hi Szabolcs,
* Szabolcs Nagy nszabo...@gmail.com [2009-04-29 13:37:17 +0200]:
On 4/28/09, Matthias Kirschner m...@fsfe.org wrote:
I am very interested in that list. Can you please sent it to me?
cad softwares (and many related formats are closed as well)
Was already on my list.
fpga
On Thu, Apr 30, 2009 at 03:44:46PM +0200, Matthias Kirschner wrote:
hi Szabolcs,
* Szabolcs Nagy nszabo...@gmail.com [2009-04-29 13:37:17 +0200]:
On 4/28/09, Matthias Kirschner m...@fsfe.org wrote:
I am very interested in that list. Can you please sent it to me?
cad softwares
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 23:41:48 +0200
Martin Oppegaard mar...@deathaven.com wrote:
Are there any BSD-style licensed equivalents?
Why do you need that?
You could also have a look at: http://www.sagemath.org/index.html
--
Preben
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 06:52:46AM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 4/28/09, Martin Oppegaard mar...@deathaven.com wrote:
Are there any BSD-style licensed equivalents?
scipy.org
And use Ipython!
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:25:55 +0200
Martin Oppegaard mar...@deathaven.com wrote:
I like free software.
But not GPL?
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:35:12AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:25:55 +0200
Martin Oppegaard mar...@deathaven.com wrote:
I like free software.
But not GPL?
It's just another lock in which is getting too big.
Hi yiyus,
* yy yiyu@gmail.com [2009-04-28 00:03:27 +0200]:
But it is not always possible. I can give you a (quite long) list of
software that doesn't have a free equivalent.
I am very interested in that list. Can you please sent it to me?
Thanks,
Matthias
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:45:35 +0200
Martin Oppegaard mar...@deathaven.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:35:12AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:25:55 +0200
Martin Oppegaard mar...@deathaven.com wrote:
I like free software.
But not GPL?
It's just another
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:58:23PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:45:35 +0200
Martin Oppegaard mar...@deathaven.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:35:12AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:25:55 +0200
Martin Oppegaard mar...@deathaven.com
I like free software.
But not GPL?
It's just another lock in which is getting too big.
Sure, if you want to make proprietary software...
If you want to be free from wacko organisations.
this fruitful discussion shall end here
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 01:05:40PM +0200, Martin Oppegaard wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:58:23PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:45:35 +0200
Martin Oppegaard mar...@deathaven.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 10:35:12AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
On Wed,
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 01:37:17PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 4/28/09, Matthias Kirschner m...@fsfe.org wrote:
I am very interested in that list. Can you please sent it to me?
cad softwares (and many related formats are closed as well)
fpga tool chain
Well, they are not superior
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 02:08:20PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 01:05:40PM +0200, Martin Oppegaard wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:58:23PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:45:35 +0200
Martin Oppegaard mar...@deathaven.com wrote:
2009/4/29 Martin Oppegaard mar...@deathaven.com:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 02:08:20PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 01:05:40PM +0200, Martin Oppegaard wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 12:58:23PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
On Wed, 29 Apr 2009 10:45:35 +0200
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 7:11 AM, Matthias-Christian Ott o...@mirix.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 29, 2009 at 01:37:17PM +0200, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
cad softwares (and many related formats are closed as well)
Well, they are not superior or unique. Their formats are just proprietary
and there's no Free
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:07:55PM +0200, pancake wrote:
If we just implement this stuff into separated .c or .h files, so everybody
can still use the basic x11 stuff, or just use cairo/pango or..maybe someone
would like to use it on w32 or osx, so, these guys will just have to
implement
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:54:35PM +0200, markus schnalke wrote:
Further more, I want to say, that there are more important things to
focus on, instead of trying to improve (or dis-improve) dwm. `st' is
the best example, of course.
Amen to that! It would be nice to see some progress on the st
Ok, thanks again for continuing the discussion.
My conclusion is as follows:
1) dwm will be slightly redesigned, code-wise. I consider having a
less suckish font and drawing abstraction in order to be implemented
in different ways (which will also be used by st and dmenu).
Officially there will
2009/4/28 pmarin pacog...@gmail.com:
Try to make the new dependencies optionals.
About the broken non-free apps, is not dwm's problem and one solution
can be to use a qemu instance with another WM and connect to the host
Xwindows server.
That won't be a really good solution, the better
Try to make the new dependencies optionals.
About the broken non-free apps, is not dwm's problem and one solution
can be to use a qemu instance with another WM and connect to the host
Xwindows server.
