Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2023-03-08 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Tue, Mar 07, 2023 at 05:00:01PM -0500, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > Here goes our first pull request towards 6.3. You know, I meant 6.4. :) Thank you Joonas for noticing that. > > drm-intel-next-2023-03-07: > > Cross-subsystem Changes: > - MEI patches to fix

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2022-11-01 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Tue, Nov 01, 2022 at 10:29:24PM +, Vivi, Rodrigo wrote: > On Sat, 2022-10-29 at 02:41 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 02:22:33PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > > > > > Here goes the first chunk of drm-intel-next targeting 6.2 > > > > > >

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2022-11-01 Thread Vivi, Rodrigo
On Sat, 2022-10-29 at 02:41 +0300, Ville Syrjälä wrote: > On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 02:22:33PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > > > Here goes the first chunk of drm-intel-next targeting 6.2 > > > > The highlight goes to Ville with many display related clean-up > > and

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2022-10-28 Thread Ville Syrjälä
On Fri, Oct 28, 2022 at 02:22:33PM -0400, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > Here goes the first chunk of drm-intel-next targeting 6.2 > > The highlight goes to Ville with many display related clean-up > and improvement, some other MTL enabling work and many other > fixes and small

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2022-08-05 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 05:25:43PM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 10:39:44 -0400 > Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 10:46:57AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > > Hi Rodrigo, > > > > > > On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 13:33:06 -0400 > > > Rodrigo Vivi

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2022-08-05 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
On Fri, 5 Aug 2022 10:39:44 -0400 Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 10:46:57AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > > Hi Rodrigo, > > > > On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 13:33:06 -0400 > > Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > > > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > > > > > Here goes

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2022-08-05 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Fri, Aug 05, 2022 at 10:46:57AM +0200, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > Hi Rodrigo, > > On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 13:33:06 -0400 > Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > > > Here goes drm-intel-next-fixes-2022-08-04: > > > > - disable pci resize on 32-bit systems (Nirmoy) > > - don't

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2022-08-05 Thread Mauro Carvalho Chehab
Hi Rodrigo, On Thu, 4 Aug 2022 13:33:06 -0400 Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > Hi Dave and Daniel, > > Here goes drm-intel-next-fixes-2022-08-04: > > - disable pci resize on 32-bit systems (Nirmoy) > - don't leak the ccs state (Matt) > - TLB invalidation fixes (Chris) > > Thanks, > Rodrigo. > > The

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next-fixes

2021-07-01 Thread Rodrigo Vivi
On Thu, Jul 01, 2021 at 11:57:53AM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Wed, 30 Jun 2021, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 30, 2021 at 01:05:35PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > >> On Tue, 29 Jun 2021, Rodrigo Vivi wrote: > >> > Hi Dave and Daniel, > >> > > >> > Here goes

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2015-12-23 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 04:31:22PM +, Tvrtko Ursulin wrote: > > On 22/12/15 14:31, Chris Wilson wrote: > >On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 03:05:14PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >>On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:37:18AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >>>Hi Dave, > >>> > >>>Final 4.5 feature pull for

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2015-12-22 Thread Tvrtko Ursulin
On 22/12/15 14:31, Chris Wilson wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 03:05:14PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:37:18AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> Hi Dave, >>> >>> Final 4.5 feature pull for drm/i915! >>> >>> drm-intel-next-2015-12-18: >>> - fix atomic watermark

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2015-12-22 Thread Chris Wilson
On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 03:05:14PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, Dec 22, 2015 at 11:37:18AM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > Hi Dave, > > > > Final 4.5 feature pull for drm/i915! > > > > drm-intel-next-2015-12-18: > > - fix atomic watermark recomputation logic (Maarten) > > - modeset

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2014-05-07 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 06 May 2014, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Knut Petersen wrote: >> On 06.05.2014 20:59, Daniel Vetter wrote: >> >On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:30:45PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> >>On Tue, 06 May 2014, Knut Petersen wrote: >> >>>On 28.04.2014 15:26,

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2014-05-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 10:04:17PM +0200, Knut Petersen wrote: > On 06.05.2014 20:59, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:30:45PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > >>On Tue, 06 May 2014, Knut Petersen wrote: > >>>On 28.04.2014 15:26, Daniel Vetter wrote: > >>>The patch below is a clear

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2014-05-06 Thread Knut Petersen
On 06.05.2014 20:59, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:30:45PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: >> On Tue, 06 May 2014, Knut Petersen wrote: >>> On 28.04.2014 15:26, Daniel Vetter wrote: >>> The patch below is a clear candidate for 3.15 as it fixes a regression >>> introduced after 3.14

