On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Christian Garbs wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:42:32PM +0100, hiro wrote:
dwm arranges the windows on the screen, nothing more, nothing less.
No program icons, no desktop environment, no notification services.
Dwm is arranging windows dynamically, listens
On Sun, Jan 25, 2009 at 6:28 PM, Christian Garbs mi...@cgarbs.de wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 01:42:32PM +0100, hiro wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko yoshi.rok...@yokuts.org
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote:
Still, dwm somehow seems very
hiro wrote:
Dwm is arranging windows dynamically, listens to multiple X events
and, as far as I know, provides a status bar.
It's doing quite some stuff in my view...
Dwm is also philosophically transformational if you've not previously
absorbed the concept of Simplicity as a Virtue.
--
Dwm is also philosophically transformational if you've not previously
absorbed the concept of Simplicity as a Virtue.
I don't understand a word, sorry.
And yeah, I understand what simplicity is about...
hiro wrote:
Dwm is also philosophically transformational if you've not previously
absorbed the concept of Simplicity as a Virtue.
I don't understand a word, sorry.
And yeah, I understand what simplicity is about..
I didn't mean to imply that you hadn't. I mean there is a world
of open
I recently switched from dwm to xmonad.
I did not like the rigid constraint on a certain number of code lines.
The resulting way of doing it with patches in my opinion is not
very sincere. I needed only two - and they did not match.
Though I do not know haskell at all I find it very simple to
On (20/01/09 09:49), henry atting wrote:
To: dwm@suckless.org
From: henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de
Subject: [dwm] Re: What happened here?
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux
I think andrew's point is about dwm's very own style.
You can, though, use dwm without any problems out of the box, and thus
I don't fully agree with him.
Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote:
Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me.
what do you mean, or what would be a more nix'isch WM?
regards, y0shi
2009/1/20 hiro 23h...@googlemail.com:
[snip]
Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me.
Well, X doesn't look like UNIX neither, however you look at it.
--
- yiyus || JGL .
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko yoshi.rok...@yokuts.org wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote:
Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me.
what do you mean, or what would be a more nix'isch WM?
regards, y0shi
Could be, that X doesn't
[2009-01-20 13:42] hiro 23h...@googlemail.com
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko yoshi.rok...@yokuts.org
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote:
Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me.
what do you mean, or what would be a more nix'isch
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:33 PM, markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de wrote:
[2009-01-20 13:42] hiro 23h...@googlemail.com
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko yoshi.rok...@yokuts.org
wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote:
Still, dwm somehow seems very much not
13 matches
Mail list logo
