On Mon, Apr 02, 2001 at 03:55:33PM +0200, Dieter Ntzel wrote:
Am Montag, 2. April 2001 15:28 schrieb Gareth Hughes:
Dieter Ntzel wrote:
Hello,
I've tried the mesa-3.5-branch several times during the last weeks but
had no luck, yet.
...
Am I missing something?
Build
On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 09:20:35AM -0400, Jay Estabrook wrote:
So, any ideas? What can I try next? What other info do you need?
Jay,
Is this Radeon card the only one in the box ? I mean is it getting
initialized by the AlphaBIOS firmware under X86 emulation (not by int10) ?
Alan.
On Thu, Apr 05, 2001 at 07:41:34PM +0100, Bill Crawford wrote:
Gareth Hughes wrote:
Time for a coffee. Please ignore the last sentence, I don't know what
I'm talking about...
I know the feeling ... time I went home for coffee (and sleep :)
Huh ? It's early.. It's only 8:00pm in the
On Sun, Apr 22, 2001 at 01:59:50PM -0700, Frank Worsley wrote:
I've updated the status page a little bit. Could the developers please take
a look at it and let me know if the information is accurate. Especially the
information about supported buses.
Temporary page is at:
Using the compilefarm we now have PPC based DRI packages online.
NOTE: I have absolutely no idea whether these work or not. Feedback is
most definately welcome.
I expect to have Alpha Linux packages online too, within the week.
(Oh, and possibly FreeBSD x86 ones as well)
URL is as always -
Thanks and fixed.
Alan.
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 08:26:17AM -0400, Allen Barnett wrote:
Here are a couple of comments on the documentation at SourceForge:
Section 5 of the 'DRI User's Guide' says that DRM kernel modules are
stored in /lib/modules/2.4.x/kernel/driver/char/drm. 'driver'
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:25:48PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
I expect to have Alpha Linux packages online too, within the week.
Alpha (compiled with -mcpu=ev5) Packages are now up too.
Alan.
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:16:26PM -0700, Daryll Strauss wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 10:56:35PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:25:48PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
I expect to have Alpha Linux packages online too, within the week.
Alpha (compiled with -mcpu
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:49:29PM -0700, Jeffrey W. Baker wrote:
On Tue, 24 Apr 2001, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:16:26PM -0700, Daryll Strauss wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 10:56:35PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:25:48PM +0100, Alan
Thanks.
I'm just about to create a new branch to commit my work and merge in what
I can from this.
Alan.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 02:46:42PM -0500, Stephen Hocking wrote:
Alan, Eric Anholt ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) has been doing some work on this, I
sent him a G400 to help out.
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 03:16:26PM -0700, Daryll Strauss wrote:
On Tue, Apr 24, 2001 at 10:56:35PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Mon, Apr 23, 2001 at 12:25:48PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
I expect to have Alpha Linux packages online too, within the week.
Alpha (compiled with -mcpu
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 12:06:51PM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
On Fri, Apr 27, 2001 at 11:43:45AM +0100, Doug Rabson wrote:
This is great Alan. When this gets closer to working, I would like to
try it
out. I have a few ideas on how to simplify the authentication code in
the
drivers.
On Sat, Apr 28, 2001 at 04:24:48PM +1000, Gareth Hughes wrote:
pedantic
Can we change *-Linux.tar.gz to *-linux.tar.gz? And possibly put the OS
before the architecture, as in:
mga-20010427-linux-i386.tar.gz
mga-20010427-linux-ppc.tar.gz
mga-20010427-freebsd-i386.tar.gz
On Thu, May 10, 2001 at 01:10:15PM +0200, Christoph Raab wrote:
Hi !
My Radeon VE is not longer detected since start of May. It's working with the
snapshot used for the debian packages (April, 29th) but only on the second
monitor port.
What does lspci or scanpci say ?
Alan.
On Fri, May 11, 2001 at 07:21:25PM +0200, Simon Cahuk wrote:
I have X 4.0.3 under FreeBSD 4.3. So if I want to enable DRI, I must
just install v0.5 DRI release over my system, or?
My card has a banshee chip. What's the Glide branch name for *BSD on the
cvs server?
No. FreeBSD support is
On Sun, May 13, 2001 at 11:20:09AM +0200, Simon Cahuk wrote:
There is tdfx.ko and drm.ko in /modules, that come with FreeBSD 4.3
RELEASE, but I get:
/kernel: link_elf: symbol agp_find_device undefined
What does that mean?