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Ok, thanks again for
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 12:19:05AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
One improvement I just remembered (unless I really have missed an
option) would be to add invisible typing to dmenu. Useful if you want
to type a password.
Set -nb to -nf :-)
Regards
Christian
--
Jeremy Jay wrote:
Don't be a bigot, it just makes you look like a moron too. Free Software
is about choice, forcing people to use an app just because you use it is
pretty stupid and annoying and just gives people a negative association
with it. Let people make their own choices. Last I checked
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:01:20 -0400
Ross Mohn rpm...@waxandwane.org wrote:
Or maybe they're getting a kick back? -RPM
Bullshit! Such slander doe not serve Open Source! The reason for
choosing commercial packages is because they have done the job. It is
fine to choose an open source alternative,
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:00:07 +0200
Preben Randhol rand...@pvv.org wrote:
That said, in most cases there is now no reason no to choose Matlab
over Octave.
EDIT
That said, in most cases there is now no reason to choose Matlab
over Octave.
/EDIT
On Tue, Apr 28, 2009 at 10:03:47PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
On Tue, 28 Apr 2009 22:00:07 +0200
Preben Randhol rand...@pvv.org wrote:
That said, in most cases there is now no reason no to choose Matlab
over Octave.
EDIT
That said, in most cases there is now no reason to choose
On 4/28/09, Martin Oppegaard mar...@deathaven.com wrote:
Are there any BSD-style licensed equivalents?
scipy.org
Thanks for all the valueable input so far in this thread.
I think here are the action points:
1) I plan to separate the bar stuff code-wise into two portions -- the
tag bar with tags and layout info, and the title/status bar, but
things will stay as they are from a user perspective, it's just
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:23:50 +0100
Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I discussed several stuff on IRC recently but wanted to share my
thoughts here.
1. One idea is getting rid of the dwm bar altogether and to print the
dwm state to stdout when it changes, however after
Hi there !
2009/4/27, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com:
Thanks for all the valueable input so far in this thread.
I think here are the action points:
1) I plan to separate the bar stuff code-wise into two portions -- the
tag bar with tags and layout info, and the title/status bar, but
2009/4/27 Preben Randhol rand...@pvv.org:
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:11:03 +0100
Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
So there are only three ways:
- stick with what we got (don't care if some langs look ugly)
- use pango and/or cairo or something like that
- invest some effort into a new
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:10:47 +0100
Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
2009/4/27 Preben Randhol rand...@pvv.org:
What about xft? Wasn't there a patch for 4.7 (can't find it
anymore). I don't know much about the font systems.
One option, though quite half hearted in my opinion.
I
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:11:03 +0100
Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
So there are only three ways:
- stick with what we got (don't care if some langs look ugly)
- use pango and/or cairo or something like that
- invest some effort into a new font rendering lib (seems to be a hard
job,
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009 10:49:55 -0500
Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
I keep hoping to
see dwm go into a 'steady state' where the only patches are to
maintain compatibility with latest x.org, etc., but instead every time
it seems 'done' we shoot forward into crazy-ass ideas like
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
Personally I would like to have one dwm as is, and one gdwm (or some
better name) with more bells and whistles and dependencies.
http://wmii.suckless.org/
Or is Wmii dead in the water?
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:05:11PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
What about xft? Wasn't there a patch for 4.7 (can't find it anymore).
I don't know much about the font systems.
I've been using this patch for quite some time with no issues. If anyone
wants to see the implementation for reference,
* David E. Thiel l...@redundancy.redundancy.org [2009-04-25 13:27:51 -0701]:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:29:12PM +0200, Dusan wrote:
Please keep bar, that's why dwm is great out of the box.
Agreed. A window manager should be usable on its own, and have sensible
defaults. Ability to
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:35:20AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
- Mathematica (Version?)
7 breaks on the help window - it doesn't get keyboard focus, mouse focus
still works. First the layout gets applied to it, then the other windows
move back below it.
I'm pretty sure that 6 did not have this
I want to feed the mailing with some more words about this topic...
I don't really care about the font rendering, because I just use title bar
to see what's going on the window (like for large builds or browser's
page titles, ..) And I dont really read contents in chineese or russian,
so i'm
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 5:45 AM, Preben Ran
well, what is the purpose of a stausbar? It is a minority of the
worlds population that adheres to 7-bit ASCII.
Which just makes it more mysterious that nobody has fixed xlib font rendering.
or that one just patch dwm for pango like one need to do
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:51:24 +0200
Martin Oppegaard mar...@deathaven.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
Personally I would like to have one dwm as is, and one gdwm (or some
better name) with more bells and whistles and dependencies.
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:35:20AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
Thanks for all the valueable input so far in this thread.
