On (20/05/09 10:04), Anselm R Garbe wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org, wmii mail list w...@suckless.org
From: Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dwm] Re: New mailing list
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
Ok, I meant the
On (20/05/09 11:53), Uriel wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: Uriel urie...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dwm] Re: New mailing list
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
The problem is not dwm@ and wmii@, the problem is all the other stuff
On (07/04/09 10:23), Zhengning Jiang wrote:
To: dwm@suckless.org
From: Zhengning Jiang zhengto...@gmail.com
Subject: [dwm] irssi + screen + urxvt in dwm - window hint urgent not working
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
Hi,
i have a little
On (07/03/09 11:50), Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
Cc: Premysl Hruby dfe...@gmail.com
From: Joerg van den Hoff j.van_den_h...@fzd.de
Subject: Re: [dwm] [dwm+ow...@suckless.org: Messages from dwm@suckless.org
to you have been bouncing]
...
Wow, his MTA
On (06/03/09 21:27), Neale Pickett wrote:
To: Ian Daniher it.dani...@gmail.com
Cc: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: Neale Pickett ne...@woozle.org
Subject: Re: [dwm] minimal communication
User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.2 (gnu/linux)
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
On (06/03/09 17:24), Joerg van den Hoff wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: Joerg van den Hoff j.van_den_h...@fzd.de
Subject: Re: [dwm] [dwm+ow...@suckless.org: Messages from dwm@suckless.org
to you have been bouncing]
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm
On (19/02/09 13:34), Anselm R Garbe wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com
Subject: [dwm] Issues with border
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
Hi,
I dislike the recent addition of the 0 border if
On (17/02/09 17:04), Jake Todd wrote:
To: dwm@suckless.org
From: Jake Todd jaketodd...@gmail.com
Subject: [dwm] Tag masks
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
I'm having some trouble with tag masks. From what I understand, they
allow you to
On (12/02/09 17:16), Enno Gottox Boland wrote:
To: dwm mail list d...@lists.suckless.org
From: Enno Gottox Boland got...@gmail.com
Subject: [dwm] [PATCH] small fix in propertynotify
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
looks like a typo.
Yes,
On (10/02/09 06:51), Kurt H Maier wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [dwm] Bottom-posting and reply trimming (was: Bottom Stack Patch)
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
Please mark
On (20/01/09 09:49), henry atting wrote:
To: dwm@suckless.org
From: henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de
Subject: [dwm] Re: What happened here?
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
On (11/11/08 01:01), Carlos Pita wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: Carlos Pita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [dwm] urxvt and show/hide bar
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
Hi all,
I usually prefer to keep the bar hidden so I've
On (06/11/08 09:53), Neale Pickett wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: Neale Pickett [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] patch to not reparent children to init
User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/21.4 (gnu/linux)
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm
On (04/11/08 16:37), yy wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: yy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] How to detect TAG activity?
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
2008/11/4 markus schnalke [EMAIL PROTECTED]:
I think it is worth to
On (04/11/08 11:04), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To: Matthias Kirschner [EMAIL PROTECTED], dwm@suckless.org
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] How to detect TAG activity?
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18
On (03/11/08 14:05), [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To: dwm@suckless.org
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [dwm] How to detect TAG activity?
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
Hello,
I'm using dwm-5.2, my
guys.
Kopete does not seem to set the URGENT flag but it
offers tha ability to launch an app when a new message is received.
Would it be possible to write a shell script that sends an URGENT flag to a
specific
window/tag ?
Veselin
On Mon, Nov 03, 2008 at 03:48:25PM +0100, Premysl
On (29/09/08 17:18), Carlos Pita wrote:
To: dwm@suckless.org
From: Carlos Pita [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [dwm] Notifications
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
Hi,
I use irssi+bitlbee to cover all my im/irc needs. Up til now my window
On (09/09/08 09:13), Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: Szabolcs Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] malloc'ed client in manage()
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
On 9/8/08, Anselm R Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi,
I'm personally using mutt+msmtp+isync for mail, but maybe you can be
happy with something like msmtp+fetchmail+mailx(light cli mail reader)
-Ph
On (26/08/08 18:11), pancake wrote:
To: dwm@suckless.org
From: pancake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [dwm] suckless mail
Reply-To: dwm mail list
On (23/08/08 17:51), Jan Kaliszewski wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: Jan Kaliszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] Feature request: any way to change default values in config
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
User-Agent:
On (22/08/08 03:33), Jan Kaliszewski wrote:
To: dwm@suckless.org
From: Jan Kaliszewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [dwm] Bug: trying to toggletag when there is no focused window = dwm
crashes
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
User-Agent:
On (17/08/08 14:48), rundstutzen wrote:
To: dwm@suckless.org
From: rundstutzen [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [dwm] is wmii dead?