It means the module is broke. Have you tried using the v0.6
On Sat, May 12, 2001 at 11:44:42PM +0200, Simon Cahuk wrote:
Hello,
I downloaded the FreeBSD package for tdfx.
I didn't run the install script, I just went to /drm and ran make -f
Makefile.bsd.
You can see in the attachment what I got.
And we should make some changes to the install.sh
On Mon, May 14, 2001 at 12:20:11PM -0400, Allen Barnett wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
O.k. the v0.6 release is up, which we've changed the install script to
check for 'ed' and to mv any old libGL's detected out of the way to old.libGL
and symlink in the new ones.
I didn't have
v0.7 packages are up for linux i386 only at the moment. Other architectures
will follow soon.
The changelog
Latest CVS trunk code.
install script fixes
restore procedure should now restore Xserver
glxinfo is not required anymore for testing the location of libGL
update the README.
NOTE:
On Wed, May 23, 2001 at 02:20:48PM -0500, Jeffrey M Einhorn wrote:
Please disregard the first message I didn't realise it was a bash script.
Here is a slighty more exciting bug.
The script will now compile the DRM kernel modules for your machine.
Press ENTER to continue or CTRL-C to exit.
On Mon, May 28, 2001 at 09:27:34AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
../../../../../../config/makedepend/makedepend: warning:
tdfx_context.c: 119: #error Unknown OS
tdfx_context.c:97: defined __cplusplus ? __GNUC_PREREQ (2, 6)
: __GNUC_PREREQ (2, 4)
On Fri, Jun 01, 2001 at 10:46:54AM -0400, Jeff Corcoran wrote:
This is a plea to release a new binary package. I've been using 0.7 and
unfortunately it has that horrible blending bug for people using mga.
(Well, for g200's anyway). Because of this I can't play q3f (I know, I
know, it sounds
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 12:10:06AM +, Simon Cahuk wrote:
Hi,
Alan, is the Glide3-FreeBSD tag the new branch or is there a newer one?
There are currently four branches on Glide3.
Glide3 - x86 architecture Linux
Glide3-64bit - Alpha architecture Linux
Glide3-FreeBSD - x86/Alpha FreeBSD
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 01:30:23AM +0200, Kreuzritter2000 wrote:
On Sat, Jun 02, 2001 at 12:10:06AM +, Simon Cahuk wrote:
Hi,
Alan, is the Glide3-FreeBSD tag the new branch or is there a newer one?
There are currently four branches on Glide3.
Glide3 - x86 architecture Linux
Sounds like you haven't updated all your modules to 4.1.0.
Alan.
On Fri, Jun 08, 2001 at 08:39:00AM -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just wondering if anyone else saw something like this unresolved symbol
in their X11 logs:
(II) TDFX(0): Primary V_BIOS segment is: 0xc000
(II) TDFX(0):
On Sun, Jun 10, 2001 at 02:38:32PM -0500, Jon Pennington wrote:
Is there something wrong with the binary packaging scripts at SourceForge? The
Annonymous FTP release/ directory has been empty for a few days. Sorry if I've
missed something, but I'd like to update my system, and building the
On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 09:45:16AM -0400, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Does the DRM module code shipped with 4.0.3 work with a 2.2.x
kernel, or is it 2.4.x only?
Also, is 3.3.6 affected by DRM module changes at all? I have
never gotten into the 3.3.6 code much at all and don't believe it
uses
On Wed, Jun 20, 2001 at 12:10:41AM +0200, Simon Cahuk wrote:
On Tue, 19 Jun 2001, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Tue, Jun 19, 2001 at 07:57:19PM +0200, Simon Cahuk wrote:
Hi,
I have still problems with the tdfx driver. I think it is a memory related
problem. Te problem wasn't there in X
Are you using the bsd-2-0-0 branch ?
If not, then you should be.
Alan.
On Tue, Sep 11, 2001 at 08:52:54AM -0400, Adam K Kirchhoff wrote:
So I thought that I'd finally try the DRI under FreeBSD (I recently
upgraded an old installation to 4.4rc4). Well, it seems that I've hit a
rough spot.
On Fri, Sep 14, 2001 at 10:08:01AM +0200, Gerd Knorr wrote:
Hi,
I've figured why the Rage 128 crashes if the bttv overlay is active (see
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/index.php?func=detailaid=210239group_id=387atid=100387).
Because the r128 driver does 2D acceleration using MMIO
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 12:05:50PM +0200, Gerd Knorr wrote:
to the Rage128's CCE engine. Although it only accelerates SolidFill and
ScreenToScreenCopies it should help a lot.
