Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 22:06:04)
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:24 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:13)
> > > +
> > > +static int kunit_try_catch_test_init(struct kunit *test)
> > > +{
> > > + struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx;
> > >
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 21:57:55)
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:22 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:12)
> > > diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
> > > index 2625bcfeb19ac..93381f841e09f 100644
> > > --- a/include/kunit/test.h
On 05.08.19 00:48, john.hubb...@gmail.com wrote:
> From: John Hubbard
>
> For pages that were retained via get_user_pages*(), release those pages
> via the new put_user_page*() routines, instead of via put_page() or
> release_pages().
>
> This is part a tree-wide conversion, as described in
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 22:02:59)
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:56 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 17:41:05)
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:59 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > kunit_resource_destroy (respective equivalents to devm_kfree, and
Hi Inki.
On Tue, Aug 13, 2019 at 10:03:51PM +0900, Inki Dae wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 19. 8. 13. 오전 3:51, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> > Hi Inki.
> >
> > Any plans to take this to the exynos tree?
> >
>
> It will be merged to next.
Thanks, one more off the list.
Sam
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:19)
> Add myself as maintainer of KUnit, the Linux kernel's unit testing
> framework.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:55 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:14)
> > Add support for assertions which are like expectations except the test
> > terminates if the assertion is not satisfied.
> >
> > The idea with assertions is that you use them to state all the
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:24 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:13)
> > +
> > +static int kunit_try_catch_test_init(struct kunit *test)
> > +{
> > + struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx;
> > +
> > + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx),
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 10:02 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 17:33:52)
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 04:57:00PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:08)
> > > > + */
> > > > +#define KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, condition) \
> > > > +
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:57 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 21:27:05)
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:56 PM Brendan Higgins
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:46 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > >
> > > > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:07)
> >
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:56 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 17:41:05)
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:59 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >
> > > > kunit_resource_destroy (respective equivalents to devm_kfree, and
> > > > devres_destroy) and use kunit_kfree here?
> > > >
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 17:33:52)
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 04:57:00PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:08)
> > > + */
> > > +#define KUNIT_EXPECT_TRUE(test, condition) \
> > > + KUNIT_TRUE_ASSERTION(test, KUNIT_EXPECTATION,
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 9:22 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:12)
> > diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
> > index 2625bcfeb19ac..93381f841e09f 100644
> > --- a/include/kunit/test.h
> > +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
> > @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> >
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 21:27:05)
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:56 PM Brendan Higgins
> wrote:
> >
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:46 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > >
> > > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:07)
> > > > +#define KUNIT_INIT_FAIL_ASSERT_STRUCT(test, type) {
komeda display HWs have kinds of coefficient tables for various purposes
like gamma/degamma. ususally these tables are shared by multiple HW
component and have limited number.
Introduce komeda_coeffs_table/manager for describing and managing these
tables, like table reuse, racing.
Signed-off-by:
Many komeda component support color management like layer and IPS, so
komeda_color_manager/state are introduced to manager gamma, csc and degamma
together for easily share it to multiple componpent.
And for komeda_color_manager which:
- convert drm 3d gamma lut to komeda specific gamma coeffs
-
DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY number 24 is not enough for komeda usage, increase
it to 32 to fit komeda's requirement.
Signed-off-by: James Qian Wang (Arm Technology China)
---
include/drm/drm_mode_object.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
This patch series enabled layer/plane color management for komeda driver
v2: Rebase it on drm-misc-next
james qian wang (Arm Technology China) (4):
drm/komeda: Introduce komeda_coeffs_table/manager
drm/komeda: Introduce komeda_color_manager/state
drm: Increase DRM_OBJECT_MAX_PROPERTY to 32
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 17:41:05)
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:59 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > > kunit_resource_destroy (respective equivalents to devm_kfree, and
> > > devres_destroy) and use kunit_kfree here?
