https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49747
--- Comment #19 from Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch 2012-05-10 23:09:22 PDT ---
Created attachment 61414
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=61414
vbios rom
--
Configure bugmail:
let's assume that one application want to allocate user space memory
region using malloc() and then write something on the region. as you
may know, user space buffer doen't have real physical pages once
malloc() call so if user tries to access the region then page fault
handler would be triggered
Hi KOSAKI,
On 05/11/2012 02:53 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
let's assume that one application want to allocate user space memory
region using malloc() and then write something on the region. as you
may know, user space buffer doen't have real physical pages once
malloc() call so if user tries
On 05/11/2012 10:47 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
-Original Message-
From: Jerome Glisse [mailto:j.gli...@gmail.com]
Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 12:53 AM
To: Jerome Glisse; Inki Dae; linux...@kvack.org;
kyungmin.p...@samsung.com;
sw0312@samsung.com; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c
index 05661bf..e2fbf4d 100644
---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49654
--- Comment #2 from Niels Ole Salscheider niels_...@salscheider-online.de
2012-05-11 00:05:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 61417
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=61417
Xorg.0.log
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49654
--- Comment #3 from Niels Ole Salscheider niels_...@salscheider-online.de
2012-05-11 00:09:55 PDT ---
Created attachment 61419
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=61419
dmesg
--
Configure bugmail:
On Don, 2012-05-10 at 13:00 -0400, alexdeuc...@gmail.com wrote:
From: Alex Deucher alexander.deuc...@amd.com
All radeon_gem_init() does is initialize the gem objects
list. radeon_device.c does this explicitly. r600+ calls
radeon_gem_init() so the list gets initialized twice. Older
asics
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49654
--- Comment #4 from Niels Ole Salscheider niels_...@salscheider-online.de
2012-05-11 00:16:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 61420
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=61420
Xorg.0.log after switching between modes
The non-native
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49782
Bug #: 49782
Summary: libdrm 2.4.34 fails to build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: DRI
Version: XOrg CVS
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Hi,
here is the updated patches including the conversion to struct
vga_switcheroo_client_ops.
The patches can be pulled from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound.git
topic/vga-switcheroo
[background info if anyone hasn't read v1 patch series:
this is for allowing to
This changes the API as a clean-up. Instead of passing multiple
function pointers at each time, introduce a new struct holding the
whole callback functions and pass it to the registration.
The same struct will be used for the upcoming audio client
registration, too.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai
Add the support for audio clients to VGA-switcheroo for handling the
HDMI audio controller together with VGA switching. The id of the
audio controller should be given explicitly at registration time
unlike the video controller.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43155
Refactor the code base a bit for the further work to adapt more clients.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai ti...@suse.de
---
drivers/gpu/vga/vga_switcheroo.c | 209 --
1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/vga/vga_switcheroo.c
On Fri, 11 May 2012 06:39:02 +0200
Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote:
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com
NAK - see the patch I posted for Randy to test. That avoids all the
ifdeffery and simply doesn't touch the opregion at all in a non ACPI
build.
Not btw that I
On Fri, 11 May 2012 11:49:48 +0200
Sasha Levin levinsasha...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
Not btw that I imagine you could run a non ACPI kernel on a box new
enough to have a GMA500 8)
Probably not, but I saw more #ifdef
Hi everybody,
well the following patches remove the cs and vram mutex from the radeon driver
and so are something very experimental. The first three just move what I know
to be still critical into the protection of the ring mutex, and the other two
actually remove the mutexs.
Interestingly it
Signed-off-by: Christian König deathsim...@vodafone.de
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 23 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c | 73 +
2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
It is completely unnecessary to create fences
before they are emitted, so remove it and a bunch
of checks if fences are emitted or not.
Signed-off-by: Christian König deathsim...@vodafone.de
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c|2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c |2
There are probably some missed corner cases, but at least try to remove or
replace it with a vm mutex where it is still needed.
Signed-off-by: Christian König deathsim...@vodafone.de
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h| 44 +---
Move inter ring syncing with semaphores into the
existing ring allocations, with that we need to
lock the ring mutex only once.
Signed-off-by: Christian König deathsim...@vodafone.de
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_blit_kms.c |3 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c |5 +-
Even more heretic than the last one. The mutex is
probably good for something, I just can't see what
that is at the moment.
Signed-off-by: Christian König deathsim...@vodafone.de
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h|1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c |1 -
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Christian König
deathsim...@vodafone.de wrote:
Hi everybody,
well the following patches remove the cs and vram mutex from the radeon driver
and so are something very experimental. The first three just move what I know
to be still critical into the protection
From: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap rdun...@xenotime.net
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/Makefile |3 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c |6 --
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.h | 22 +-
From: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
This starts the move away from lots of confused unions of per driver stuff
inherited when we merged the drivers together.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/cdv_intel_display.c | 33 ++---
From: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
We have lots of local assignments that can now be eliminated
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/mdfld_device.c | 129 -
1 files changed, 46 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
diff --git
From: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
All the conditional ugly register selection really wants to be
cleaned up. Use a struct describing each pipe and its registers.