I think here are the action points:
1) I plan to separate the bar stuff code-wise into two portions -- the
tag bar with tags and layout info, and the title/status bar,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:47:33PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:35:20AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
That's mainly proprietary software. dwm shouldn't support that kind of
software, but instead expose their bare brokenness to the user. Maybe users
will
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 1:47 PM, Matthias-Christian Ott o...@mirix.org wrote:
Could you please briefly explain why you are opposed to XRandR. It seems
pretty common and usable.
Not only that, xinerama is going to be entirely supplanted by xrandr.
Developing for xinerama is a dead end.
On Mon,
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:50:49PM +0200, Valentin wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:47:33PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:35:20AM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
That's mainly proprietary software. dwm shouldn't support that kind of
software, but instead
Except some of us don't have a choice and have to use this for their
work or at uni...
Well, what about GNU Octave? Mathematica seems to have become as much a
disease as Fortran was in last decades.
I once tried to explain to my professor if I could use Octave instead
of Matlab but he
Kurt H Maier dixit (2009-04-27, 13:54):
$subject is broken, therefore we must bloat up dwm to work around it
is bad reasoning, even if $subject is x11 font rendering or some
expensive app my school is forcing on me
The only difference is that you *have* to use X11 font rendering while
you do
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 12:05:57PM -0700, Amit Uttamchandani wrote:
Except some of us don't have a choice and have to use this for their
work or at uni...
Well, what about GNU Octave? Mathematica seems to have become as much a
disease as Fortran was in last decades.
I once tried
Don't be a bigot, it just makes you look like a moron too. Free Software
is about choice, forcing people to use an app just because you use it is
pretty stupid and annoying and just gives people a negative association
with it. Let people make their own choices. Last I checked it was very
easy to
[ pretty off topic ]
Three days off-line and now ... *eek* ... 75 new messages.
It was interesting to read all those opinions and comments. I think it
was even fun, because I'm not directly affected ... not anymore. I
already found what I was looking for, more than a year ago. dwm then
was
When I was in the university I had to use matlab. Proffessors told me
that I can use the windows boxes in place, but for personal reasons
(time and so) I proposed them to use the telnet interface and use it
remotely.
It happened that their license didn't allowed them to export the
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 06:57:13PM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 13:51:24 +0200
Martin Oppegaard mar...@deathaven.com wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 11:47:19AM +0200, Preben Randhol wrote:
Personally I would like to have one dwm as is, and one gdwm (or some
better
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:05:36PM -0400, Jeremy Jay wrote:
Don't be a bigot, it just makes you look like a moron too. Free Software
Well, you are a moron if you get bad marks, because you didn't hand in your
papers, because you refuse to use proprietary software: You don't change
anything and
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:58:31PM +0200, pancake wrote:
When I was in the university I had to use matlab. Proffessors told me
that I can use the windows boxes in place, but for personal reasons
(time and so) I proposed them to use the telnet interface and use it
remotely.
It happened
I thought you mentioned stopping in the email you sent before this
one? (Or was that only applicble to other people?)
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:30 PM, Matthias-Christian Ott o...@mirix.org wrote:
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 10:58:31PM +0200, pancake wrote:
When I was in the university I had to use
2009/4/27 Matthias-Christian Ott o...@mirix.org:
At least you didn't loose your dignity, carried out your principles and
proofed that Free Software is as powerful as an expensive proprietary
software.
But it is not always possible. I can give you a (quite long) list of
software that doesn't
On Mon, 27 Apr 2009 22:54:35 +0200
markus schnalke mei...@marmaro.de wrote:
Important is IMO to define a clear goal and to follow a straight path
to this goal. This is not only for the competition with other WMs but
also for keeping the software clear.
Yes, I wanted at one point to try out
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 08:47:33PM +0200, Matthias-Christian Ott wrote:
That's mainly proprietary software. dwm shouldn't support that kind of
software, but instead expose their bare brokenness to the user. Maybe users
will realise then that proprietary software is not worth using, because you
On Mon, Apr 27, 2009 at 04:05:36PM -0400, Jeremy Jay wrote:
Don't be a bigot, it just makes you look like a moron too. Free Software
is about choice, forcing people to use an app just because you use it is
pretty stupid and annoying and just gives people a negative association
with it. Let
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 1:57 PM, Haomin Wen wen1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am sorry but I really hope dwm can switch to using pango.
X fonts are broken and not well supported, at least in Ubuntu. I have six
Chinese fonts shown in xlsfonts, but only two of them can be displayed.
