Hiya,
> The website lists clarity as a feature. Clarity!
> As for only having to learn C code to edit the config, I know C
> reasonably well, but I get bad vibes from config.h, I think I'd rather
> try to learn Lua.
do consider the alternatives - xmonad is a smashing tiling wm (using it
now for it
2009/1/20 andrew :
> I've spent a lot of time with awesome in the past months, since it
> had, at the time, a sensible tiling system and some of the features I
> wanted that dwm lacked. Unfortunately, with the progression to the
> latest major revision, lua integration has ruined its usability. And
I recently switched from dwm to xmonad.
I did not like the rigid constraint on a certain number of code lines.
The resulting way of doing it with patches in my opinion is not
very sincere. I needed only two - and they did not match.
Though I do not know haskell at all I find it very simple to con
On (20/01/09 09:49), henry atting wrote:
> To: dwm@suckless.org
> From: henry atting
> Subject: [dwm] Re: What happened here?
> Reply-To: dwm mail list
> List-Id: dwm mail list
> User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux)
> Cancel-Lock: sha1:WaXw8qx3RxRmlkx9dQJG0B9fg4s=
>
> I
I think andrew's point is about dwm's very own style.
You can, though, use dwm without any problems out of the box, and thus
I don't fully agree with him.
Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me.
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote:
> Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me.
what do you mean, or what would be a more nix'isch WM?
regards, y0shi
On (20/01/09 12:08), sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de wrote:
> To: dwm mail list
> From: sta...@cs.tu-berlin.de
> Subject: [dwm] Focus follows mouse
> Reply-To: dwm mail list
> List-Id: dwm mail list
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)
>
> Hi,
>
> At the time I switched from wmii back to dwm I was ev
Hi,
At the time I switched from wmii back to dwm I was evaluating couple of
other WM from the family and I liked a feature I cannot currently tell
where it was (but I suspect it was Xmonad): switch off the
focus-follows-mouse behaviour.
Can anybody give a sketch how to achieve this in dwm (or giv
2009/1/20 hiro <23h...@googlemail.com>:
[snip]
> Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me.
>
Well, X doesn't look like UNIX neither, however you look at it.
--
- yiyus || JGL .
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote:
>> Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me.
>
> what do you mean, or what would be a more nix'isch WM?
>
> regards, y0shi
>
>
Could be, that X doesn't allow it to be more
On 1/20/09, andrew wrote:
> Specify commands as a list of argument strings?
SHCMD("put your posix compliant shell script here")
> I don't even recognize the key array as C code ... {.v = dmenucmd} },
to use dwm you need to know the c language
..specifically c99
> Tagmasks? Why are we forcing
[2009-01-20 13:42] hiro <23h...@googlemail.com>
> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko
> wrote:
> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote:
> >> Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me.
> >
> > what do you mean, or what would be a more nix'isch WM?
>
> Co
On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 2:33 PM, markus schnalke wrote:
> [2009-01-20 13:42] hiro <23h...@googlemail.com>
>> On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 11:22 AM, Yoshi Rokuko
>> wrote:
>> > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 10:37:58AM +0100, hiro wrote:
>> >> Still, dwm somehow seems very much not unix alike for me.
>> >
>>
13 matches
Mail list logo
