Or, someone could just leave it as is, disable it and forget
about it because sourceforge's bug tracking system sucks. [1]
I don't think we ever found out how to disable it. Just another aspect of its
suckage - you can't turn it off.
Keiht
-
Ian Romanick wrote:
I forgot to include the log. Sorry.
While I'm waiting to merge the texmem-0-0-1 branch into the trunk,
I've been looking into the problems with Unreal Tournament 2003 on the
R200 driver.
Here's how I've set up my debug environment, in case anyone wants to
reproduce what I'
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 08:14:33AM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> > Or, someone could just leave it as is, disable it and forget
> > about it because sourceforge's bug tracking system sucks. [1]
>
> I don't think we ever found out how to disable it. Just another aspect of its
> suckage - you
On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:56:04PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 11:46:13PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 11:47:13PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> > > The docs at http://dri.sourceforge.net/doc/drm_low_level.html
> > >
> > > say about drmAddMap(), for
XFree86 BOD wrote:
It has been brought to the attention of the XFree86 Core Team that one
of its members, Keith Packard, has been actively (but privately) seeking
out support for a fork of XFree86 that would be led by himself. He is
also in the process of forming a by-invitation-only group of ves
Keith Whitwell wrote:
XFree86 BOD wrote:
It has been brought to the attention of the XFree86 Core Team that one
of its members, Keith Packard, has been actively (but privately) seeking
out support for a fork of XFree86 that would be led by himself. He is
also in the process of forming a by-invita
Keith Whitwell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> It's always a shock to see that what is meant to tease when written comes out
> looking more like a direct attack when read back...
Oh, I would agree even if it was considered as sort of an attack,
Martin.
--
Unix _IS_ user friendly - it's just sele
Title: GO一起上 www.go173.com
首页
激情公社
野蛮女生
同城约会
两性笑话
==
On Thu, 2003-03-20 at 09:31, Philip Brown wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 08:14:33AM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> >
> > > Or, someone could just leave it as is, disable it and forget
> > > about it because sourceforge's bug tracking system sucks. [1]
> >
> > I don't think we ever found out ho
I just purchased an ati 8500dv and would like to get the dir project and the gatos
project running on my system. I am trying to identify what I need to do to make
everything work together.
I have read through the CVS documentation I can find and have pulled the src from cvs
using the following
Jonathan Warren wrote:
I just purchased an ati 8500dv and would like to get the dir project
and the gatos project running on my system. I am trying to identify
what I need to do to make everything work together.
AFAIK you can't have Gatos- and DRI-drivers at the same time. Both
projects use diffe
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:37:34 +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
XFree86 BOD wrote:
It has been brought to the attention of the XFree86 Core Team that one
of its members, Keith Packard, has been actively (but privately) seeking
out support for a fork of XFree86 that would be l
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:37:34 +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> XFree86 BOD wrote:
>
> >It has been brought to the attention of the XFree86 Core Team that one
> >of its members, Keith Packard, has been actively (but privately) seeking
> >out support for a fork of XFree86 that would be led by himse
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 02:49:37PM +, Alan Cox wrote:
>...
> I guess they've been busy writing 3D drivers instead. If you know the
> SF system well then this kind of info could be a real help
I dont know it "well". I just poked around with it at admin-level for 10
minutes.
It would be a good
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:34:11AM +, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 19, 2003 at 03:56:04PM -0800, Philip Brown wrote:
> > I'd rather hear first what it is "supposed" to mean in the current
> > implementations. The current docs say "locked in kernel memory".
> > As written, that statement do
Hi Philip
Are you going to put your time where your mouth is?
I'm sure that having someone who looks after the admin of the
DRI project is a good idea.
If only for the reason as having someone to fiddle with the
website, ie leaving the dri developers more time to code drivers.
Heck I might eve
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 04:08:06PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
>
> From my selfish point of view, an XFree fork will put the DRI tree in a bit
> of a difficult position - especially if the new fork gets significant distro
> support and we have to somehow track both trees or go through yet anoth
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 10:47:01PM +0200, Smitty wrote:
> Hi Philip
>
> Are you going to put your time where your mouth is?
>
> I'm sure that having someone who looks after the admin of the
> DRI project is a good idea.
>
> If only for the reason as having someone to fiddle with the
> website,
Philip Brown <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Perhaps then, this will provide enough incentive for DRI to move back into
> a pure extension module form, rather than its current xfree tree
> entanglement.
You don't want to imply that people touch bigger areas as is would be
necessary for DRI developme
On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 02:48:21PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:37:34 +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > - Extend CVS access to regular contributors. Use scripts or
> > whatever to control access to subtrees if you want.
>
> This comes up from time to time, and
On Thursday 20 March 2003 02:53 pm, you wrote:
> Why not simply have a second CVS repository, where most development
> would take place under, while the current repository would be the one
> used for (pre-/post-) releases with coarse-grain commits. Like stable
> and development branches, but with t
On Thu, 20 Mar 2003, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:37:34 +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > XFree86 BOD wrote:
> >
> > >It has been brought to the attention of the XFree86 Core Team that one
> > >of its members, Keith Packard, has been actively (but privately) seeking
> > >ou
On Don, 2003-03-20 at 22:53, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 02:48:21PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:37:34 +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
> > > - Extend CVS access to regular contributors. Use scripts or
> > > whatever to control access to subtrees i
> > > patches. I guess this 'prolonged' period, is the stickling point for most.
> >
> > Why not simply have a second CVS repository, where most development
> > would take place under, while the current repository would be the one
> > used for (pre-/post-) releases with coarse-grain commits. Like s
On Fre, 2003-03-21 at 00:28, José Fonseca wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2003 at 12:07:04AM +0100, Michel Dänzer wrote:
> > On Don, 2003-03-20 at 22:53, José Fonseca wrote:
> > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 02:48:21PM +, Alan Hourihane wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Mar 20, 2003 at 11:37:34 +, Keith Whitwell
- Extend CVS access to regular contributors. Use scripts or
whatever to control access to subtrees if you want.
This comes up from time to time, and I'm sure will get discussed even more.
I know there have been offers to others for CVS commit access, and some
have refused and some have accep
Title: Eehocwoodorlewsyeramxfhbvvtkykltxshueeqvqvyxkgnknkjwy
BRANDON
No mail!
oq6M4rvypssKCAYC7YgY162Uua
4609PRWA3-401lUfp9594QFtf9-856NgBM0285oWkv3-536Ysyz5318aekA5-488hfnl63N¬HYÞµéX¬²'²Þu¼i¹^´ð¡ë2¢êÜ¡×)äx§.r¥w§i6ëOgiúÞy6ëO
ë-~鬢¡jÖ«{*.Á¨x ¢¸m¶ÿiÛ,
27 matches
Mail list logo
