Hi All,
I am working for adding the DRM Client cap for the aspect ratio support
as part of the series:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/10850/ : /Picture aspect ratio
support in DRM layer/ by Shashank Sharma.
I have an open as to how to go about it.
I was going through the
Hi All,
I am working for adding the DRM Client cap for the aspect ratio support
as part of the series:
https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/series/10850/ : /Picture aspect ratio
support in DRM layer/ by Shashank Sharma.
I have an open as to how to go about it.
I was going through the
Hi Ville,
Thanks for the suggestions. Please find my response inline
On 11/21/2017 10:41 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Fri, Nov 17, 2017 at 03:00:29PM +0530, Shashank Sharma wrote:
From: Ankit Nautiyal
If the user mode does not support aspect-ratio, and requests
n set_mode_for_crtc() check if bit field aspect_ratio_allowed, is
set for the drm_atomic_state.
I am currently testing this and am open to suggestions and feedback on
this approach.
Regards,
Ankit
On 10/19/2017 9:17 PM, Daniel Stone wrote:
Hi Ankit,
On 17 October 2017 at 12:08
On 5/5/2018 1:49 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 08:26:26AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 12:20:20PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nauti...@intel.com>
We parse the EDID and add all the modes in the connector's mo
On 5/7/2018 5:58 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Mon, May 07, 2018 at 10:34:53AM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
On 5/5/2018 1:49 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, May 03, 2018 at 08:26:26AM +0200, Daniel Vetter wrote:
On Wed, May 02, 2018 at 12:20:20PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
From
From: Ville Syrjälä
AVI infoframe can only carry none, 4:3, or 16:9 picture aspect
ratios. Return an error if the user asked for something different.
Cc: Shashank Sharma
Cc: "Lin, Jia"
Cc: Akashdeep Sharma
From: Ankit Nautiyal
This patch series is a re-attempt to enable aspect ratio support in
DRM layer. Currently the aspect ratio information gets lost in translation
during a user->kernel mode or vice versa.
The old patch series
From: Ville Syrjälä
commit 6dffd431e229 ("drm: Add aspect ratio parsing in DRM layer")
cause us to not send out any VICs in the AVI infoframes. That commit
was since reverted, but if and when we add aspect ratio handing back
we need to be more careful.
Let's
From: Ville Syrjälä
If the user mode would specify an aspect ratio other than 4:3 or 16:9
we now silently ignore it. Maybe a better apporoach is to return an
error? Let's try that.
Also we must be careful that we don't try to send illegal picture
aspect in the
From: "Sharma, Shashank"
Current DRM layer functions don't parse aspect ratio information
while converting a user mode->kernel mode or vice versa. This
causes modeset to pick mode with wrong aspect ratio, eventually
causing failures in HDMI compliance test cases, due
From: Ankit Nautiyal
We parse the EDID and add all the modes in the connector's modelist.
This adds CEA modes with aspect ratio information too, regadless of
whether user space requested this information or not.
This patch prunes the modes with aspect-ratio
From: Ankit Nautiyal
If the user-space does not support aspect-ratio, and requests for a
modeset with mode having aspect ratio bits set, then the given
user-mode must be rejected. Secondly, while preparing a user-mode from
kernel mode, the aspect-ratio info must not
From: Ville Syrjälä
Make mode matching less confusing by allowing the caller to specify
which parts of the modes should match via some flags.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma
---
From: "Sharma, Shashank"
HDMI 2.0/CEA-861-F introduces two new aspect ratios:
- 64:27
- 256:135
This patch:
- Adds new DRM flags for to represent these new aspect ratios.
- Adds new cases to handle these aspect ratios while converting
from user->kernel mode or vise
From: Ankit Nautiyal
To enable aspect-ratio support in DRM, blindly exposing the aspect
ratio information along with mode, can break things in existing
non-atomic user-spaces which have no intention or support to use this
aspect ratio information.
To avoid this, a
From: Ville Syrjälä
Use drm_mode_equal_no_clocks_no_stereo() in
drm_match_hdmi_mode_clock_tolerance() for consistency as we
also use it in drm_match_hdmi_mode() and the cea mode matching
functions.
