RE: [DX-CHAT] Re:A52AM

2007-12-17 Thread Ron Notarius W3WN
me falls on the shoulders of one person: The operator who broke the rules under which he was permitted to operate. 73, ron w3wn -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of mike giddings Sent: Monday, December 17, 2007 4:28 PM To: dx-chat@njdxa.org Subje

Re: [DX-CHAT] Re:A52AM

2007-12-17 Thread Dan Zimmerman N3OX
> I'm with you, > personally - that there was a valid license was in force before that > date, Presumably there is strong suspicion or proof of 1kW operation prior to the cancellation, so I think it makes sense to invalidate the whole operation. Otherwise it'd be like saying all P5/N3OX contacts

Re: [DX-CHAT] Re:A52AM

2007-12-17 Thread Peter Dougherty
At 04:28 PM 12/17/2007, mike giddings wrote: A paragraph in the January issue of "Radio Communication" mentions that the RSGB have recently received an email from the Director,Bhutan Infocomm and Media Authority, to the effect that the callsign A52AM was cancelled on the 27 September 2007 and a

[DX-CHAT] Re:A52AM

2007-12-17 Thread mike giddings
A paragraph in the January issue of "Radio Communication" mentions that the RSGB have recently received an email from the Director,Bhutan Infocomm and Media Authority, to the effect that the callsign A52AM was cancelled on the 27 September 2007 and any subsequent operation under that callsign is