[Bug 814] Hard lockup with r200 DRI driver

2004-10-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=814 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-08 00:45 --- dbg = 0x06

DRI building - Radeon module problem

2004-10-08 Thread Paulo R. Dallan
On Thursday 07 October 2004 11:57, Paulo R. Dallan wrote: On Thursday 07 October 2004 11:43, Keith Whitwell wrote: Paulo R. Dallan wrote: On Thursday 07 October 2004 10:37, Felix Kühling wrote: On Tue, 5 Oct 2004 19:04:02 -0300 Paulo R. Dallan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: snip Well,

Mach64 problems.

2004-10-08 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
I'm having problems with my laptop after doing an apt-get upgrade. I have done a make install since the upgrade. The mach64 kernel driver is getting loaded, but direct rendering is never enabled. Instead, I get various drmOpenDevice failures for /dev/dri/card0 through /dev/dri/card254:

Re: Mach64 problems.

2004-10-08 Thread Dave Airlie
Mind you, I haven't updated my copy of the DRI cvs tree in a very long time. Certainly not since I last did a make install. Any ideas? The only thing I'm noticing now that I don't remember seeing before is this: mach64: Ignoring new-style parameters in presence of obsolete ones [drm]

Re: Mach64 problems.

2004-10-08 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Dave Airlie wrote: Mind you, I haven't updated my copy of the DRI cvs tree in a very long time. Certainly not since I last did a make install. Any ideas? The only thing I'm noticing now that I don't remember seeing before is this: mach64: Ignoring new-style parameters in presence of obsolete ones

Re: Mach64 problems.

2004-10-08 Thread Dave Airlie
That's very possible, but I did reinstall from my local copy of the DRI/Mesa cvs tree. where did the drm come from? The drm branch of the DRI cvs. From back in September. What's the current state of the cvs tree? I don't mind upgrading to the most recent code, but given how long it

Re: Mach64 problems.

2004-10-08 Thread Adam K Kirchhoff
Dave Airlie wrote: That's very possible, but I did reinstall from my local copy of the DRI/Mesa cvs tree. where did the drm come from? The drm branch of the DRI cvs. From back in September. What's the current state of the cvs tree? I don't mind upgrading to the most recent code, but

Re: More Oopses...

2004-10-08 Thread Thomas Hellström
Hi! Jon Smirl wrote: On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 08:56:30 +0200, Thomas Hellstrom [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi! Ok, now the rmmod oops is gone, and I'm back at the previous state... Oops the fourth time the via module is loaded. No X server activity: Give this patch a try and

Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Marcello Maggioni
Like the Subject says I can't apply S3TC patch anymore to current Mesa tree (works with yesterday tree) . I get these messages : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/prova/Mesa$ zcat ../mesa_dri_txc_cvs040908.diff.gz | patch -p0 zcat: ../mesa_dri_txc_cvs040908.diff.gz: No such file or directory [EMAIL

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Alex Deucher
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:29:38 +0200, Marcello Maggioni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Like the Subject says I can't apply S3TC patch anymore to current Mesa tree (works with yesterday tree) . I get these messages : [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/prova/Mesa$ zcat ../mesa_dri_txc_cvs040908.diff.gz | patch

[Bug 814] Hard lockup with r200 DRI driver

2004-10-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=814 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-08 06:44 --- dbg=0x6

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Marcello Maggioni
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 09:42:54 -0400, Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:29:38 +0200, Marcello Maggioni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Like the Subject says I can't apply S3TC patch anymore to current Mesa tree (works with yesterday tree) . I get these messages :

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Alex Deucher
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:55:40 +0200, Marcello Maggioni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 09:42:54 -0400, Alex Deucher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 15:29:38 +0200, Marcello Maggioni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Like the Subject says I can't apply S3TC patch anymore

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 15:29 schrieb Marcello Maggioni: Like the Subject says I can't apply S3TC patch anymore to current Mesa tree (works with yesterday tree) . 'Cause it is IN...?! ;-))) You've worked hard guys in one day ;) Compiling... Regards, Dieter

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Marcello Maggioni
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:12:44 +0200, Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 15:29 schrieb Marcello Maggioni: Like the Subject says I can't apply S3TC patch anymore to current Mesa tree (works with yesterday tree) . 'Cause it is IN...?! ;-))) You've worked hard

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Marcello Maggioni
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:34:38 +0200, Marcello Maggioni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:12:44 +0200, Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 15:29 schrieb Marcello Maggioni: Like the Subject says I can't apply S3TC patch anymore to current Mesa

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Felix Kühling
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:47:56 +0200 Marcello Maggioni [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] I've also another question . Why ,if I choose in DRICONF Frame Throttling as Usleep or Busy Waiting I get this message if I try to run applications as user, do I get this message ? : IRQ's not enabled,