This doesn't actually change anything since the input mode
comes
From: Ankit Nautiyal
We parse the EDID and add all the modes in the connector's modelist.
This adds CEA modes with aspect ratio information too, regardless of
whether user space requested this information or not.
This patch:
-prunes the modes with aspect-ratio
From: Ankit Nautiyal
This patch series is a re-attempt to enable aspect ratio support in
DRM layer. Currently the aspect ratio information gets lost in translation
during a user->kernel mode or vice versa.
The old patch series
From: Ville Syrjälä
Make mode matching less confusing by allowing the caller to specify
which parts of the modes should match via some flags.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma
---
From: Ville Syrjälä
commit 6dffd431e229 ("drm: Add aspect ratio parsing in DRM layer")
cause us to not send out any VICs in the AVI infoframes. That commit
was since reverted, but if and when we add aspect ratio handing back
we need to be more careful.
Let's
From: Ville Syrjälä
If the user mode would specify an aspect ratio other than 4:3 or 16:9
we now silently ignore it. Maybe a better apporoach is to return an
error? Let's try that.
Also we must be careful that we don't try to send illegal picture
aspect in the
From: Ville Syrjälä
Use drm_mode_equal_no_clocks_no_stereo() in
drm_match_hdmi_mode_clock_tolerance() for consistency as we
also use it in drm_match_hdmi_mode() and the cea mode matching
functions.
This doesn't actually change anything since the input mode
comes
From: "Sharma, Shashank"
HDMI 2.0/CEA-861-F introduces two new aspect ratios:
- 64:27
- 256:135
This patch:
- Adds new DRM flags for to represent these new aspect ratios.
- Adds new cases to handle these aspect ratios while converting
from user->kernel mode or vise
From: Ankit Nautiyal
To enable aspect-ratio support in DRM, blindly exposing the aspect
ratio information along with mode, can break things in existing
non-atomic user-spaces which have no intention or support to use this
aspect ratio information.
To avoid this, a
From: Ville Syrjälä
AVI infoframe can only carry none, 4:3, or 16:9 picture aspect
ratios. Return an error if the user asked for something different.
Cc: Shashank Sharma
Cc: "Lin, Jia"
Cc: Akashdeep Sharma
From: Ankit Nautiyal
If the user-space does not support aspect-ratio, and requests for a
modeset with mode having aspect ratio bits set, then the given
user-mode must be rejected. Secondly, while preparing a user-mode from
kernel mode, the aspect-ratio info must not
From: "Sharma, Shashank"
Current DRM layer functions don't parse aspect ratio information
while converting a user mode->kernel mode or vice versa. This
causes modeset to pick mode with wrong aspect ratio, eventually
causing failures in HDMI compliance test cases, due
From: Ville Syrjälä
If the user mode would specify an aspect ratio other than 4:3 or 16:9
we now silently ignore it. Maybe a better apporoach is to return an
error? Let's try that.
Also we must be careful that we don't try to send illegal picture
aspect in the
From: Ville Syrjälä
Use drm_mode_equal_no_clocks_no_stereo() in
drm_match_hdmi_mode_clock_tolerance() for consistency as we
also use it in drm_match_hdmi_mode() and the cea mode matching
functions.
This doesn't actually change anything since the input mode
comes
From: Ville Syrjälä
Make mode matching less confusing by allowing the caller to specify
which parts of the modes should match via some flags.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma
---
From: Ville Syrjälä
commit 6dffd431e229 ("drm: Add aspect ratio parsing in DRM layer")
cause us to not send out any VICs in the AVI infoframes. That commit
was since reverted, but if and when we add aspect ratio handing back
we need to be more careful.
Let's
From: Ankit Nautiyal
To enable aspect-ratio support in DRM, blindly exposing the aspect
ratio information along with mode, can break things in existing
non-atomic user-spaces which have no intention or support to use this
aspect ratio information.