Hmm, maybe it's easy for someone who doesn't touch the dri code for the
first time, but not for me. I've
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 11:33:25AM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Mon, Sep 17, 2001 at 12:05:50PM +0200, Gerd Knorr wrote:
to the Rage128's CCE engine. Although it only accelerates SolidFill and
ScreenToScreenCopies it should help a lot.
Hmm, maybe it's easy for someone who
Check the /var/log/XFree86.0.log file again.
It looks like your loading older modules from XFree86 4.0.x rather than
the 4.1.0 ones.
Alan.
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 10:27:05AM -0500, Mark Bainter wrote:
Note: I posted this on the dri-users list about a week or so ago
and no-one there
On Tue, Sep 18, 2001 at 10:55:02PM -0400, Frank Earl wrote:
On Tuesday 18 September 2001 19:05, Mike A. Harris wrote:
Very much agreed. This is moreso even for standard XFree86
driver development (2D et al.), and porting old 3.3.6 driver to
4.x.
Yes, I would love to see the CyberBlade
Take your kernel upto 2.4.10 and you'll be o.k.
Alan.
On Thu, Oct 04, 2001 at 04:28:33PM +0200, Huber, Matthias 6667 SFA-31 wrote:
Hi,
the subject says it: glxgears (and all other OpenGL-based programs)
abort with the message:
drmR128SwapBuffers = -14
My configuration:
Kernel 2.4.6
Your jumping the gun.
The mesa-4-0-branch is still under construction
As and when - the Mesa 4.0 code will be merged under xc/extras/Mesa
and symlinked in as usual.
Be patient
Alan.
On Fri, Nov 02, 2001 at 05:47:31PM +0100, Andreas Stenglein wrote:
Hello!
I tried to compile the
On Mon, Nov 12, 2001 at 08:03:16PM +0100, yhata wrote:
Thanks for answering me, Mike :)
I couldn't download that file from dri.sourceforge.net, but fortunately I
had a copy of it on my HD. I tried that, but it didn't seem to have any
problems. Anyway, here is the output:
Direct Rendering
On Thu, Nov 29, 2001 at 04:31:30PM +0100, Dieter Nützel wrote:
Am Donnerstag, 29. November 2001 09:42 schrieb Alan Hourihane:
That's because you need to use the mesa_4_0_branch check out from mesa3d
too, and not the trunk code.
You call the Mesa CVS (4.1) which I use, the trunk?
So I
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 01:40:12PM +0100, Daniel Polombo wrote:
Michel Dänzer wrote:
The X server and its modules are in xserver-xfree86. If reinstalling
that doesn't fix this, you have a non-distribution X which is picked up.
There was indeed an X11R6-DRI in which some things were
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 02:11:33PM +0100, Daniel Polombo wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
Sounds like your kernel driver isn't uptodate.
If you type 'dmesg' to look at the kernel messages the r128 kernel
module should identify itself as version 2.1.6.
Looks good to me :
ambre
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 02:34:56PM +0100, Daniel Polombo wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
Then we need to see the full /var/log/XFree86.0.log file.
Here it comes (attached).
O.k. That looks good. What does the last 10 or so lines of 'dmesg' say ?
Alan
On Mon, Dec 03, 2001 at 03:02:35PM +0100, Daniel Polombo wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
O.k. That looks good. What does the last 10 or so lines of 'dmesg' say ?
I'm not sure this is what you want, but :
I need the output from the loading of the drm module to when these
*ERROR*'s started
On Fri, Dec 07, 2001 at 02:35:41AM +0100, Alexander Stohr wrote:
OT:
Does someone know about Jeff Hartmann? Is he well and up again?
Jeff is off doing other things now. I'm not sure if he's even on the
mailing list anymore.
Alan.
___
Dri-devel
On Tue, Dec 11, 2001 at 01:27:12PM -0600, Jorge Luis Williams wrote:
On Tue, 2001-12-11 at 09:06, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Jorge Luis Williams wrote:
Hello,
I've run into what appears to be a dead-lock while running
On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 10:13:41AM +0100, stephane conversy wrote:
I wonder what's going on with fbdri (http://fbdri.sf.net).
Is it stuck ?
if so is it because of a lack of interest, a lack of developers, or because
it's too cumbersome to do ?
You'll need to ask over on their lists, this
On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 09:24:27PM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
Andreas Ehliar wrote:
Just wondering where the IRC-based meeting is supposed to take place?
#dri on irc.openprojects.net ?