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 16:34 schrieb Marcello Maggioni: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:12:44 +0200, Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 15:29 schrieb Marcello Maggioni: Like the Subject says I can't apply S3TC patch anymore to current Mesa tree (works with

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Felix Kühling
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:10:35 +0200 Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] When I set 'setenv force_s3tc_enable 1' quake3-smp do NOT start anymore. ATTENTION: default value of option force_s3tc_enable overridden by environment. Fatal error in __driConfigOptions line 75, column 0:

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 17:37 schrieb Felix Kühling: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:10:35 +0200 Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] When I set 'setenv force_s3tc_enable 1' quake3-smp do NOT start anymore. ATTENTION: default value of option force_s3tc_enable overridden by

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 17:10 schrieb Dieter Nützel: Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 16:34 schrieb Marcello Maggioni: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:12:44 +0200, Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 15:29 schrieb Marcello Maggioni: Like the Subject says I can't

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 17:53 schrieb Dieter Nützel: Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 17:10 schrieb Dieter Nützel: Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 16:34 schrieb Marcello Maggioni: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:12:44 +0200, Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 15:29

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Felix Kühling
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 18:09:29 +0200 Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] INSTALL/SOURCE ut2004demo [1] 31246 INSTALL/SOURCE Disabling HW TCL support Argh, Felix, what is here wrong? It is due to disabled TCL for doom3! When I delete doom3 settings from drirc driconf

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 17:41 schrieb Dieter Nützel: Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 17:37 schrieb Felix Kühling: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:10:35 +0200 Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] When I set 'setenv force_s3tc_enable 1' quake3-smp do NOT start anymore.

[Bug 814] Hard lockup with r200 DRI driver

2004-10-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=814 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-08 09:45 --- dbg=0x6 is

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Marcello Maggioni
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 18:43:28 +0200, Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 17:41 schrieb Dieter Nützel: Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 17:37 schrieb Felix Kühling: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:10:35 +0200 Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] When I

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 18:24 schrieb Felix Kühling: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 18:09:29 +0200 Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] INSTALL/SOURCE ut2004demo [1] 31246 INSTALL/SOURCE Disabling HW TCL support Argh, Felix, what is here wrong? The problem is that the

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Roland Scheidegger
Marcello Maggioni wrote: I get : WARNING: vertex array range in virtual memory (SLOW) signal caught: Segmentation fault si_code 1 Trying to exit gracefully.. Shutting down sound hardware You don't list what you got as renderer, but this sounds to me like you got indirect rendering. You need to

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 18:56 schrieb Marcello Maggioni: Deiter, ?;-) are you able to run Doom3 on your 8500 board? Yes, see here: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dri-develm=109714730107167w=2 But Roland has problems: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=dri-develm=109700495010472w=2

Re: DRI building - Radeon module problem

2004-10-08 Thread Ian Romanick
Paulo R. Dallan wrote: *glxinfo*: direct rendering *yes* OpenGL renderer string: Mesa DRI R200 20030328 AGP 4x x86/MMX+/3DNow!+/SSE TCL OpenGL version string: 1.3 *Mesa* *5.0.2* *glxgears* *-info*: GL Renderer: *Mesa* GLX *indirect* GL_VERSION= 1.2 (1.5 *Mesa* *6.1*) Some doubts: (a) Shouldn't

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Marcello Maggioni
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:18:30 +0200, Roland Scheidegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marcello Maggioni wrote: I get : WARNING: vertex array range in virtual memory (SLOW) signal caught: Segmentation fault si_code 1 Trying to exit gracefully.. Shutting down sound hardware You don't list

Re: [Dri-users] Re: DRI building - Radeon module problem

2004-10-08 Thread Paulo R. Dallan
On Friday 08 October 2004 08:08, Felix Kühling wrote: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 05:37:30 -0300 Paulo R. Dallan [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Thursday 07 October 2004 11:57, Paulo R. Dallan wrote: On Thursday 07 October 2004 11:43, Keith Whitwell wrote: Paulo R. Dallan wrote: On Thursday 07

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Dieter Nützel
OK, I have a fix. Now, we have: #ifndef USE_EXTERNAL_DXTN_LIB #define USE_EXTERNAL_DXTN_LIB 0 #endif --- src/mesa/main/texcompress_s3tc.c.orig 2004-10-08 15:12:34.0 +0200 +++ src/mesa/main/texcompress_s3tc.c2004-10-08 19:54:43.0 +0200 @@ -29,7 +29,11 @@ */

