. Not to
mention a whole laundry list of other problems. The big pine tree --
who's needles are excellent attenuators at 1.2 GHz) being in the way,
isn't helping either.)
You gotta love microwave bands... eh?
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
here locally, perhaps you and Dave and other
folks talking on this thread will have come to some consensus on how
best to get a complete newcomer who's blind, started operating on D-
STAR.
(Sounds like a great article for publication somewhere, doesn't it?)
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
-key.)
Don't worry, even all us sighted folks get -- beyond that -- is a very
twitchy RF S-meter on an ultra-hot receiver prone to inter-mod and IF
mixes, and that information doesn't really mean a whole lot in a
digital system. :-)
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Manos Darkadakis wrote:
Hello all
I have finally received and installed G2 software. A few things I miss
like, what is the trust server ip, how can I register our SZ1SV gateway
there?
Then we hope that we will be able to join the rest of the world from
here at SZ1SV.
Thanks in advance
g7akm wrote:
Does any one know what has happened to this web site.
http://www.dstarusers.org/lastheardG2.php?
http://www.dstarusers.org/lastheardG2.php? DAVE.
[ED Dstarusers.org had a major system failure over the weekend. See if
the information you need is available just by going to
Ernest Kapphahn wrote:
Proposing any plan that requires existing systems to move, is not
going to meet with a good reception.
(rim-shot.)
Pun intended? Good reception? I like that one Ernie.
Nate WY0X
to be misbehaving.
The owner may or my not have time to debug, but a replacement with
another known-good supply was in order.
Sorry if we missed FD fun on D-STAR from Colorado...
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
at hand.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Charles Scott wrote:
Not exactly the kind of comments I'd expect from you. I didn't notice
which band it was for this unit, but from 440 up the little mobile
duplexers can be pretty small and work well for low-power applications.
Also, why are you worried about shielding? I believe the radios
Bob McCormick W1QA wrote:
In what I've drawn up so far - one of the weakest points
in our whole configuration is the D-STAR repeater controller
itself! Its easy to configure redundancy in that last mile
network connection ... and setup a reliable gateway including
maybe even a backup system.
These types of scramble codes are common in telecom for doing things
like ones density.
I wouldn't even call them scrambled, that seems to be a term that
picked up somewhere in D-STAR.
Telecom engineers would simply call this line coding of different sorts.
Study all of these, and you'll
Ron Wright wrote:
ICOM locked their products to work together.
The ICOM D-Star controller does not put out typical controller logic and
audio. It talks to its repeaters with a CAT5 cable in a digital control
format...serial data. This data is broken down in the repeaters radios
and used
Ron Wright wrote:
My concern is the attack/recovery times with digital. With a mobile
swishing in/out in analog the recovery is very quick, instantly, but
with digital it has to do its verification thing and takes time.
This is what larger buffers and fast DSP processing is for in the
Woodrick, Ed wrote:
Version 1.4.3.2 of the D-STAR
Calculatorhttp://www.dstarinfo.com/Calculator/
http://www.dstarinfo.com/Calculator/ has been published.
By only comment would be that there are currently 192 Gateways showing
up in the Gateway Info page of the Gateways, and far less than
garyp609 wrote:
I did more testing today and switched out the power supply for the
repeater to an Astron SS-25M. I also cleaned the N-Connector pins and
checked for loose cables. The receive is better today but consistently
after the repeater sits for 5 - 8 minutes dormant and is keyed up the
out of the
duplexer) 100%, including data/callsigns, perfectly.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Simon Templar wrote:
Are there any audio streams to listen to D-Star repeaters? This would be a
good way to attract Amateurs that do not yet have D-Star radios.
--
The views I present are that of my own and NOT of any organisation I may
belong to.
73 de Simon, VK3XEM.
-Dongle on REF005A and heard both
here locally, no problem.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
area is
impossible.
So... RPT1 is fairly useless except in fringe/overlap areas on co-
channeled D-STAR repeaters, and even then won't help much. A user in
the overlap coverage area will cause problems.
Just the strange things one thinks about while running errands on a
Sunday...
