On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 07:43:09PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> I also think the NMASTER thing feels wrong and should/might be
> removed.
Please let NMASTER stay. I don't use it often, but it's definitely
useful.
Regards,
Christian
--
Christian.Garbs.
On 8/10/07, Robert Figura <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This indeed ist a weakness of nmaster. Once you have them in place
> you don't want to change the order of these windows again. a single l2r
> stack would do as well, i could hack this in minutes...
FWIW, another alternative is to extend the c
Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
schrieb:
> Tako rzecze Robert Figura (w e-mailu datowanym 2007-08-10, 05:46):
> > Actually, i do use NMASTER for file sorting occasionally but with the
> > master windows tiling left to right (made myself a twist orientation
> > hotkey). Never felt the need to in
* Tuncer Ayaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [Aug 09 2007 23:17] wrote:
> view 5-7: not used as they're not easily reached with two fingers
I had also this problem, but when you configure them to qwer intead of
6789 it is more comfortable ( e.g Alt+q for the mail view )
greetz
didi
pgpR8ImuBEzE9.pgp
Des
> I've read about the vertical patch, but I am not sure, whetr
Ignore this, please. I was going to ask, whether vim-style splitting of
windows was possible in screen, but I already found out that it is possible
(which is very good).
Regards
Hi,
it is true, that I use dwm tiled layout only for handling my terminals.
Everywhere else it doesn't feel good, so I usually use either floating mode
or else just one client per tag.
Now, you guys made me interested in screen and if I switch to it for console
handling, I won't need the tile layo
Antoni Grzymala <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those of you guys, who use nmaster for having two terminal windows
> one above the other just use screen(1)'s split function. It's very
> practical and so much simpler than fiddling with nmaster and trying to
> get correct windows where intended.
Ri
Tako rzecze Robert Figura (w e-mailu datowanym 2007-08-10, 05:46):
> > Actually, more and more I come to the same conclusion. The ratio
> > stuff just feels wrong. I also think the NMASTER thing feels
> > wrong and should/might be removed.
>
> Actually, i do use NMASTER for file sorting occasiona
Hi,
I use nmaster quite often, because I want to switch between this two setups:
a) one master + several programs in the stack
b) two masters
Another thing that this shows is that ratios are needless to me. I just need
to be able to resize horizontally in a) and vertically in b) option,
respectiv
"Anselm R. Garbe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Actually, more and more I come to the same conclusion. The ratio
> stuff just feels wrong. I also think the NMASTER thing feels
> wrong and should/might be removed.
Actually, i do use NMASTER for file sorting occasionally but with the
master windows
On Thu, 2007-08-09 at 12:58 -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
> I dislike {H|V}ratio, but I think NMASTER is a good option. I use it
> once in a while.
+1
-RPM
> As to the ratio -- I'm still not sure. As to nmaster, yes, it's most
> definitely evil. Nmaster should go!
i use it quite a bit - 3 x 2 or similar count between master and right stacks
fits pretty well compard to 1x5 or similar..
the ratio stuff definitely feels weird though
c
> [a]
Tako rzecze Anselm R. Garbe (w e-mailu datowanym 2007-08-09, 19:43):
> Actually, more and more I come to the same conclusion. The ratio
> stuff just feels wrong. I also think the NMASTER thing feels
> wrong and should/might be removed.
As to the ratio -- I'm still not sure. As to nmaster, yes, it
On 8/9/07, Damjan Vrencur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 07:43:09PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
> Hi!
> >
> > Actually, more and more I come to the same conclusion. The ratio
> > stuff just feels wrong. I also think the NMASTER thing feels
> > wrong and should/might be remov
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 07:43:09PM +0200, Anselm R. Garbe wrote:
Hi!
>
> Actually, more and more I come to the same conclusion. The ratio
> stuff just feels wrong. I also think the NMASTER thing feels
> wrong and should/might be removed.
>
> What is the impression of others regarding this?
I end
I also think the ratio thing is not a good idea (at least for main
dwm). About nmaster, imo you can remove it. I'm making more tests with
bwm and 0.2 will let you having several master clients and change
between them like you change layers now, i'm still thinking about it
but if somebody wants this
I dislike {H|V}ratio, but I think NMASTER is a good option. I use it
once in a while.
On 8/9/07, Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 03:08:56PM +0200, pancake wrote:
> > Hi, i have finally patched my dwm with the latests mercurial
> > changes. and this is my conf
On Thu, Aug 09, 2007 at 03:08:56PM +0200, pancake wrote:
> Hi, i have finally patched my dwm with the latests mercurial
> changes. and this is my config:
>
> { MODKEY, XK_h, inchratio, ".1"
> }, \
> { MODKEY, XK_l,
Hi, i have finally patched my dwm with the latests mercurial
changes. and this is my config:
{ MODKEY, XK_h, inchratio, ".1" },
\
{ MODKEY, XK_l, inchratio, "-.1"
}, \
{ MODKEY|ShiftMask,
> Well I currently think about shortcuts to the desired
> functionality. Currently we have inchratio() bound to
> Mod1-{h,l}, and Mod1-{j,k} for up/down navigation. This feels
> convenient, even if it breaks consistency. Besides this, there
> is Mod1-Shift-{j,k} for dec-/incrementing nmaster.
>
N
* Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [070804 17:24]:
> Hi there,
>
> I pushed a my new tile() algorithm to hg tip. It now supports
> two distinct ratios, a vertical and a horizontal.
>
> Each ratio is manipulated using the inc{v,h}ratio() functions.
>
> See config.arg.h how I like the ratios ch
* Anselm R. Garbe <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-08-04 19:16:53 +0200]:
> Hence, I propose the following:
>
> Mod1-{j,k} -> focusclient() up down
> Mod1-{h,l} -> incnmaster() inc dec
> Mod1-Shift-{h,l} -> inchratio() inc dec
> Mod1-Shift-{j,k} -> incvratio() inc dec
> [...]
>
> Any c
Tako rzecze Anselm R. Garbe (w e-mailu datowanym 2007-08-04, 19:16):
> Hence, I propose the following:
>
> Mod1-{j,k} -> focusclient() up down
> Mod1-{h,l} -> incnmaster() inc dec
> Mod1-Shift-{h,l} -> inchratio() inc dec
> Mod1-Shift-{j,k} -> incvratio() inc dec
>
> I tested th
On Sat, Aug 04, 2007 at 02:00:57PM +0200, Giorgio Lando wrote:
> > See config.arg.h how I like the ratios change in a combined way,
> > and config.default.h only changes the horizontal ratio and keeps
> > the vertical ratio at 1.0.
>
> Since the old behaviour can now be easily restored, I have not
> See config.arg.h how I like the ratios change in a combined way,
> and config.default.h only changes the horizontal ratio and keeps
> the vertical ratio at 1.0.
Since the old behaviour can now be easily restored, I have nothing to
complain further.
Thanks
Giorgio Lando
Hi there,
I pushed a my new tile() algorithm to hg tip. It now supports
two distinct ratios, a vertical and a horizontal.
Each ratio is manipulated using the inc{v,h}ratio() functions.
See config.arg.h how I like the ratios change in a combined way,
and config.default.h only changes the horizont
26 matches
Mail list logo
