Hi,
After upgrading to 3.9.1-rc (and later git HEAD), I noticed lots of
errors in my logging:
2010-08-07T14:13:08+02:00 vmail dspam[13054]: bailing on error -2
2010-08-07T14:13:08+02:00 vmail dspam[13054]: process_message returned
error -5. delivering.
When this started, headers were also no lo
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 14:44:00 +0200
Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> Hi,
>
Hallo Tom,
> After upgrading to 3.9.1-rc (and later git HEAD), I noticed lots of
> errors in my logging:
>
> 2010-08-07T14:13:08+02:00 vmail dspam[13054]: bailing on error -2
> 2010-08-07T14:13:08+02:00 vmail dspam[13054]: process_
| DSPAM 3.9.0 had totally messed up and wrong working group support. We
| got that fixed:
|
Is that the reason for the following error:
My fresh dpsam database with osb
oen regular training user dspam
group: dspam:shared:*
incomming mail to user can be retrained in his history - not a valid s
On 07/08/10 14:58, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 14:44:00 +0200
> Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
> Hallo Tom,
>
>> After upgrading to 3.9.1-rc (and later git HEAD), I noticed lots of
>> errors in my logging:
>>
>> 2010-08-07T14:13:08+02:00 vmail dspam[13054]: bailing on error -2
>>
On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 15:32:47 +0200
Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> On 07/08/10 14:58, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> > On Sat, 07 Aug 2010 14:44:00 +0200
> > Tom Hendrikx wrote:
> >
> >> Hi,
> >>
> > Hallo Tom,
> >
> >> After upgrading to 3.9.1-rc (and later git HEAD), I noticed lots of
> >> errors in my logging
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 15:30:04 +0200 (CEST)
"Imposit.com - webmaster" wrote:
>
>
> | DSPAM 3.9.0 had totally messed up and wrong working group support. We
> | got that fixed:
> |
>
> Is that the reason for the following error:
>
> My fresh dpsam database with osb
> oen regular training user dsp
On Sat, 7 Aug 2010 15:30:04 +0200 (CEST)
"Imposit.com - webmaster" wrote:
>
>
> | DSPAM 3.9.0 had totally messed up and wrong working group support. We
> | got that fixed:
> |
>
> Is that the reason for the following error:
>
> My fresh dpsam database with osb
> oen regular training user dsp
its not bad, in terms what is in.
but its absolutly not strctured.
installation and administrations is mixed and some partes are in other files
(drivers / postfix)
someti,mes administration topic is there then comes an instalation topic then
something else :-)
- Ursprüngliche Mail -
On Aug 7, 2010, at 9:16 AM, Imposit.com - webmaster wrote:
> its not bad, in terms what is in.
> but its absolutly not strctured.
>
> installation and administrations is mixed and some partes are in
> other files (drivers / postfix)
> someti,mes administration topic is there then comes an insta