This will also let us hide some of the oddments between platforms
for any future merging of bits together. In particular the way the
From: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
We have a lot of debug type stuff we don't actually need any more.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/cdv_device.c |2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/framebuffer.c |2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/gtt.c | 12
From: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
Cover all D2xxx/N2xxx chips.
Signed-off-by: Zhenyu Wang zhen...@linux.intel.com
[Hand applied to upstream driver]
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c |8
1 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 0
From: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
We don't need to check these - they are always going to be the
same for any PVR based device.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/cdv_device.c |3 +++
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/mdfld_device.c|2 ++
From: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
Keep this as a patch of its own in case of bug reports.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox a...@linux.intel.com
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c |4 ++--
1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.c
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49789
Bug #: 49789
Summary: External monitor flickers on xrandr or cat
/sys/class/drm/card0-VGA-1/status
Classification: Unclassified
Product: DRI
Version: XOrg CVS
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49789
--- Comment #1 from Harald Judt h.j...@gmx.at 2012-05-11 04:38:17 PDT ---
Created attachment 61442
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=61442
xdpyinfo
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
On 11.05.2012 12:12, Dave Airlie wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Christian König
deathsim...@vodafone.de wrote:
Hi everybody,
well the following patches remove the cs and vram mutex from the radeon driver
and so are something very experimental. The first three just move what I know
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49794
Michel Dänzer mic...@daenzer.net changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|xorg-driver-...@lists.x.org
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Christian König
deathsim...@vodafone.de wrote:
Even more heretic than the last one. The mutex is
probably good for something, I just can't see what
that is at the moment.
Signed-off-by: Christian König deathsim...@vodafone.de
---
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Jerome Glisse j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Christian König
deathsim...@vodafone.de wrote:
Even more heretic than the last one. The mutex is
probably good for something, I just can't see what
that is at the moment.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49789
Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43207
Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43207
--- Comment #3 from Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com 2012-05-11 14:56:18
---
This is a duplicate of:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49792
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49794
--- Comment #1 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com 2012-05-11 07:59:13 PDT ---
Please attach a copy of your vbios.
(as root)
(use lspci to get the bus id)
cd /sys/bus/pci/devices/pci bus id
echo 1 rom
cat rom /tmp/vbios.rom
echo 0 rom
--
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49789
--- Comment #3 from Harald Judt h.j...@gmx.at 2012-05-11 08:10:30 PDT ---
Can I somehow find out (log files, whatever), whether the monitor has an EDID
or not, after it has been connected? Because then I could turn off the polling
for the time
On 11.05.2012 16:44, Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 10:41 AM, Jerome Glissej.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:10 AM, Christian König
deathsim...@vodafone.de wrote:
Even more heretic than the last one. The mutex is
probably good for something, I just can't see
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Alan Cox a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk wrote:
Not btw that I imagine you could run a non ACPI kernel on a box new
enough to have a GMA500 8)
Probably not, but I saw more #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI below and assumed
there's a good reason for that.
Out of curiously, is a
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49794
--- Comment #2 from ddfs s.dema...@gmail.com 2012-05-11 08:24:45 PDT ---
Created attachment 61456
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=61456
hd5850 bios
vbios attached
--
Configure bugmail:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 4:08 AM, Daniel Vetter daniel.vet...@ffwll.ch wrote:
Compared to Rob Clark's RFC I've ditched the prepare/finish hooks
and corresponding ioctls on the dma_buf file. The major reason for
that is that many people seem to be under the impression that this is
also for
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49794
--- Comment #3 from ddfs s.dema...@gmail.com 2012-05-11 08:33:08 PDT ---
Created attachment 61457
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=61457
boot clocks
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49794
--- Comment #4 from ddfs s.dema...@gmail.com 2012-05-11 08:33:36 PDT ---
Created attachment 61458
-- https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=61458
UVD clocks
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49794
--- Comment #5 from ddfs s.dema...@gmail.com 2012-05-11 08:34:42 PDT ---
I also attched RBE screenshots with opened vbios.rom
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You are receiving this mail
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49789
--- Comment #4 from Alex Deucher ag...@yahoo.com 2012-05-11 10:23:56 PDT ---
(In reply to comment #3)
Can I somehow find out (log files, whatever), whether the monitor has an EDID
or not, after it has been connected? Because then I could turn
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=27184
--- Comment #27 from tomi.or...@ncircle.nullnet.fi 2012-05-11 13:14:35 PDT ---
You can use xset to test dpms, e.g.,
xset dpms force off
Also, for what it's worth, the driver only implements two states: on and off.
