I don't think Nate dislikes D-Star. I certainly don't, but I do wish that
the folks who have produced compatible stuff for it, while promising that it
would be open source, would follow through on their promises - or at least
release documentation so other amateurs can do so.
Agree with Nate
[mailto:dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of john_ke5c
Sent: Tuesday, May 18, 2010 10:05 AM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Honest questions .
I don't think Nate dislikes D-Star. I certainly don't, but I do wish that
the folks who have produced
Very well put, Ed. I agree with your sentiments about open vs. closed
and how it can be applied to different pieces of D-STAR differently, and
that was the whole point of my reply and questions.
Comparing D-STAR to iPhone is somewhat an Apples-to-Oranges (pun
intended? - GRIN!) comparison
] Re: Honest questions .
Very well put, Ed. I agree with your sentiments about open vs. closed
and how it can be applied to different pieces of D-STAR differently, and
that was the whole point of my reply and questions.
Comparing D-STAR to iPhone is somewhat an Apples-to-Oranges (pun
intended
The one question that I got referred to a mistaken concept that D-STAR was a
closed protocol. We explained that the D-STAR protocol is open and defined by
the JARL. Sitting right next to us was Internet Labs with the DVDongle and
DVAP and David with his non-Icom repeater, great examples of
own small part
of the world.
Ed WA4YIH
From: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Jonathan Naylor
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 10:44 AM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Honest questions .
The one question that I got
On 5/17/2010 11:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
And while you indicate that the G2 and DPlus protocols aren't open
source, they definitely have been reversed engineered and we have
third party solutions talking to them now.
Which ones? Where can one find information on them?
Did they publish
[mailto:dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 3:09 PM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Honest questions .
On 5/17/2010 11:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
And while you indicate that the G2 and DPlus protocols aren't
On May 17, 2010, at 12:09 PM, Nate Duehr wrote:
On 5/17/2010 11:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
And while you indicate that the G2 and DPlus protocols aren’t open
source, they definitely have been reversed engineered and we have
third party solutions talking to them now.
Which ones? Where
At 03:57 AM 5/18/2010, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
And while you indicate that the G2 and DPlus protocols aren't open
source, they definitely have been reversed engineered and we have
third party solutions talking to them now.
This also has precedent. The exact same thing happened with
Echolink,
At 05:22 AM 5/18/2010, you wrote:
But if you would do a little legwork and reading, you'll find that
indeed, the hotspots access the DPlus network and that the G4ULF
repeater is accessing the G2 network.
I think Nate is asking for the results of the reverse engineering,
not (closed)
On 5/17/2010 1:22 PM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
Nope, they aren't readily available for you to read. Did you see that
written anywhere in what I said? Did you see me publish a URL to it?
That's all I asked. Thank you for confirming that the answer is no, and
that D-STAR development is as
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Honest questions .
On 5/17/2010 1:22 PM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
Nope, they aren't readily available for you to read. Did you see that
written anywhere in what I said? Did you see me publish a URL to it?
That's all I asked
On 5/17/2010 1:51 PM, John Hays wrote:
On 5/17/2010 11:57 AM, Woodrick, Ed wrote:
And while you indicate that the G2 and DPlus protocols aren’t open
source, they definitely have been reversed engineered and we have
third party solutions talking to them now.
Which ones? Where can one
On Mon, May 17, 2010 at 05:31:49PM -0400, Ted Wrobel wrote:
Take a deep breath, climb down off your high horse and find something else
to do! You critical, repetitive comments add nothing to the group.
If you dislike D-Star, or wish it was something else, why don't you go and
create that
on the ID-1,
it's fully documented and capable of millions of applications.
From: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com [mailto:dstar_digi...@yahoogroups.com] On
Behalf Of Nate Duehr
Sent: Monday, May 17, 2010 5:01 PM
To: dstar_digital@yahoogroups.com
Subject: Re: [DSTAR_DIGITAL] Re: Honest questions
16 matches
Mail list logo