> > >
> >
> > Yes, or drop the API entirely? Does anything need this
- D71 has 3 global layer gamma table which can be used for all layers as
gamma lookup table, no matter inverse or forward.
- Add komeda_color_manager/state to layer/layer_state for describe the
color caps for the specific layer which will be initialized in
d71_layer_init, and for D71 only
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:14)
> Add support for assertions which are like expectations except the test
> terminates if the assertion is not satisfied.
>
> The idea with assertions is that you use them to state all the
> preconditions for your test. Logically speaking, these are
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:20)
> From: Iurii Zaikin
>
> KUnit tests for initialized data behavior of proc_dointvec that is
> explicitly checked in the code. Includes basic parsing tests including
> int min/max overflow.
>
> Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin
> Signed-off-by: Brendan
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:18)
> Add documentation for KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework.
> - Add intro and usage guide for KUnit
> - Add API reference
>
> Signed-off-by: Felix Guo
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
> Cc: Jonathan Corbet
> Reviewed-by: Greg
On Thu, 8 Aug 2019 at 09:47, Lyude Paul wrote:
>
> Just some runtime PM fixes for some much less noticeable runtime PM ref
> tracking issues that I got reminded of when fixing some unrelated issues
> with nouveau.
>
> Changes since v1:
> * Don't fix CRTC RPM code in dispnv04, because it's not
On Fri, 9 Aug 2019 at 10:53, Lyude Paul wrote:
>
> I -thought- I had fixed this entirely, but it looks like that I didn't
> test this thoroughly enough as we apparently still make one big mistake
> with nv50_msto_atomic_check() - we don't handle the following scenario:
>
> * CRTC #1 has n VCPI
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:17)
> diff --git a/arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig b/arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig
> new file mode 100644
> index 0..bfe49689038f1
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/arch/um/configs/kunit_defconfig
> @@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
> +CONFIG_OF=y
>
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=107877
jason miller changed:
What|Removed |Added
URL||https://mywifiextlogn.com/
--
You are
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:15)
> +
> +static int kunit_resource_test_init(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct kunit_test_resource_context *ctx =
> + kzalloc(sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
> +
> + if (!ctx)
> + return -ENOMEM;
Should this
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:56 PM Brendan Higgins
wrote:
>
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:46 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:07)
> > > Add `struct kunit_assert` and friends which provide a structured way to
> > > capture data from an expectation or an
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:13)
> +
> +static int kunit_try_catch_test_init(struct kunit *test)
> +{
> + struct kunit_try_catch_test_context *ctx;
> +
> + ctx = kunit_kzalloc(test, sizeof(*ctx), GFP_KERNEL);
Can this fail? Should return -ENOMEM in that case?
> +
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:12)
> diff --git a/include/kunit/test.h b/include/kunit/test.h
> index 2625bcfeb19ac..93381f841e09f 100644
> --- a/include/kunit/test.h
> +++ b/include/kunit/test.h
> @@ -13,6 +13,7 @@
> #include
> #include
> #include
> +#include
>
> struct
Hi,
On 19. 8. 13. 오전 3:51, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Hi Inki.
>
> Any plans to take this to the exynos tree?
>
It will be merged to next.
Thanks,
Inki Dae
> Sam
>
> On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 04:57:35PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>> There was a few uses of drmP that was missed in the last
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110674
--- Comment #93 from Chris Hodapp ---
Note: It might be good for someone else to double-check my conclusion before
too much stock is put into it. Scientific method and all that.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110674
--- Comment #92 from ReddestDream ---
>If you follow the callstack:
I've been thinking all this over. The only thing unfortunately that really
sticks out at me still is how Chris Hodapp says that reverting this commit:
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110457
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|---
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110258
Alex Deucher changed:
What|Removed |Added
CC||jian-h...@endlessm.com
--- Comment #14
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110457
--- Comment #11 from jian-h...@endlessm.com ---
(In reply to Eugene Bright from comment #10)
> The patch is on it's way
> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110258#c12
I tried the patch upon Linux stable 5.2.8. It fixed this issue.
