On 11/28/2011 02:50 PM, sean darcy wrote:
> The most important thing lesson in all this is that the Fedora package
> for dspam does NOT enable clamav. It has to be rebuilt to work.
Builds for epel 5/6 and Fedora 17,16,15 have been pushed to the testing
repos with clamav support built in. Please
On 30.11.2011 06:41, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 11/29/2011 01:28 AM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
>
>>*require* is a strong word. Enabling clamav support in DSPAM does not
>>require ClamAV at all. All it does is enable code that is capable to
>>send to a TCP/IP socket some data and act on t
On 11/29/2011 01:28 AM, Stevan Bajić wrote:
> *require* is a strong word. Enabling clamav support in DSPAM does not
> require ClamAV at all. All it does is enable code that is capable to
> send to a TCP/IP socket some data and act on the result. That is all
> what the clamav code is doing
On Mon, 28 Nov 2011 22:39:23 -0800, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 11/28/2011 02:50 PM, sean darcy wrote:
>> The most important thing lesson in all this is that the Fedora
>> package
>> for dspam does NOT enable clamav. It has to be rebuilt to work.
>
> Hello,
>
>I'm the fedora package maint
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 07:39:23AM CET, "Nathanael D. Noblet"
said:
> On 11/28/2011 02:50 PM, sean darcy wrote:
> > The most important thing lesson in all this is that the Fedora package
> > for dspam does NOT enable clamav. It has to be rebuilt to work.
>
> Hello,
>
>I'm the fedora package
On 11/28/2011 02:50 PM, sean darcy wrote:
> The most important thing lesson in all this is that the Fedora package
> for dspam does NOT enable clamav. It has to be rebuilt to work.
Hello,
I'm the fedora package maintainer for dspam. I didn't enable it
because I was under the impression that i
On 11/28/2011 09:41 AM, Christoph Langguth wrote:
> Am 28.11.2011 15:22, schrieb sean darcy:
> > On 11/28/2011 12:37 AM, Dudi Goldenberg wrote:
> >> -napt|grep 3310
> >
> > Thanks for the suggestion, but:
> >
> > netstat -napt|grep 3310
> > tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:3310
Am 28.11.2011 15:22, schrieb sean darcy:
> On 11/28/2011 12:37 AM, Dudi Goldenberg wrote:
>> -napt|grep 3310
>
> Thanks for the suggestion, but:
>
> netstat -napt|grep 3310
> tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:3310 0.0.0.0:*
> LISTEN 3270/clamd.clamd-ma
>
> clamav is li
On 11/28/2011 12:37 AM, Dudi Goldenberg wrote:
> -napt|grep 3310
Thanks for the suggestion, but:
netstat -napt|grep 3310
tcp0 0 127.0.0.1:3310 0.0.0.0:*
LISTEN 3270/clamd.clamd-ma
clamav is listening.
Any other thoughts?
sean
-
>> FWIW, clamav is enabled:
>>
>> dspam --version | grep clam
>> Configuration parameters: '--host=i686-pc-linux-gnu'
>> '--build=i686-pc-linux-gnu' '--program-prefix=' '--prefix=/usr'
>> '--exec-prefix=/usr' '--bindir=/usr/bin' '--sbindir=/usr/sbin'
>> '--datadir=/usr/share' '--includedir=/usr/
On 11/27/2011 09:02 PM, sean darcy wrote:
> On 11/27/2011 07:56 PM, sean darcy wrote:
>> On 11/27/2011 06:00 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>>> On 27-11-11 20:58, sean darcy wrote:
I'm trying to set up postfix>dspam&clamav>dovecot.
Mail gets through. postfix call dspam, and the
On 11/27/2011 07:56 PM, sean darcy wrote:
> On 11/27/2011 06:00 PM, Tom Hendrikx wrote:
>> On 27-11-11 20:58, sean darcy wrote:
>>> I'm trying to set up postfix> dspam& clamav> dovecot.
>>>
>>> Mail gets through. postfix call dspam, and the mail ends up at dovecot.
>>>
>>> The dspam and clama
On 27-11-11 20:58, sean darcy wrote:
> I'm trying to set up postfix > dspam & clamav > dovecot.
>
> Mail gets through. postfix call dspam, and the mail ends up at dovecot.
>
> The dspam and clamav logs show they're up, but nothing else.
>
> I've sent a test virus from http://www.eicar.org/86-0-I
13 matches
Mail list logo
