Re: [dwm] What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread Mate Nagy
Hiya, The website lists clarity as a feature. Clarity! As for only having to learn C code to edit the config, I know C reasonably well, but I get bad vibes from config.h, I think I'd rather try to learn Lua. do consider the alternatives - xmonad is a smashing tiling wm (using it now for its

Re: [dwm] What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread yy
2009/1/20 andrew alindb...@gmail.com: I've spent a lot of time with awesome in the past months, since it had, at the time, a sensible tiling system and some of the features I wanted that dwm lacked. Unfortunately, with the progression to the latest major revision, lua integration has ruined

[dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread henry atting
I recently switched from dwm to xmonad. I did not like the rigid constraint on a certain number of code lines. The resulting way of doing it with patches in my opinion is not very sincere. I needed only two - and they did not match. Though I do not know haskell at all I find it very simple to

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (20/01/09 09:49), henry atting wrote: To: dwm@suckless.org From: henry atting nspm...@literaturlatenight.de Subject: [dwm] Re: What happened here? Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread hiro
I think andrew's point is about dwm's very own style. You can, though, use dwm without any problems out of the box, and thus I don't fully agree with him. Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me.

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread Yoshi Rokuko
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote: Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me. what do you mean, or what would be a more nix'isch WM? regards, y0shi

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread yy
2009/1/20 hiro 23h...@googlemail.com: [snip] Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me. Well, X doesn't look like UNIX neither, however you look at it. -- - yiyus || JGL .

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread hiro
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko yoshi.rok...@yokuts.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote: Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me. what do you mean, or what would be a more nix'isch WM? regards, y0shi Could be, that X doesn't

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread markus schnalke
[2009-01-20 13:42] hiro 23h...@googlemail.com On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko yoshi.rok...@yokuts.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote: Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me. what do you mean, or what would be a more nix'isch

Re: [dwm] Re: What happened here?

2009-01-20 Thread hiro
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:33 PM, markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de wrote: [2009-01-20 13:42] hiro 23h...@googlemail.com On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko yoshi.rok...@yokuts.org wrote: On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote: Still, dwm somehow seems very much not