On 18/04/2012 00:07, Steve Fatula wrote:
Have 10 users on this system, highest spam hit rate is 37%, which is
quite bad if you ask me.
On my setup DSPAM is disabled for most users as they don't need it, the
checks that are in place at the MTA are sufficient enough for those
users to receive
On my setup DSPAM is disabled for most users as they don't need it, the checks
that are in place at the MTA are sufficient enough for those users to receive
a very low level of spam. DSPAM is used for some troublesome accounts or
those that want/can handle training a filter.
That's great,
On 18/04/2012 20:45, Steve Fatula wrote:
On my setup DSPAM is disabled for most users as they don't need
it, the checks that are in place at the MTA are sufficient enough
for those users to receive a very low level of spam. DSPAM is
used for some troublesome accounts or those
On Apr 18, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Steve Fatula wrote:
On Apr 18, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Paul Cockings wrote:
On 18/04/2012 00:07, Steve Fatula wrote:
Have 10 users on this system, highest spam hit rate is 37%, which is
quite bad if you ask me.
On my setup DSPAM is disabled for most users as
From: Bradley Giesbrecht bradley.giesbre...@gmail.com
To: Steve Fatula compconsult...@yahoo.com
Cc: Dspam List dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 3:04 PM
Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
I can't help you other then to point out that you may have
On 18.04.2012 22:04, Bradley Giesbrecht wrote:
On Apr 18, 2012, at 12:45 PM, Steve Fatula wrote:
On Apr 18, 2012, at 12:35 PM, Paul Cockings wrote:
On 18/04/2012 00:07, Steve Fatula wrote:
Have 10 users on this system, highest spam hit rate is 37%, which is
quite bad if you ask me.
On my
I setup dspam a while ago with TEFT. Everything I've read on the list
says to use TOE instead of TEFT. Once the training period is over
(2,500 messages I believe) does it matter? Does TOE vs TEFT only affect
the spam detection when in training mode?
Put another way, if none of my users are
On 18.04.2012 22:38, Steve Fatula wrote:
*From:* Bradley Giesbrecht bradley.giesbre...@gmail.com
*To:* Steve Fatula compconsult...@yahoo.com
*Cc:* Dspam List dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 18, 2012 3:04 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam
On Wed, Apr 18, 2012 at 08:55:11PM +0100, Paul Cockings wrote:
On 18/04/2012 20:45, Steve Fatula wrote:
On my setup DSPAM is disabled for most users as they don't need
it, the checks that are in place at the MTA are sufficient enough
for those users to receive a very low level
On 18.04.2012 22:37, Ben Luey wrote:
I setup dspam a while ago with TEFT. Everything I've read on the list
says to use TOE instead of TEFT. Once the training period is over
(2,500 messages I believe) does it matter?
Yes it does!
Does TOE vs TEFT only affect
the spam detection when in
Thanks for the explanation Stevan.
Now that is appears it is worth switching, my next question is how best
to do the switch for already existing users trained again TEFT:
If I just change the dspam setting, what happens? Does it start over
with no training data? Convert the old data? Do some
From: Stevan Bajić ste...@bajic.ch
To: dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
Sent: Wednesday, April 18, 2012 3:41 PM
Subject: Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
This is not good. But the above data is not that horrible. Anyway... allow me
to ask you a bunch of questions:
1) When you get a FN
On 18.04.2012 23:40, Ben wrote:
Thanks for the explanation Stevan.
Now that is appears it is worth switching, my next question is how best
to do the switch for already existing users trained again TEFT:
If I just change the dspam setting, what happens?
Allow me to explain with more detail.
On 19.04.2012 00:54, Steve Fatula wrote:
*From:* Stevan Bajić ste...@bajic.ch
*To:* dspam-user@lists.sourceforge.net
*Sent:* Wednesday, April 18, 2012 3:41 PM
*Subject:* Re: [Dspam-user] Increase Spam Hit Rate
This is not good. But the above data is not that horrible.
On 19/04/2012 04:41, Stevan Bajić wrote:
IgnoreHeader X-Paranoid-Spam
IgnoreHeader X-Paranoid-Prob
IgnoreHeader X-Paranoid-Report
IgnoreHeader X-ArGoMail-Read
Ohhh boy! From where is that list? Looks like one of my older
IgnoreHeader list.
I too have the same list. Should I use this
On 19.04.2012 03:32, P.V.Anthony wrote:
On 19/04/2012 04:41, Stevan Bajić wrote:
IgnoreHeader X-Paranoid-Spam
IgnoreHeader X-Paranoid-Prob
IgnoreHeader X-Paranoid-Report
IgnoreHeader X-ArGoMail-Read
Ohhh boy! From where is that list? Looks like one of my older
IgnoreHeader list.
I too
On 19.04.2012 04:06, Stevan Bajić wrote:
On 19.04.2012 03:32, P.V.Anthony wrote:
On 19/04/2012 04:41, Stevan Bajić wrote:
IgnoreHeader X-Paranoid-Spam
IgnoreHeader X-Paranoid-Prob
IgnoreHeader X-Paranoid-Report
IgnoreHeader X-ArGoMail-Read
Ohhh boy! From where is that list? Looks like one
On 19/04/2012 10:06, Stevan Bajić wrote:
.
I too have the same list. Should I use this feature
You can use the list. Why not?
Cool.
or is there an
updated list that I can use?
IgnoreHeader acceptlanguage
IgnoreHeader Accept-Language
IgnoreHeader Approved
IgnoreHeader Archive
Thank
18 matches
Mail list logo
