-20130725 VS. next-20130726:
>
> $ head -2313 next-20130725-VS-next-20130726.diff | grep ^+ | grep i915
> + drm/i915: Colocate all GT access routines in the same file
> + drm/i915: Use a private interface for reg
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Chris Wilson
wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:27:03AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Sedat Dilek
>> wrote:
>> > ...
>> > ... but does not start as well, so it seems to be a kernel-issue as
>> > assumed (2nd confirmation).
>> >
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:27:03AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Sedat Dilek
> wrote:
> > ...
> > ... but does not start as well, so it seems to be a kernel-issue as
> > assumed (2nd confirmation).
> >
> > X.log attached.
> >
>
> Now, really w/ promised attachment
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:15:14AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> For example: I could start my X with even doing ugly hacks like this...
>
> [ intel-ddx (git) ]
> ...
> Bool intel_uxa_create_screen_resources(ScreenPtr screen)
> ...
> #if 0
> if (drm_intel_gem_bo_map_gtt(bo))
> re
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 11:11 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> I have compared next-20130725 VS. next-20130726:
>
> $ head -2313 next-20130725-VS-next-20130726.diff | grep ^+ | grep i915
> + drm/i915: Colocate all GT access routines in the same file
> + drm/i915: Use a private interface for reg
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:50 AM, Chris Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:27:03AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> > ...
>> > ... but does not start as well, so it seems to be a kernel-issue as
>> > assumed (2nd confirmation).
>> >
>> >
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:27:03AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 10:25 AM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > ...
> > ... but does not start as well, so it seems to be a kernel-issue as
> > assumed (2nd confirmation).
> >
> > X.log attached.
> >
>
> Now, really w/ promised attachment.
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 09:15:14AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> For example: I could start my X with even doing ugly hacks like this...
>
> [ intel-ddx (git) ]
> ...
> Bool intel_uxa_create_screen_resources(ScreenPtr screen)
> ...
> #if 0
> if (drm_intel_gem_bo_map_gtt(bo))
> re
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:21:07AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:07:02PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> What means the bang line?
> >>
> >> [54.564] (II) GLX: Initialized DRI2 GL provider for screen 0
> >> [
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:07:02PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> What means the bang line?
>
> [54.564] (II) GLX: Initialized DRI2 GL provider for screen 0
> [54.565] bang: 1159
> [54.565]
> Fatal server error:
> [54.565] failed to create screen resources
That means between the kern
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 09:12:41PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> New -3 dmesg.
That puts the ball back in the ddx's court. Next debugging patch:
diff --git a/src/intel_driver.c b/src/intel_driver.c
index f4d76bb..1f4f299 100644
--- a/src/intel_driver.c
+++ b/src/intel_driver.c
@@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ s
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:50:59PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Against what tree is this applicable? It is definitely not drm-intel-nightly.
Applied cleanly to nightly here, but just in case here's a rebased version:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
i
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:03:06PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > F*ck. Wrong patch refreshed.
> >
>
> New dmesg attached.
Hmm, not seeing any difference, so let's add a couple more lines just to
be sure:
(apologies I didn't stash the previou
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 07:52:22PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 07:15:03PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Chris Wilson >> chris-wilson.co.uk> wrote:
> >> > Basically boils down to e
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 07:15:03PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > Basically boils down to either an object allocation failure or mmaping
> > failure. I think dmesg with drm.debug=7 is the next step.
>
> Attached! Thanks for taking care.
Hm
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:35:10PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:11:18PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> Might be OT, but I cannot use my X graphics stack containing
> >> libdrm-2.4.46, mesa-9.1.5 and intel-ddx 2.2
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:11:18PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Might be OT, but I cannot use my X graphics stack containing
> libdrm-2.4.46, mesa-9.1.5 and intel-ddx 2.21.12-git (tried also
> v2.21.11).
> Switching back to the one from Ubuntu/precise lets my X start.
>
>
> [40.379] (II) AIGLX
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 04:23:40PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:37:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 01:21:07AM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:52 PM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:07:02PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> What means the bang line?
> >>
> >> [54.564] (II) GLX: Initialized DRI2 GL provider for screen 0
> >> [
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 04:23:40PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:37:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Jani Nikula
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >>
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:37:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Jani Nikula
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Sedat Dilek
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jani Nikula
> >>> wrote:
> >>
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 10:07:02PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> What means the bang line?
>
> [54.564] (II) GLX: Initialized DRI2 GL provider for screen 0
> [54.565] bang: 1159
> [54.565]
> Fatal server error:
> [54.565] failed to create screen resources
That means between the kern
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Sedat Dilek
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jani Nikula
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell >>> canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> Hi a
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell
> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Changes since 20130724:
>>
>> Removed tree:
>> arm-dt (at maintainer's request)
>>
>> The wireless-next tree lost its build failure and gained a conflict
>> against Linus
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Jani Nikula
wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Sedat Dilek
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jani Nikula
>>> wrote:
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:1
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 09:12:41PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> New -3 dmesg.
That puts the ball back in the ddx's court. Next debugging patch:
diff --git a/src/intel_driver.c b/src/intel_driver.c
index f4d76bb..1f4f299 100644
--- a/src/intel_driver.c
+++ b/src/intel_driver.c
@@ -170,6 +170,7 @@ s
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:50:59PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Against what tree is this applicable? It is definitely not drm-intel-nightly.
Applied cleanly to nightly here, but just in case here's a rebased version:
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/i915_gem.c
i
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jani Nikula
> wrote:
>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>>> wrote:
Hi all,
Changes since 20130724:
Removed tree:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jani Nikula
wrote:
> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell
>> wrote:
>>> Hi all,
>>>
>>> Changes since 20130724:
>>>
>>> Removed tree:
>>> arm-dt (at maintainer's request)
>>>
>>> The wireless-next
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 08:03:06PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:55 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> > F*ck. Wrong patch refreshed.
> >
>
> New dmesg attached.
Hmm, not seeing any difference, so let's add a couple more lines just to
be sure:
(apologies I didn't stash the previou
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 07:52:22PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:26 PM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 07:15:03PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Chris Wilson
> >> wrote:
> >> > Basically boils down to either an object a
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 07:15:03PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:01 PM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > Basically boils down to either an object allocation failure or mmaping
> > failure. I think dmesg with drm.debug=7 is the next step.
>
> Attached! Thanks for taking care.
Hm
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:35:10PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 6:31 PM, Chris Wilson
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:11:18PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> Might be OT, but I cannot use my X graphics stack containing
> >> libdrm-2.4.46, mesa-9.1.5 and intel-ddx 2.2
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 06:11:18PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> Might be OT, but I cannot use my X graphics stack containing
> libdrm-2.4.46, mesa-9.1.5 and intel-ddx 2.21.12-git (tried also
> v2.21.11).
> Switching back to the one from Ubuntu/precise lets my X start.
>
>
> [40.379] (II) AIGLX
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 5:03 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 4:27 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 04:23:40PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
>>> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:37:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 04:23:40PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 3:36 PM, Daniel Vetter wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:37:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Jani Nikula
> >> wrote:
> >> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >>
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:37:44PM +0200, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:21 PM, Jani Nikula
> wrote:
> > On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> >> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Sedat Dilek
> >> wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jani Nikula
> >>> wrote:
> >>
On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 12:02 PM, Sedat Dilek wrote:
>> On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 11:44 AM, Jani Nikula
>> wrote:
>>> On Thu, 25 Jul 2013, Sedat Dilek wrote:
On Thu, Jul 25, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Stephen Rothwell
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Ch
38 matches
Mail list logo