I was wondering the same thing. Your suggestion sounds good. Let's go
with that.
Did you
On Mon, Jan 28, 2002 at 01:03:52PM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
Thanks to all who participated this week.
It was suggested that we move the meeting to be 3 hours later so might
pick up any developers in Australia and New Zealand. None of the
European and African developers had a concern with
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 04:19:04AM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Daryll mentioned them and said he would try to contact Alan. I don't have
those scripts.
I saw them recently somewhere - maybe on the dri website. I'm not sure
where. Alan?
Yes, the scripts got committed into the CVS.
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 11:42:48AM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
Alan,
I've been playing with your scripts and I'm impressed with the level of
functionality you have. I do have a few questions probably based on my
inexperience with your scripts.
O.k.
First, what are the base requirements
On Thu, Feb 21, 2002 at 01:56:01PM -0800, Ian Romanick wrote:
Which branch merges are complete? If the mesa-4-0-branch to trunk merge is
complete, is the branch dead?
Yep.
Alan.
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Fixed.
texutil_tmp.h needed fixing too.
Alan.
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 12:13:25AM +0100, Dieter Nützel wrote:
make[5]: Entering directory `/tmp/INSTALL/SOURCE/dri/xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src'
rm -f texutil.o
gcc -c -O -mcpu=k6 -fomit-frame-pointer -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2
-malign-functions=4
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:12:44AM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
Keith Whitwell wrote:
Jens, For TCL support, the driver needs drm module version 1.3.
So, we really want to get version 1.3 onto users machines. Am I correct
in saying that older versions still work, but would cause the driver
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:26:03AM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Wed, Feb 20, 2002 at 11:42:48AM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
First, what are the base requirements before installation? It looks
like XFree86 4.x and Linux Kernel 2.4.x are required and checked
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 04:56:48PM +, Jose Fonseca wrote:
Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
http://mefriss1.swan.ac.uk/~jfonseca/dri/packages/
Just a comment. Why don't you put these up on the DRI pages
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 05:15:00PM +, Jose Fonseca wrote:
On Fri, 2002-02-22 at 17:02, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 04:56:48PM +, Jose Fonseca wrote:
Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
sucessfully. The generated packages are available
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:37:08PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Jos Fonseca wrote:
On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
Jose Fonseca wrote:
Luckily, after sending the previous email the script completed
sucessfully. The generated packages are available at:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:59:01PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
On 2002.02.22 20:57 Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:37:08PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Jos Fonseca wrote:
On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
...
What is libGLcore.a? Is that actually used
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:17:28PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
On 2002.02.22 21:13 Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:59:01PM +, Jos Fonseca wrote:
On 2002.02.22 20:57 Alan Hourihane wrote:
...
libGLcore.a is the internal Mesa code that drives indirect GLX
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:38:28PM +, José Fonseca wrote:
No. XFree86 4.2.0 is Mesa 3.4.x based, and it seems XFree86 4.3.0 will
be Mesa 4.0.x based. A MAJOR update!
Alan.
hmmm.. the only way I see to make everyone happy (I'm already seeing
Sergey complaining about the size of
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 09:53:50PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Fri, Feb 22, 2002 at 08:37:08PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Jos Fonseca wrote:
On 2002.02.22 17:28 Keith Whitwell wrote:
Jose Fonseca wrote:
Luckily, after sending
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 08:38:20AM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
I would like to move the device dependent functionality currently
included in the drm library back into the device driver layer.
My objective is to make sure new driver suites can be independently
released without stepping on any
On Mon, Mar 18, 2002 at 07:57:55PM +, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
CVSROOT:/cvsroot/dri
Module name:xc
Repository: xc/xc/lib/GL/mesa/src/drv/trident/
Changes by: alanh@usw-pr-cvs1. 02/03/18 11:38:43
Log message:
fix up the copyright
On Thu, Mar 28, 2002 at 10:35:16AM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Fri, Mar 22, 2002 at 08:03:29 -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Fri, Mar 15, 2002 at 08:38:20AM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
I would like to move the device dependent functionality
On Fri, Mar 29, 2002 at 09:21:52PM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
I've checked into the drmcommand-0-0-1-branch the complete conversion of
the Radeon driver suite to the drmCommand interface. Take a look, and
let me know if you see any problems, or if you have any questions.
If anyone is
Jens,
Are we moving the files in
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support
into their relevant ddx drivers directory ?
Alan.