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.16 (X11/20080724)
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
Hi folks,
the question arised in
On (15/08/08 13:07), Martin Hurton wrote:
To: dwm@suckless.org
From: Martin Hurton [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [dwm] current hg tip
Mail-Followup-To: dwm@suckless.org
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
I
On (14/08/08 09:52), Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: Szabolcs Nagy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] [patch] Minor code cleanup, part 2
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
On 8/14/08, Martin Hurton [EMAIL
On (13/08/08 16:21), Enno Gottox Boland wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] [patch] Minor code cleanup
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
Hi!
2008/8/13, Martin Hurton [EMAIL
(2008-05-17)
On Wed, Aug 13, 2008 at 04:43:46PM +0200, Premysl Hruby wrote:
On (13/08/08 16:21), Enno Gottox Boland wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] [patch] Minor code cleanup
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
On (09/08/08 12:55), yy wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: yy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [dwm] some proposed changes
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
Attached there is a patch with some changes to dwm.c. It uses
XLowerWindow and
On (19/07/08 11:52), Yoshi Rokuko wrote:
To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
From: Yoshi Rokuko [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [dwm] hgiki
Organization: Black Red Inc.
Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org
Hi,
I was trying to add a screenshot to
On (17/07/08 14:49), Jacek Hoffman wrote:
To: dwm mail list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Jacek Hoffman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] mailing list changed
Hi,
I have to leave my mailbox unattended for some weeks. In order to
avoid mailbox overloading perhaps I have to sign-out from the
Hi,
it also defines feature macro _BSD_SOURCE, so usleep and strdup is
declared.
patch attached.
-Ph
--
Premysl Anydot Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/
diff -r 0088cc3243e3 config.mk
--- a/config.mk Sat Jun 21 16:43:12 2008 +0100
+++ b/config.mk Wed Jun 25 23:09:40 2008 +0200
@@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
On 6/26/08, Premysl Hruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi,
it also defines feature macro _BSD_SOURCE, so usleep and strdup is
declared.
patch attached.
return (char *)1;?
cistrstr(s, sub) is supposed to return a pointer to the first
occurence of sub in s, or NULL if there is none
On (14/06/08 16:20), James Turner wrote:
To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
From: James Turner [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] dmenu directory test
On Sat, Jun 14, 2008 at 10:16:03PM +0200, Peter Hartlich wrote:
Hi,
[...] I was wondering if it would make sense to add a
Hi,
I just created patch which includes some minor patches, maybe at least
some of them can be included.
it contains these parts:
- reintroducion of union Arg
- join of focusnext and focusprev into one function which use parameter
- reenabling -Os and stripping of build (to save binary size)
-
On (10/06/08 10:51), Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
From: Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] patch
On Tue, Jun 10, 2008 at 10:38:55AM +0200, Premysl Hruby wrote:
- reintroducion of union Arg
I don't like this, because intialization
Hi,
patch is attached
-Ph
--
Premysl Anydot Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/
diff -r 81b40dd1b766 dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Mon Jun 02 12:19:02 2008 +0200
+++ b/dwm.c Tue Jun 03 21:22:35 2008 +0200
@@ -612,7 +612,7 @@
void
focus(Client *c) {
- if(!c || (c c-isbanned))
+ if(!c || c-isbanned)
for(c
On (02/06/08 09:56), Enno Gottox Boland wrote:
To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
From: Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] [patch] simplification to drawtext
Reply-To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dynamic window manager dwm.suckless.org
On (01/06/08 12:38), Enno Gottox Boland wrote:
To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
From: Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [dwm] [patch] simplification to drawtext
Reply-To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dynamic window manager dwm.suckless.org
Hi!
Hi,
i found that Client.flags is unused and can be removed. Patch attached.
-Ph
--
Premysl Anydot Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/
diff -r 2c5c99803c2e dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Sat May 31 17:37:13 2008 +0100
+++ b/dwm.c Sat May 31 22:16:32 2008 +0200
@@ -69,7 +69,6 @@
int x, y, w, h;
int basew,
On (21/05/08 08:27), Enno Gottox Boland wrote:
To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
From: Enno Gottox Boland [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] using bitaray for tags (PATCH)
Reply-To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dynamic window manager dwm.suckless.org
Here's
: dynamic window manager dwm.suckless.org
Premysl Hruby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
This is realization of Gottox's proposal discuted on IRC today.
