On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 06:03:42PM +0100, Michel Dnzer wrote:
[ I assume you meant to follow up to the list as well ]
yes it is possible I failed to do so.
The first one definitely wasn't correct. A process of pid 0 doesn't exist, but
it has been handled as if it existed.
The test (
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 06:03:42PM +0100, Michel Dnzer wrote:
After digging around the code a bit, my current theory is that the
indirect buffer is incorrectly reused after the start of a new server
generation. The only difference I see in the radeon driver (which I
assume doesn't have the
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 08:15:29PM -0300, Davor Buvinic wrote:
Works for me: ATI Xpert 128, XFree86 4.2.0, your patch against GATOS ATI
drivers sources. No more messages in the kernel log like the following:
[drm:r128_cce_indirect] *ERROR* process 1668 using buffer owned by 0
Yes this was
On Sunday 27 January 2002 20:43, you wrote:
On Sun, Jan 27, 2002 at 08:15:29PM -0300, Davor Buvinic wrote:
Works for me: ATI Xpert 128, XFree86 4.2.0, your patch against GATOS ATI
drivers sources. No more messages in the kernel log like the following:
[drm:r128_cce_indirect] *ERROR*
On Sunday 27 January 2002 21:59, you wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jan 2002, Davor Buvinic wrote:
[...]
Works for me: ATI Xpert 128, XFree86 4.2.0, your patch against GATOS ATI
drivers sources. No more messages in the kernel log like the following:
[drm:r128_cce_indirect] *ERROR* process 1668 using
On Sat, Jan 26, 2002 at 05:22:17PM +0100, Michel Dnzer wrote:
On Sam, 2002-01-26 at 06:13, Peter Surda wrote:
Sorry that I'm not sending a patch, but I don't know if my solution is
correct.
A patch might help to make a judgement. ;)
Ok, here goes:
--- drm-kernel/r128_state.c Thu Dec 13
Hi!
Sorry that I'm not sending a patch, but I don't know if my solution is
correct.
Problem description (both with dri from CVS dri and CVS gatos): on r128 when I
KDE is starting, display is corrupt and lots of:
Jan 26 04:38:38 ten kernel: [drm:r128_cce_indirect] *ERROR* process 15795 using