Then file
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 5:43 PM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Mate Nagy mn...@port70.net wrote:
I strongly believe that the major problem of dwm currently is
not font handling (8bit ascii bitmap fonts are perfectly fine thank
you);
Agree 100%.
Hi,
2009/4/26 Szabolcs Nagy nszabo...@gmail.com:
On 4/26/09, Christian Garbs mi...@cgarbs.de wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:06:08PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 4/25/09, Christian Garbs mi...@cgarbs.de wrote:
work, even without pango or cairo. I have German umlauts as well as
2009/4/26 Szabolcs Nagy nszabo...@gmail.com:
On 4/25/09, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
1. One idea is getting rid of the dwm bar altogether and to print the
dwm state to stdout when it changes, however after thinking carefully
about it I conclude that having the bar build-in is
Oh, sorry. There is a typo. Three but not two Chinese fonts can be
displayed. Two of them are too large, and the third one is not bitmap font.
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 7:57 PM, Haomin Wen wen1...@gmail.com wrote:
Hello,
I am sorry but I really hope dwm can switch to using pango.
X fonts are
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 9:15 PM, Kurt H Maier karmaf...@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 6:57 AM, Haomin Wen wen1...@gmail.com wrote:
For programmers, there is little difference, or at least it generally will
not increase SLOC.
Yes, but at the cost of dragging in a huge chain of
You could add an option to print the window title to stdout. This way
if somebody wants to pipe it to an external program to show window
titles (like dzen on top of the dwm bar), they can.
--
- yiyus || JGL .
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Haomin Wen wrote:
Hello,
I am sorry but I really hope dwm can switch to using pango.
X fonts are broken and not well supported, at least in Ubuntu. I have six
Chinese fonts shown in xlsfonts, but only two of them can be displayed. Two
of them only support 16 pixel and
I do not care antialias or hinting if there are bitmap fonts, but they
are necessary when using some truetype fonts. I use dmenu to show how
fonts are broken.
https://www.getdropbox.com/gallery/957017/1/dwm?h=fb5e6b
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:13 PM, bill lam cbill@gmail.com wrote:
On Sun,
Hi all,
I'm sure there is a severe risk of this piece being understood as
flamebait (this is not my intention).
However, I strongly believe that the major problem of dwm currently is
not font handling (8bit ascii bitmap fonts are perfectly fine thank
you); not the status bar (it's great);
Mate Nagy dixit (2009-04-26, 17:01):
However, I strongly believe that the major problem of dwm currently is
not font handling (8bit ascii bitmap fonts are perfectly fine thank
you);
This is a very selfish view. 8-bit character sets suck big way, even not
considering anything outside accented
On Sun, 26 Apr 2009, Haomin Wen wrote:
I do not care antialias or hinting if there are bitmap fonts, but they
are necessary when using some truetype fonts. I use dmenu to show how
fonts are broken.
https://www.getdropbox.com/gallery/957017/1/dwm?h=fb5e6b
Thanks, I follow you example by echo
Hi,
Why not make statusbar a (default) compile-time option, and add
possibility to export all statusbar information? This way user can
choose between builtin statusbar, or make his own. To make things more
simple, mouseclick support for statusbar should be removed.
As about cairo/pango, again,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:01 AM, Mate Nagy mn...@port70.net wrote:
I strongly believe that the major problem of dwm currently is
not font handling (8bit ascii bitmap fonts are perfectly fine thank
you);
Agree 100%. Folks, if you want unicode support, develop a sane,
working implementation.
...that's from dwm 5.4.1, using xrandr --output DVI-0 --right-of
DVI-1. Problem solved.
well obviously i had something more sophisticated in mind :)
like, horribile dictu, displaying different tags or different layouts
on different monitors. or supporting more monitors than 2...
M.
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 10:45 AM, Mate Nagy mn...@port70.net wrote:
...that's from dwm 5.4.1, using xrandr --output DVI-0 --right-of
DVI-1. Problem solved.
well obviously i had something more sophisticated in mind :)
like, horribile dictu, displaying different tags or different layouts
on
Hi,
I never look at the windows titles. I only look at the tags in the
status bar. So for me, this font rendering problem is less important
than this problem : handling several monitors. I agree with Mate Nagy
about dwm handling correctly several monitors. My point of view is that
we should
Hi There!