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2014-05-06 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 04:30:45PM +0300, Jani Nikula wrote: > On Tue, 06 May 2014, Knut Petersen wrote: > > On 28.04.2014 15:26, Daniel Vetter wrote: > > The patch below is a clear candidate for 3.15 as it fixes a regression > > introduced after 3.14 > >> Egbert Eich (1): > >>

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2014-05-06 Thread Jani Nikula
On Tue, 06 May 2014, Knut Petersen wrote: > On 28.04.2014 15:26, Daniel Vetter wrote: > The patch below is a clear candidate for 3.15 as it fixes a regression > introduced after 3.14 >> Egbert Eich (1): >>drm/i915/SDVO: For sysfs link put directory and target in correct >> order >

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2014-05-06 Thread Knut Petersen
On 28.04.2014 15:26, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > drm-intel-next-2014-04-16: > - vlv infoframe fixes from Jesse > - dsi/mipi fixes from Shobhit > - gen8 pageflip fixes for LRI/SRM from Damien > - cmd parser fixes from Brad Volkin > - some prep patches for CHV, DRRS, ... > - and tons of

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2013-12-21 Thread Ben Widawsky
On Fri, Dec 20, 2013 at 10:42:34PM +0100, Daniel Vetter wrote: > Hi Dave, > > We're back to the regular -next updates. Somehow still not too much going > on really, I guess everyone was thinking about vacation already ;-) > > On that topic: I'll be offline for 2 weeks now. I don't really expect

[Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-next

2012-09-14 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:55:58AM -0400, Bobby Powers wrote: > This tree gives me recursive dependency problems, which ends up > removing a big (& important) part of my .config: > > [bpowers at fina linux]$ git reset --hard drm-intel-next-2012-09-09 > HEAD is now at e04190e drm/fb helper: don't

[Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-next

2012-09-14 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Hi 2012/9/14 Daniel Vetter : > On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:55:58AM -0400, Bobby Powers wrote: >> This tree gives me recursive dependency problems, which ends up >> removing a big (& important) part of my .config: >> >> [bpowers at fina linux]$ git reset --hard drm-intel-next-2012-09-09 >> HEAD is

[Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-next

2012-09-14 Thread Bobby Powers
Hi Daniel, This tree gives me recursive dependency problems, which ends up removing a big (& important) part of my .config: [bpowers at fina linux]$ git reset --hard drm-intel-next-2012-09-09 HEAD is now at e04190e drm/fb helper: don't call drm_helper_connector_dpms directly [bpowers at fina

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-next

2012-09-14 Thread Daniel Vetter
On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:55:58AM -0400, Bobby Powers wrote: This tree gives me recursive dependency problems, which ends up removing a big ( important) part of my .config: [bpowers@fina linux]$ git reset --hard drm-intel-next-2012-09-09 HEAD is now at e04190e drm/fb helper: don't call

Re: [Intel-gfx] [pull] drm-intel-next

2012-09-14 Thread Paulo Zanoni
Hi 2012/9/14 Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch: On Fri, Sep 14, 2012 at 09:55:58AM -0400, Bobby Powers wrote: This tree gives me recursive dependency problems, which ends up removing a big ( important) part of my .config: [bpowers@fina linux]$ git reset --hard drm-intel-next-2012-09-09 HEAD is

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2012-01-05 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:24:08 +0100 Daniel Vetter wrote: > I'd also like to express my frustration with the general -next process for > drm/i915: > - This drm-intel-next tree is less than 24h ours old (if you look at when > it showed up at an official place where both our QA and the community >

[Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2012-01-05 Thread Ben Widawsky
On 01/05/2012 07:24 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: > On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:35:41PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote: >> >> Here are the rest of the 3.3 pending changes. >> >> This has a bunch of small bug fixes and overlay plane support for i915. >> >> The following changes since commit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2012-01-05 Thread Ben Widawsky
On 01/05/2012 07:24 AM, Daniel Vetter wrote: On Wed, Jan 04, 2012 at 07:35:41PM -0800, Keith Packard wrote: Here are the rest of the 3.3 pending changes. This has a bunch of small bug fixes and overlay plane support for i915. The following changes since commit

Re: [Intel-gfx] [PULL] drm-intel-next

2012-01-05 Thread Jesse Barnes
On Thu, 5 Jan 2012 16:24:08 +0100 Daniel Vetter dan...@ffwll.ch wrote: I'd also like to express my frustration with the general -next process for drm/i915: - This drm-intel-next tree is less than 24h ours old (if you look at when it showed up at an official place where both our QA and the