On Sunday 17 June 2001 21:42, you wrote:
Have you looked at the new driver template code? I'm not a developer, but
this sounds like the most logical place to start. Using the template code
and changing the registers appropriately to suit the mach64 seems like the
best way to avoid
Does the combination
Rage128 RF chipset and the VIA KT133 (VT8363) work
for DRI ?
I have such a combination and it does not work, whereas
with the same Graphics card and a Pentium bord
DRI works with the same configuration.
Any ideas what I could do to make it work?
Alexander Strohmaier
Este es un mensaje de prueba del servicio tecnico de eresMas. No
responda a este mensaje, si necesita soporte tecnico por favor
solicitelo en:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Saludos cordiales
S.A.C eresMas
---
Entra en Eltinglao y rompe las reglas.
Publica tus propias noticias y gana 10.000 ptas.
Neale,
I think the known limitations was written a long time ago,
multiple servers has been working at least for some people for
quite some time. I am not sure of what configurations are
working and which are not.
The debug information you provided doesn't say if you are
using DRI or not.
I have had the absolute worst luck getting any Rage128 or Radeon-based ATI
card to work on my Asus A7V (Via Apollo Pro KT133 chipset), but the
unofficial FAQ on bork-DCC in #dri on OpenProjects notes that there are
tremendous problems with early Via chipsets, which I guess the KT133
falls under.
Good point - I have X4.1.0 and kernel 2.4.5, and no DRI with my Radeon under
Linux.
2.4.5 gives me radeon.o in /lib/modules/blah
X4.1.0 gives me a radeon_drv.o somewhere in /usr/X11R6/lib
insmod /path/to/it/radeon_drv.o doesn't do anything,
insmod radeon.o works, but only is version 1.0.0, not
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good point - I have X4.1.0 and kernel 2.4.5, and no DRI with my Radeon under
Linux.
2.4.5 gives me radeon.o in /lib/modules/blah
X4.1.0 gives me a radeon_drv.o somewhere in /usr/X11R6/lib
insmod /path/to/it/radeon_drv.o doesn't do anything,
insmod radeon.o
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 02:48:32PM -0400, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Good point - I have X4.1.0 and kernel 2.4.5, and no DRI with my Radeon under
Linux.
2.4.5 gives me radeon.o in /lib/modules/blah
X4.1.0 gives me a radeon_drv.o somewhere in /usr/X11R6/lib
insmod /path/to/it/radeon_drv.o
On Monday 18 June 2001 12:00, you wrote:
I'm also starting to look at the code for the mach64. What do you mean with
the new driver template code? Are you talking about the structure of the
ATI driver in the mach64 branch?
Any help will be appreciated.
From what I can tell about the driver
Jeremy W. Bean wrote:
On Monday 18 June 2001 12:00, you wrote:
I'm also starting to look at the code for the mach64. What do you mean
with the new driver template code? Are you talking about the structure of
the ATI driver in the mach64 branch?
Any help will be appreciated.
From
On Mon, Jun 18, 2001 at 01:28:33PM -0700, Frank Worsley wrote:
-
Frankÿÿÿî/Ýz÷¥¨¥x%ËC®/Ýz÷¥þX¬¶Ïì¢êÜyú+ïçzØm¶ÿþX¬¶Ïì¢êÜyú+ïçzßåËlþX¬¶)ߣ÷k÷^
Is that Unicode for Worsley? :-)
- |Daryll
Hi Matthew,
On Mon, 18 Jun 2001, Sottek, Matthew J wrote:
I think the known limitations was written a long time ago,
multiple servers has been working at least for some people for
quite some time. I am not sure of what configurations are
working and which are not.
OK, I guess I have one
El Lun 18 Jun 2001 22:46, escribiste:
Jeremy W. Bean wrote:
On Monday 18 June 2001 12:00, you wrote:
I'm also starting to look at the code for the mach64. What do you mean
with the new driver template code? Are you talking about the structure
of the ATI driver in the mach64 branch?
Hey,
I just noticed a recent patch to dri for Radeon PCI support.
I thought there wasnt any yet? Is this patch against the version included
in X 4.1 to CVS or to a previous version? I figure I may as well give it a
try.
Also all the downloadable releases on the DRI project page seem to be
14 matches
Mail list logo