3. A third idea for legacy support is, that I tend to add a
compile-time option or a specific Rule extension that let's you set to
reparent all clients or certain clients which are broken such as
Mathematica or various Swing apps, though I'm not absolutely sure how
likely that
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 05:09:26PM +0200, Antoni Grzymala wrote:
Mate Nagy dixit (2009-04-26, 17:01):
However, I strongly believe that the major problem of dwm currently is
not font handling (8bit ascii bitmap fonts are perfectly fine thank
you);
This is a very selfish view. 8-bit
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 2:08 PM, David E. Thiel
l...@redundancy.redundancy.org wrote:
Agreed. Proven fact: non-English-speaking people exist. Minimalism and
simplicity shouldn't exclude basic functionality like displaying
characters in the language the user speaks.
Rendering thousands of
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 4:26 PM, Evgeny Grablyk
evgeny.grab...@gmail.com wrote:
Why not make statusbar a (default) compile-time option, and add
possibility to export all statusbar information? This way user can
choose between builtin statusbar, or make his own. To make things more
simple,
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 08:15:40AM -0500, Kurt H Maier wrote:
I may be be in the minority here, but ASCII works wonderfully, and I'm
happy with the state of font rendering in dwm.
+1
--
Marc Andre Tanner http://www.brain-dump.org/ GPG key: CF7D56C0
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009 19:23:50 +0100
Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
Hi there,
I discussed several stuff on IRC recently but wanted to share my
thoughts here.
1. One idea is getting rid of the dwm bar altogether and to print the
dwm state to stdout when it changes, however after
2009/4/25 yy yiyu@gmail.com:
There is a middle way solution. I just thought about it, and will
probably have its drawbacks, but here it goes: keep a bar with only
the tags and tile symbol and print the sel client title to stdout.
This way you can use an external program (dzen) to render
2009/4/25, yy yiyu@gmail.com:
There is a middle way solution. I just thought about it, and will
probably have its drawbacks, but here it goes: keep a bar with only
the tags and tile symbol and print the sel client title to stdout.
This way you can use an external program (dzen) to render
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 08:29:12PM +0200, Dusan wrote:
Please keep bar, that's why dwm is great out of the box.
Agreed. A window manager should be usable on its own, and have sensible
defaults. Ability to customize is great, but it shouldn't be depended
upon to make for a decent user experience.
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 09:37:56PM +0200, yy wrote:
I don't think nobody needs unicode glyphs in their tag names or tile
symbols, you wouldn't need cairo in dwm
I'm still using dwm-4.7 (because I did not yet have time to port all
patches to the current version), but Unicode glyphs in status
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 07:23:50PM +0100, Anselm R Garbe wrote:
2. Another idea is to switch to another dependency for the rendering
bit which could possibly be cairo. After all I'm nearly giving up the
hope that X font handling will ever be fixed and work properly, so
that relying on a pile
Anselm R Garbe wrote:
2. Another idea is to switch to another dependency for the rendering
bit which could possibly be cairo. After all I'm nearly giving up the
hope that X font handling will ever be fixed and work properly, so
that relying on a pile of other crap seems to become a solution.
On 4/25/09, Christian Garbs mi...@cgarbs.de wrote:
work, even without pango or cairo. I have German umlauts as well as
Japanese characters (eg. web page titles from Firefox).
try greek or cyrillic
i had trouble with those when fonts were loaded with XCreateFontSet
In spanish we have a sentence for this: gunfire to kill flies
On Sun, Apr 26, 2009 at 12:06 AM, Szabolcs Nagy nszabo...@gmail.com wrote:
On 4/25/09, Christian Garbs mi...@cgarbs.de wrote:
work, even without pango or cairo. I have German umlauts as well as
Japanese characters (eg. web page
On 4/25/09, Anselm R Garbe garb...@gmail.com wrote:
1. One idea is getting rid of the dwm bar altogether and to print the
dwm state to stdout when it changes, however after thinking carefully
about it I conclude that having the bar build-in is definately a
stayer. It's so much simpler than the
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:06:08PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 4/25/09, Christian Garbs mi...@cgarbs.de wrote:
work, even without pango or cairo. I have German umlauts as well as
Japanese characters (eg. web page titles from Firefox).
try greek or cyrillic
i had trouble with those
On Sat, 25 Apr 2009, Christian Garbs wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 09:37:56PM +0200, yy wrote:
I don't think nobody needs unicode glyphs in their tag names or tile
symbols, you wouldn't need cairo in dwm
I'm still using dwm-4.7 (because I did not yet have time to port all
patches to
On 4/26/09, Christian Garbs mi...@cgarbs.de wrote:
On Sat, Apr 25, 2009 at 11:06:08PM +0100, Szabolcs Nagy wrote:
On 4/25/09, Christian Garbs mi...@cgarbs.de wrote:
work, even without pango or cairo. I have German umlauts as well as
Japanese characters (eg. web page titles from Firefox).
93 matches
Mail list logo