___
Dri-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dri-devel
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 03:39:48PM -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
Eric Anholt wrote:
Just to update you all on what I'm doing: I have just finished getting
some of the 4.2.0 patches and drm-kmod (DRM kernel modules in the
FreeBSD port/package system) updates into the FreeBSD ports collection.
On Tue, Apr 02, 2002 at 08:01:04 -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
Just FYI.
I noticed the i830 and SiS 3D drivers are not being built on the trunk.
If they aren't supported enough to have them on by default, then I'll
skip converting them to the new drmCommand interface. If they are ever
On Wed, Apr 03, 2002 at 10:47:28 -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
Jens Owen wrote:
The following driver suites still need to be converted to the new
drmCommand interface before the drmcommand-0-0-1-branch can be merged to
the trunk:
gamma
i810
i830
mga
r128
sis
I
On Mon, Apr 01, 2002 at 08:01:58 -0700, Jens Owen wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
Jens,
Are we moving the files in
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support
into their relevant ddx drivers directory ?
If you are specifically asking about the xf86drmDriverName.h files
Thanks for pointing them out Dieter.
I've applied them to the Glide source tree.
Alan.
On Tue, Apr 09, 2002 at 11:54:23PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
Hello,
I got a helpfully mail pointing me to a post at glide.sourceforge.net on
Thursday or Friday last week and bingo, I got it.
Thanks for finding that. You can apply the patch.
Although the cleanup_dma function isn't used at all in the gamma
driver yet (it should be - I know), but the AGP code hasn't been
tested a whole lot either.
Alan.
On Sun, Apr 14, 2002 at 11:00:02 +0100, Jos Fonseca wrote:
When I found what I
Anyone seen this...
May 14th is the annoucement - whatever it may be...
http://www.aceshardware.com/read_news.jsp?id=55000492
Alan.
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.net is looking for download mirrors. We supply
the hardware. You get
On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 03:22:52PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
I've got some time to take a look at this over the next couple of days. It
really depends how big the differences are - but probably we need to come up
with a way of doing things without too much #ifdef crud in the main
On Mon, May 27, 2002 at 09:35:28PM -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
Tim Rowley wrote:
Jens Owen wrote:
It would be interesting to hear more details from their developers
regarding the comment they put in their README: If an OpenGL
application is forcibly terminated by closing the X
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 02:21:42PM +0100, Michael wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 01:59:31PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Michael wrote:
On Thu, May 30, 2002 at 12:59:23PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
So, I've been writing a sanity checker for the radeon dma stream. All
going nicely
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 05:47:28 -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
Good news for Radeon 8500 owners. We have posted this announcement on
our TG web site:
The Weather Channel is funding TG to develop an open source 3D DRI
driver for the ATI Radeon 8500 graphics card. The driver will be
released to
On Tue, Jun 11, 2002 at 12:17:18PM +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Then there's the render extension...
That's one of the next items on my list. :)
I wouldn't waste too much time on accelerating the RENDER extension
just yet. Things are still changing, and then there's the lacking
of a test
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 07:31:29 +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Yeah! Let's burn Rome! ;o)
OK, maybe I'm getting carried away.
But as I see it, there aren't many people in total on dri_devel+dri_users.
The only people who can really answer dri_users questions are on dri_devel
anyway.
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 02:28:45 -0600, Jens Owen wrote:
Peter Soetens (Kaltan) wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2002 19:49, Keith Whitwell wrote:
The dri-users list was founded on the idea that there might be a class of
'power users' out there who would altruistically help newbies get
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:03:05PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Wed, Jun 12, 2002 at 11:13:40PM +0200, Dieter Nützel wrote:
On Wednesday 12 June 2002 20:53, Alan Hourihane wrote:
[-]
We really need to clean up the stuff on SF now. Probably about 90%
don't even
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:20:47PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
On 2002.06.13 15:43 Alan Hourihane wrote:
...
What would be great, is if someone assigned the bugs to relevant
developers. Once someone is assigned to the bug report, they get
emails whenever it's updated. But that someone needs
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:46:44PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
It's not that I'm being lazy when I say I don't want to use it.
First of all, if someone has a bug they want me to fix, they should stick
around long enough to have an email conversation about it. I'm doing free
work for
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:05:05PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:46:44PM +0100, Keith Whitwell wrote:
It's not that I'm being lazy when I say I don't want to use it.
First of all, if someone has a bug they want me to fix, they should stick
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 04:49:57PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
On 2002.06.13 16:24 Alan Hourihane wrote:
...