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Herring
> Sent: 2019年8月13日 7:30
> To: Wen He
> Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org;
> devicet...@vger.kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; shawn...@kernel.org;
> Leo Li
> Subject: [EXT] Re: [v2 1/4] dt-bindings: display: Add
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:59 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 16:33:36)
> > On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 03:55:19PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:06)
> > > > +void string_stream_clear(struct string_stream *stream)
> > > > +{
>
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 04:57:00PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:08)
> > Add support for expectations, which allow properties to be specified and
> > then verified in tests.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
> > Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> >
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 16:33:36)
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 03:55:19PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:06)
> > > +void string_stream_clear(struct string_stream *stream)
> > > +{
> > > + struct string_stream_fragment *frag_container,
> > >
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:10)
> Add a test for string stream along with a simpler example.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
> ---
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:08)
> Add support for expectations, which allow properties to be specified and
> then verified in tests.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
> Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
> Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd
Just some minor
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 4:46 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
>
> Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:07)
> > Add `struct kunit_assert` and friends which provide a structured way to
> > capture data from an expectation or an assertion (introduced later in
> > the series) so that it may be printed out
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:07)
> Add `struct kunit_assert` and friends which provide a structured way to
> capture data from an expectation or an assertion (introduced later in
> the series) so that it may be printed out in the event of a failure.
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 03:55:19PM -0700, Stephen Boyd wrote:
> Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:06)
> > +void string_stream_clear(struct string_stream *stream)
> > +{
> > + struct string_stream_fragment *frag_container, *frag_container_safe;
> > +
> > + spin_lock(>lock);
> >
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 06:09:39PM +0800, Wen He wrote:
> Add DT bindings documentmation for the HDP-TX PHY controller. The describes
> which could be found on NXP Layerscape ls1028a platform.
Not required, but please consider converting to DT schema (YAML) format.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen He
>
On Fri, Jul 19, 2019 at 05:58:42PM +0800, Wen He wrote:
> Add optional property node 'arm,malidp-arqos-value' for the Mali DP500.
> This property describe the ARQoS levels of DP500's QoS signaling.
>
> Signed-off-by: Wen He
> ---
> Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/arm,malidp.txt | 3
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:06)
> +void string_stream_clear(struct string_stream *stream)
> +{
> + struct string_stream_fragment *frag_container, *frag_container_safe;
> +
> + spin_lock(>lock);
> + list_for_each_entry_safe(frag_container,
> +
On Sun, 11 Aug 2019 17:10:00 +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> Add documentation for auo kd101n80-45na panel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi
> Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg
> ---
> .../display/panel/auo,kd101n80-45na.txt | 34 +++
> 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+)
> create mode
Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-12 11:24:05)
> Create a common API for test managed resources like memory and test
> objects. A lot of times a test will want to set up infrastructure to be
> used in test cases; this could be anything from just wanting to allocate
> some memory to setting up a
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 02:02:54PM +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> Add decriptions about supported chips, including MT2701 & MT8173 &
> mt8183
>
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi
> ---
> .../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.txt| 11 +++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
And run a
On Wed, Aug 07, 2019 at 02:02:54PM +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> Add decriptions about supported chips, including MT2701 & MT8173 &
> mt8183
>
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi
> ---
> .../bindings/display/mediatek/mediatek,dpi.txt| 11 +++
> 1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
>
> diff
On Fri, Aug 02, 2019 at 09:37:53AM +0200, John Ogness wrote:
> On 2019-08-01, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 1:31 AM Petr Mladek wrote:
> >> On Thu 2019-07-25 13:21:12, Brendan Higgins wrote:
> >>> On Wed, Jul 24, 2019 at 12:31 AM Petr Mladek wrote:
> On Mon 2019-07-22
On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:43 PM Brendan Higgins
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 2:14 PM Stephen Boyd wrote:
> >
> > Quoting Brendan Higgins (2019-08-01 11:59:57)
> > > On Thu, Aug 1, 2019 at 11:55 AM Brendan Higgins
> > > wrote:
> > > >
> > > > On Fri, Jul 26, 2019 at 1:31 AM Petr Mladek
Hi all.