All of the intermediate
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43207
--- Comment #4 from Vladislav Tcendrovskii c...@mail.ru 2012-05-11 20:21:01
---
Created an attachment (id=73252)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=73252)
dmesg
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43207
--- Comment #5 from Vladislav Tcendrovskii c...@mail.ru 2012-05-11 20:21:21
---
Created an attachment (id=73253)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=73253)
Xorg log
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43207
--- Comment #6 from Vladislav Tcendrovskii c...@mail.ru 2012-05-11 20:34:02
---
Created an attachment (id=73254)
-- (https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=73254)
screenshot
--
Configure bugmail:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49603
--- Comment #6 from Sven Arvidsson s...@whiz.se 2012-05-11 13:46:30 PDT ---
I have tried both stopsleep and the shell loop now, but sadly neither one gets
rid of the problem.
I get the feeling that there's less stalls with them, but video
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49817
Bug #: 49817
Summary: radeon: The kernel rejected CS when running shader
example from SFML library
Classification: Unclassified
Product: Mesa
Version: git
Platform:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 5:20 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
kosaki.motoh...@gmail.com wrote:
(5/10/12 11:01 PM), Jerome Glisse wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:51 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
kosaki.motoh...@gmail.com wrote:
(5/10/12 8:50 PM), Minchan Kim wrote:
Hi KOSAKI,
On 05/11/2012 02:53 AM, KOSAKI
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43167
Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch changed:
What|Removed |Added
AssignedTo|dan...@ffwll.ch
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43167
--- Comment #35 from Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch 2012-05-11 16:16:21 PDT ---
Bisect result points at core drm, moving bug from driver component to general.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
--- You
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43167
--- Comment #36 from Alan a...@linux.intel.com 2012-05-11 16:22:12 PDT ---
Looks like a vt bug to me as well. As if something is changing the end of line
behaviour flag and not restoring it. As and when Alex files it against the vt
layer in the
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:59 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
kosaki.motoh...@gmail.com wrote:
My point is this ioctl will be restricted to one user (Xserver if i
understand) and only this user, there is no fork in it so no need to
worry about fork, just setting the vma as locked will be enough.
But i
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43125
Alan a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43209
Alan a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43112
Alan a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Component|Video(Other)|Video(DRI - non Intel)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42984
Alan a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43167
--- Comment #37 from al...@verizon.net 2012-05-11 19:07:07 PDT ---
Thanks, Alan.
As mentioned, I'm a simple user, never filed a kernel bug
so I need a little help, please.
Is there an easy way (workaround?) to file a kernel bugzilla
whereby I'd
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42609
Alan a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42570
Alan a...@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43112
Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42609
Alex Deucher alexdeuc...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42609
Alexandre Demers alexandre.f.dem...@gmail.com changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC|
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49322
--- Comment #1 from Brian Schott briancsch...@gmail.com 2012-05-11 21:27:21
PDT ---
I got tired of only being able to use ⅔ of my monitors, so I tried using the
integrated graphics (Intel hd4000 / ivy bridge) to power them. (Motherboard has
VGA,
2012/5/12 KOSAKI Motohiro kosaki.motoh...@gmail.com:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 7:29 PM, Jerome Glisse j.gli...@gmail.com wrote:
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 6:59 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
kosaki.motoh...@gmail.com wrote:
My point is this ioctl will be restricted to one user (Xserver if i
understand) and
Hi,
we had posted this patch and we hope this patch is applied to libdrm
so that we can go ahead next work. as you may know, exynos drm driver
have already been merged to mainline.
