Hello Stevan,
I would like to implement your way of doing this. Can you tell me where
to put the PCRE within postfix?
Another question I have is the following:
I have two Mail-Gateways. One is a SuSE SLES 10.3 and the other one is a
Mac OS X Snow Leopard Server. I have successfully installed
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:41:11 +0200
Nico Hoffmann n...@bacanol.de wrote:
Hello Stevan,
Hello Nico,
I would like to implement your way of doing this. Can you tell me where
to put the PCRE within postfix?
in main.cf. Just add it as an additional transport. For example:
transport_maps =
Hi Stevan,
I would like to have a setup like:
MX01 -- DSPAM -- Mailserver
MX02 -- DSPAM -- Mailserver
And Mailserver is one Machine. MX01 and MX02 are two different machines
with separate dspam instances.
best regards,
Nico
Am 23.07.2010 14:00, schrieb Stevan Bajić:
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010
Nico Hoffmann wrote:
Am 23.07.2010 14:19, schrieb Paul Cockings:
Nico Hoffmann wrote:
Hi Stevan,
I would like to have a setup like:
MX01 -- DSPAM -- Mailserver
MX02 -- DSPAM -- Mailserver
MX01 and MX02 serve the same domains? You want redundancy between MX01
and MX02?
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:14:39 +0200
Nico Hoffmann n...@bacanol.de wrote:
Hi Stevan,
Hallo Nico,
I would like to have a setup like:
MX01 -- DSPAM -- Mailserver
MX02 -- DSPAM -- Mailserver
And Mailserver is one Machine. MX01 and MX02 are two different machines
with separate dspam
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 14:22:19 +0200
Nico Hoffmann n...@bacanol.de wrote:
Exactly, I want to have mail filtering on the gateways (MX01 and MX02).
Is this possible?
The gateways are for the same domain. Is this setup unusual?
Yes. I have something like that.
Am 23.07.2010 14:19, schrieb
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 13:29:01 +0100, Paul Cockings ds...@cytringan.co.uk
wrote:
Nico Hoffmann wrote:
Am 23.07.2010 14:19, schrieb Paul Cockings:
Nico Hoffmann wrote:
Hi Stevan,
I would like to have a setup like:
MX01 -- DSPAM -- Mailserver
MX02 -- DSPAM -- Mailserver
Hallo Stevan,
Yes the DSPAM instances are now completely separated. (At this moment I am just
using DSPAM on the mx01 because I did not know that there is a setup also for
Mac OS X.)
I think one shared mysql database should be no problem. Maybe I can arrange
some kind of sync or master/slave
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:35:09 -0400
Disconnect dc.disconn...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello Disconnect,
Neat, personal attacks.
you mean from me? Because I have written that you will not that easy upgrade?
Way to stay classy. Paul asked for feedback:
I'd love to hear comments from anyone still
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:50:57 +0200
Nico Hoffmann n...@bacanol.de wrote:
Hallo Stevan,
Hallo Nico,
Yes the DSPAM instances are now completely separated. (At this moment I am
just using DSPAM on the mx01 because I did not know that there is a setup
also for Mac OS X.)
I think one
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:10:40 +0200
Julien Valroff jul...@kirya.net wrote:
Le vendredi 23 juillet 2010 à 15:51 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit :
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:35:09 -0400
Disconnect dc.disconn...@gmail.com wrote:
[...]
And I stated, in so many words, that I was going to be looking at
Le vendredi 23 juillet 2010 à 18:40 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit :
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:10:40 +0200
Julien Valroff jul...@kirya.net wrote:
Le vendredi 23 juillet 2010 à 15:51 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit :
On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:35:09 -0400
Disconnect dc.disconn...@gmail.com wrote:
If I misunderstood, then I'm sorry. Your statement (quoted below) was both
dismissive and not in agreement with what I actually said:
Thanks for the feedback. But I am pretty much confident that the user
Disconnect does still not care and will not upgrade.
As to the rest of your message, on
Hi Stevan, I wonder if you and/or other have seen this error and if there is
something I should look at. I mail came in as spam and I forward it to the
s...@mydomain.com and saw this
loaded default preferences externally
22095: [07/23/2010 15:27:42] using
14 matches
Mail list logo
