I suggested a while ago to merge wmii@ and dwm@ into hackers@, both
lists are rather low level, and there is much overlap, and such a
single list would be more fitting for new minor side projects and for
'offtopic' discussion.
Right now when one has something to say that doesn't quite fit in
[2009-05-20 08:35] Uriel urie...@gmail.com
I suggested a while ago to merge wmii@ and dwm@ into hackers@, both
lists are rather low level, and there is much overlap, and such a
single list would be more fitting for new minor side projects and for
'offtopic' discussion.
+1
Right now when
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 2:35 PM, Uriel urie...@gmail.com wrote:
I suggested a while ago to merge wmii@ and dwm@ into hackers@, both
lists are rather low level, and there is much overlap, and such a
single list would be more fitting for new minor side projects and for
'offtopic' discussion.
I
Greetings.
Uriel wrote:
I suggested a while ago to merge wmii@ and dwm@ into hackers@, both
lists are rather low level, and there is much overlap, and such a
single list would be more fitting for new minor side projects and for
'offtopic' discussion.
There is a philosophical distraction
Hi pancake,
2009/5/19 pancake panc...@youterm.com:
I have been looking a bit for an alternative for X11, and I found nano-X
quite interesting,
but it is currently an abandoned project. 8000 LOCs, there's an abstraction
library to wrap
libX11 and there's support for some many IO devices (tty,
2009/5/20 Jacob Todd jaketodd...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:08:07PM +0200, pancake wrote:
Seems interesting, but instead of reinventing the wheel, why don't we just
clean
up X.org and submit patches back upstream? Rewriting/implementing X.org seems
li
ke more work than
I think that's a sensible proposal, let's do it.
For those who are subscribed already, there won't be a difference. The
new ones will subscribe to hackers. We will keep dwm@ and wmii@
working, but direct it to hack...@.
Kind regards,
Anselm
2009/5/20 markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de:
Ok, I meant the following:
Let's have hackers@ be some meta list which sends to dwm@ and wmii@,
and those subscribed to hackers will receive dwm@ and w...@. Those who
are only interested in dwm@ or wmii@ specifically could just stay on
dwm@ resp. w...@. That should be technically possible.
Kind
Hi,
2009/5/20 Szabolcs Nagy nszabo...@gmail.com:
On 5/20/09, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's have hackers@ be some meta list which sends to dwm@ and wmii@,
and those subscribed to hackers will receive dwm@ and w...@. Those who
are only interested in dwm@ or wmii@ specifically
On (20/05/09 10:04), Anselm R Garbe wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org, wmii mail list w...@suckless.org
From: Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dwm] Re: New mailing list
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
Ok, I meant the
2009/5/20 Premysl Hruby dfe...@gmail.com:
On (20/05/09 10:04), Anselm R Garbe wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org, wmii mail list w...@suckless.org
From: Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dwm] Re: New mailing list
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail
2009/5/20 Szabolcs Nagy nszabo...@gmail.com:
On 5/20/09, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's have hackers@ be some meta list which sends to dwm@ and wmii@,
and those subscribed to hackers will receive dwm@ and w...@. Those who
are only interested in dwm@ or wmii@ specifically could
2009/5/20 yy yiyu@gmail.com:
2009/5/20 Szabolcs Nagy nszabo...@gmail.com:
On 5/20/09, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Let's have hackers@ be some meta list which sends to dwm@ and wmii@,
and those subscribed to hackers will receive dwm@ and w...@. Those who
are only interested in
The problem is not dwm@ and wmii@, the problem is all the other stuff
that is unrelated to either, the only two logical and consistent
options are to either we further split the community into st@ dws@ and
so on, or we merge everything, and I think that option is a
no-brainer.
uriel
On Wed, May
2009/5/20 Uriel urie...@gmail.com:
The problem is not dwm@ and wmii@, the problem is all the other stuff
that is unrelated to either, the only two logical and consistent
options are to either we further split the community into st@ dws@ and
so on, or we merge everything, and I think that
On (20/05/09 11:53), Uriel wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: Uriel urie...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dwm] Re: New mailing list
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
The problem is not dwm@ and wmii@, the problem is all the other stuff
On 5/20/09, Uriel urie...@gmail.com wrote:
For simplicity and consistency #dwm and #wmii have moved to #hackers.
Still in the oftc network.
#suckless
#dev
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 12:08 PM, Szabolcs Nagy nszabo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/20/09, Uriel urie...@gmail.com wrote:
For simplicity and consistency #dwm and #wmii have moved to #hackers.
Still in the oftc network.
#suckless
On Wed, 20 May 2009 12:08:28 +0200
Szabolcs Nagy nszabo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 5/20/09, Uriel urie...@gmail.com wrote:
For simplicity and consistency #dwm and #wmii have moved to
#hackers. Still in the oftc network.
#suckless
#suckless is probably the best. #hackers will attract wrong
2009/5/20 Dusan ef_...@yahoo.com:
#suckless is probably the best. #hackers will attract wrong kids and
does not describe anything.
The agreed channel name is #suckless. Period.
Kind regards,
Anselm
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 09:53:30AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
2009/5/20 Jacob Todd jaketodd...@gmail.com:
On Tue, May 19, 2009 at 04:08:07PM +0200, pancake wrote:
Seems interesting, but instead of reinventing the wheel, why don't we just
clean
up X.org and submit patches back
On Wed, May 20, 2009 at 4:53 AM, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
I have a completely new WS in mind, design-wise with no X
dependency, just an X legacy support layer instead.
... , we want a different WS, not a state-machine WS like X.
Do you envision including xcb style asynchrony?
Attached is a patch adding xft support to dmenu 4.0. I claim no
copyright as it is little more than mimicing patterns I found in
Alexander Polakov's 3.4 patch and Robert Manea's dzen xft support. I
have attempted to follow the suckless paradigm as much as possible
(e.g. config.mk). xft support
23 matches
Mail list logo