It handles tags not as Bool [], but as bit-array saved in int.
I read, that bit-arrays are not very portable between different
architectures
On (20/05/08 11:22), Kurt H Maier wrote:
To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
From: Kurt H Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
C has bitfield support inside structs:
unsigned tagsapplied :8;
and replace 8 with whatever value you want
Not really with whatever value, only that values so whole
Hi,
This is realization of Gottox's proposal discuted on IRC today.
It handles tags not as Bool [], but as bit-array saved in int.
There's only one problem, as I don't find easy solution (in compile time)
for check if there's no more tags than sizeof(int)*8.
Maybe it can be asserted with
On (20/05/08 11:22), Kurt H Maier wrote:
To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
From: Kurt H Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] using bitaray for tags (PATCH)
Reply-To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dynamic window manager dwm.suckless.org
C has bitfield
On (20/05/08 11:22), Kurt H Maier wrote:
To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
From: Kurt H Maier [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] using bitaray for tags (PATCH)
Reply-To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dynamic window manager dwm.suckless.org
C has bitfield
On (19/05/08 11:16), pancake wrote:
I usually install new versions of applications in my PREFIX, and dmenu
needs to update most of time the cache. When this happens, dmenu takes
the keyboard input and it's impossible to open a terminal or type things
in a chat, etc..
The 'esc' key is not
On (19/05/08 20:34), Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
From: Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Well, for mainstream dwm my opinion has always been to stick to
mouse only. But I had occasional cases when I'd like to have
keyboard driven resizals as well, esp.
On (14/05/08 16:24), Kai Grossjohann wrote:
To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
From: Kai Grossjohann [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] more consistent codestyle patch
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.14 (X11/20080505)
Reply-To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
List-Id:
On (29/04/08 11:27), Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
From: Anselm R. Garbe [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] Java patch
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)
Reply-To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dynamic window manager
Hi,
I do small cleanup of drawtext():
- buf[] is not needed to be global
- there's no need to end buf[] with zero byte, as all function take length
parameter
- w dc.w can be true iff length of printed text is zero
-Ph
--
Premysl Anydot Hruby, http://www.redrum.cz/
diff -r 042cef9c6ace
On (27/04/08 19:58), Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
With the current change in mind, do we still need viewprev()?
Short answer: yes, we do :)
Long answer: yes, we do because: - you are not able to see previous
tagset if you have currently selected more than one tag
- for switching to
On (27/04/08 20:33), yy wrote:
To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
From: yy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] Yet another simplification, this time sel/prevtags
Reply-To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dynamic window manager dwm.suckless.org
After the last
On (23/04/08 14:18), pancake wrote:
To: dwm@suckless.org
From: pancake [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [dwm] bloq may used to ignore keybindings
Reply-To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dynamic window manager dwm.suckless.org
Recently I tried wmii (for a few minutes :P) and
On (20/04/08 05:15), Ruben Gonzalez Arnau wrote:
To: dwm@suckless.org
From: Ruben Gonzalez Arnau [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [dwm] New client on bottom instead of top
Reply-To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dynamic window manager dwm.suckless.org
Hello,
What is the way
Hi,
both Layout *lt and Geom *geom can be initialized in compile time:
diff -r 4accc080ae2e -r 2fc025a5a54f dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Sun Apr 20 00:13:19 2008 +0200
+++ b/dwm.c Sun Apr 20 00:15:30 2008 +0200
@@ -239,14 +239,15 @@ Cursor cursor[CurLast];
Cursor cursor[CurLast];
Display *dpy;
Hi,
this patch creates macros MAX and MIN, and use it where it is possible.
-Ph
diff -r 1a0cf77c2345 dwm.c
--- a/dwm.c Sun Apr 20 12:49:18 2008 +0200
+++ b/dwm.c Sun Apr 20 15:18:46 2008 +0200
@@ -41,6 +41,8 @@
#include X11/Xutil.h
/* macros */
+#define MAX(a, b) ((a)(b)?(a):(b))
+#define
Hi,
attached patch makes one array for both sel and prevtags. So there is
no need to swap them in memory in view() as we only change seltags
pointer to point viewtags[0] or viewtags[1].
It also with little change can support arbitrary number of saved tags
set (3 save position can be usable, with
On (20/04/08 21:49), yy wrote:
To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
From: yy [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [dwm] Yet another simplification, this time sel/prevtags
Reply-To: dynamic window manager dwm@suckless.org
List-Id: dynamic window manager dwm.suckless.org
I like this change,
58 matches
Mail list logo