--
Nate
it a
few decades. (GRIN)
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
of the site... and had an ID-1... GRIN)
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
wd8knl wrote:
Any user can drop an active link.
The call sign does not have to be an 'administrator' as far as dplus
is concerned.
Try it.
Eric
WD8KNL
It shouldn't work unless your admin has changed this section of the
dplus.conf file to read like this:
[adminusers]
# admin
WR9A wrote:
I wouldn't doubt that at least *some* of those complaining about the high
use of the system connected to the reflector would prefer to have a nice,
quiet radio to listen to until someone called them.
With D-STAR, we have that capability built into the system already; it's
Randy wrote:
The complaints have been that the same one
or two people are constantly rag chewing at literally all hours of
the day and night and go on forever. I know these are open to the
ham community and anyone has a perfect right to use them. I
personally have had no problem with it;
Gary Pearce KN4AQ wrote:
D-STAR Forums at Dayton 2008
DVD Now Ready
Wow, you're quick Gary.
I was thinking about ordering the D-STAR User Seminar DVD for doing a
presentation (or ten) here locally at some meetings.
It says it covers the Dongle, but does it cover Reflectors? I'm
guessing
Gary Pearce KN4AQ wrote:
Thanks for the head's up, Nate. It's fixed. I had notification going to my
@arrl.net address, and when I put the new DVDs in the soup, I used my
@arvideonews.com address for that product only. PayPal didn't like the
confusion.
I figured it was something like that!
Manos Darkadakis wrote:
Hello Nate, aftertwo e-mails nothing is coming from tx/rx!!!
Is it perhaps because I am far? just a guess
73 Manos SV1IW
Wow, no idea. I'd give them a phone call, although I know that's
probably not cheap to do from there.
There's always the possibility that their
about a 17dB slide where analog sounds worse and worse, and
digital is just fine.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
these low-speed data file-
transfer tests sounds like I invested in a sonar company. Ping-ping,
Ping-ping, Ping-ping... Heh.)
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi folks,
Did some interesting testing here tonight... we were playing around with
using D-RATS *through* the Icom repeaters. (As opposed to the new
D-RATS IP Repeater.)
It was very hit-and-miss. IC-91AD to IC-92AD was almost flawless once
we messed around with timers between W0CBI and
k7ve wrote:
This is kind of a moving target. From your radio, you currently do not.
The linking is not like analog, IRLP or Echolink. A transmitting
station can address their transmission to a remote repeater or to a
specific station through the gateway, stations on the other end have to
I'll answer what I think I can Ken, and chop the rest... others can
reply to your original message.
ken cleaver wrote:
Does it seem like there is significant growth in dstar? Are there other
manufacturers adopting?
[ED - http://www.dstarusers.org/dsm_growth.html
Dan Smith wrote:
Did some interesting testing here tonight... we were playing around
with using D-RATS *through* the Icom repeaters. (As opposed to the
new D-RATS IP Repeater.)
FYI, I don't have a repeater locally, so I can't test it this way yet.
A that would explain it. Where
Dan Smith wrote:
Actually, neither the windows control or the one in D-RATS lets you
toggle it either way. I override the Windows setting when I open the
serial port. I also always imply flow control in recent versions. It
gives me a blocking read/write function that works on all platforms
Adrian wrote:
See my post on Linux_Dstar Nate?
cheers
Adrian
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (not using the vk6tux these days)
Wow, that needed a trim really bad.
Adrian, I saw where you asked me if I had tried D-RATS on Linux yet. Is
that what you mean?
No, I haven't tried it yet, but I will
Manos Darkadakis wrote:
Hello Mark and thanks for the info.
I know of such links, as a matter of fact we are going to use one in
5 GHz to have internet available at the D-Star site on top of a 3500
ft mountain here in Athens. The other end will be at our headquarters
where the computer
a cheap $3 MOV, too.
--
Nate Duehr, WY0X
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Robert wrote:
One thing analog systems really need to do, which in this day and age
there is no excuse not to, is use CTCSS or DCS on the receiver.
This type of thing is the reason that Analog FM coordinations in our
area REQUIRE that the system have a working CTCSS decoder.
It doesn't have
301 - 338 of 338 matches
Mail list logo
