Le vendredi 23 juillet 2010 à 18:40 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit :
> On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 18:10:40 +0200
> Julien Valroff <jul...@kirya.net> wrote:
> 
> > Le vendredi 23 juillet 2010 à 15:51 +0200, Stevan Bajić a écrit :
> > > On Fri, 23 Jul 2010 09:35:09 -0400
> > > Disconnect <dc.disconn...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > [...]
> > > > And I stated, in so many words, that I was going to be looking at 
> > > > upgrading
> > > > it. (I also pointed out that you were going to end up supporting 3.6.8
> > > > forever if someone doesn't step up to either prod or replace the debian
> > > > maintainers.)
> > > > 
> > > Julien Valroff has already taken steps in that direction.
> > 
> > Things seem to move in the dpkg-dspam team. Matthijs Möhlmann has
> > proposed to merge the (for now) experimental branch to trunk in the svn
> > repository, and will review the package in view of a possible upload
> > once done. I am currently reviewing and testing 3.9.1 RC1 in order to
> > ensure the packages are in good shape (I have already fixed a lot of
> > problems which weren't yet raised by any user).
> > 
> What kind of problems are you refering to? Problems with DSPAM as
> application or with the Debian package? If the first then it would be
> great if you could share the problems with me so I can include your
> fixes into 3.9.1.

Only  issues with the packaging itself - be sure I would have shared
them in case they were problems with DSPAM!

> 
> > > I joined the discussion and then got out of time and could not deliver
> > > what was needed to get 3.9.0 into Debian.I need to find time.
> > 
> > Stevan, you have already done a lot. I know I can get your support in
> > case we encounter a major problem, which is much more than what a Debian
> > packager can expect from upstream in most situations.
> > 
> Still. I could help more. Time is currently my biggest enemy. I am so
> loaded with work that I don't know where to start? I already played
> with the thoughts to retire from the DSPAM project and let other
> developers take over.

I do understand your point - but still, this would be a great loss for
the project!

I even think this would lead - sooner or later - to the dead of the
project: you are by far the main developer, this is easy to measure your
commitment to the project: just check the mailing-list archives, or the
number of commits (eg. git shortlog -s -n --since=REL_3_9_0 for those
who want to check).

Instead of totally retiring from the project (which I do not want to
happen, but well, it is *your* decision), you might want to simply
consider putting different priorities to your various projects/tasks,
which might (hopefully not) mean less time spent on DSPAM, while still
working on it when time allows it and/or for important issues.

Cheers,
Julien


-- 
Julien Valroff <jul...@kirya.net>
http://www.kirya.net
GPG key: 4096R/290D20C5 
092F 4CB5 5F19 E006 1CFD  B489 D32B 8D66 290D 20C5


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Sprint
What will you do first with EVO, the first 4G phone?
Visit sprint.com/first -- http://p.sf.net/sfu/sprint-com-first
_______________________________________________
Dspam-user mailing list
Dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/dspam-user

Reply via email to