To avoid this, a
From: "Sharma, Shashank"
HDMI 2.0/CEA-861-F introduces two new aspect ratios:
- 64:27
- 256:135
This patch:
- Adds new DRM flags for to represent these new aspect ratios.
- Adds new cases to handle these aspect ratios while converting
from user->kernel mode or vise
From: Ankit Nautiyal
We parse the EDID and add all the modes in the connector's modelist.
This adds CEA modes with aspect ratio information too, regardless of
whether user space requested this information or not.
This patch:
-prunes the modes with aspect-ratio
From: Ville Syrjälä
AVI infoframe can only carry none, 4:3, or 16:9 picture aspect
ratios. Return an error if the user asked for something different.
Cc: Shashank Sharma
Cc: "Lin, Jia"
Cc: Akashdeep Sharma
From: "Sharma, Shashank"
Current DRM layer functions don't parse aspect ratio information
while converting a user mode->kernel mode or vice versa. This
causes modeset to pick mode with wrong aspect ratio, eventually
causing failures in HDMI compliance test cases, due
From: Ankit Nautiyal
This patch series is a re-attempt to enable aspect ratio support in
DRM layer. Currently the aspect ratio information gets lost in translation
during a user->kernel mode or vice versa.
The old patch series
From: Ankit Nautiyal
If the user-space does not support aspect-ratio, and requests for a
modeset with mode having aspect ratio bits set, then the given
user-mode must be rejected. Secondly, while preparing a user-mode from
kernel mode, the aspect-ratio info must not
On 4/27/2018 7:24 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:44:53PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nauti...@intel.com>
If the user-space does not support aspect-ratio, and requests for a
modeset with mode having aspect ratio bits set, then the
On 4/27/2018 7:35 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2018 at 05:44:54PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nauti...@intel.com>
We parse the EDID and add all the modes in the connector's modelist.
This adds CEA modes with aspect ratio information too, reg
Nautiyal, Ankit K:
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nauti...@intel.com>
A new drm client cap is required to enable user-space to advertise
if it supports modes with aspect-ratio. Based on this cap value, the
kernel will take a call on exposing the aspect ratio information in
modes or not.
This
From: Ankit Nautiyal
To enable aspect-ratio support in DRM, blindly exposing the
aspect-ratio information along with mode, can break things
in existing user-spaces which have no intention or support
to use this aspect-ratio information.
To avoid this, a new drm
From: "Sharma, Shashank"
HDMI 2.0/CEA-861-F introduces two new aspect ratios:
- 64:27
- 256:135
This patch:
- Adds new DRM flags for to represent these new aspect ratios.
- Adds new cases to handle these aspect ratios while converting
from user->kernel mode or vise
From: Ankit Nautiyal
We parse the EDID and add all the modes in the connector's
modelist. This adds CEA modes with aspect ratio information
too, regadless of if user space requested this information or
not.
This patch prunes the modes with aspect-ratio information,
From: Ankit Nautiyal
If the user mode does not support aspect-ratio, and requests for
a modeset, then the flag bits representing aspect ratio in the
given user-mode must be rejected.
Similarly, while preparing a user-mode from kernel mode, the
aspect-ratio info must
From: Ville Syrjälä
commit 6dffd431e229 ("drm: Add aspect ratio parsing in DRM layer")
cause us to not send out any VICs in the AVI infoframes. That commit
was since reverted, but if and when we add aspect ratio handing back
we need to be more careful.
Let's
From: Ville Syrjälä
Use drm_mode_equal_no_clocks_no_stereo() in
drm_match_hdmi_mode_clock_tolerance() for consistency as we
also use it in drm_match_hdmi_mode() and the cea mode matching
functions.
This doesn't actually change anything since the input mode
comes
From: "Sharma, Shashank"
Current DRM layer functions don't parse aspect ratio information
while converting a user mode->kernel mode or vice versa. This
causes modeset to pick mode with wrong aspect ratio, eventually
causing failures in HDMI compliance test cases, due
From: Ankit Nautiyal
A new drm client cap is required to enable user-space to advertise
if it supports modes with aspect-ratio. Based on this cap value, the
kernel will take a call on exposing the aspect ratio information in
modes or not.
