Re: [Dx4win] Development

2020-04-05 Thread Paul F6EXV
Hi Bruce Let's face it : the 2 major competitors to DX4Win are Logger32 and DXLab. Both are free, and very well supported. I am also thankfull to all our DX4W friends who kindly spend their time answering any questions. They basically do everything DX4Win does, plus other things. Yes I agree,

Re: [Dx4win] Development

2020-04-04 Thread n4qs
Paul, Try LogHX3. It can be setup to look and operate like DX4WIN, but has all the additional features that we have been asking for. In just one week, I have it up and running with 167,000 QSOs imported from DX4WIN. Alexei, RX4HX, appears to be very actively supporting it with frequent

Re: [Dx4win] Development

2020-04-04 Thread Paul F6EXV
Guy Thanks for your input. I disagree with you : to take a simple example, L32LogSync will (automatically for each QSO if you set it up this way) upload QSOs to ClubLog and/or LoTW very easily. JTDX and WSJT make provisions to send QSO directly to some logs, like Logger32 for example, and it

Re: [Dx4win] Development

2020-04-04 Thread ON4AOI
Paul, My point of view is that all these automatic uploads leads to many errors and unneeded internet traffic. check eQSL where I get every week claims for qso's with wrong band, wrong time etc even fake qso's are there now and then. I prefer the way it is now, after I overlooked my log I