Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hi Sebastian, Am Samstag, 13. Februar 2021, 12:19:57 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke: > On 11.02.2021 15:42, Heiko Stübner wrote: > >Am Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2021, 06:25:15 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke: > >> On 10.02.2021 12:15, Heiko Stübner wrote: > >> >Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2021, 15:55:56 CET

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hey Heiko, On 11.02.2021 15:42, Heiko Stübner wrote: Hi Sebastian, Am Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2021, 06:25:15 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke: Hey Heiko, On 10.02.2021 12:15, Heiko Stübner wrote: >Hi Sebastian, > >Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2021, 15:55:56 CET schrieb Heiko Stübner: >> Hi Sebastian,

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hi Sebastian, Am Donnerstag, 11. Februar 2021, 06:25:15 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke: > Hey Heiko, > > On 10.02.2021 12:15, Heiko Stübner wrote: > >Hi Sebastian, > > > >Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2021, 15:55:56 CET schrieb Heiko Stübner: > >> Hi Sebastian, > >> > >> I did some tests myself today as

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hey Heiko, On 10.02.2021 12:15, Heiko Stübner wrote: Hi Sebastian, Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2021, 15:55:56 CET schrieb Heiko Stübner: Hi Sebastian, I did some tests myself today as well and can confirm your hdmi related finding - at least when plugged in on boot. I tried some combinations of

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hi Sebastian, Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2021, 15:55:56 CET schrieb Heiko Stübner: > Hi Sebastian, > > I did some tests myself today as well and can confirm your > hdmi related finding - at least when plugged in on boot. > > I tried some combinations of camera vs. hdmi and it seems > really only

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hi Sebastian, I did some tests myself today as well and can confirm your hdmi related finding - at least when plugged in on boot. I tried some combinations of camera vs. hdmi and it seems really only when hdmi is plugged in on boot (1) - boot - camera --> works (2) - boot - camera - hdmi

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hey Heiko, On 03.02.2021 20:54, Heiko Stübner wrote: Hi Sebastian, Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2021, 19:14:22 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke: Hey Heiko, I have tested your patch set on my nanoPC-T4, here is a complete log with: - relevant kernel log entries - system information - media ctl output

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hi Sebastian, Am Freitag, 5. Februar 2021, 07:43:35 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke: > On 03.02.2021 20:54, Heiko Stübner wrote: > >Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2021, 19:14:22 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke: > >> I have tested your patch set on my nanoPC-T4, here is a complete log > >> with: > >> -

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hey Heiko, I have tested your patch set on my nanoPC-T4, here is a complete log with: - relevant kernel log entries - system information - media ctl output - sysfs entry information https://paste.debian.net/1183874/ Additionally, to your patchset I have applied the following patches:

Re: [PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

Hi Sebastian, Am Mittwoch, 3. Februar 2021, 19:14:22 CET schrieb Sebastian Fricke: > Hey Heiko, > > I have tested your patch set on my nanoPC-T4, here is a complete log > with: > - relevant kernel log entries > - system information > - media ctl output > - sysfs entry information > >

[PATCH 0/6] Support second Image Signal Processor on rk3399

The rk3399 has two ISPs and right now only the first one is usable. The second ISP is connected to the TXRX dphy on the soc. The phy of ISP1 is only accessible through the DSI controller's io-memory, so this series adds support for simply using the dsi controller is a phy if needed. That