This patch adds the client
From: Ville Syrjälä
Make mode matching less confusing by allowing the caller to specify
which parts of the modes should match via some flags.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
---
drivers/gpu/drm/drm_modes.c | 134
From: Ankit Nautiyal
This patch series is a re-attempt to enable aspect ratio support in
DRM layer. Currently the aspect ratio information gets lost in
translation during a user->kernel mode or vice versa.
The old patch series
Hi Ville,
Thanks for the comments and suggestions.
Please find my response inline:
On 1/30/2018 12:28 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:51:34AM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nauti...@intel.com>
We parse the EDID and add all the
On 1/30/2018 12:23 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:51:33AM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nauti...@intel.com>
If the user mode does not support aspect-ratio, and requests for
a modeset, then the flag bits representing aspect
Hi Ville,
Appreciate your time and the suggestions.
Please find my response inline:
On 1/31/2018 6:39 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Wed, Jan 31, 2018 at 12:04:52PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
On 1/30/2018 12:23 AM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Fri, Jan 12, 2018 at 11:51:33AM +0530, Nautiyal
Hi Ville,
I still have some queries regarding the handling of aspect ratio flags
in getblob ioctl.
Please find below my responses inline.
On 2/1/2018 6:24 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu, Feb 01, 2018 at 04:35:22PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
Hi Ville,
Appreciate your time
+0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
Hi Ville,
As per our last discussion, following points were discussed:
1. To suppress the aspect-ratio info from getblob ioctl to a user that
does not support it:
i. A new flag must be added to drm_blob_property to mark if the
blob has mode data.
ii
suggestions on how to handle this situation?
Regards,
Ankit
On 2/8/2018 9:59 AM, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
Hi Ville,
I still have some queries regarding the handling of aspect ratio flags
in getblob ioctl.
Please find below my responses inline.
On 2/1/2018 6:24 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Thu
From: Ankit Nautiyal
If the user-space does not support aspect-ratio, and requests for a
modeset with mode having aspect ratio bits set, then the given
user-mode must be rejected. Secondly, while preparing a user-mode from
kernel mode, the aspect-ratio info must not
From: "Sharma, Shashank"
Current DRM layer functions don't parse aspect ratio information
while converting a user mode->kernel mode or vice versa. This
causes modeset to pick mode with wrong aspect ratio, eventually
causing failures in HDMI compliance test cases, due
From: Ville Syrjälä
Make mode matching less confusing by allowing the caller to specify
which parts of the modes should match via some flags.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma
---
From: Ankit Nautiyal
If the user space does not support aspect-ratio, then getblob called
with the blob id of a user mode, should clear the aspect ratio
information in the blob data.
Currently for a given blob id, there is no way to determine if the
blob stores user
From: Ankit Nautiyal
We parse the EDID and add all the modes in the connector's modelist.
This adds CEA modes with aspect ratio information too, regadless of
whether user space requested this information or not.
This patch prunes the modes with aspect-ratio
From: Ankit Nautiyal
To enable aspect-ratio support in DRM, blindly exposing the aspect
ratio information along with mode, can break things in existing
user-spaces which have no intention or support to use this aspect
ratio information.
To avoid this, a new drm
From: Ville Syrjälä
commit 6dffd431e229 ("drm: Add aspect ratio parsing in DRM layer")
cause us to not send out any VICs in the AVI infoframes. That commit
was since reverted, but if and when we add aspect ratio handing back
we need to be more careful.
Let's
From: Ankit Nautiyal
This patch series is a re-attempt to enable aspect ratio support in DRM layer.
Currently the aspect ratio information gets lost in translation during a
user->kernel mode or vice versa.
The old patch series
From: Ville Syrjälä
Use drm_mode_equal_no_clocks_no_stereo() in
drm_match_hdmi_mode_clock_tolerance() for consistency as we
also use it in drm_match_hdmi_mode() and the cea mode matching
functions.
This doesn't actually change anything since the input mode
comes
From: "Sharma, Shashank"
HDMI 2.0/CEA-861-F introduces two new aspect ratios:
- 64:27
- 256:135
This patch:
- Adds new DRM flags for to represent these new aspect ratios.
