On Sat, Feb 07, 2004 at 12:44:39AM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
I like it. :) It looks a little weird to me like that, but I think
doing 1.2 (1.4.20040108 Foobar, Inc. Fancypants GL) should work just
as well.
I would want to be very sure that there are no apps parsing that
string before
Am 2004.02.07 09:44:39 +0100 schrieb(en) Ian Romanick:
[...]
as well. I'll try to have a patch tomorrow. The server-side of things
Looks like its fixed in DRI CVS with/since your patch.
I have to admit that I only tried with the new libGL.so and old
Xserver/libs, not with old libGL and new
Andreas Stenglein wrote:
Am 2004.02.04 21:00:14 +0100 schrieb(en) Brian Paul:
Ian Romanick wrote:
Making that change and changing the server-side to not advertise a core
version that it can't take protocol for would fix the bug for 4.4.0. Do
you think anything should be done to preserve text
Andreas Stenglein wrote:
Am 2004.02.04 21:00:14 +0100 schrieb(en) Brian Paul:
Ian Romanick wrote:
[snip]
Making that change and changing the server-side to not advertise a core
version that it can't take protocol for would fix the bug for 4.4.0. Do
you think anything should be done to
On Wed, Feb 04, 2004 at 10:12:19AM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
|
| Okay, that's just weird. Normally the Nvidia extension string is about
| 3 pages long.
Just for reference, here's the direct-rendering version (table of
Visuals omitted):
name of display: :0.0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct
Ian Romanick wrote:
Andreas Stenglein wrote:
after setting LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=1
glxinfo shows
OpenGL version string: 1.5 Mesa 6.0
but doesnt show all extensions necessary for OpenGL 1.5
An application only checking for GL_VERSION 1.5 would probably fail.
Any idea what would happen with
Brian Paul wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
That's *bad*. It is currently *impossible* to have GL 1.5 with
indirect rendering because some of the GLX protocol (for
ARB_occlusion_query ARB_vertex_buffer_objects) was never completely
defined. Looking back at it, we can't even advertise 1.3 or 1.4
Ian Romanick wrote:
Brian Paul wrote:
Ian Romanick wrote:
That's *bad*. It is currently *impossible* to have GL 1.5 with
indirect rendering because some of the GLX protocol (for
ARB_occlusion_query ARB_vertex_buffer_objects) was never completely
defined. Looking back at it, we can't even
Am 2004.02.04 21:00:14 +0100 schrieb(en) Brian Paul:
Ian Romanick wrote:
[snip]
Making that change and changing the server-side to not advertise a core
version that it can't take protocol for would fix the bug for 4.4.0. Do
you think anything should be done to preserve text after the
after setting LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=1
glxinfo shows
OpenGL version string: 1.5 Mesa 6.0
but doesnt show all extensions necessary for OpenGL 1.5
An application only checking for GL_VERSION 1.5 would probably fail.
Any idea what would happen with libGL.so / libGLcore.a from different versions
of
Andreas Stenglein wrote:
after setting LIBGL_ALWAYS_INDIRECT=1
glxinfo shows
OpenGL version string: 1.5 Mesa 6.0
but doesnt show all extensions necessary for OpenGL 1.5
An application only checking for GL_VERSION 1.5 would probably fail.
Any idea what would happen with libGL.so / libGLcore.a
11 matches
Mail list logo
