On Tue, Jun 03, 2003 at 10:34:25AM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
>David Dawes wrote:
>> On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:23:14PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
>>
>>>Sounds like the Mesa directory re-org should happen sooner, rather
>>>than later.
>>>
>>>I've been doing some research into CVS and it looks like th
Brian Paul wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:23:14PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
Sounds like the Mesa directory re-org should happen sooner, rather
than later.
I've been doing some research into CVS and it looks like there are
two approaches to doing the re-org:
1. Use the usu
David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:23:14PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
Sounds like the Mesa directory re-org should happen sooner, rather
than later.
I've been doing some research into CVS and it looks like there are two
approaches to doing the re-org:
1. Use the usual cvs add/remove/c
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:23:14PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
>
>Sounds like the Mesa directory re-org should happen sooner, rather
>than later.
>
>I've been doing some research into CVS and it looks like there are two
>approaches to doing the re-org:
>
>1. Use the usual cvs add/remove/commit comma
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 05:29:54PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> Keith Whitwell wrote:
>...
> > One thing that is a bit confusing is that some drivers are just drivers,
> > wheras others are combinations of drivers and window system interfaces.
> > It would be nice to have just drivers here and mov
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:23:14PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
>
> Sounds like the Mesa directory re-org should happen sooner, rather
> than later.
>
> I've been doing some research into CVS and it looks like there are two
> approaches to doing the re-org:
>
> 1. Use the usual cvs add/remove/comm
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Brian Paul wrote:
David Dawes wrote:
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:23:14PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
Sounds like the Mesa directory re-org should happen sooner, rather
than later.
I've been doing some research into CVS and it looks like there are
two approaches to doing the
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Brian Paul wrote:
Sounds like the Mesa directory re-org should happen sooner, rather
than later.
I've been doing some research into CVS and it looks like there are
two approaches to doing the re-org:
1. Use the usual cvs add/remove/commit commands t
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Brian Paul wrote:
Sounds like the Mesa directory re-org should happen sooner, rather
than later.
I've been doing some research into CVS and it looks like there are two
approaches to doing the re-org:
1. Use the usual cvs add/remove/commit commands to move everything
arou
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Brian Paul wrote:
Sounds like the Mesa directory re-org should happen sooner, rather
than later.
I've been doing some research into CVS and it looks like there are two
approaches to doing the re-org:
1. Use the usual cvs add/remove/commit commands to move everything
arou
Brian Paul wrote:
Sounds like the Mesa directory re-org should happen sooner, rather than
later.
I've been doing some research into CVS and it looks like there are two
approaches to doing the re-org:
1. Use the usual cvs add/remove/commit commands to move everything
around. This would work, b
On Mon, Jun 02, 2003 at 04:23:14PM -0600, Brian Paul wrote:
> kernel/ - kernel drivers, modules
> agpgart-2.5/
> drm/
> radeon/
> radeonfb/
> radeonfb-
Sounds like the Mesa directory re-org should happen sooner, rather
than later.
I've been doing some research into CVS and it looks like there are two
approaches to doing the re-org:
1. Use the usual cvs add/remove/commit commands to move everything
around. This would work, but it would be pre
13 matches
Mail list logo