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 11:41:28AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> This set of patches is one of the final steps before
> we have succeeded to stop using drmP.h in all of drm/.
>
> There is a few patches in flight through other trees
> and the plan is that all users shall be gone in the
>
On 8/10/19 4:13 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On something vaguely related to this patch:
You use the NVIF_VMM_PFNMAP_V0_V* defines from nvif/if000c.h, which are
a little odd as we only ever set these bits, but they also don't seem
to appear to be in values that are directly fed to the
On Sun, Aug 04, 2019 at 08:55:51AM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> Drop the deprecated drmP.h header file, and trim msm_drv.h
> to the relevant include files.
>
> This resulted in a suprisingly many edits as many files relied
> on headers included via msm_drv.h.
> But msm_drv.h is not supposed to
Hi,
On 01-08-19 16:59, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
Hi Hans.
On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 03:38:56PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
3 small cleanups:
1) Drop unused DRIVER_PATCHLEVEL
2) We do not set mode_config.preferred_depth, so instead of passing the
unset mode_config.preferred_depth to
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:56 AM Sam Ravnborg wrote:
>
> Hi Laurent.
>
> My meta-schemas foo is very limited, but I noticed a few things.
> Hopefully Rob finds time soon to review.
>
> Sam
>
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 02:10:42AM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> > The NEC NL8048HL11 is a
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 5:10 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> The NEC NL8048HL11 is a 10.4cm WVGA (800x480) panel with a 24-bit RGB
> parallel data interface and an SPI control interface.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> ---
> Changes since v1:
>
> - Convert to YAML
> ---
>
Hi,
[This is an automated email]
This commit has been processed because it contains a "Fixes:" tag,
fixing commit: d3862e44daa7 dma-buf/sw-sync: Fix locking around sync_timeline
lists.
The bot has tested the following trees: v5.2.8, v4.19.66, v4.14.138, v4.9.189.
v5.2.8: Build OK!
v4.19.66:
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 5:10 PM Laurent Pinchart
wrote:
>
> The 'toppoly' vendor prefix is in use and refers to TPO, whose DT vendor
> prefix is already defined as 'tpo'. Add 'toppoly' as an alternative and
> document it as legacy.
>
> Signed-off-by: Laurent Pinchart
> ---
> Changes since v1:
>
Hi Inki.
Any plans to take this to the exynos tree?
Sam
On Sat, Aug 03, 2019 at 04:57:35PM +0200, Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> There was a few uses of drmP that was missed in the last
> patch removing this header from exynos.
>
> Remove the final uses of this header.
>
> Signed-off-by: Sam
Hi Noralf.
> > - drm_panel has proper support for modes.
> > This is today duplicated in mipi_dbi.
> > Could we make it so that when a panel is used then the panel
> > has the mode info - as we then use the panel more in the way we do
> > in other cases?
> > As it is now the mode is
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110674
--- Comment #91 from ReddestDream ---
>It returns 0 on success and -EIO on failure, which is then in turn returned
>from vega20_set_fclk_to_highest_dpm_leve. Where did you see the check/retry on
>EINVAL? Perhaps -EIO should be -EINVAL?
I
Add entry for the new proc sysctl KUnit test to the PROC SYSCTL section,
and add Iurii as a maintainer.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Cc: Iurii Zaikin
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
Acked-by: Luis Chamberlain
---
MAINTAINERS | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2
Add support for expectations, which allow properties to be specified and
then verified in tests.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
include/kunit/test.h | 843 +++
kunit/test.c | 58
Add core facilities for defining unit tests; this provides a common way
to define test cases, functions that execute code which is under test
and determine whether the code under test behaves as expected; this also
provides a way to group together related test cases in test suites (here
we call
Add documentation for KUnit, the Linux kernel unit testing framework.
