On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 00:51, Alan Cox wrote:
On Maw, 2003-11-25 at 20:26, Michel Dnzer wrote:
* Our drivers do something which makes newer chips perform very
poorly with PCI GART, be they AGP or PCI
The former wouldn't necessarily say anything about PCI cards, but I'm
not
Hi guys,
On Wednesday, 26. November 2003 18:54, you wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 00:51, Alan Cox wrote:
On Maw, 2003-11-25 at 20:26, Michel Dänzer wrote:
* Our drivers do something which makes newer chips perform
very poorly with PCI GART, be they AGP or PCI
The former
Roland Scheidegger wrote:
I'm really not sure about this, but I believe there could be a severe
performance problem when using pci radeons (at least on x86). I haven't
seen any measurements of this, and few people seem to have such hardware.
But by using the BusType option, I've forced pci mode
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 00:45, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Results (AXP 1600, 9000pro, 1GB sdram, KT133A Chipset):
glxgears QuakeIII (1024x768, graphic options all set to high)
AGP 4x 1910 62.5
AGP 1x 1860 61.1
PCI 200 16.8
I've seen similarly pathetic PCI
Alan Cox wrote:
On Maw, 2003-11-25 at 20:26, Michel Dnzer wrote:
* Our drivers do something which makes newer chips perform very
poorly with PCI GART, be they AGP or PCI
The former wouldn't necessarily say anything about PCI cards, but I'm
not sure how to determine which it is (and
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 10:32, Ian Romanick wrote:
I'm pretty sure that anything that did that for PCI would also do it for
AGP. I assume that would kill performance even more, yes?
Could somebody with an actual PCI card try this with ATI's driver? If
the performance is okay there, that
Chris Ison wrote:
On Wed, 2003-11-26 at 10:32, Ian Romanick wrote:
I'm pretty sure that anything that did that for PCI would also do it for
AGP. I assume that would kill performance even more, yes?
Could somebody with an actual PCI card try this with ATI's driver? If
the performance is okay
Can you try ATI's binary drivers for Linux, or are you not on x86?
ATI's FireGL drivers do not support PCI cards, lord knows I tried.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more
Can you try ATI's binary drivers for Linux, or are you not on x86?
ATI's FireGL drivers do not support PCI cards, lord knows I tried.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by: SF.net Giveback Program.
Does SourceForge.net help you be more
Chris Ison wrote:
Its the same situation in GL apps (which I did mention, I only used
glxgears as the prime example cause it should be heeps faster
considering it doesn't do texturing).
In general I agree. However, it does usefully suggest that Chris isn't
getting hardware acceleration. He
On Tue, 2003-11-25 at 09:45, Roland Scheidegger wrote:
Results (AXP 1600, 9000pro, 1GB sdram, KT133A Chipset):
glxgears QuakeIII (1024x768, graphic options all set to high)
AGP 4x 1910 62.5
AGP 1x 1860 61.1
PCI 200 16.8
My radeon 9000 PCI (with 64megs
First of all a big hello again...;-)
Am Sonntag, 23. November 2003 15:26 schrieb Chris Ison:
Its the same situation in GL apps (which I did mention, I only used
glxgears as the prime example cause it should be heeps faster
considering it doesn't do texturing).
In general I agree. However,
On Sun, 2003-11-23 at 23:54, Dieter Nützel wrote:
What do you get with glxinfo?
name of display: :0.0
display: :0 screen: 0
direct rendering: Yes
server glx vendor string: SGI
server glx version string: 1.2
server glx extensions:
GLX_ARB_multisample, GLX_EXT_visual_info,
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 04:55:37PM +1000, Chris Ison wrote:
celeron 500 pc)and glxgears only gives me 250fps on average, and openGL
IMHO glxgears should not be used as real benchmark. Try at least something with
textures and any effects like fog.
--
Free Software - find interesting programs
Jacek Popawski wrote:
On Sat, Nov 22, 2003 at 04:55:37PM +1000, Chris Ison wrote:
celeron 500 pc)and glxgears only gives me 250fps on average, and openGL
IMHO glxgears should not be used as real benchmark. Try at least something with
textures and any effects like fog.
In general I agree.
Its the same situation in GL apps (which I did mention, I only used
glxgears as the prime example cause it should be heeps faster
considering it doesn't do texturing).
In general I agree. However, it does usefully suggest that Chris isn't
getting hardware acceleration. He needs to find out
I am wondering if there is any env variables or host.def lines I can add
that will improve performance of DRI. I have a radeon 9000 PCI (in a
celeron 500 pc)and glxgears only gives me 250fps on average, and openGL
applications only perform a little better than they did with the voodoo2
(in a p200
17 matches
Mail list logo