- Adds new cases to handle these aspect ratios while converting
from user->kernel mode or vise
wrote:
On Tue, Feb 13, 2018 at 09:53:53PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
Hi Ville,
Thanks yet again to look into this.
I am still skeptical about rejecting the mode, if aspect ratio cap is
not set.
Perhaps I am not aware with the userspace expectations.
Please find my response inline:
On 2/13
On 3/9/2018 6:40 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Fri, Mar 09, 2018 at 11:07:14AM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
From: Ankit Nautiyal <ankit.k.nauti...@intel.com>
If the user-space does not support aspect-ratio, then getblob called
with the blob id of a user-mode, should clear the aspect
From: Ankit Nautiyal
If the user-space does not support aspect-ratio, then getblob called
with the blob id of a user-mode, should clear the aspect-ratio
information in the blob data.
Currently for a given blob id, there is no way to determine if the
blob stores
From: Ankit Nautiyal
This patch series is a re-attempt to enable aspect ratio support in
DRM layer. Currently the aspect ratio information gets lost in translation
during a user->kernel mode or vice versa.
The old patch series
From: Ville Syrjälä
Make mode matching less confusing by allowing the caller to specify
which parts of the modes should match via some flags.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma
---
From: Ville Syrjälä
commit 6dffd431e229 ("drm: Add aspect ratio parsing in DRM layer")
cause us to not send out any VICs in the AVI infoframes. That commit
was since reverted, but if and when we add aspect ratio handing back
we need to be more careful.
Let's
From: Ville Syrjälä
Use drm_mode_equal_no_clocks_no_stereo() in
drm_match_hdmi_mode_clock_tolerance() for consistency as we
also use it in drm_match_hdmi_mode() and the cea mode matching
functions.
This doesn't actually change anything since the input mode
comes
From: Ville Syrjälä
If the user mode would specify an aspect ratio other than 4:3 or 16:9
we now silently ignore it. Maybe a better apporoach is to return an
error? Let's try that.
Also we must be careful that we don't try to send illegal picture
aspect in the
From: Ankit Nautiyal
If the user-space does not support aspect-ratio, and requests for a
modeset with mode having aspect ratio bits set, then the given
user-mode must be rejected. Secondly, while preparing a user-mode from
kernel mode, the aspect-ratio info must not
From: Ankit Nautiyal
To enable aspect-ratio support in DRM, blindly exposing the aspect
ratio information along with mode, can break things in existing
user-spaces which have no intention or support to use this aspect
ratio information.
To avoid this, a new drm
From: Ville Syrjälä
AVI infoframe can only carry none, 4:3, or 16:9 picture aspect
ratios. Return an error if the user asked for something different.
Cc: Shashank Sharma
Cc: "Lin, Jia"
Cc: Akashdeep Sharma
From: "Sharma, Shashank"
HDMI 2.0/CEA-861-F introduces two new aspect ratios:
- 64:27
- 256:135
This patch:
- Adds new DRM flags for to represent these new aspect ratios.
- Adds new cases to handle these aspect ratios while converting
from user->kernel mode or vise
From: Ankit Nautiyal
We parse the EDID and add all the modes in the connector's modelist.
This adds CEA modes with aspect ratio information too, regadless of
whether user space requested this information or not.
This patch prunes the modes with aspect-ratio
From: Ankit Nautiyal
If the user-space does not support aspect-ratio, then getblob called
with the blob id of a user-mode, should clear the aspect-ratio
information in the blob data.
Currently for a given blob id, there is no way to determine if the
blob stores
From: "Sharma, Shashank"
Current DRM layer functions don't parse aspect ratio information
while converting a user mode->kernel mode or vice versa. This
causes modeset to pick mode with wrong aspect ratio, eventually
causing failures in HDMI compliance test cases, due
From: Ankit Nautiyal
This patch series is a re-attempt to enable aspect ratio support in
DRM layer. Currently the aspect ratio information gets lost in translation
during a user->kernel mode or vice versa.