- Add intro and usage guide for KUnit
- Add API reference
Signed-off-by: Felix Guo
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Cc: Jonathan Corbet
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
Add `struct kunit_assert` and friends which provide a structured way to
capture data from an expectation or an assertion (introduced later in
the series) so that it may be printed out in the event of a failure.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
---
include/kunit/assert.h | 183
Add a test for string stream along with a simpler example.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
kunit/Kconfig | 21 +
kunit/Makefile | 4 ++
kunit/example-test.c | 88
From: Iurii Zaikin
KUnit tests for initialized data behavior of proc_dointvec that is
explicitly checked in the code. Includes basic parsing tests including
int min/max overflow.
Signed-off-by: Iurii Zaikin
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan
Add KUnit tests for the KUnit test abort mechanism (see preceding
commit). Add tests both for general try catch mechanism as well as
non-architecture specific mechanism.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
kunit/Makefile| 3 +-
Add support for aborting/bailing out of test cases, which is needed for
implementing assertions.
An assertion is like an expectation, but bails out of the test case
early if the assertion is not met. The idea with assertions is that you
use them to state all the preconditions for your test.
KUnit is a new unit testing framework for the kernel and when used is
built into the kernel as a part of it. Add KUnit to the root Kconfig and
Makefile to allow it to be actually built.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Acked-by: Masahiro Yamada
Cc: Michal Marek
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Add support for assertions which are like expectations except the test
terminates if the assertion is not satisfied.
The idea with assertions is that you use them to state all the
preconditions for your test. Logically speaking, these are the premises
of the test case, so if a premise isn't true,
A number of test features need to do pretty complicated string printing
where it may not be possible to rely on a single preallocated string
with parameters.
So provide a library for constructing the string as you go similar to
C++'s std::string. string_stream is really just a string builder,
## TL;DR
This revision removes dependence on kunit_stream in favor of
kunit_assert, as suggested by Stephen Boyd. kunit_assert provides a more
structured interface for constructing messages and allows most required
data to be stored on the stack for most expectations until it is
determined that a
Create a common API for test managed resources like memory and test
objects. A lot of times a test will want to set up infrastructure to be
used in test cases; this could be anything from just wanting to allocate
some memory to setting up a driver stack; this defines facilities for
creating "test
From: Felix Guo
The ultimate goal is to create minimal isolated test binaries; in the
meantime we are using UML to provide the infrastructure to run tests, so
define an abstract way to configure and run tests that allow us to
change the context in which tests are built without affecting the
Fix the following warning seen on GCC 7.3:
kunit/test-test.o: warning: objtool: kunit_test_unsuccessful_try() falls
through to next function kunit_test_catch()
kunit_try_catch_throw is a function added in the following patch in this
series; it allows KUnit, a unit testing framework for the
Add defconfig for UML and a fragment that can be used to configure other
architectures for building KUnit tests. Add option to kunit_tool to use
a defconfig to create the kunitconfig.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
Add myself as maintainer of KUnit, the Linux kernel's unit testing
framework.
Signed-off-by: Brendan Higgins
Reviewed-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman
Reviewed-by: Logan Gunthorpe
---
MAINTAINERS | 11 +++
1 file changed, 11 insertions(+)
diff --git a/MAINTAINERS b/MAINTAINERS
index
From: Avinash Kondareddy
Add unit tests for KUnit managed resources. KUnit managed resources
(struct kunit_resource) are resources that are automatically cleaned up
at the end of a KUnit test, similar to the concept of devm_* managed
resources.
Signed-off-by: Avinash Kondareddy
Signed-off-by:
Hi Laurent/Noralf.