What I'm afraid might happen with setting up something like bugzilla,
is the much more severe maintenance of it. If that person where to
walk away from the project, we're much more
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:52:59PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
On 2002.06.13 17:19 Alan Hourihane wrote:
...
If Dieter is volunteering to go through it - then power to him...
Alan, it's not as simple as that. Although it's very kind of him to
volunteer, we all must get to a consensus
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 09:38:48AM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
On a separate topic - have you guys thought about replacing the user
mailing list with a real newsgroup? Yes, newsgroups are noisy as hell, but
they are also fairly easy to browse through (especially with a scoring
newsreader, or
On Sat, Jun 15, 2002 at 11:43:21 -0700, Daryll Strauss wrote:
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 05:13:11PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
True.
The other alternative is to completely close the bug-tracking system
and don't allow it. Forcing people to email.
It's currently what we do
On Tue, Jun 25, 2002 at 11:53:53 +0200, max wrote:
In drm_context.h at line 558 we have:
queue = gamma_alloc(sizeof(*queue), DRM_MEM_QUEUES);
I think it should be:
queue = DRM(alloc)(sizeof(*queue), DRM_MEM_QUEUES);
so that it works with driver different from gamma doing alloc_queue.
I can do the trunk merge for you, if you want to fixup the code
later.
Alan.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:45:51AM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
Last night the script tried to build the s3virge binary snapshot for the
first time, but it failed when building a file related with the i830
driver:
Looks like the s3virge branch is lagging quite a bit behind the trunk.
Max - you should bring in the current trunk code into your s3virge
branch and fixup for the new drmCommand interface.
Alan.
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 11:45:51AM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
Last night the script tried to build
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 03:43:42PM +0200, Massimiliano Lingua wrote:
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 12:54, Alan Hourihane wrote:
I can do the trunk merge for you, if you want to fixup the code
later.
Ok. It would be very nice from you. What I am supposed to do after:
cvs update? So that code
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 04:00:18PM +0100, José Fonseca wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 07:07:00AM -0700, Alan Hourihane wrote:
merge trunk into s3virge branch (probably won't build at all now).
Needs fixing for drmCommand interface.
Er.. I was just about to suggest to do the merge
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 04:31:09PM +0100, Alan Hourihane wrote:
On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 03:59:06PM +0200, Massimiliano Lingua wrote:
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 15:52, Alan Hourihane wrote:
I'll do the merge now for you.
Obviously this branch won't build at all until fixed up
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 12:48:30AM +0200, Massimiliano Lingua wrote:
On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 19:16, Alan Hourihane wrote:
It builds now, so could you 'cvs update' build, install, and check
everything is working.
I had some problem building it in mesa/src/drv/s3v
In s3v_context.h
On Thu, Jun 27, 2002 at 05:26:37PM +0100, Sergey V. Udaltsov wrote:
The output went into the /var/log/XFree86.0.log (or to the console where
you started the X server), not to the GDB screen.
Yes!!! What I got:
0x841eb84 ATIMach64SetDPMSMode+46a
Module
On Sun, Jun 30, 2002 at 12:39:30 +0200, Felix Kühling wrote:
Hi mach64 folks,
after several weeks of extreme busyness/absence I am back now and
testing the mach64-0-0-4 and 0-0-5 branches again (still the best I can
do :( ). It's great that you got 2D accel working. However, there is
still
Sven,
If your seriously working on pm2 and pm3 support maybe you should
get CVS access and create a branch. Do you want CVS access to
the DRI tree ?
Alan.
On Thu, Jul 04, 2002 at 03:23:56 +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
Hello, ...
I have just submitted patch # 577344 via sourceforge, bue the
On Fri, Jul 05, 2002 at 11:10:22 -0600, Eric Anholt wrote:
There are files left over in the bsd DRM's driver subdirectories after
the merge to trunk. These got moved a directory above that (or to
shared/drm/kernel/), but the leftovers are getting in the way. I tried
to cvs rm and commit,
Does this file exist in your checked out tree ?
xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/os-support/shared/drm/kernel/mga.h
It should, make sure you do a full cvs checkout or update.
Alan.
On Fri, Jul 19, 2002 at 06:21:38 +1000, Daniel Kasak wrote:
Hi all.
Just tried compiling the latest cvs code
On Sun, Sep 22, 2002 at 10:33:15 +0200, Michel Dänzer wrote:
Several people on IRC reported crashes in the 2D code with the current
trunk snapshots. I realized they are due to the TwoPoint acceleration
functions depending on XAA changes. How can we handle this, bump the XAA
version and
1 - 100 of 380 matches
Mail list logo