Re: kern/60474: Temporary fix for DRM support for Radeon 9200

2004-10-08 Thread Mikhail Teterin
Hi, Eric! Can this be assigned back to you? I have another pair of PCI IDs, BTW, and I am sure, there are people with shiny new Radeon-9800 out there too... Yours, -mi cvs diff: Diffing . Index: drm_pciids.h === RCS file:

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Dieter Nützel
Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 20:13 schrieb Marcello Maggioni: On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 19:18:30 +0200, Roland Scheidegger [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marcello Maggioni wrote: I get : WARNING: vertex array range in virtual memory (SLOW) signal caught: Segmentation fault si_code 1 Trying

[r200] depth, alpha bugs with Viewperf-7.1.1 (8.0.1)

2004-10-08 Thread Dieter Ntzel
I'm in a hurry, so... Try viewperf-7.1.1 'ugs-03'. Have a look at ugs02QualityFull.png. I see text from KDE's Konsole (uninitialized alpha?). With alpha it is fine ugs03Full.png. Big windows wrap depth. On the right you can see same part as on the left. ugs06Full-depth.png Pictures

Re: kern/60474: Temporary fix for DRM support for Radeon 9200

2004-10-08 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 11:17, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hi, Eric! Can this be assigned back to you? I have another pair of PCI IDs, BTW, and I am sure, there are people with shiny new Radeon-9800 out there too... Yours, This is not a bug. The DRM does not support r300-series hardware. Among

Re: FW: [Dri-users] ProSavageDDR, No DRI Thusfar

2004-10-08 Thread Alex Deucher
On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 07:11:42 -0700, Nathan Olberding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dmesg output is attached, as well as /var/log/messages. I can feel it, I'm gonna gets me my DRI! (maybe) hmmm... looks like the drm is causing an oops. You might try a newer one, or try the one from xorg cvs.

Re: R200 ReadPixels optimization

2004-10-08 Thread Ian Romanick
Ian Romanick wrote: Here's a simple patch that gives about a 50% (on my box) speed boost to glReadPixels performance in 24-bit. I measured using the benchmark built into progs/demos/readpix. The interesting thing is that the core MMX SSE2 routines can be used for other cards as well. For

Re: kern/60474: Temporary fix for DRM support for Radeon 9200

2004-10-08 Thread Vladimir Dergachev
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Eric Anholt wrote: On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 11:17, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hi, Eric! Can this be assigned back to you? I have another pair of PCI IDs, BTW, and I am sure, there are people with shiny new Radeon-9800 out there too... Yours, This is not a bug. The DRM does not

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 08:41, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 17:37 schrieb Felix Kühling: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:10:35 +0200 Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] When I set 'setenv force_s3tc_enable 1' quake3-smp do NOT start anymore. ATTENTION: default

Re: FW: [Dri-users] ProSavageDDR, No DRI Thusfar

2004-10-08 Thread Vladimir Dergachev
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Alex Deucher wrote: On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 07:11:42 -0700, Nathan Olberding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dmesg output is attached, as well as /var/log/messages. I can feel it, I'm gonna gets me my DRI! (maybe) [snip..] vesafb: framebuffer at 0xd000, mapped to 0xe680a000, size

Re: FW: [Dri-users] ProSavageDDR, No DRI Thusfar

2004-10-08 Thread Alex Deucher
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 16:26:58 -0400 (EDT), Vladimir Dergachev [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Alex Deucher wrote: On Thu, 07 Oct 2004 07:11:42 -0700, Nathan Olberding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: dmesg output is attached, as well as /var/log/messages. I can feel it, I'm gonna

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Marcello Maggioni
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 20:44:14 +0200, Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: OK, I have a fix. Now, we have: #ifndef USE_EXTERNAL_DXTN_LIB #define USE_EXTERNAL_DXTN_LIB 0 #endif --- src/mesa/main/texcompress_s3tc.c.orig 2004-10-08 15:12:34.0 +0200 +++

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Marcello Maggioni
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:23:03 -0700, Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 08:41, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 17:37 schrieb Felix Kühling: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:10:35 +0200 Dieter Nützel [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: [snip] When I set

Re: Can't apply S3TC patch anymore with current Mesa

2004-10-08 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 13:40, Marcello Maggioni wrote: On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 13:23:03 -0700, Eric Anholt [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 08:41, Dieter Nützel wrote: Am Freitag, 8. Oktober 2004 17:37 schrieb Felix Kühling: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 17:10:35 +0200 Dieter Nützel

[Bug 1461] missing textures in some games on r200

2004-10-08 Thread bugzilla-daemon
Please do not reply to this email: if you want to comment on the bug, go to the URL shown below and enter yourcomments there. https://freedesktop.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1461 --- Additional Comments From [EMAIL PROTECTED] 2004-10-08 14:15 --- I was told