please, let me know if there is any problem.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
2012/5/4 Inki Dae inki@samsung.com:
this patch
> -Original Message-
> From: Jerome Glisse [mailto:j.glisse at gmail.com]
> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 12:53 AM
> To: Jerome Glisse; Inki Dae; linux-mm at kvack.org;
kyungmin.park at samsung.com;
> sw0312.kim at samsung.com; dri-devel at lists.freedesktop.org
> Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2 v3]
On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 10:51 PM, KOSAKI Motohiro
wrote:
> (5/10/12 8:50 PM), Minchan Kim wrote:
>>
>> Hi KOSAKI,
>>
>> On 05/11/2012 02:53 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
>>
>> let's assume that one application want to allocate user space memory
>> region using malloc() and then write
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49747
--- Comment #19 from Daniel Vetter 2012-05-10 23:09:22 PDT
---
Created attachment 61414
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=61414
vbios rom
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
Hi KOSAKI,
On 05/11/2012 02:53 AM, KOSAKI Motohiro wrote:
let's assume that one application want to allocate user space memory
region using malloc() and then write something on the region. as you
may know, user space buffer doen't have real physical pages once
malloc() call
On 05/11/2012 10:47 AM, Inki Dae wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Jerome Glisse [mailto:j.glisse at gmail.com]
>> Sent: Friday, May 11, 2012 12:53 AM
>> To: Jerome Glisse; Inki Dae; linux-mm at kvack.org;
> kyungmin.park at samsung.com;
>> sw0312.kim at samsung.com; dri-devel at
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c |4
1 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 0 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c
b/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c
index 05661bf..e2fbf4d 100644
--- a/drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c
+++
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49654
--- Comment #2 from Niels Ole Salscheider
2012-05-11 00:05:13 UTC ---
Created attachment 61417
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=61417
Xorg.0.log
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49654
--- Comment #3 from Niels Ole Salscheider
2012-05-11 00:09:55 PDT ---
Created attachment 61419
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=61419
dmesg
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
---
On Don, 2012-05-10 at 13:00 -0400, alexdeucher at gmail.com wrote:
> From: Alex Deucher
>
> All radeon_gem_init() does is initialize the gem objects
> list. radeon_device.c does this explicitly. r600+ calls
> radeon_gem_init() so the list gets initialized twice. Older
> asics don't call it
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49654
--- Comment #4 from Niels Ole Salscheider
2012-05-11 00:16:58 UTC ---
Created attachment 61420
--> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=61420
Xorg.0.log after switching between modes
The non-native mode 1440x900 seems to work, too.
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=49782
Bug #: 49782
Summary: libdrm 2.4.34 fails to build
Classification: Unclassified
Product: DRI
Version: XOrg CVS
Platform: Other
OS/Version: All
Status: NEW
Hi,
here is the updated patches including the conversion to struct
vga_switcheroo_client_ops.
The patches can be pulled from
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tiwai/sound.git
topic/vga-switcheroo
[background info if anyone hasn't read v1 patch series:
this is for allowing to
This changes the API as a clean-up. Instead of passing multiple
function pointers at each time, introduce a new struct holding the
whole callback functions and pass it to the registration.
The same struct will be used for the upcoming audio client
registration, too.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai
Add the support for audio clients to VGA-switcheroo for handling the
HDMI audio controller together with VGA switching. The id of the
audio controller should be given explicitly at registration time
unlike the video controller.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=43155
Refactor the code base a bit for the further work to adapt more clients.
Signed-off-by: Takashi Iwai
---
drivers/gpu/vga/vga_switcheroo.c | 209 --
1 file changed, 110 insertions(+), 99 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/vga/vga_switcheroo.c
On Fri, 11 May 2012 06:39:02 +0200
Sasha Levin wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin
NAK - see the patch I posted for Randy to test. That avoids all the
ifdeffery and simply doesn't touch the opregion at all in a non ACPI
build.
Not btw that I imagine you could run a non ACPI kernel on a box
On Fri, 11 May 2012 11:49:48 +0200
Sasha Levin wrote:
> On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:43 AM, Alan Cox
> wrote:
> > Not btw that I imagine you could run a non ACPI kernel on a box new
> > enough to have a GMA500 8)
>
> Probably not, but I saw more #ifdef CONFIG_ACPI below and assumed
> there's a
Hi everybody,
well the following patches remove the cs and vram mutex from the radeon driver
and so are something very experimental. The first three just move what I know
to be still critical into the protection of the ring mutex, and the other two
actually remove the mutexs.
Interestingly it
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h | 23 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_fence.c | 73 +
2 files changed, 85 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h
It is completely unnecessary to create fences
before they are emitted, so remove it and a bunch
of checks if fences are emitted or not.
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen.c|2 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/ni.c |2 +-
There are probably some missed corner cases, but at least try to remove or
replace it with a vm mutex where it is still needed.
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h| 44 +---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_cs.c |7 ++---
Move inter ring syncing with semaphores into the
existing ring allocations, with that we need to
lock the ring mutex only once.
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/evergreen_blit_kms.c |3 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/r600.c |5 +-
Even more heretic than the last one. The mutex is
probably good for something, I just can't see what
that is at the moment.
Signed-off-by: Christian K?nig
---
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon.h|1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_device.c |1 -
drivers/gpu/drm/radeon/radeon_object.c
On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 11:10 AM, Christian K?nig
wrote:
> Hi everybody,
>
> well the following patches remove the cs and vram mutex from the radeon driver
> and so are something very experimental. The first three just move what I know
> to be still critical into the protection of the ring mutex,
From: Alan Cox
Reported-by: Randy Dunlap
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/Makefile |3 ++-
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.c |6 --
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/opregion.h | 22 +-
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/psb_drv.h |6
From: Alan Cox
This starts the move away from lots of confused unions of per driver stuff
inherited when we merged the drivers together.
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox
---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/cdv_intel_display.c | 33 ++---
drivers/gpu/drm/gma500/mdfld_device.c |
1 - 100 of 136 matches
Mail list logo