On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 06:35:42PM +0300, Laurent Pinchart wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 12, 2019 at 02:13:54PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
> > Den 11.08.2019 18.41, skrev Sam Ravnborg:
> > > On Thu, Aug 01, 2019 at 03:52:49PM +0200, Noralf Trønnes wrote:
> > >> Add support for panels
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=203471
--- Comment #15 from Haxk20 (haxk...@gmail.com) ---
I have tried manually patching 5.3rc4 and even compiling drm-next-5.4 branch
but sadly i still get tearing on the screen.
Is there a config option to enable it or its enabled by default ?
And as
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110674
--- Comment #90 from Tom B ---
I'm not sure this is helpful but I managed to somewhat test the race condition
theory.
If you follow the callstack:
vega20_set_fclk_to_highest_dpm_level -> smum_send_msg_to_smc_with_parameter ->
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204559
--- Comment #9 from Maxim Sheviakov (shoeg...@tutanota.com) ---
Thanks for your explanation. By the way, disabling runpm also seems to fix the
other issue with disabling the display after activating the lockscreen as a
powersaving measure.
Is
Am 12.08.19 um 17:42 schrieb Chris Wilson:
> During release of the syncpt, we remove it from the list of syncpt and
> the tree, but only if it is not already been removed. However, during
> signaling, we first remove the syncpt from the list. So, if we
> concurrently free and signal the syncpt,
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204559
--- Comment #8 from Alex Deucher (alexdeuc...@gmail.com) ---
(In reply to Maxim Sheviakov from comment #7)
> By the way, how *exactly* does disabling runpm affect the system? Does it
> leave the discrete GPU always-on or vice verse? Or does it
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110674
--- Comment #89 from Tom B ---
> It should return -EINVAL instead. Maybe then it would reset and try again
> instead of just ignoring it and continuing with initialization anyway,
> leading to instability.
If you look at
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204559
--- Comment #7 from Maxim Sheviakov (shoeg...@tutanota.com) ---
By the way, how *exactly* does disabling runpm affect the system? Does it leave
the discrete GPU always-on or vice verse? Or does it vary on each system?
I have tried running The
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110674
--- Comment #88 from ReddestDream ---
>The question then becomes: Why doesn't the race condition happen with only one
>screen? Perhaps it's a matter of speed. With a single display, the driver
>detect the displays, read/parse the EDID data,
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=204559
--- Comment #6 from Maxim Sheviakov (shoeg...@tutanota.com) ---
Created attachment 284345
--> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/attachment.cgi?id=284345=edit
dmesg -w with runpm=0 parameter
I have left my laptop with a video playing for about half
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110674
--- Comment #87 from Tom B ---
> Could be we've got a race condition between the powerplay setup and amdgpu
handing off the card to drm_dev_register to advertise it for normal use.
The question then becomes: Why doesn't the race condition
https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=110674
--- Comment #86 from ReddestDream ---
>In addition to that, vega20_set_fclk_to_highest_dpm_level is called several
>times before the card is initialized and even on 5.2.7 works. Something
>happens during or just before the initialization
On Thu, Aug 8, 2019 at 10:55 AM Neil Armstrong wrote:
>
> The amlogic,meson-dw-hdmi.txt and amlogic,meson-vpu.txt has been
> converted to YAML schemas, update MAINTAINERS to match them again.
>
> Signed-off-by: Neil Armstrong
> ---
> MAINTAINERS | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2
Applied. thanks!
Alex
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 6:29 AM Colin King wrote:
>
> From: Colin Ian King
>
> The check on ret is duplicated in two places, it is redundant code.
> Remove it.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Logically dead code")
> Fixes: b94afb61cdae ("drm/amd/powerplay: honor hw limit on
Applied. thanks!
Alex
On Sat, Aug 10, 2019 at 9:55 AM Christophe JAILLET
wrote:
>
> This should be 'dce_audio_mask', not 'dce_aduio_mask'.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christophe JAILLET
> ---
> drivers/gpu/drm/amd/display/dc/dce/dce_audio.c | 2 +-
>
1 - 100 of 159 matches
Mail list logo
