On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:52:03PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
yy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, this is my proposal in patch form. I'm not sure about the
convenience of setting fx and fy in tileresize, but you get the idea.
I posted a similar patch on 31st March, so it is
2008/4/9, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:52:03PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
yy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, this is my proposal in patch form. I'm not sure about the
convenience of setting fx and fy in tileresize, but you get the idea.
I
On Wed, Apr 09, 2008 at 11:40:09AM +0200, yy wrote:
2008/4/9, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:52:03PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
yy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, this is my proposal in patch form. I'm not sure about the
convenience of
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 07:16:03PM +0200, yy wrote:
Well, this is my proposal in patch form. I'm not sure about the
convenience of setting fx and fy in tileresize, but you get the idea.
I think about your solution.
Kind regards,
--
Anselm R. Garbe http://www.suckless.org/ GPG key: 0D73F361
On Mon 07-04-2008 13:55 +0200, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
question: any chance of making `dwm' remember any `floating'
positioning information on a per-window basis which would enable
restoration of positions when coming back to floating layout?
Hi, I'd also like to see such a functionality
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
as `togglemax' seems gone in 4.9: I agree, that `monocle'
is very useful (and superior). the only problem is (seems?)
that one cannot easily toggle back and forth to the previous
layout. rather, one needs to cycle through
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 10:50:56AM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
as `togglemax' seems gone in 4.9: I agree, that `monocle'
is very useful (and superior). the only problem is (seems?)
that one cannot easily toggle back
2008/4/8, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
as `togglemax' seems gone in 4.9: I agree, that `monocle'
is very useful (and superior). the only problem is (seems?)
that one cannot easily toggle back and forth to the
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 01:35:40PM +0200, yy wrote:
2008/4/8, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 01:55:29PM +0200, Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
as `togglemax' seems gone in 4.9: I agree, that `monocle'
is very useful (and superior). the only problem is (seems?)
2008/4/8, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 01:35:40PM +0200, yy wrote:
2008/4/8, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Any complains?
If we are coming back to reverse geometries per client, what's the
point of resizing clients in focus changes? I think this
yy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
2008/4/8, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
On Tue, Apr 08, 2008 at 01:35:40PM +0200, yy wrote:
2008/4/8, Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
Any complains?
If we are coming back to reverse geometries per client, what's the
point of resizing
Well, this is my proposal in patch form. I'm not sure about the
convenience of setting fx and fy in tileresize, but you get the idea.
--
- yiyus || JGL .
diff -r 595ed1a4447c dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Tue Apr 08 11:49:35 2008 +0100
+++ b/dwm.c Tue Apr 08 18:59:12 2008 +0200
@@ -66,6 +66,7 @@ struct
yy [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Well, this is my proposal in patch form. I'm not sure about the
convenience of setting fx and fy in tileresize, but you get the idea.
I posted a similar patch on 31st March, so it is wasted effort.
Regards
Matthias-Christian
hi,
as `togglemax' seems gone in 4.9: I agree, that `monocle'
is very useful (and superior). the only problem is (seems?)
that one cannot easily toggle back and forth to the previous
layout. rather, one needs to cycle through all 4 layouts
right now, it seems. this is not so nice...
Hi Joerg,
question: is their a chance to get a kind of `togglemonocle'
functionality into dwm without writing it myself? this would
seem a frequent demand: activate monocle for some time than
switch back to tiling (or whatever layout was in effect
previously).
I had a similar demand,
On Mon, Apr 07, 2008 at 02:07:04PM +0200, Julien Barnier wrote:
Hi Joerg,
question: is their a chance to get a kind of `togglemonocle'
functionality into dwm without writing it myself? this would
seem a frequent demand: activate monocle for some time than
switch back to tiling (or
16 matches
Mail list logo
