Re: [dwm] Issues with border

2009-02-19 Thread Enno Gottox Boland
fullack. 2009/2/19, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com: Hi, I dislike the recent addition of the 0 border if only 1 tiled client is in the view, reasons: - gained screen real eastate is very minimal - configure events are increased by n at any view() and toggleview(), if n is the

Re: [dwm] Issues with border

2009-02-19 Thread Antoni Grzymala
Anselm R Garbe dixit (2009-02-19, 13:34): Hi, I dislike the recent addition of the 0 border if only 1 tiled client is in the view, reasons: - gained screen real eastate is very minimal - configure events are increased by n at any view() and toggleview(), if n is the number of clients in

Re: [dwm] Issues with border

2009-02-19 Thread Premysl Hruby
On (19/02/09 13:34), Anselm R Garbe wrote: To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org From: Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com Subject: [dwm] Issues with border Reply-To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org List-Id: dwm mail list dwm.suckless.org Hi, I dislike the recent addition of the 0 border if

Re: [dwm] Issues with border

2009-02-19 Thread Jeremy Jay
I agree too. The shimmy going from a one-client tag to a multi-client tag and back again is very distracting. Jeremy On Thu 19 Feb 2009 - 02:57PM, Premysl Hruby wrote: On (19/02/09 13:34), Anselm R Garbe wrote: To: dwm mail list dwm@suckless.org From: Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com

Re: [dwm] Issues with border

2009-02-19 Thread Jake Todd
On Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:53:41 +0100 Antoni Grzymala ant...@chopin.edu.pl wrote: Anselm R Garbe dixit (2009-02-19, 13:34): Hi, I dislike the recent addition of the 0 border if only 1 tiled client is in the view, reasons: - gained screen real eastate is very minimal - configure

Re: [dwm] Issues with border

2009-02-19 Thread David E. Thiel
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:34:48PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote: And then define a key binding for it. Opinions? Seems I'm one of the few that prefers the no-border option. If there aren't any other clients on the screen, I don't see a need to indicate focus. And it looks quite nicely minimal,

Re: [dwm] Issues with border

2009-02-19 Thread Enno Gottox Boland
A patch to remove adjustborder is attached. 2009/2/19, David E. Thiel l...@redundancy.redundancy.org: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:34:48PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote: And then define a key binding for it. Opinions? Seems I'm one of the few that prefers the no-border option. If there

Re: [dwm] Issues with border

2009-02-19 Thread Julio Missao
On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 10:41:04AM -0800, David E. Thiel wrote: On Thu, Feb 19, 2009 at 01:34:48PM +, Anselm R Garbe wrote: And then define a key binding for it. Opinions? Seems I'm one of the few that prefers the no-border option. If there aren't any other clients on the screen, I

Re: [dwm] Issues with border

2009-02-19 Thread voltaic
I also like the no-border behavior from a clarity point of view. My situation is similar to Julio's in that I also use a very bright color for the focused border and a very dark gray for the unfocused border. This makes it quick and easy to see when a client has focus. When there is only one