The old patch series
From: Ville Syrjälä
Use drm_mode_equal_no_clocks_no_stereo() in
drm_match_hdmi_mode_clock_tolerance() for consistency as we
also use it in drm_match_hdmi_mode() and the cea mode matching
functions.
This doesn't actually change anything since the input mode
comes
From: Ville Syrjälä
If the user mode would specify an aspect ratio other than 4:3 or 16:9
we now silently ignore it. Maybe a better apporoach is to return an
error? Let's try that.
Also we must be careful that we don't try to send illegal picture
aspect in the
From: Ville Syrjälä
commit 6dffd431e229 ("drm: Add aspect ratio parsing in DRM layer")
cause us to not send out any VICs in the AVI infoframes. That commit
was since reverted, but if and when we add aspect ratio handing back
we need to be more careful.
Let's
From: Ville Syrjälä
AVI infoframe can only carry none, 4:3, or 16:9 picture aspect
ratios. Return an error if the user asked for something different.
Cc: Shashank Sharma
Cc: "Lin, Jia"
Cc: Akashdeep Sharma
From: Ankit Nautiyal
To enable aspect-ratio support in DRM, blindly exposing the aspect
ratio information along with mode, can break things in existing
user-spaces which have no intention or support to use this aspect
ratio information.
To avoid this, a new drm
From: Ville Syrjälä
Make mode matching less confusing by allowing the caller to specify
which parts of the modes should match via some flags.
Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä
Reviewed-by: Shashank Sharma
---
From: Ankit Nautiyal
This patch adds helper functions for determining if aspect-ratio is
expected in user-mode and for allowing/disallowing the aspect-ratio,
if its not expected.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal
---
From: "Sharma, Shashank"
HDMI 2.0/CEA-861-F introduces two new aspect ratios:
- 64:27
- 256:135
This patch:
- Adds new DRM flags for to represent these new aspect ratios.
- Adds new cases to handle these aspect ratios while converting
from user->kernel mode or vise
From: Ankit Nautiyal
If the user-space does not support aspect-ratio, and requests for a
modeset with mode having aspect ratio bits set, then the given
user-mode must be rejected. Secondly, while preparing a user-mode from
kernel mode, the aspect-ratio info must not
From: Ankit Nautiyal
We parse the EDID and add all the modes in the connector's modelist.
This adds CEA modes with aspect ratio information too, regadless of
whether user space requested this information or not.
This patch prunes the modes with aspect-ratio
From: "Sharma, Shashank"
Current DRM layer functions don't parse aspect ratio information
while converting a user mode->kernel mode or vice versa. This
causes modeset to pick mode with wrong aspect ratio, eventually
causing failures in HDMI compliance test cases, due
of
modes in the connector modelist is increased by 2, resulting in failure
of assertion 'mode_count==13'.
Perhaps this need to be handled in the test.
-Regards,
Ankit
On 4/6/2018 10:34 PM, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
From: "Sharma, Shashank" <shashank.sha...@intel.com>
Current DRM layer fu
On 4/6/2018 11:14 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:55:14PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
This patch is causing failure of IGT test kms_3d. The kms_3d test
expects the no. of 3d modes to be 13.
(The test has hard-coded value for expected no. of 3d modes as 13)
But due
On 4/17/2018 11:17 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 10:45:07AM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
On 4/6/2018 11:14 PM, Ville Syrjälä wrote:
On Fri, Apr 06, 2018 at 10:55:14PM +0530, Nautiyal, Ankit K wrote:
This patch is causing failure of IGT test kms_3d. The kms_3d test
From: Ankit Nautiyal
This patch adds helper functions for determining if aspect-ratio is
expected in user-mode and for allowing/disallowing the aspect-ratio,
if its not expected.
Signed-off-by: Ankit Nautiyal
---
From: Ankit Nautiyal
To enable aspect-ratio support in DRM, blindly exposing the aspect
ratio information along with mode, can break things in existing
user-spaces which have no intention or support to use this aspect
ratio information.
To avoid this, a new drm
1 - 100 of 255 matches
Mail list logo