On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 06:55:34PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-03-08 18:48:51)
> > Quoting Matt Roper (2018-03-08 18:22:06)
> > > * Option 2: Allow priority offset to be set in a much larger range
> > >(e.g., [SHRT_MIN+1023,SHRT_MAX-1023]). This allows cgroups to
Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-03-08 18:48:51)
> Quoting Matt Roper (2018-03-08 18:22:06)
> > * Option 2: Allow priority offset to be set in a much larger range
> >(e.g., [SHRT_MIN+1023,SHRT_MAX-1023]). This allows cgroups to have
> >effective priority ranges that don't overlap. cgroup
Quoting Matt Roper (2018-03-08 18:22:06)
> On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 01:11:33PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> > Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-03-08 11:32:04)
> > > Quoting Matt Roper (2018-03-06 23:46:59)
> > > > There are cases where a system integrator may wish to raise/lower the
> > > > priority of
On Thu, Mar 08, 2018 at 01:11:33PM +, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-03-08 11:32:04)
> > Quoting Matt Roper (2018-03-06 23:46:59)
> > > There are cases where a system integrator may wish to raise/lower the
> > > priority of GPU workloads being submitted by specific OS
Quoting Chris Wilson (2018-03-08 11:32:04)
> Quoting Matt Roper (2018-03-06 23:46:59)
> > There are cases where a system integrator may wish to raise/lower the
> > priority of GPU workloads being submitted by specific OS process(es),
> > independently of how the software self-classifies its own
Quoting Matt Roper (2018-03-06 23:46:59)
> There are cases where a system integrator may wish to raise/lower the
> priority of GPU workloads being submitted by specific OS process(es),
> independently of how the software self-classifies its own priority.
> Exposing "priority offset" as an
There are cases where a system integrator may wish to raise/lower the
priority of GPU workloads being submitted by specific OS process(es),
independently of how the software self-classifies its own priority.
Exposing "priority offset" as an i915-specific cgroup parameter will
enable such