Re: FW: [Dri-users] ProSavageDDR, No DRI Thusfar

2004-10-08 Thread Alex Deucher
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004 14:07:20 -0700, Nathan Olberding [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I've tried the drm from CVS (which wouldn't compile), both savage snapshots from Felix's site, and the os-support/linux one from the 6.8.1 release (which I'm not sure actually supports DRI). Is there another? Should

VIA update

2004-10-08 Thread Thomas Hellström
Hi! I've commited the rudimentary command verifyer in the via drm now, and also altered the Unichrome DDX to export MMIO read-only. Hopefully we'll update Xorg with the Unichrome driver soon as well. So from my point of view it should be safe for the via drm to go into the kernel. The Mesa

Re: R200 ReadPixels optimization

2004-10-08 Thread Ian Romanick
Marcello Maggioni wrote: I experience a great slowdown in using this patch . [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/driconf-0.2.2$ glxgears Mesa: software DXTn compression/decompression available Using MMX version of ReadRGBASpan 27 frames in 5.1 seconds = 5.320 FPS 25 frames in 5.0 seconds = 4.982 FPS [EMAIL

Re: R200 ReadPixels optimization

2004-10-08 Thread Marcello Maggioni
On Fri, 08 Oct 2004 15:12:51 -0700, Ian Romanick [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Marcello Maggioni wrote: I experience a great slowdown in using this patch . [EMAIL PROTECTED]:~/driconf-0.2.2$ glxgears Mesa: software DXTn compression/decompression available Using MMX version of ReadRGBASpan

Re: kern/60474: Temporary fix for DRM support for Radeon 9200

2004-10-08 Thread Eric Anholt
On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 15:14, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Eric Anholt wrote: On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 11:17, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hi, Eric! Can this be assigned back to you? I have another pair of PCI IDs, BTW, and I am sure, there are people with shiny new Radeon-9800 out there too...

Re: kern/60474: Temporary fix for DRM support for Radeon 9200

2004-10-08 Thread Mikhail Teterin
Vladimir Dergachev wrote: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Eric Anholt wrote: On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 11:17, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hi, Eric! Can this be assigned back to you? I have another pair of PCI IDs, BTW, and I am sure, there are people with shiny new Radeon-9800 out there too... Yours, This is not a

Re: kern/60474: Temporary fix for DRM support for Radeon 9200

2004-10-08 Thread Mikhail Teterin
Eric Anholt wrote: On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 11:17, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hi, Eric! Can this be assigned back to you? I have another pair of PCI IDs, BTW, and I am sure, there are people with shiny new Radeon-9800 out there too... Yours, This is not a bug. The DRM does not support

[PATCH] Re: DRM oops with unichrome drivers

2004-10-08 Thread Robert Clark
On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 15:19, Robert Clark wrote: Oct 5 22:02:21 miller kernel: Oops: 0002 [#1] The attached (trivial) patch fixes this oops for me but I think this is only half the problem. What seems to have been happening is that, without the DRIVER_HAVE_DMA flag, dev-dma was not being

Re: kern/60474: Temporary fix for DRM support for Radeon 9200

2004-10-08 Thread Vladimir Dergachev
On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Vladimir Dergachev wrote: On Fri, 8 Oct 2004, Eric Anholt wrote: On Fri, 2004-10-08 at 11:17, Mikhail Teterin wrote: Hi, Eric! Can this be assigned back to you? I have another pair of PCI IDs, BTW, and I am sure, there are people with shiny new

Re: [PATCH] Re: DRM oops with unichrome drivers

2004-10-08 Thread Jon Smirl
On Sat, 09 Oct 2004 00:58:00 +0100, Robert Clark [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: On Wed, 2004-10-06 at 15:19, Robert Clark wrote: Oct 5 22:02:21 miller kernel: Oops: 0002 [#1] The attached (trivial) patch fixes this oops for me but I think this is only half the problem. What seems to

Re: R200 ReadPixels optimization

2004-10-08 Thread Ian Romanick
Ian Romanick wrote: Here's a simple patch that gives about a 50% (on my box) speed boost to glReadPixels performance in 24-bit. I measured using the benchmark built into progs/demos/readpix. The interesting thing is that the core MMX SSE2 routines can be used for other cards as well. For

Re: FW: [Dri-users] ProSavageDDR, No DRI Thusfar

2004-10-08 Thread Vladimir Dergachev
mtrr: no more MTRRs available mtrr: no more MTRRs available mtrr: no more MTRRs available mtrr: 0xd000,0x100 overlaps existing 0xd000,0x10 This is caused by vesa framebuffer driver - try running a kernel without it.