Furthermore, if it's the same YL I'm thinking of, she's the first Indian
national to participate in a DXpedition outside of India, and her
primary experience before this was PSK-31. I think I posted an article
on the DX-News reflector within the last month or two.
As many have said in the
Exactly - she's out there doing it and that goes a long way in my book.
Mark N1UK G3ZZM
Jim wrote:
Furthermore, if it's the same YL I'm thinking of, she's the first Indian
national to participate in a DXpedition outside of India, and her primary
experience before this was PSK-31. I
Exactly - she's out there doing it and that goes a long way in my book.
I thought she was doing a *good job*. She wasn't making 100 QSO/hr
rate but when a whole bunch of people decide W7 please? means N4 and
NN3 and KP4 and NF5 should keep calling, and you have to make every
single QSO with a
that's quite common when someone loose the control of the pile-up. He or
she try nothing and everything to go ahead... and sometime he/she just
pick up the bigest signal even it doesn't fit with the rule that he/she
trying to run
HAMRADIO is a big game don't forget this. Even if at
Name and shame? Who did you hear?
Dave G0OIL
-Original Message-
From: Dan Zimmerman N3OX [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 10 February 2008 17:25
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Ungrateful
Exactly - she's out there doing it and that goes a long way in my book.
I thought she
What we're seeing is another side-effect of the lower of license
requirements.
Ron, don't even go there. I don't want to name-and-shame as G0OIL
says, but of the two worst ones I was hearing yesterday one was
licensed in '86 and the other I know has been a ham for quite a long
time (not sure
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dan Zimmerman
N3OX
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2008 2:12 PM
To: dx-chat@njdxa.org
Subject: Re: [DX-CHAT] Ungrateful
What we're seeing is another side-effect of the lower of license
requirements.
Ron, don't even go there. I
